On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once I moved xenocara's source to /usr/xenocara. I have been unable to
> compile. It looks like a Makefile still points to /usr/src/xenocara.
>
The fix is obvious: remove your obj dir first and rerun make obj.
> I have no idea. OBP = "on board PROM"?
nearly
OpenBoot Prom
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/advsearch.do?collection=PATCH&type=collections
&queryKey5=119235&toDocument=yes
_
Discover and Win with Live Search
http://clk.atdmt.com/UK
Once I moved xenocara's source to /usr/xenocara. I have been unable to
compile. It looks like a Makefile still points to /usr/src/xenocara.
Here's my error message:
# make build
make distrib-dirs
mtree -qdef /usr/xenocara/etc/mtree/BSD.x11.dist -p / -U
cd /usr/xenocara/share/mk && exec make
Jay wrote:
> I'm porting some oddball software, and trying to get "every" platform, if I
> have hardware, and getting more hardware (but not a lot).
> So, regarding SPARC, my quick understanding is that:
> OpenBSD has separate "pure" SPARC and SPARC64.
> On SPARC64, gcc accepts -m32 and -m64 (I t
I'm trying to get my Sierra Wireless MC5720 modem to work and I'm not
having much luck. After editing usbdevs and regenerating (my card has
a product ID of 0x0218 instead of the 0x0018 listed, and too lazy to
ukc it on the fly) I've got it to successfully attach to umsm(4). Now
I'm stuck; mostly be
Michael Dexter wrote:
>>here's a better idea:
>>just use a standard install. It is very difficult to buy a <1G flash
>>media anymore that isn't covered in dust, so it is hard (if not nearly
>>impossible) to justify building a crippled system anymore.
>
> Nonsense. Many "new" embedded boards have
You are invited to "$30milion business proposal if you are interested reply me
or call+22678217398".
By your host Aishatuu Aruba:
Date: Monday May 12, 2008
Time: 11:00 pm - 12:00 am (GMT +00:00)
Will you attend? RSVP to this invitation at:
http://ca
Sorry, http://archive.openbsd.nu/?ml=openbsd-misc&a=2008-05&m=7350623
shows all the newlines removed...
I'll see if I can edit below to fix
- Jay
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SPARC32 ==
SPARC32on64?Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 22:49:20 +
I'm porting some oddball softwar
I'm porting some oddball software, and trying to get "every" platform, if I
have hardware, and getting more hardware (but not a lot).
So, regarding SPARC, my quick understanding is that:
OpenBSD has separate "pure" SPARC and SPARC64.
On SPARC64, gcc accepts -m32 and -m64 (I think),
defaults to
On 2008-05-12, Peter Bristow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the replies so far. bgpd can handle full tables. This means that
> as of today ~251K prefixes demonstrably work but most of these are from
> peers (iBGP or eBGP) I'm interested in known limitations/expected gotchas on
> locally or
I have no idea. OBP = "on board PROM"?
I'll research this, but not right away.
Anecdotally, Linux is running well, been up for a few days, with the same sort
of scenarios I was attempting in OpenBSD, just a bunch of
ssh/scp/cvs/gcc/ld.
Is it possible OpenBSD is sensitive to having the latest OB
> Well, bgpd has no problem handing out a full route table to many clients.
>
Again I know it can handle lots of sessions, and lots of routes over those
sessions it's getting them into bgp.
>
> If these are co-lo servers, wouldn't you just want to have one 'network
> inet static set { blah }'
Well, bgpd has no problem handing out a full route table to many clients.
If these are co-lo servers, wouldn't you just want to have one 'network inet
static set { blah }' line and then add the 50K routes as static routes in the
kernel?
Peter Bristow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for the re
Thanks for the replies so far. bgpd can handle full tables. This means that
as of today ~251K prefixes demonstrably work but most of these are from
peers (iBGP or eBGP) I'm interested in known limitations/expected gotchas on
locally originating 50k prefixes.50K lines of
network 92.48.111.0/26 set
Plenty of people, including myself, are using bgpd to manage full route tables
(> 230K routes, or even more these days) from multiple providers and/or to
multiple customers and have been for years. Some people are using it at
exchange points with dozens or hundreds of peers. At close to 5 year
Peter Bristow wrote:
Hi,
Are there any known limitations or expected gotchas with originating a large
number of routes with OpenBGPD?
