> Ah, if you didn't reboot after doing that, then what you saw is expected.
Good to know.
>> Is there a better way to install xshare73 and xbase73?
>
> From the installer, usually.
I can’t do that, but point taken.
Thank you Stu and Daniel!
> That should have /usr/X11R6/lib as well.
This makes me want to mention that I installed xshare73 and xbase73 after the
installer completed, using these commands:
```
(curl -s -O https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.3/amd64/xshare73.tgz && cd
/ && tar xzvphf /root/xshare73.tgz)
(curl -s
> is /usr/X11R6/lib a real directory or have you moved it elsewhere
> and replaced with a symlink?
No symlink. No mount either.
> did you get any errors after "creating runtime link editor directory
> cache" at boot? (check with dmesg -s)
None. Here are the last 5 lines of `dmesg -s`:
```
[I'm new to PHP, but I believe that this was an issue in 7.2 as well]
Both 'xbase' and 'xshare' are installed.
What got me started was trying to run a DokuWiki CLI command
```
# ./bin/plugin.php usermanager list
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'gd.so' (tried:
> Does /usr/lib/crt0.o exist? If it doesn't did tar complete successfully?
I’ve since scrubbed that install, but I did check before for the file and noted
that it was not present. Interestingly, the file is in the TGZ, so something
happened…
$ tar -tzvf comp70.tgz | grep /usr/lib/crt
> As you're the one in possession of the system with the nonstandard
> configuration you're the best person to figure out what's different
> between that and a normally installed system.
My bad, I thought it was supported to install filesets this way, but I don’t
see this approach discussed on
>
> Which uses the whole toolchain.
>
> You need comp. You don't have a choice.
>
> Kent Watsen wrote:
>
>> The “httpd-plus” [1] patch installs just find when a fresh 7.0 install
>> selects packages "base", "bsd", "bsd.rd", &q
The “httpd-plus” [1] patch installs just find when a fresh 7.0 install selects
packages "base", "bsd", "bsd.rd", "bsd.mp", “comp”, and “man”.
However, when a fresh 7.0 install selects all the same packages except “comp”,
and then subsequently adds the “comp” package via the command:
(cd
Thanks Theo!
> It seems you copied libjq and libonig into usr/local/lib in the chroot.
> By default, ld.so only looks for shared objects in /usr/lib, so it can't
> find them.
>
> # env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib chroot /var/www
> /usr/local/bin/jq --version
>
> should work.
Indee
mkdir -p /var/www/$d
cp $f /var/www/$d/
done
K.
> On Jul 16, 2021, at 6:24 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> I’ve spent a few hours on this and am lost. I have plenty experience moving
> executables into a chr
I’ve spent a few hours on this and am lost. I have plenty experience moving
executables into a chroot environments, but `jq` is proving to be exceptionally
difficult.
The executable is found when chrooted to ‘/‘ but not ' /var/www’. Yes, of
course I copied all the files referenced from `ldd`
>> Does openbsd amd use NFSv3 ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>
> No, NFSv2, according to a recent post on this list.
This is incorrect; mount_nfs(8) clearly indicates support for v2 and v3 (the
default).
The recent debate is has been around if to support v4. For instance:
https:/
[My previous message was clobbered by the mailer because, I think, it contained
some non-ASCII characters]
>> Perfect, but I’m hesitant to use without long-term viability.
>
> Since I have no plans to give up OpenBSD, you shouldn't worry
> too much about this.
Fair, and one could fork your rep
tpd-plus#custom-error-documents
>
>
>
> On 2021-06-19 07:26, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> This is incredibly basic, but after reading httpd.conf(5) and random web
>> searches, I’ve been unable to determine how to customize the default failed
>> login page (from the
This is incredibly basic, but after reading httpd.conf(5) and random web
searches, I’ve been unable to determine how to customize the default failed
login page (from the "authenticate” directive in httpd.conf) to be something
other than:
401 Unauthorized
OpenBSD httpd
I gues
>> The Crucial BX500 SSD uses SMR technology, which is best used for
>> infrequent-write applications.
>> For general-purpose, and especially NAS, applications, CMR technology should
>> be used.
>
> hmm, does SMR stand for something other than "shingled magnetic recording"
> related to sto
The Crucial BX500 SSD uses SMR technology, which is best used for
infrequent-write applications.
For general-purpose, and especially NAS, applications, CMR technology should be
used.
K.
> On Jun 10, 2021, at 6:20 AM, Xavier Sanchez wrote:
>
> Hi ! not so surprising news: hardware is the
I did this too, because I have:
1) a single external IP
2) multiple internal HTTP-based services
3) a port-based firewall policy
This whole issue would disappear, and remove a single point of failure
(relayd), if my firewall directed inbound traffic based on URLs (for port 80)
and SN
I used to be able to install OpenBSD on a 1G disk (sets: -x* -g* -c*) and 256M
ram, but no more….now a 1280M disk + 384M ram is needed.
