Theo de Raadt wrote:
Luckily all the source code is available for our project, and you can
handle this yourself. And it pretty much always compiles.
This happens every release, you know. Nothing has changed in the process.
Thanks for the info Theo!
No problem, I will take care of it from th
> Just wonder if there is a possible estimate as to when we might get
> snapshots packages for the I386?
No estimate. Maybe a week or two.
> There is for:
>
> Alpha
> AMD64
> ARM
> HPPA
> m68k (but old)
> mips64
> powerpc
> sparc64
And none of those will work because libc has cranked major.
Hi,
Just wonder if there is a possible estimate as to when we might get
snapshots packages for the I386?
There is for:
Alpha
AMD64
ARM
HPPA
m68k (but old)
mips64
powerpc
sparc64
Same on all the mirrors I looked at.
Not a complain here, just wonder as I have a server that crash and I am
try
I cannot get pfstat to run with -c or -d option whenever I run:
pfstat -c /etc/pfstat.conf
I get:
usage: pfstat [-v] [-c config] [-d data] [-r host[:port]] [-p] [-q] [-t
days[:days]]
same thing when I even run against provided example pfstat.conf file.
Any ideas? anyone?
any help, highly ap
Peter_APIIT wrote:
>
>
>
> Peter_APIIT wrote:
>>
>> Hello all expert network administrator, i truly new to openbsd.
>>
>> I have some dhcp problem.
>>
>> http://forums.bsdnexus.com/viewtopic.php?id=1858
>>
>
> I try it with windows box, it say limited connectivity but Fedora 7 can
> get ip
> Yes it unfortunately causes real problems but forr now we are working
> without ftp-proxy and therefore allowing all ports >1024. A little, ugly
> workaround ;).
In case it's helpful, it's perhaps worth mentioning that allowing a
much more restricted range of ports, controlled by sysctls, is
Hi everyone,
I'm waiting to set up a new box with the latest snapshot but the corresponding
i386 packages directory on the main ftp server is empty. When will it be
populated?
Thank you,
/juan
__
Looking for the perfect
On 2008-04-02, Barry Commander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can I list flavors for dependencies of a given port and ensure when
> doing make install, a dependency isn't going to
> install a lot of stuff I don't want?
See bsd.port.mk(5)
Sorry, a cat ran across my keyboard and hit send.
I follow current which is the reason I don't just use packages and can make
dependency
flavor decisions in a matter of seconds.
Thanks so very much
Barry
Hi
how can I list flavors for dependencies of a given port and ensure when
doing make install, a dependency isn't going to
install a lot of stuff I don't want?
I follow curre
On 2008-04-02, John Brahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fanless micro atx system. I was hoping to get some suggestions from
> y'all. I know there is a hardware compatibility list at
> http://www.openbsd.org but I was looking for specific experience with
> motherboards with supported ethernet chips (
First, I would like to congratulate the developers of relayd. They have
made a great daemon which is fast and very flexible.
I was able to get relayd to replace all of the functions of a Pound reverse
proxy except URL and request method filtering. As far as I can tell relayd
does not have these ab
I all,
I'm using symon to monitor my PF-based FW (bridge). It's a very and I
can see all the generated graphs with the exception of PF... the most
important for me.
After reading man pages, I don't understand why, so:
* the pf 'mux' is available in conf files.
* the pf rrd f
Hi Everyone,
I wanted to find out if anyone has experience with creating home
automation systems using OpenBSD. I was planning on buying a random
fanless micro atx system. I was hoping to get some suggestions from
y'all. I know there is a hardware compatibility list at
http://www.openbsd.org but I
On 2008-04-02, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 00:09:21 +1000, N J wrote
>
>> seemed to work ok so i keep going, I sorta presumed that 4.3 might
>> have a branch of its own...
>
> Every release has two CVS tags:
>
> x.y-release: OPENBSD_x_y_BASE
> x.y-stable: OPENBSD_x
On 2008-04-02, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Vinicius Vianna wrote:
>
>> Maybe it would be easier to just upgrade your NIC's to some intel
>> "em" ones, it have low interrupt usage, don't know about bge on high
>> usage.
>>
>
> I'm interested to the see the result
On Apr 1, 2008, at 11:28 PM, Khalid Schofield wrote:
very interesting reply. I look forward to reading it in more depth
(just got out of bed to check if I have replys)
really I'm after using openbsd to make a vpn concentrator so the
traffic will be high.
On 2 Apr 2008, at 02:21, Girish V
On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Vinicius Vianna wrote:
Maybe it would be easier to just upgrade your NIC's to some intel
"em" ones, it have low interrupt usage, don't know about bge on high
usage.
I'm interested to the see the results if the OP does this.
I've got some similar boxes with bge
> at least on three different i386-machines I got kernel panics while booting,
> here is the dmesg from the machine I could attach a serial console to:
>
>
> booting cd0a:/4.3/i386/bsd.rd: 4995572+874168 [52+190496+176373]=0x5f2b6c
> entry point at 0x20
> Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 199
Hi,
Since I am not able to test this now in the real world, I
would like to know how would spamd behave when it
received SMTP connections to a fake low priority MX
address and the real MTA was unavailable at the time.
I mean, would the connection be rejected with error 450?
