Please accept my apologies for using the list in this way, but I saw
no other means to contact the person responsible for the cullmail.com
domain. Rest assured I will only use the list for this purpose once.


Dear postmaster at cullmail.com,

Your spamd installation seems to be blocking connections from Gmail as
a result of using greylisting. I would kindly request you add the
Gmail outbound mail server pool to your list of exceptions, as a
previous message of mine directed at your domain did not make it
through.

I attached the original Gmail MTA failure message for your
convenience. Being a spamd user myself, I use the following exception
list for Gmail's mail server pool:

64.233.162.192/28
64.233.170/24
64.233.182.192/28

Sincerely,

Rogier Krieger


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 23, 2007 6:39 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Technical details of permanent failure:
TEMP_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 451 Temporary failure, please try
again later.

  ----- Original message -----

Received: by 10.114.132.5 with SMTP id f5mr3361439wad.1171982350130;
       Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:39:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.181.9 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:39:09 +0100
From: "Rogier Krieger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OpenBSD-misc list" <misc@openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?
Cc: "J Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On 2/20/07, J Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was under the impression that spamd was supposed to "politely" defer
connections from unknown/greylisted hosts.

Given the '451' response in the SMTP conversation, it is a relatively
polite and benign way to defer connections. I doubt a sending MTA will
feel too heartbroken over the accompanying text ;)

Humans shouldn't be connecting to port 25 in any case, unless when
they know what they're doing (and know why they're connecting). End

  ----- Message truncated -----



--
If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.

Reply via email to