After a little sleuthing, the primary reason seems to be that the size of
/usr/share/relink/kernel/GENERIC/ has been growing:
Rel Size
---
[My SMTP-client is garbling my mail again! Just changed it to always send
plain-text! Sorry for the noise :sigh:]
OT, but that’s a signature and doesn’t imply that the content has been
encrypted. I suggest you ask your friend about it.
K.
> On Apr 23, 2021, at 6:52 PM, Kent Watsen wr
OT, but that’s a signature and doesn’t imply that the content has been
encrypted. I suggest you ask your friend about it.
K.
> On Apr 22, 2021, at 8:35 PM, Braden Speer wrote:
>
> I had a friend make me backups of some pretty important information, and for
> some reason I can't get my head
[My previous message was somewhat garbled when reflected back at me. It looks
better in the archives here:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=161902769301731&w=2. I’m resending as
plain-text to see if the problem is on my end.]
I’m running OpenBSD on top of bHyve using virtual disks allocat
I’m running OpenBSD on top of bHyve using virtual disks allocated out of ZFS
pools. While not the same setup, some concepts carry over…
I have two types of pools:
1) an “expensive" pool for fast random IO:
- this pool is made up stripes of SSD-based vdevs.
- ZFS is configured
I've been running a bunch of VMs on KVM/Qemu for close to 12 years now. Every
year or so, I upgrade a few of them...to keep them "fresh". Now I'm trying to
replace a VM having two CPUs that is has been running 6.5 since for about the
last year. My general strategy is to fresh install into a
For posterity, the issue was that the `git` command itself needs to be in the
jail also. This is not written down anywhere. I only determined it after
reading the source code for `git-http-backend`.
This is my init script now:
# cd /var/www
# for c in git git-http-backend gi
Regarding the rewrite rules below, `man git-http-backend` is instructive
...though it would be better if updated for OpenBSD's native `httpd` ;)
K.
> 6) set /etc/httpd.conf
>
> server "default" {
> listen on 0.0.0.0 port 80
>
> # these two rules are trying to match
>
TL;DR; The current issue is this error:
error: cannot run upload-pack: No such file or directory
Steps:
1) OpenBSD 6.5 fresh install
2) pkg_add git
3) make /var/www/dev/null
# mkdir dev
# mknod dev/null c 2 2
# chmod 666 dev/null
4) put `git-http-backend` into
Probably not what the OP is looking for, but `tmux` is my current "window
manager" of choice ;)
K.
> On May 7, 2019, at 2:01 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 02:01:34AM -0300, Clark Block wrote:
>
>> In 2019 still there is not a great desktop experience for NetBSD. Howe
`man 2 sysctl` shows:
KERN_SEMINFO_SEMMNI (kern.seminfo.semni)
The maximum number of semaphore identifiers allowed.
KERN_SEMINFO_SEMMNU (kern.seminfo.semnu)
The maximum number of semaphore undo structures allowed
in the system.
But when using sysctl(8) or /etc
> You are bypassing [OpenBSD] packages by using pip
True, but it's not "me" so much as the open source moinmoin wiki project.
I think, perhaps, on purpose, because it's a pure-Python release that uses
`virtualenv` (and `tox`, for devs) to maximize portability (it runs on all Unix
and Windows).
[CC-ing Remi, "python2.7" package maintainer]
[Stuart, already CC-ed, is maintainer of the "openldap-client" package]
The subject line of this email says "python3", but the same issue occurs
with python2.7 (this on OpenBSD 6.4).
I filed an report for the broken `pip install python-ldap` issue (te
FWIW, the permission I seek is from my Legal department. They want to
ensure that 1) we don't use software having unacceptable licenses or in
unacceptable ways, and 2) that the terms of all the copyrights are
adhered to (e.g., reproducing attribution statements, etc.).
At this point, it app
I'm throwing together a quick proof-of-concept thingy to give to a
customer and thought it might be fun to use OpenBSD as the OS for the
VM image. Unfortunately, the not so fun part of it is that I'm
required to get permission to use/distribute this open source software,
which entails need
On 1/10/18 1:53 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:51:19PM +, Mark Carroll wrote:
Since my hosting provider https://www.bytemark.co.uk/cloud-hosting/
patched for Meltdown last weekend I'm seeing significant performance
issues with an OpenBSD virtual instance there. It seems ok
Precondition: /etc/pf.conf contains scr_addr/dst_addr set to FQDNs
On boot, the consoles shows error about not being able to load pf.conf
because it can't resolve the symbolic names.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Setup.activate says:
   "... if you had specified a DNS-resolved symboli
On 11/24/12 1:54 PM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
On 11/24/2012 12:38 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
some of you may remember a posting of mine here from March, 2012, in which I
mentioned that the ACPI buttonpress event is not being correctly transmitted
form a debian 6 host to an OpenBSD v5.1 guest.
