On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> OpenBSD apache 1.3 != apache 1.3
>
> What is wrong with apache in base?
>
> And if you don't like it what is wrong with apache 2 in ports?
>
> Or any other web server in ports for that matter.
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:21:03PM -0800, D
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Brynet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know not everyone uses OpenBSD for a desktop OS, but I have been for
> nearly 5 years and I'm quite curious about some of your opinions? do you
> embrace minimalism or pure aesthetics? are the two mutually exclusive?
>
> When I started us
pkg_clean helps to delete Lola packages.
A package is said to be Lola only if:
1. It's unneeded by other packages.
2. It's unwanted by the root user.
If a package that was deleted needed _now_ Lola packages, pkg_clean
will also help deleting them. This is usual when a package uses
libraries unne
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> Many people have received their 4.6 CDs in the mail by now, and we
> really don't want them to be without the full package repository.
> Oct 18, 2009.
>
> We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.6.
> This is our 26th rele
I don't know if it is the way, but kind of works:
./umsm.c: {{ USB_VENDOR_QUALCOMM3, USB_PRODUCT_QUALCOMM3_ZTE_626 }, 0},
./usbdevs.h:#define USB_PRODUCT_QUALCOMM3_ZTE_626 0x0031 /*
ZTE-626 MSM */
./usbdevs_data.h: USB_VENDOR_QUALCOMM3, USB_PRODUCT_QUALCOMM3_ZTE_626
Thanks for the reply.
Indeed, I use usb_modeswitch under Linux, it is, however, quite just
for Linux, cause it reloads a certain kernel module. With GENERIC
kernel, usb_modeswitch does not even recognize the device. However,
compiling it (the kernel) without umass support, that is, the device
bein
Hi again.
Sometimes I get the following:
OpenBSD 4.5 (GENERIC.MP) #2133: Sat Feb 28 15:02:16 MST 2009
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 2143023104 (2043MB)
avail mem = 2069721088 (1973MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf72
Ok, here is full output of dmesg and usbdevs -v
OpenBSD 4.5 (GENERIC.MP) #2133: Sat Feb 28 15:02:16 MST 2009
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 2143023104 (2043MB)
avail mem = 2069721088 (1973MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @
Sorry about the duplicate, I'm not used to a mail list :(
Isn't that really the relevant info? It is the generic kernel of OpenBSD 4.5
-release...
I don't know what extra relevant info could dmesg, or usbdevs offer FOR THIS
CASE, please, if I'm wrong, or if there is an official protocol for
report
Well, I guess this is the relevant output from startup:
umass0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "ZTE, Incorporated ZTE
CDMA Technologies MSM" rev 2.00/0.00 addr 2
umass0: using ATAPI over Bulk-Only
scsibus1 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0
umass0: BBB reset failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB
Hi.
Sorry about the late response.
I do know what problem am having and what exactly I want, sorry didn't post
my original intention.
I would like to know more about procfs implemention in OpenBSD, not just
knowing how to mount it... That's what I refered to when I said "didn't have
success while
Hi.
Sorry about the late response.
I do know what problem am having and what exactly I want, sorry didn't post
my original intention.
I would like to know more about procfs implemention in OpenBSD, not just
knowing how to mount it... That's what I refered to when I said "didn't have
success while
Hi.
I failed googling about this topic. Any help please? :D :D :D :D
Hi,
I'm running OpenBSD 4.5 with a GENERIC kernel (i386), and my computer
boots after shutdown when I run halt. It's not the same like
rebooting, since when I halt, the computer actually turns off (as in,
all the LEDs are off); but when I reboot it, the LEDs remain on.
This worked fine in OpenBSD
This morning I received the package :D
Waiting for 05-01 to install.
Greetings!
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:24:54 +0300
> Alexander Polakov wrote:
>> What do you think about cwm(1) maximized mode? I find it rather useful
>> on small screens.
