On 2/21/08, Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-21 16:32:47]:
> > 1. what happens when the bad people pull the plug on a running computer?
> >
> > 2. how long do the bad people have to read your memory after you turn it
> off?
>
> Who said anyt
On 2/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. what happens when the bad people pull the plug on a running computer?
>
>
> Well that's why I personaly mentioned a modified libary or the kernel wich
> may could overwrite the RAM 3 times or so in case it has nothing to do.
The
On 2/21/08, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Twenty+ years ago, I'd noticed this, having completely powered down my
> computer, decided I had something more to do, flipped the power switch
> right back on, and I was sitting at a command prompt. I marveled, I did
> it again, it worked
On 2/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Think about bigger netroks! You do know ANY devices wich has NO ram?
> Even a simple client-PC wich boots via network has ram. And in
> universities or so with about 129k users you just can't ensure that NOBODY
> turns off the PC, gets
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Amarendra Godbole
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am unable to move the display to a projector or an external monitor
> on my Thinkpad X60, which is running OpenBSD 4.2-current. Fn-F7 is the
> keycombination to be used to switch displays, but it does not work.
>
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Chris Smith wrote:
> On Thursday 21 February 2008, Allie D. wrote:
> > I'm getting bad file descriptor errors on every ssh connection on a
> > box that I built from source on 4.3 beta last night. Anyone else
> > seeing this as well ?
> >
> > Feb 21 09:54:43 crusty sshd[21741]:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:19:28PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> >
> > Let me give you an engineering opinion: bwahahahahahaha this is
> > retarded.
> >
>
> Well, let me give you another engineering opinion based on actual
> experience working on a m
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Allie D. wrote:
> I'm getting bad file descriptor errors on every ssh connection on a
> box that I built from source on 4.3 beta last night. Anyone else
> seeing this as well ?
>
> Feb 21 09:54:43 crusty sshd[21741]: error: getsockname failed: Bad
> file descriptor
>
>
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Aaron escreveu:
I am trying to configure ifstated on an i386 4.2 Stable pair of openbsd
firewalls but having some issues on how to determine connectivity of a
backup/secondary wan interface.
The carp states seem solid and preempt seems to work great. The only
thin
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:32:22 -0500 (EST), mcb, inc. wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
>> Let me give you an engineering opinion: bwahahahahahaha this is retarded.
>
>A lesson from history for those who fail to learn from it.
>Rebooting from the latent image in core memory after
* Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-21 22:43:44]:
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > I really have a hard time buying this. I can see how you ended up with
> > some crap in that memory upon reboot but I fail to see how that memory
> > could retain its contents. Not knowing the situation you mi
* Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-21 22:17:08]:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:41:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Of course there many kinds of attack but if somebody shutdowns your box
> > and reads the infos from your memory there's something we can do about it:
> > Over
* Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-21 16:32:47]:
> On 2/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My suggestion is to overwrite memory like 3 times if a programm free's the
> > memory or if a reboot is commanded via the shell. Of course this harms
> > "old" boxes but it's sti
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Let me give you an engineering opinion: bwahahahahahaha this is retarded.
A lesson from history for those who fail to learn from it.
Rebooting from the latent image in core memory after months or
even years without power was not particularly remarkab
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:15:32PM -0500, Nick Bender wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Jussi Peltola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Displaying the name of the file and the matched line nicely like grep
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I really have a hard time buying this. I can see how you ended up with
> some crap in that memory upon reboot but I fail to see how that memory
> could retain its contents. Not knowing the situation you might have
> had some huge caps on that machine; or even battery back
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 08:04:07PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I really have a hard time buying this.
Yes, I can understand that - I was the same until I saw the remnants
of the display come up on the screen.
> I can see how you ended up with
> some crap in that memory upon reboot but I fail
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:33 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not at all! RAM keeps the information partly for MINUTES! It not a real
> race condition or so... it's about physics and electricity.