In the
> Are there many users of KDE on OpenBSD? I thought OpenBSD is mostly
GNOME :-)
On the few systems I install X on, I use FVWM and like it
K.
s/which we have not been dealt with so far/which have not been dealt
with so far/
BTW, the "Final steps" section would be clearer if the text between the
title "Final Steps" and section "1a" were put into a section called "1.
Merging locally changed files", which then has the two existing
su
On 5/11/11 9:14 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
anyone replaced firewalls with 4.9 boxes yet? noticed a difference?
A drop in replacement for me - works great!
Maybe you should tell us what happened and what you were expecting.
I saw the check-in which stated that it was being turned on to see what
response there is, which is all I'm doing...
When installing on a system only having IDE-based drives, I was
expecting to not be prompted, since I don't
My first install was onto a USB pen drive and I thought this was brilliant.
My second install was onto a fusion-based virtual machine and I was like
WTF?
I suppose that the installer can't tell if a sd root disk is swappable
or not, but certainly it should know that wd is not - right? - or m
On 04/21/11 05:50, Jacob Meuser wrote:
no. azalia(4) supports the HD audio interface on ich. see azalia(4).
there's perhaps a gpio that controls eapd or somesuch.
can you please send the output of '# pcidump -x 0:27:0' ? thanks for
including a dmesg.
# pcidump -x 0:27:0
0:27:0: Intel 828
A couple listers suggested trying -current, so here it is again on a 4.9
snapshot dated 201104119 (summary: no change, all issues still present)
1. screen blacks out during boot
Still blacks out, but the location changed. This is the last line I see before
th
I've always wanted a netbook for OpenBSD. The form factor reminds me of
the TS1000, my first computer. I picked up this refurbished Acer Aspire
One (D255-1268) for just $229, and have 7 days (5 more now) to return it
to the store. So far it's running OpenBSD pretty well, but I found some
issues
it's not there, nor should it be. sparc* does not use fdisk.
That's what I had read, but my other Netra T1 running 4.6 has it - and I
used it when configuring RAIDFrame (raid(4))...why is it there? - why
did it work?
Now I'm giving softraid(4) a go and these instructions
(http://jpiasetz.
|
Welcome to the OpenBSD/sparc64 4.8 installation program.
(I)nstall, (U)pgrade or (S)hell? S
# fdisk
sh: fdisk: not found
# ls /sbin/fdisk
ls: /sbin/fdisk: No such file or directory
# ls /sbin
bioctl dmesg initmount_udf restore
chown fsck
I had an issue like this a couple years ago. Turned out that the
Solaris box I was SSH-ing into had NWAM misconfigured, which was causing
it to periodically reset connections. It looked like a PF issue because
what I saw was PF blocking a session it had previously accepted, but the
reality wa
There is a discussion on the osol-discuss mailing list this morning where
it's pointed out that OpenBSD source tree has a blob in it:
http://osdir.com/ml/opensolaris-discuss/2010-05/msg00095.html
The location of the blob in the tree is here:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/micr
Jurgen/Pete - thanks for your replies, but it seems that I wasn't clear
- my question is how to do fresh-install of OpenBSD with the new kernel
discovering and trying to use the old RAID partition. I ultimately
solved this problem by rebooting using the old kernel and running
`raidctl -A no ra
Hi,
I have a Netra T1 (sparc64) running 3.9 with raidframe on root. Being
such an old system, I decided to do a fresh install, so I boot the 4.6
cdrom and install the system on the first disk (sd0). Rebooting again
brings the 4.6 up fine so I compile and install a new raidframe-enabled
kern
Todd Alan Smith wrote:
This only happens with SSH connections? Are the rulesets identical
between the two machines? Also, why are you still running 4.2? As I'm
sure you know, there have been many improvements to pf since that
release.
No, I also see it happening with every TCP-based protocol and
Again, this is with OBSD 4.2
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Kent
Kent Watsen wrote:
I'm consistently getting a RST packet, but I can't figure out why?
# tcpdump -nettti pflog0
tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
Nov 14 11:42:20.408301 rule 62/(match) pass in on vlan4:
I'm consistently getting a RST packet, but I can't figure out why?