>
>bind 4-f maximize
>
> That's one key-combination to maximize the current w
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are at /home/daniell, the tar tries to find the files at
> /home/daniell/home/daniell. Try:
> tar -C / -cvf test.tar ./daniell/.ksh*
>
Sorry, try this:
tar -C / -cvf test.tar .ksh*
If you are at /home/daniell, the tar tries to find the files at
/home/daniell/home/daniell. Try:
tar -C / -cvf test.tar ./daniell/.ksh*
Hi, guys, I just want to share this link I just found. Didn't tried it
yet, but others may want to try it too. Giving the results we get, it
would be a good idea to include the link in the FAQ: How can I access
my OpenBSD file system from Windows directly?
http://ffsdrv.sourceforge.net/
Greetings
I just read about this project, might be of interest:
http://unbound.net/
It's developed by Kirei, NLnet Labs, Nominet, and VeriSign; and
released under a permissive free software license:
http://unbound.net/svn/trunk/LICENSE
I read about it at:
http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/05/21/0153201.shtm
While rebuilding the binaries for 4.3-stable, I get this error:
===> usr.sbin/config
make: don't know how to make mkmakefile.c. Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/config.
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin (line 48 of /usr/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src (line 48 of /us
2008/5/6 Jordi Espasa Clofent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Spanish:
> Esta es una lista inglesa; tu actitud es _muy_ desconsiderada.
>
> English:
> This is an english mail-list; your attitude is _very_ rude.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Jordi Espasa Clofent
>
>
I don't see why his "attitude" is rude at all.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I found an old email on the mailing lists, dating back to 1996, when
> > Theo announced users could connect and chat with the developers on
> > their ICB server.
>
> Many developers did not like it, so please leave the
I wonder if anyone actually took a look to the code before opening
his/her mouth.
Note that I don't trust Microsoft either, but giving that Singularity
is not planned to be a successor to Windows, but a research
experiment, makes me think it _can_ be good.
On Jan 28, 2008 4:10 PM, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:11:53AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I don't know if it's known but there's a online petition for VIA.
> > Hopefully some people sign up and name also OpenBSD (in the
> > "op
On Jan 13, 2008 9:53 AM, chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/13/08 9:35 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > By taking them away from the developer and putting them under auspices
> > of the FSF. I would never write a single line of code with a gun to my
> > head and that is what the
1. Stallman states that Linux current version is partially non-free. *1
A program can't be partially non-free. A program is free if users have
the four freedoms, if not, it is non-free. The users of Linux does not
have the freedom to access the source code of parts of it (freedom 1).
2. Stallman
"[...] Linux is not free software".
"[...] Linux [...] is on the ok side of the line".
Therefore: if there's only one popular kernel that GNU can use in its
project, then it's OK to use it, even if it's not free software.
Unpopular stuff like gNewSense have to be thought about, probably by a
mark
Jacob Meuser wrote:
"the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio devices."
Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
contribute its development to audio drivers to OSS so all operating
systems using it could benefit? And then OpenBSD could support j
"Gobuntu also has the problem that its name is so close to Ubuntu that
people would get them confused. Practically speaking it is not
feasible to recommend Gobuntu without recommending Ubuntu."
But you _do_ recommend _Linux_ even when "Torvalds' version of Linux
is not free software"! And let me p
On Jan 7, 2008 8:31 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have not presented any evidence that there are non-free programs
> in gNewSense.
gNewsSense bugs 31, 100, 103, 108:
31: license problems - cdrecord (no open date)
http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00031
100: Helix Player reco
On Jan 6, 2008 7:47 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Run GNOME in a **VMWare Player** in a Linux virtual machine."
>
> Or:
>
> "Run GNOME on a virtual machine using QEMU on Linux or **Parallels**
> for **Mac** or Linux."
>
> promoting the use of non-free softwa
Richard, Linux is not free software, as you have already stated,
please change your religion, so users don't get confused.