I'm thinking in the order of tens of thousands of routes. I've done a basic
'stress' test with 100,000 routes and nothing
immediately broke. The idea is to route b
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:29:32PM -0700, Darrian Hale wrote:
> Thanks for your help,
>
> See additional comments below.
>
> -Darrian
> >
> > Just edit your disklabel, using the 'm' command.
>
> Thanks, this worked. After booting from 4.2 ramdisk kernel, i ran
> disklabel -E wd0
> I then modi
Thanks for your help,
See additional comments below.
-Darrian
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:47:48AM -0700, Darrian Hale wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > First of all I want to thank anyone in advance for any help i receive.
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:11:14PM +0200, Rafal Brodewicz wrote:
> Hi.
> I have problem with pf on -current. It's enabled, but it doesn't work.
> It's behaving like there was an empty pf.conf.
make includes in /usr/src/incluse solved the problem.
Thanks anyway.
Hi,
Are there any known limitations or expected gotchas with originating a large
number of routes with OpenBGPD?
I'm thinking in the order of tens of thousands of routes. I've done a basic
'stress' test with 100,000 routes and nothing
immediately broke. The idea is to route blocks of IP space to se
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:47:48AM -0700, Darrian Hale wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all I want to thank anyone in advance for any help i receive. I am
> having problems upgrading from OpenBSD 4.1 to 4.2.
>
> After putting the GENERIC 4.2 kernel in place, i get the following errors
> for all par
Thanks for taking a look.
I will play with larger fragment/block sizes unless anyone suggests otherwise.
-William
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:16:28AM -0400, Will wrote:
>
> > Here are the requested outputs.
>
> OK, you
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:02 AM, sonjaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i want make NAT from ip public to server inside ( with non Ip public
> )/dmz without make ip alias.
> replacement PIX Fw cisco with PF in openbsd the main point .
You probably want a binat entry for each host in the DMZ wit
Hello,
First of all I want to thank anyone in advance for any help i receive. I am
having problems upgrading from OpenBSD 4.1 to 4.2.
After putting the GENERIC 4.2 kernel in place, i get the following errors
for all partitions during boot,
followed by a panic:
wd0a: id not found reading fsbn 12
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Rafal Brodewicz wrote:
Hello.
How can I set keyboard.repeat.del* for external keyboard connected to
laptop through usb port?
Above settings works fine for laptop's keyboard.
wsconsctl -f /dev/wskbd1 keyboard.repeat.del1=400
If the ubs keyboard is wdkbd1
-moj
Thanks f
Hello.
How can I set keyboard.repeat.del* for external keyboard connected to
laptop through usb port?
Above settings works fine for laptop's keyboard.
Thanks for reply.
--
Rafal Brodewicz
Hi.
I have problem with pf on -current. It's enabled, but it doesn't work.
It's behaving like there was an empty pf.conf.
Thanks for any help.
cc -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-uninitialized -Wstrict-prototypes
-I/usr/src/sbin/pfctl -c /usr/src/sbin/pfctl/pfctl.c
/usr/src/sbin/pfctl
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:16:28AM -0400, Will wrote:
> Here are the requested outputs.
OK, your filesystem indeed uses default block and fragment sizes. The
# of inodes is about 238M.
De fsck_ffs code allocates a number of arrays directly depending on
the # of indodes in setup(), totalling 4 by
I get this:
$ snmptable -v2c -c public localhost HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageTable
End of MIB
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageTable: No entries
And the server outputs:
snmpe_parse: 127.0.0.1: SNMPv2 'public' context 5 request 537622771
snmpe_parse: 127.0.0.1: oid iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib_2.25.2
On 12 maj 2008, at 12.08, LIVAI Daniel wrote:
Could this be a help for you?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Kerberos
thanks, but that i GSSAPI-authentication - i.e. not password
authentication against a kerberos realm.
jakob
BALAJI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE
Laknepally (V), Narsampet (M), Warangal - 506 331
Dr. A. R. P. Reddy, Chairman
Cell : 9866078586, Email ID : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear HR Colleague,
Sub: Inviting HR professionals to undertake campus recruitment
at our
On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:58:38 +0300, Michael Dexter wrote:
>>here's a better idea:
>>just use a standard install. It is very difficult to buy a <1G flash
>>media anymore that isn't covered in dust, so it is hard (if not nearly
>>impossible) to justify building a crippled system anymore.