# tcpdump -nettti pflog0
tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
Nov 14 11:42:20.408301 rule 62/(match) pass in on vlan4: 10.0.4.6.53255 >
10.0.1.24.22: [|tcp] (DF)
Nov 14 11:42:20.408407 rule 34/(match) pass out on vlan1: 1
[Picking up on this old thread]
Question for those of you running OpenBSD HVM DomUs, does your IO
performance suck?
Description:
I have OpenBSD 4.3 DomU running HVM mode with 1x vcpu on top on
OpenSolaris b97 xVM Dom0, which pins down 2x vcpus (box is a quad-core
1.9GHz opteron with 8GB mem).
I just installed a Netgear GA311 (re) into a 500MHz Netra T1 running 4.2
(sparc64)
Running `iperf -s` on it shows only 187 Mbits/sec, which surprised me
because other iperf-targets plugged into same switch show ~600 Mbits/sec
Looking at `top` shows why: 31% system, 69% interrupt, 0% idle and
Johan Fredin wrote:
Yep, two boxes with one cable each to the switch. Both with a bunch of
vlans and carp interfaces on top of that.
This is from one of the machines:
Hey, thanks a lot, I got it working, but it isn't stable - in fact, I
really only had one successful fail-over...
When I `
Johan Fredin wrote:
On 08-01-30 17:50, Kent Watsen wrote:
hme0 \
hme1 \ /- vlan0 --- carp0
--- trunk0 - vlan1 --- carp1
hme2 / \- valn2 --- carp2
hme3 /
I say this is the way to go. You can consider trunk0 a physical
interface
I'm trying to setup CARP for my gateway. Both my gateways have 6 interfaces
- one for uplink to ISP
- one for CARP/pfsync
- four that are trunked and then have vlans running on top of
My current setup looks some like this:
hme0 \
hme1 \ /- vlan0
--- tr
I successfully have two vlans running over one physical interface
connected to my managed switch (a PowerConnect 5224), but I can't get
the same two vlans to work when running over a trunk interface spanning
four physical interfaces.
Before: (this works, but only uses one physical interface)
Looking at the output from `ifconfig` (see below), I notice that the
trunk0 doesn't show that its "UP" - why wouldn't it be up?
Thanks,
Kent
# ifconfig
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33168
groups: lo
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 p
On a lark I just executed `ifconfig trunk0 up` and now my trunk is
working! And, to make it come up automatically, I just added the single
line "up" to hostname.trunk0...
BTW, the "trunk" interface is not documented in hostname.if(5)
Thanks anyways,
Kent
Kent Watsen
Boris Goldberg wrote:
Hello misc,
I've been booting my system from RAIDframe partitions for a long while.
Small partition for kernel(s), raidctl -A root raid0 - and I have root on
raid0a and swap on raid0b.
But with 4.2 I'm getting "swapmount: no device" error from the kernel and
"saveco
While not quite meeting your requirements, I don't think you can beat
the value of a Netra T1. I got two 500Mhz 512MB 64-bit Sparc boxes off
eBay for $50 each. They come with two 100 Mbs ports, to which I added
Sun Quad Fast Ethernet 4-port pci adapter for $12 each off eBay. While
having a f
Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
They're not required to make their changes available. They're required
to acknowledge your copyright, but your licence does not require
proprietary developers to release changes at all and it does not require
GPL developers to release changes under your choice of licence.
Some commercial firewalls (i.e. Juniper/NetScreen ScreenOS-based gear)
have been offering virtual-systems for years now. I think the negative
comments received here may be appropriate when sharing the system with
non-secure guest OSs, but it seems that it might be alright if its
nothing but fi
Christmas in April? ;) A couple requests I recall seeing (*cough*
posting *cough*):
- enable chroot-ed apps to dump core (this is an easy one)
- enable openbsd to run as a para-virtualized Xen guest (this is more
involved)
Kent
Shawn Nock wrote:
A quick search of the archive and google
STeve Andre' wrote:
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 21:07, Paul Greene wrote:
STeve Andre' wrote:
Seeing all sorts of good wishes to the project, but I haven't
seen any gifts, yet. ;-)
I just paypaled $25 to the project, as a birthday present. Given
what we all get from this OS, OpenBSD
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I want to chroot an application I'm developing, but I still want
coredumps...
_dump.c_
#include
int main() {
abort();
}
# gcc dump.c -o dump
# ./dump
Abort trap (core dumped)
# chroot ./ ./dump
Abort trap[note
Hi,
I want to chroot an application I'm developing, but I still want
coredumps...
_dump.c_
#include
int main() {
abort();
}
# gcc dump.c -o dump
# ./dump
Abort trap (core dumped)
# chroot ./ ./dump
Abort trap[note that no c
69 matches
Mail list logo