"Emacs was originally a text editor, but it became a way of life and a
religion. To join the Church of Emacs, you need only say the
Confession of the Faith three times:
There
Richard, isn't:
"Run GNOME in a **VMWare Player** in a Linux virtual machine."
Or:
"Run GNOME on a virtual machine using QEMU on Linux or **Parallels**
for **Mac** or Linux."
promoting the use of non-free software?
http://torrent.gnome.org/
GNOME _is_ a GNU package.
Greetings!
On Jan 5, 2008 11:31 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
> is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
> me where that statement appears? If I need to correct it, I need to
> know where it
On Jan 5, 2008 11:30 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I've said, I think it's acceptable for free applications to run on
> non-free platforms (and say that they do), because this doesn't
> recommend the installation of those non-free platforms. But free
> systems should not rec
Rui, I kindly ask you to not remove Richards's e-mail, since he is as
interested as everyone else who follows this thread.
Richard does not receive duplicated e-mail, since he is not in
misc@openbsd.org, so don't hesitate to add him.
Greetings.
On Dec 13, 2007 12:41 PM, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Andris wrote:
>
> >> there's already games/prboom, so why another Doom-engine?
> >
> > Because someone ported it?
> >
> > I don't get this "there's already a ported implementation of ".
> > Sounds like monopoly.
To: list
Richard's words are the essence of the Free Software Foundation and
the GNU General Public License: people _must_ use free software,
people _can_ decide whether to use free software or not, but people
_must not_ be free to exercise that desire. I will explain that last
statement, since it
On Dec 7, 2007 2:41 PM, Eric Furman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I'll add my own two p.
> Even tho I know nobody asked.
> http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/
> Not feature rich, but it's small, fast and strives for security.
> Seems to have a BSDish license as well.
License example of thttpd:
On Dec 7, 2007 3:57 PM, Ste Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But hey I am not an Openbsd developer and can't comment on the
> security of lighttpd's code, but I think most people would agree it
> would be better to have a maintained piece of BSD software opposed to
> a fairly stagnant bit of GPL.
On Dec 7, 2007 2:41 PM, Eric Furman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:39:39 -0600, "Gregg Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > On 12/7/07, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
> > >
> > > First of all, you
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
note that the first has a newer date than the later, that's because I
delete it, and I asked Hugo to send it to me again :P
Thought that his words could be useful.
Greetings.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hugo Le
On Dec 3, 2007 10:53 PM, Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Secondly, I don't think anyone in OpenBSD would display as much hubris
> as this claim on the Hiawatha home page: "Hiawatha's source code is
> free of security-bugs".
Heh, OK.
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
(the developer) and see if the code could be relicensed if the project
has interest in it. IMHO, replacing forked software with actively
developed one is a good idea
On Dec 2, 2007 5:42 PM, Marco S Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Miod Vallat writes:
> > But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not
> > come from pdksh initially.
>
> That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states, but I didn't look
> further. OK, looking I see that a
Hi, I have read about formal verification, and it sounds like a
perfect tool to outreach the project goals. I'm pretty sure developers
know about it, so I'd like to read comments or opinions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_verification
Greetings.
I've read that the process is not the same as burning DVD+R, but, at
the same time, I couldn't get much information :S
Has anyone tried burning DVD+R Dual Layer media?, what are the steps?
Greetings.
Hi, today, I read that one of the Google Summer of Code 2007 projects
from FreeBSD involved a reimplementation of GPL-licensed bintools.
Details:
Project: BSD bintools project (Part I)
Student: Kai Wang
Mentor: Joseph Koshy
Summary:
This project re-implemented part of the GNU binutils based on t
On 10/14/07, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He will not be independent anymore.
Why not? As long as Theo releases his software under the ISC license,
I see no issue with independency. And if Google have problems with new
development, Theo could quit. Yeah, he will lose money, but he
On 9/16/07, Martin Reindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Andris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Question: Is it true there was a developer's comment line in the Linux
> > > kernel that said, "Does this belong here?"