Would there be any in
Hi,
at least on three different i386-machines I got kernel panics while booting,
here is the dmesg from the machine I could attach a serial console to:
booting cd0a:/4.3/i386/bsd.rd: 4995572+874168 [52+190496+176373]=0x5f2b6c
entry point at 0x20
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
>>It sounds like a race condition, where the server FIN reaches the
>>proxy before the final data is sent out to the client. I'd have to
>>dig into it a bit more.
>>
>>Does it cause a real problem? (in other words: how urgent is the
>>fix?)
>>
Yes it unfortunately causes real problems but for
Michael Hoffrath wrote:
> Same problem here Running OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375 i386.
>
> It seems not only being a problem of Microsoft, I've found that problem also
> on VSFTPd (centos) and Filezilla (Windows 2003 Server).
>
> Both are sending "221 Goodbye" but ftp-proxy seems to swallow that
Hello,
Same problem here Running OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375 i386.
It seems not only being a problem of Microsoft, I've found that problem also
on VSFTPd (centos) and Filezilla (Windows 2003 Server).
Both are sending "221 Goodbye" but ftp-proxy seems to swallow that from time
to time.
Regards
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 00:09:21 +1000, N J wrote
> seemed to work ok so i keep going, I sorta presumed that 4.3 might
> have a branch of its own...
Every release has two CVS tags:
x.y-release: OPENBSD_x_y_BASE
x.y-stable: OPENBSD_x_y
The CVS logs are the place to go to see which revisions apply t
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 23:35:53 +1000, N J wrote
>
> > I've been doing:
> > # cd /usr/ports
> > # cvs -q up -Pd
>
> This will update an *existing* working directory in /usr/ports -- and that
> update will use what
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:52:38 -0500, I wrote
> Something like this should work:
>
> # find /usr/ports -type f -name w-\* | xargs rm -rf
Typo, sorry. -type d, not -type f.
Sorry about that.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 23:35:53 +1000, N J wrote
> I've been doing:
> # cd /usr/ports
> # cvs -q up -Pd
This will update an *existing* working directory in /usr/ports -- and that
update will use whatever CVS tag was used last, unless you use -A. Since
we've established this was a -current
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Janne Johansson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 22:33 +1000, N J wrote:
> > Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without
> > having to remove then old package and dependencies first?
> > I'm trying to build pidgin out of
bellow error message i get :
195710.884316 Default attribute_unacceptable: ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM:
got AES_CBC, expected 3DES_CBC
195710.885049 Default attribute_unacceptable: ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM:
got AES_CBC, expected 3DES_CBC
195710.885584 Default attribute_unacceptable: AUTHENTICATION_METHOD:
go
On 2008-04-02, N J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without
> having to remove then old package and dependencies first?
> I'm trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree.
>
> Tried: set env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER
> Tried: make install FORCE_PKG_REG
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich hdtte einen Interesenten f|r Openbsd zu den Themen
- Einrichtung
- Firewalling,ect...
Kann mir jemand sagen wo es daf|r einen Referendar bekommen kann oder wo es
daf|r schulungen gibt ?
Danke f|r die Hilfe
Mit freundlichen Gr|_en
Stefan Goldapp
Vertrieb
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:33:00 +1000, N J wrote
> Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without
> having to remove then old package and dependencies first?
> I'm trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree.
>
> Tried: set env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER
> Tried: make install FORCE_PKG_REG
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 22:33 +1000, N J wrote:
> Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without
> having to remove then old package and dependencies first?
> I'm trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree.
>
> Tried: set env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER
> Tried: make install FORCE_PKG_REG
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:33:00PM +1000, N J wrote:
> Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without
> having to remove then old package and dependencies first? I'm
> trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree.
See bsd.port.mk(5) -- specifically, look at the update (or
reins
Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without
having to remove then old package and dependencies first?
I'm trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree.
Tried: set env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER
Tried: make install FORCE_PKG_REGISTER
Sorry for my newbie question and thanks in advance
Hello,
I'm running 4.2 GENERIC#642 i386 and uses pf and ftp-proxy for a
firewall service. I noticed that ftp connections, established with the
help of ftp-proxy, don't receive the "221 Goodbye" Message from the
FTP-Server.
#:~ falk$ telnet 192.168.30.22 21
Trying 192.168.30.22...
Connecte
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez le visualiser en
suivant ce lien.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Bonjour,
Venez dicouvrir et commander gratuitement en avant premihre
le catalogue d'objet publicitaire et de cadeau d'entreprise du riseau
Promocadeaux..
92 agences ` vo
Maybe it would be easier to just upgrade your NIC's to some intel "em"
ones, it have low interrupt usage, don't know about bge on high usage.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-04-01, B A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have OpenBSD acting as router+IPsec vpn concentrator.
Our company expanding,
hi,
if anyone here has this particular piece of hardware, could
you please e-mail me off list? thanks.
felix
- Forwarded message from Felix Kronlage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 02:54:08 -0600 (MDT)
From: Felix Kronlage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: C
> > Some days ago I install 4.2 on IBM machine (not so new PIII hardware).
> > At first booting system freeze on "iic at piixpm". I do "disable iic"
> > after boot -c.
> > So I comment out #iic* at piixpm? in GENERIC and rebuild it.
>
> Once you disabled it with 'boot -c', just make this change
On Tue, Apr 01 2008 at 00:15, Khalid Schofield wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm wondering what is the best crypto card to buy to use with openbsd to do
> AES and blowfish and the SSL encryption.
The question you should ask yourself is "Do you need an accelerated SSL card?"
As showed in http://marc.info/?l=open
42 matches
Mail list logo