>
>Nonsens
Snort may also be of interest here.
>
> You can do it using open-source software as "Bro" (http://bro-ids.org),
> it's an open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection
> System (NIDS) that passively monitors network traffic and looks for
> suspicious activity.
> "Bro" has the "DPD" (d
There's some doubt if someone will achieve a valid OpenBSD binary.
Also, the program may be subject to virus and trojan horses on its
way to an OpenBSD system.
:)
2008/5/9 David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> copy con program.exe
>here's a better idea:
>just use a standard install. It is very difficult to buy a <1G flash
>media anymore that isn't covered in dust, so it is hard (if not nearly
>impossible) to justify building a crippled system anymore.
Nonsense. Many "new" embedded boards have limited flash memory soldered
On Monday 12 May 2008 12.01.29 you wrote:
> On 12 maj 2008, at 11.43, LIVAI Daniel wrote:
> > Just simply out of curiosity; why don't you use dovecot with
> > virtual users in plain text passwd-file style, or even sql/ldap?
>
> 'cause the users are provisioned using kerberos.
>
> jakob
Could
On 12 maj 2008, at 11.43, LIVAI Daniel wrote:
Just simply out of curiosity; why don't you use dovecot with virtual
users in plain text passwd-file style, or even sql/ldap?
'cause the users are provisioned using kerberos.
jakob
On Mon, 12 May 2008 16:37:38 +0700, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 2008-05-12, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since I got an Gigabyte motherboard, and installed 4.2-Stable and now
4.3-Stable, I cannot get re(4) (Dlink H/W) working with VLANs. When I
use
VLAN on th
On Monday 12 May 2008 10.09.19 you wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have an imap server (dovecot) that can auhenticate using BSD
> authentication. however, when imap server requests authenitcation for
> user xyzzy, I'd like the bsd authentication layer to authenticate
> user 'xyzzy/mail' (which has a separate pa
On 2008-05-12, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since I got an Gigabyte motherboard, and installed 4.2-Stable and now
> 4.3-Stable, I cannot get re(4) (Dlink H/W) working with VLANs. When I use
> VLAN on them, I can ping it, but when I tried to ssh or other services, it
> wont work. We u
On 2008-05-12, Steve B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I was thinking about buying an industrial grade
> flash drive from logicsupply.com and loading the OS onto it in place of the
> CF method used by EmBSD.
I've been much happier with ordinary consumer-grade sandisk CF tha
On 11/05/08 16:39 +0200, Cesare Gargano wrote:
> Hi all.
> I'm playing with acpi to get it working on my T23 thinkpad.
> Thermal zone and battery status are working ok. But when I play with hotkey
> buttons, open/close lid, unplug AC cable, nothing happens. After reading
> acpi.c
> I've noted that
Hi Misc@,
Since I got an Gigabyte motherboard, and installed 4.2-Stable and now
4.3-Stable, I cannot get re(4) (Dlink H/W) working with VLANs. When I use
VLAN on them, I can ping it, but when I tried to ssh or other services, it
wont work. We use 100mbps link on it.
So, maybe anyone on the Misc@ h
hi,
I have an imap server (dovecot) that can auhenticate using BSD
authentication. however, when imap server requests authenitcation for
user xyzzy, I'd like the bsd authentication layer to authenticate user
'xyzzy/mail' (which has a separate password in kerberos). I can see
multiple solu
I'm not sure how many packets your cards can put into ipintrq in one
int. 3000 might still be not enough. watch net.inet.ip.ifq.*,
especially len. teh question is wether you see bursts or constant
pressure.
Relating about that, I see:
$ sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq
net.inet.ip.ifq.len=0
net.inet.ip
45 matches
Mail list logo