> >
> > Don't know that. But I do see this:
> > ftp -Vo -
> http://www.openbsd.o
> Question: Is it true there was a developer's comment line in the Linux
> kernel that said, "Does this belong here?"
Don't know that. But I do see this:
ftp -Vo -
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/sys/arch/mac68k/mac68k/machdep.c?rev=1.142
| grep belong
Greetings.
Index: www/42.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/42.html,v
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -r1.52 42.html
--- www/42.html 5 Sep 2007 19:05:42 - 1.52
+++ www/42.html 6 Sep 2007 11:01:16 -
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@
gracefully. It als
On 8/11/07, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO, column is one of the most underestimated utilities in UNIX.
> Every utility should output different information if they are running
> in a terminal or not. That way, shell scripting would be more
> straightforward.
>
> While column - ts '' does
IMHO, column is one of the most underestimated utilities in UNIX.
Every utility should output different information if they are running
in a terminal or not. That way, shell scripting would be more
straightforward.
While column - ts '' does help, it has some limitations. One
can't specify per-colu
On 8/6/07, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Andris wrote:
>
> > On 8/6/07, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Andris wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeap, it segfaults here with:
> > > >
> > > > aTbTc
> > > > daaaTe
> > > > fsss
On 8/6/07, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Andris wrote:
>
> > Yeap, it segfaults here with:
> >
> > aTbTc
> > daaaTe
> > fs
> >
> > Upper case T are horizontal tabs. It makes OpenBSD freeze too :S
> >
>
> Hmm, no segfault here, j
On 8/5/07, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Andris wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm writing a set of small utilities as scripts, and I got a
> > segmentation fault working on one of them.
>
> I tried running your script but it did not produce any seg faults.
> Do you have exampl
On 8/5/07, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andris wrote:
> > On 8/5/07, Jacek Masiulaniec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 4 Aug 2007, at 19:31, Andris wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, I'm writing a set of small utilities as scripts, and I got a
> >>> segmentation fault working on one of them.
On 8/5/07, Jacek Masiulaniec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4 Aug 2007, at 19:31, Andris wrote:
> > Hi, I'm writing a set of small utilities as scripts, and I got a
> > segmentation fault working on one of them.
> >
> > The script is suppoused to align text with spaces. Say you have
> > this file:
On 8/4/07, Mic J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/4/07, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, I'm writing a set of small utilities as scripts, and I got a
> > segmentation fault working on one of them.
> >
> > The script is suppoused to align text with spaces. Say you have this
file:
> >
> > F
Hi, I'm writing a set of small utilities as scripts, and I got a
segmentation fault working on one of them.
The script is suppoused to align text with spaces. Say you have this file:
Foo1\tFoo2
Br\tBar2
Baz
Where \t are horizontal tabs. My script would replace the tabs with an
adequa
On 7/14/07, Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/13/07, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi, I just got a computer yesterday, which has an ASRock 755i65G*
> > > motherboard,
On 7/13/07, Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you tell us how you startx X, and try to capture the command's
stdout and stderr ?
If you're running ksh or bash, this should be something like
startx > startx.log 2>&1
Here is the output of startx > startx.log 2>&1 *before* moving
.xi
On 7/13/07, Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I just got a computer yesterday, which has an ASRock 755i65G*
> motherboard, with an Intel 865G* chipset, 512 MB of RAM, and a
> ViewSonic E70f+* monitor. I'm using OpenBSD 4.1-stable (i386/G
On 6/1/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/31/07, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After OpenBSD boots, it clears the screen. Then I can't see some
> information, for example, the start of local daemons. All I can see
> using the console scrollback buffer is this:
>
>
> Automat
After OpenBSD boots, it clears the screen. Then I can't see some
information, for example, the start of local daemons. All I can see
using the console scrollback buffer is this:
Automatic boot in progress: starting file system checks.