Wow! For minutes! While the research is interesting the chances of
actually being a victim to this
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:41:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of course there many kinds of attack but if somebody shutdowns your box
> and reads the infos from your memory there's something we can do about it:
> Overwriting
> Well my oppinion is still: If you modify the libs so that
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:22 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So seriously: if you've any "productive" or "critical" comment feel free
> to post it just stop bitching 'course it does not help/solve anything
> except of wasting YOUR bandwith.. right? Right... :)
I guess he's just too busy actua
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The paper you mentioned has some info on possible countermeasures. The
> > best (IMO) is physically securing your RAM. This seems to fit in best
> > with OpenBSD's philosophy, which has never been to put much time into
> > thwartin
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:26:29PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:15:32PM -0500, Nick Bender wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Jussi Peltola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Never used -r so I'm not sure what the output looks like but how about:
> >
> > find .
Terrific! Thanks to all who responded.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> > My suggestion is to overwrite memory like 3 times if a programm free's
>> the
>> > memory or if a reboot is commanded via the shell. Of course this harms
>> > "old" boxes but it's still btter then loosing your SSH-Key or whatever
>
STeve Andre' escreveu:
>
> The research is very interesting, but it doesn't apply to OpenBSD.
>
> --STeve Andre'
>
>
Why doesn't apply to openbsd? And secondly, would vnd devices be
affected by this kind of attack? I particularly believe that this could
be done, i also saw those kind of display "du
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:22:45AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well Marco just fuck you and piss off...ok?
I would love to but you make me reply every single time you post this
type of uninteresting shit.
> If you don't care stfu and do something else and let people talk who may
> care abou
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > My suggestion is to overwrite memory like 3 times if a programm free's
> the
> > memory or if a reboot is commanded via the shell. Of course this harms
> > "old" boxes but it's still btter then loosing your SSH-Key or whatever
> > resists in your ram.
>
> If so
> The paper you mentioned has some info on possible countermeasures. The
> best (IMO) is physically securing your RAM. This seems to fit in best
> with OpenBSD's philosophy, which has never been to put much time into
> thwarting attacks that require physical access to the box -- if you
> have that,
I really have a hard time buying this. I can see how you ended up with
some crap in that memory upon reboot but I fail to see how that memory
could retain its contents. Not knowing the situation you might have
had some huge caps on that machine; or even battery backed up ram. This
combined with
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Marti Martinez wrote:
> The paper you mentioned has some info on possible countermeasures. The
> best (IMO) is physically securing your RAM. This seems to fit in best
> with OpenBSD's philosophy, which has never been to put much time into
> thwarting attacks that requi
Well Marco just fuck you and piss off...ok?
If you don't care stfu and do something else and let people talk who may
care about "physical" things. And "phyisical" in the meaning of something
related to physics... (just in case you don't know it's the thing you may
missed in school...)
Or why don't
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:12:58PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> And the power plug wasn't plugged in right?
>
Correct. We are not talking PC DRAM here - this was custom hardware
with a circuit breaker that really cut power to everything. Often
when you powered it up before the firmware got a
And the power plug wasn't plugged in right?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:45:56AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:19:28PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> >
> > Let me give you an engineering opinion: bwahahahahahaha this is
> > retarded.
> >
>
> Well, let me give you anothe
> On 2/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> My suggestion is to overwrite memory like 3 times if a programm free's
>> the
>> memory or if a reboot is commanded via the shell. Of course this harms
>> "old" boxes but it's still btter then loosing your SSH-Key or whatever
>> resist
On Thursday 21 February 2008 19:15:56 Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:19:28PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > Let me give you an engineering opinion: bwahahahahahaha this is
> > retarded.
>
> Well, let me give you another engineering opinion based on actual
> experience working on
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:08:54AM +0200, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > For instance 'ggrep -r ...' instead of 'grep -r ...' to search recursively
> > with gnu grep (a worthless feature imho).
>
> Displaying the name of the file and t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Jussi Peltola
> Sent: Friday, 22 February 2008 8:39 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: There's something about OpenBSD...
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:22:25PM +0200,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:19:28PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> Let me give you an engineering opinion: bwahahahahahaha this is
> retarded.
