On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:01:13 +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
>2013/9/19
>
>> Alexander Hall wrote:
>> > Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
>> >
>> > > Fuck off
>>
>> The most brilliant answers of the experts:
>>
>
>An old quote which fits nicely here:
>
>A book is a mirror:
2013/9/19
> Alexander Hall wrote:
> > Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
> >
> > > Fuck off
>
> The most brilliant answers of the experts:
>
An old quote which fits nicely here:
A book is a mirror: if an ape looks into it an apostle is hardly likely to
look out. We have
Joe Gidi [j...@entropicblur.com] wrote:
> Support for the RdRand instruction was added to i386 and amd64 a year ago
> (see http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=134808609318790&w=2 ), but recent
> events have called its trustworthiness into question:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RdRand
> https://p
Interesting. I just used Xfce for a bit on a new Ubuntu box from a vendor
here today, I didn't check the version. It sure has come a lng way
from when I last used it around 1999. I may try it out on my home desktop,
seems a lot more responsive than KDE and Gnome.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:
I've just came on this:
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/2013-September/010649.html
Just a short quote of it:
"Hi, today we've made the first release of OSv, a new operating system
for running applications on virtual machines. OSv is free software,
released under the BSD license.
hru...@gmail.com writes:
> Alexander Hall wrote:
>
>> Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
>>
>> > Fuck off
>
> The most brilliant answers of the experts:
[...]
Those people, that you qualify as experts, have spent hours reading and
answering your mails. I bet you're prett
Paolo Aglialoro [paol...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Considering that OpenBSD is implementing fuse, cannot then ZFS be included
> just like package/port (using fuse infrastructure as in linux) to
> circumvent licence issues?
Yeah, if you want your filesystem to be some huge monster slow bloated
piece of s
Alexander Hall wrote:
> Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
>
> > Fuck off
The most brilliant answers of the experts:
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:18:03 +0200
From: Marc Espie
To: hru...@gmail.com
Cc: t...@servasoftware.com, misc@openbsd.org
Subject
Jiri B [ji...@devio.us] wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> > http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
> >
> > It supposed to be open-er. I didn't find a license, thought it might be of
> > mild interest.
>
> bitrig (OpenBSD fork) has ongoing work to intergr
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> Suppose you are limited to length 1 strings of [a-z], then you have
> 29 possible strings.
>
> Still. If you select one of those strings and calculates its SHA-1
> hash value. When you try any of the other 28 strings (or any other
> string of any lengh
Ok, thanks for the help.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE
network.
From: Marc EspieSent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 6:24 PMTo: Richard
ThorntonReply To: espie@nerim.netCc: OpenBSD general usage listSubject:
Re: general ports question
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Richard Thornton wrote:
> So if one has a 5.3 release system running, but finds a desired package in
> say 5.1, will pkg_add work on this, assuming I adjust the PKG_PATH to point
> to a 5.1 package folder? Or will doing this cause other instabilities?
The
So if one has a 5.3 release system running, but finds a desired package in
say 5.1, will pkg_add work on this, assuming I adjust the PKG_PATH to point
to a 5.1 package folder? Or will doing this cause other instabilities?
Thanks,
Richard
Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
Fuck off
/Alexander
On 09/18/13 23:59, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
What was the probability?
Rodrigo.
Eric Furman wrote:
Troll, the question has been answered.
You are an entertaining troll, though.
It is highly amusing seeing someo
What was the probability?
Rodrigo.
Eric Furman wrote:
> Troll, the question has been answered.
> You are an entertaining troll, though.
> It is highly amusing seeing someone make themselves look so silly.
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013, at 11:28 AM, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Marc Espie wrote:
> >
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 09:25:55PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > * hru...@gmail.com [2013-09-16 21:33]:
> > > It confirms that it supposes: A=B if hash(A)=hash(B).
> >
> > which is fine even with a relatively poor hash like md5 when the size
> > is also checked.
>
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * hru...@gmail.com [2013-09-16 21:33]:
> > It confirms that it supposes: A=B if hash(A)=hash(B).
>
> which is fine even with a relatively poor hash like md5 when the size
> is also checked.
A=B because parts of the file in the server coincide with parts of the
file in th
Riccardo Mottola libero.it> writes:
> apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
> acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
boot -c and disable apm
* hru...@gmail.com [2013-09-16 21:33]:
> It confirms that it supposes: A=B if hash(A)=hash(B).
which is fine even with a relatively poor hash like md5 when the size
is also checked.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secur
On Thu, September 19, 2013 00:35, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, did we miss the 5.4 pre-order announcement
> this time around or was I the only one who missed it?
It was silent. See undeadly.
>
> Regardless, my order was placed about a week ago. Thanks for all
> your efforts!