/dev/rwd0a: file system is clean; not checking
setting tty fl
On 4/5/07, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their
licence.
That said, there are more ways than one to protect one
On 4/5/07, Steven Harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This isnt a question of him being wrong, its a question of HOW IT WAS
HANDLED. Get it?
The simple courtesy of privately emailing someone would have taken 30
seconds and would have saved everyone a bunch of time, energy, and
embarrassment.
On 4
On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andris Delfino wrote:
> What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
Did you read the full tread first before you wrote this? Did you look at
the code in CVS, did you even see Marcus reply and why?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ke
On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And this make it even worst:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746
All good work and good faith to come with better end results is
wrongfully drag into mud.
I read all the thread and this makes me sick!
It only makes me more
AFAIK, it isn't answered yet in the FAQ, I'am suggesting that.
On 3/2/07, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Andris wrote:
> IMHO, this should be answered in the FAQ.
>
> On 3/2/07, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's the reason for not providing MD5 sums
>
IMHO, this should be answered in the FAQ.
On 3/2/07, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
What's the reason for not providing MD5 sums
of X*.tgz sets in the MD5-file of release directories?
I found only one thread [1] regarding this question
from the archives and it didn't answer it
r
egrep shouldn't find anything, you are searching for the string "" in
"some text here", clearly, it isn't there.
On 9/7/06, Martin Marusak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OpenBSD egrep finds nothing in any text:
---
% echo "some text here" | egrep -x "" ; echo $status
some text here
0
---
GNU grep d
The problem is that packages which don't have dependencies are not
always of the third type, because maybe I started to use some
dependency directly. That's why I always ask to the user what she/he
wants to do.
Thank you all for the comments :)
On 8/4/06, Sideris Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Section 4 (commercial distribution) with its beautiful "certain
responsibilities" is still there.
Section 7 (export control) is still there.
On 7/31/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, AndrC)s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should convince both the Free Software Foundation an
We should convince both the Free Software Foundation and the Open
Source Initiative that "Lucent Public License Version 1.02" is not a
free software license. Mainly based in Theo's arguments*.
This paragraph says it all:
And come on it says "certain responsibilities". Good god. Are you
people
An OpenBSD C compiler from scratch, AFAIK, is not an idea of the
project. Today, I read about Theo's interest in Plan 9' C compiler.
But, there are license problems, so, that is not possible; at least,
right now.
A source tree in Ada, I think, would be safer. But maybe it is not as
portable/well-
Just to remember that I don't have any problem, and I didn't start
this thread ;)
On 7/21/06, Blitzkrieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
steven mestdagh wrote:
> Andris [2006-07-21, 09:09:45]:
>> I do this when I know the package name:
>>
>> 1. ftp $PKG_PATH
>>
>> 2. ls kdel*
>>
>> -r--r--r-- 1 100
I do this when I know the package name:
1. ftp $PKG_PATH
2. ls kdel*
-r--r--r-- 1 100 100 20614454 Mar 4 18:38 kdelibs-3.5.1p0.tgz
3. bye
4. sudo pkg_add kdelibs-3.5.1p0.tgz
I changed a couple of things:
a) Now there's a license notice (template from
/usr/src/share/misc/license.template). Nothing important, just to be
sure.
b) All packages which you didn't want to delete are saved to a file,
so you will not have to answer "n" in future runs (to check the full
list o
The script to remove "packages wich are not needed by others" is not
buggy, is just not fully automated. You MUST decide what packages
delete.
Greetings
On 7/1/06, Tom Doherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Please could someone familiar with pkg_add(1) confirm whether the
behavior I'm experi
I've done a rewrite, which reads directories and searches for files,
which is MUCH faster :)
Greetings
#!/bin/ksh
function check_for_packages {
for package in $(ls /var/db/pkg); {
echo "Checking if any package depends on $package"
if ! $(test -a /var/d
It's going to get deleted if you choose that. It's not a fully automated script.