>
Well, let me give you another engineering opinion based on actual
experience working on a machine with a custom graphics system - it is
not 100% re
On 2/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My suggestion is to overwrite memory like 3 times if a programm free's the
> memory or if a reboot is commanded via the shell. Of course this harms
> "old" boxes but it's still btter then loosing your SSH-Key or whatever
> resists in your r
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:15:32PM -0500, Nick Bender wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Jussi Peltola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Displaying the name of the file and the matched line nicely like grep -r
> > does is not elegant with find + grep without using a script or a long
> > a
The paper you mentioned has some info on possible countermeasures. The
best (IMO) is physically securing your RAM. This seems to fit in best
with OpenBSD's philosophy, which has never been to put much time into
thwarting attacks that require physical access to the box -- if you
have that, there are
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes quite, its all there but in odd places. Also not that make is in
/usr/ccs/bin
The thing that put me off sx developer edition is that it requires a whopping
760MB of RAM for install.
Solaris 10 and Solaris Express and Indian
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:55:39PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My suggestion is to overwrite memory like 3 times if a programm free's the
> memory or if a reboot is commanded via the shell. Of course this harms
> "old" boxes but it's still btter then loosing your SSH-Key or whatever
> resists
Someone please send me some coffee; I can't stay awake.
Somehow I knew some moron would send it to the list. I honestly
guessed the person right.
Let me give you an engineering opinion: bwahahahahahaha this is
retarded.
On Feb 21, 2008, at 4:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Little blog:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Jussi Peltola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Displaying the name of the file and the matched line nicely like grep -r
> does is not elegant with find + grep without using a script or a long
> and inelegant alias - or if it is, I'd be interested in how it can be
>
What's wrong with: find . -name *.[ch] -exec grep blah {} \; -print
On Feb 21, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Jussi Peltola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For instance 'ggrep -r ...' instead of 'grep -r ...' to search
recursively
with gnu gr
Little blog:
http://citp.princeton.edu/memory/
Paper:
http://citp.princeton.edu.nyud.net/pub/coldboot.pdf
Well some months ago I asked (not here.. more directly) if it would be
possible to may overwrite memory serval times in case the Box has nothing
to do. Back then there was like no interest be
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Darrin Chandler
> Sent: Friday, 22 February 2008 12:52 AM
> To: Guido Tschakert
> Cc: OpenBSD Misc
> Subject: Re: Why does pf work with last matching rule wins
[snip]
> Don't use quick that way. If you
On Thursday, February 21, 2008, 12:11:27, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:50:50AM -0500, Rod Dorman wrote:
>> ...
>> When I'm working with a Cisco IOS access-list I find its much easier to
>> state each specific "allow routing to this port on this host" and let
>> the fina
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For instance 'ggrep -r ...' instead of 'grep -r ...' to search recursively
> with gnu grep (a worthless feature imho).
Displaying the name of the file and the matched line nicely like grep -r
does is not elegant with find + grep
Marco Peereboom ha scritto:
real men use find
or locate (1)
Francesco
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:40:28PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> >What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
> >
> >After the past long exchange about "our ultimate goal" and a lot of
> >people advising me to go over to Solaris 10, I did, I removed OpenBSD
> >from one o
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Klaus Botschen wrote:
Writing into /dev, /tmp and /var would definitely NOT "destroy the CF
card".
Might be. I used none-industrial-grade CF cards, so the chance is of course
higher.
Yes, I did it. Just let /var run full and try to log a lot of stuff and
you will write
You are right.
I think I'll put a box like soekris in front of ILO ports to prevent hack on
ILO
By this way I 'll be able to push CD / floppy image to the HP's servers.
During upgrade of the soerkis box. I'll use the firewall server COM port and
PXE if I should do a full reinstall.
Xavier.
Vijay Sankar escreveu:
> On February 21, 2008 05:19:54 am Guido Tschakert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder why pf works from top to bottom in filtering with last matching
>> rule wins but in adress translation from top to bottom with first
>> matching rule wins.
>>
>> Sure, I can use "quick" on every r
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Simon Slaytor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Richard, should have mentioned the RRD voodoo, hopefully Peter has
> set you on the right track.
>
> I never really liked the 'rough' graphs produced by the version of RRD
> Graph available from the packages collec
real men use find
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:30:30PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
>
>> Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
>>> What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
>>>
>> yeah, I've been doing some things with Solaris for work, it's stunned
>> me that
Jason Dixon wrote:
> Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.10 Generic January 2005
> -bash-3.00$ grep -r foo *
> grep: illegal option -- r
> Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . .
You are not using the default shell. :-)
The ksh implementation that comes with solaris is horrible indeed.
