Section 4 (commercial distribution) with its beautiful "certain responsibilities" is still there. Section 7 (export control) is still there.
On 7/31/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, AndrC)s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We should convince both the Free Software Foundation and the Open > Source Initiative that "Lucent Public License Version 1.02" is not a > free software license. Mainly based in Theo's arguments*. > > * [9fans] The new ridiculous license > http://9fans.net/archive/2003/06/270 i don't think 2003 qualifies as new anymore.
-- AndrC)s Delfino