Thanks for the feedback :)
On 6/30/06, Wade, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That all good and well, but what happens when my package that I use has zero
depends?
It's going to get deleted.
I don't know how to explain it well (:P), the script finds which
packages are not needed by others, so you can delete those you don't
use.
It's my first shell script, so feedback is apreciated, :) This is in
public domain, blah blah blah blah.
#!/bin/ksh
function check_for_packages {
Follow these steps, they worked just fine to me in OpenBSD 3.9:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/openoffice_on_openbsd.html
Good luck
On 6/6/06, Nikolaus Hiebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
In October of last year, Frank reported that he succeeded in installing
OpenOffice 2.0 on
Op
That worked just fine, after uninstalling that I could install
mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.3.
Thanks ;)
On 6/3/06, steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andris Delfino [2006-06-03, 11:38:13]:
> Hi, I updated my packages (pkg_add -u), two of them weren't updated
> because they had several candida
Hi, I updated my packages (pkg_add -u), two of them weren't updated
because they had several candidates, so I updated them "manually"
(pkg_add -iu pkg-name).
They were curl, and mozilla-firefox. curl updated ok, mozilla-firefox didn't.
The error was: "Can't install mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.3 becaus
I've using ion since a time ago, and I absolutely recommend it to
everyone. At least, give it a try, it's pretty handy.
Greetings.
On 5/26/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/26/06, Alexander Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Nelson wrote:
> [...]
> > I was wondering w
IMHO, it would be useful to identify the hardware which is supported
thanks to reverse engineering; so users can always check the pages and
buy hardware with "open" documentation.
What do you think?
Thanks
--
Andris Delfino
I would like to know what does Theo think about Plan 9. Just curiosity, :P.
Don't do that, that is extortion. If you don't want to make OpenBSD
free-as-in-freedom, but not free-as-in-beer; well, there is another
thing that might help. Companies will only donate if they gain
something, not just code, I'm talking about money.
I'm not a legal guy, but: isn't there a way to m
As I have said before, BSD was the unique Unix-like operative system
with a ISC-style license. That's why, IMHO, companies invested in it.
On 3/24/06, Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Andris Delfino wrote:
>
> > Please, stop wanting companies to support you. It doesn
It was the unique Unix-like OS with that licence. Right now, there are
tons of other systems. Companies want to invest in Linux-based
systems, because of marketing.
On 3/24/06, mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:40:59AM -0300, Andr?s Delfino wrote:
> > Please, stop want
Please, stop wanting companies to support you. It doesn't work that
way. To develop an OS under a licence like the ISC has a big hole:
funding. You can't just go: Hey, you use the implementation that I
develop and give away for free, you should pay me!. If the pay you,
OK, if the don't, well, that'
As far as I know, that isn't possible. Maybe if you use Mozilla
Firefox under Linux emulation (which I have tried, but failed). Since
Flash Player is a Linux binary, you must use it with another Linux
binary. That's why you should use Opera.
Greetings
On 3/21/06, Roy Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I've tried gtk-gnutella, mutella, and mldonkey, but I'd like a client
which can search by bit rate. Any suggestion?
Thanks
I use the ksh shell. Tried csh in an xterm, no problem there (I can
use the characters there). So, is something I can tweak to make them
work in ksh?
On 3/14/06, David T Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually if you're having the same problems on a tty,
> you might want to ssh in remotely an
Hi, my problem is that I can't use characters like "q" or "s" in xterm
or a console. When I'm about to login, I can use that characters, but
once logged, no.
Is there something I can do? Thanks
I followed the steps in that page using sudo, no problems.
On 3/11/06, Mike Loiterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm following the instructions at http://openbsd.org/stable/html to upgrade
> to 3.8-stable.
>
> Everything works as it is supposed to until I get to the part where I am
> supposed to
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