Just out of curiosity, did we miss the 5.4 pre-order announcement
this time around or was I the only one who missed it?
Regardless, my order was placed about a week ago. Thanks for all
your efforts!
Cheers,
--patrick
Of course it can. It depends on time, resources, which basically means
programmers who are interested in this.
It will happen when it happens. Asking won't help. Giving money would
help... :)
If enough people are interested, you can work with the openbsd foundation
to fund a programmer to work
Considering that OpenBSD is implementing fuse, cannot then ZFS be included
just like package/port (using fuse infrastructure as in linux) to
circumvent licence issues?
Il giorno 18/set/2013 16:09, "Kenneth Westerback"
ha scritto:
> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/About_OpenZFS
>
> Under 'Other' at the b
apm has priority over acpi.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 18:32, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> checking ACPI on my older thinkpad T600x I notice (running current
> snapshot of today) I don't seem th have ACPI. I know that some older
> Thinkpads did have APCI "disabled by bios to avoid interfering
Hi,
checking ACPI on my older thinkpad T600x I notice (running current
snapshot of today) I don't seem th have ACPI. I know that some older
Thinkpads did have APCI "disabled by bios to avoid interfering with
windows" (back then of course support was bad), so I read.
I read in dmesg (full dme
Hi,
Ted Unangst wrote:
I suppose something did not upgrade properly? I will try to uprgade to
today's snapshot.
Yes, SQLite was just upgraded in base.
Exactly, I had a skew between updating bae and ports, I redid it all
today and I'm up and running again :)
Thanks to all.
R
Hi,
When using synproxy state, PF seems to set the TCP window size to zero in ACK
packets. This breaks some network configurations, is this normal/desired ?
With synproxy state, we have win 0 :
14:33:02.934065 0800 74: 37.161.129.131.45134 > 192.168.1.2.80: S
1330066024:1330066024(0) win 14600
http://open-zfs.org/wiki/About_OpenZFS
Under 'Other' at the bottom:
"ZFS source code is copyright various contributors, and available under the
CDDL open-source license."
The second paragraph is amusing:
"OpenZFS is not associated with openzfs.org. Don't forget the dash in our
URS: open-zfs.org
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:20, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Philip Guenther wrote:
>> That binary compatibility was quite incomplete and only considered
>> good enough for building the system and *NOT* for general or long-term
>> use. Since we now have post-time_t-change snapshots for all arc
Hi,
For a very long time now, and many releases I'm having this strange
issue with my pfsync device which runs on an em(4) Intel 82575EB
on one of the two firewalls. When I reboot it (usually to put a newer
snapshot) the pfsync device does not work.
The rest of the em devices (in/out) are work
Hi,
Philip Guenther wrote:
That binary compatibility was quite incomplete and only considered
good enough for building the system and *NOT* for general or long-term
use. Since we now have post-time_t-change snapshots for all archs, I
removed the compat code. You should have followed the direct
* Riccardo Mottola [2013-09-18 08:58:22 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated to a current snapshot (13 sept to be precise). The
> system starts up, but most of the application which I had installed
> from ports crash with a "bad system call". wmaker, svn
> I thought we had binary compatibility a
On 2013-09-18, john slee wrote:
> On 17 September 2013 20:37, Jes wrote:
>
>> but if you want you can mount them in /etc/fstab. Simply read the
>> documentation about permissions and syntax. It's very easy.
>>
> For NFS the best way is mount them in /etc/fstab too.
>>
>
> /Why/ is it the best w
Hi assume that OpenZFS will continue to be CDDL-licensed, and just start
incorporating the changes that were developed for Illumos and FreeBSD
(zpool version 5000, etc). Nothing new here.
Bernd
On 9/18/13 7:37 AM, patric conant wrote:
http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
It supposed to
for sure !
>
> From: Jiri B
> Sent: Wed Sep 18 09:12:58 CEST 2013
> To: patric conant
> Subject: Re: OpenZFS announcement
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> > http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
> >
> > It supp
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
> I have updated to a current snapshot (13 sept to be precise). The system
> starts up, but most of the application which I had installed from ports
> crash with a "bad system call". wmaker, svn
> I thought we had binary compatibility a
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
>
> It supposed to be open-er. I didn't find a license, thought it might be of
> mild interest.
bitrig (OpenBSD fork) has ongoing work to intergrate
hammer filesystem from DragonflyBSD. If t
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
Most likely the 8/13 change.
2013/9/18 Riccardo Mottola
> Hi,
>
> I have updated to a current snapshot (13 sept to be precise). The system
> starts up, but most of the application which I had installed from ports
> crash with a "bad system call". wmaker,
38 matches
Mail list logo