# Han
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
>
> > Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> >> What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
> >>
>
> > yeah, I've been doing some things with Solaris for work, it's stunned
> > me th
I really like PXE too.
But the servers to be administrate remotely would be the firewalls (two in
carp association).
Xavier
I really like PXE too.
But the servers to be administrate remotely would be the firewalls (two in
carp association).
Xavier
2008/2/21, Jussi Peltola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:01:21PM +0100, Xavier Millihs-Lacroix wrote:
> > We need to be able to do 'quite' everything rem
Are there any plans underway to resume ports-stable maintenance? I'm
aware that maintaining ports-stable is not a project goal or high on
the todo list. I'd like to volunteer to assist, but I'm not sure what
is needed.
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:50:52PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I normally go for the time-honoured serial console to a box running
> conserver and a masterswitch though (on a separate lan: you don't
> really want this sort of thing, ILO/DRAC or masterswitch or IP KVM
> or whatever else, on you
$ pkill bob; echo $?
1
$
Just live with it.. ;)
Breaking compatibility just to convenience you... is not an option.
-Nix Fan.
On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
yeah, I've been doing some things with Solaris for work, it's stunned
me that an OS can take most of DVD...and still be missing what I would
call absolute basics that OpenBS
On 2008/02/21 14:21, Steve Shockley wrote:
> Xavier Millihs-Lacroix wrote:
>> Who wins in the OpenBSD world? DRAC (Dell Remote Admin Card) or iLo (HP's
>> Integrated Lights Out) (or better ilo2) ?
>
> I prefer HP ILO. Both do more or less the same thing, but Dell seems to
> change their card int
Darcy Winslow of Nike to Present
Organizers of the first annual Lean and Green Summit announced the completion
of the conference agenda. This "next generation" event will feature keynote
presenter Darcy Winslow of Nike. Darcy is head of Nike's Women's Footwear
Division and is a champion for the com
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:01:21 +0100
"Xavier Millihs-Lacroix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who wins in the OpenBSD world? DRAC (Dell Remote Admin Card) or iLo
> (HP's Integrated Lights Out) (or better ilo2) ?
>
> We're looking at new servers and are wondering if these are worth the
> cash, or which
Henri Salo wrote:
...
Where did you get this information? ...
It's a question, hence the question mark. Not a statement of fact,
hence the absence of a period. Serves me right for having two topics in
the same message.
The topic that is more interesting to me is getting group level access
Xavier Millihs-Lacroix wrote:
Who wins in the OpenBSD world? DRAC (Dell Remote Admin Card) or iLo (HP's
Integrated Lights Out) (or better ilo2) ?
I prefer HP ILO. Both do more or less the same thing, but Dell seems to
change their card interface every other week, and HP builds them into
the
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
After the past long exchange about "our ultimate goal" and a lot of
people advising me to go over to Solaris 10, I did, I removed OpenBSD
from one of my machines and installed "Solaris Express Developers
Edition".
It was slic
The short answer is no, not over IPSec. You could change your IPSec filter
to only match for TCP traffic, but that's not be a feasible solution if you
need to IPSec protect ALL traffic.
Without IPSec in the picture, traceroute works by sending a UDP packet from
128.164.144.144 to 128.164.159.159
That depends what kind of hardware you have and what type of setting
it will be used in.
For example, have used a 100Mhz net4511 on a home-based connection
without much trouble, but it would be inappropriate for much above
that.
-Will
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Gustavo Polillo <[EMAIL PRO
Y
X*X4X1Y YX1YX2 X'YX'X/X'X! X'YYX*YX'X2Y X(X/X9YX*YY YX-X6YX1
X#X-X/X+ X'YY
X1X'YX, X'YX*X/X1Y
X(Y
X) YX'YYX$X*YX1X'X* YX9X'Y 2008
http://www.bsdubai.org
This message was sent by: Heba Munier, Al-Qusaif T-Dubai, Dubai, Dubai 56970,
United Arab Emirates
Powered by iConta
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:01:21PM +0100, Xavier Millihs-Lacroix wrote:
> We need to be able to do 'quite' everything remotely (from installing
> (virtual floppy / cd / dvd) to exploitation).
I prefer PXE booted bsd.rd and a serial console, with BIOS serial
redirection it is quite close to a LOM m
* raven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-21 18:50]:
> Now, you have to kiss all their ass.
err, I'll pass...
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Ho
On 2/21/08, Rod Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't the general rule of thumb to allow only what you explicitly need
> and reject everything else?
>
> When I'm working with a Cisco IOS access-list I find its much easier to
> state each specific "allow routing to this port on this host"
Who wins in the OpenBSD world? DRAC (Dell Remote Admin Card) or iLo (HP's
Integrated Lights Out) (or better ilo2) ?
We're looking at new servers and are wondering if these are worth the cash,
or which is the one to go for ?
I see some problem with ILO2 on HP DL320 G5 (/G5p ?).
We need to be abl
How much OpenBSD performance is losted with IPSEC enable?
I'm getting bad file descriptor errors on every ssh connection on a box
that I built from source on 4.3 beta last night. Anyone else seeing this as
well ?
Feb 21 09:54:43 crusty sshd[21741]: error: getsockname failed: Bad file
descriptor
Wanted to see if anyone else is seeing it as well before I
Sorry for my dumbness, to all developers :)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:56 PM, raven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And...you forgot to say: "Sorry for my dumbness" to all developers that
> give you an answer.
> Now, you have to kiss all their ass.
>
> Francesco
>
> Mayuresh Kathe ha scritto:
>
>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:50:50AM -0500, Rod Dorman wrote:
> On Thursday, February 21, 2008, 09:22:25, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > ...
> > One good reason for last match wins is that the rules proceed from most
> > general to most specific. This is a normal way for humans to think, and
> > once y
Hello all.
A while back (several months ago), I had a dialogue with Henning
regarding hfsc in pf not working as it was supposed to. To be more
specific, according to previous posts and discussions, the following
bare-bones ruleset should parse OK:
ext_if = "hme0"
int_if = "fxp0"
altq on $
And...you forgot to say: "Sorry for my dumbness" to all developers that
give you an answer.
Now, you have to kiss all their ass.
Francesco
Mayuresh Kathe ha scritto:
What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
After the past long exchange about "our ultimate goal" and a lot of
people adv
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:53:43 +0530
"Mayuresh Kathe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
>
> After the past long exchange about "our ultimate goal" and a lot of
> people advising me to go over to Solaris 10, I did, I removed OpenBSD
> from one of my machine
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:03:40 +0100
Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:49:02PM +0200, Lars Noodin wrote:
> >1) What is the timeline for completely dropping scp?
>
> I hope never.
>
> >[...]
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Hannah.
Where did you get this informati
What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
After the past long exchange about "our ultimate goal" and a lot of
people advising me to go over to Solaris 10, I did, I removed OpenBSD
from one of my machines and installed "Solaris Express Developers
Edition".
It was slick looking, very graphica
Hi,
We are recruting 'web designers' and 'web programmers' to work with us in
part time and full time in Contract basis. If you or your friends or your
family members are looking for oppurtunities to work from home contact us ASAP
by phone or email or by 'yahoo messanger'
'yahoo messanger' : [EMA
On Thursday, February 21, 2008, 09:22:25, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> ...
> One good reason for last match wins is that the rules proceed from most
> general to most specific. This is a normal way for humans to think, and
> once you get used to it I bet you like it better. For me it makes it
> easie
On 2008/02/21 10:12, Chris Smith wrote:
> On Thursday 21 February 2008, Alexander Hall wrote:
> > Thanks to the "pretty much" part, I assumed that is was ok, but
> > anyone more educated may be of another opinion.
>
> Thanks.
>
> It's been announced that OpenBSD turned 4.3-beta, does that
> mean
On February 21, 2008 05:19:54 am Guido Tschakert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder why pf works from top to bottom in filtering with last matching
> rule wins but in adress translation from top to bottom with first
> matching rule wins.
>
> Sure, I can use "quick" on every rule in filtering to have "first
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 03:41:30PM +0530, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
> I am unable to move the display to a projector or an external monitor
> on my Thinkpad X60, which is running OpenBSD 4.2-current. Fn-F7 is the
> keycombination to be used to switch displays, but it does not work.
> Now, I am not t
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Thanks to the "pretty much" part, I assumed that is was ok, but
> anyone more educated may be of another opinion.
Thanks.
It's been announced that OpenBSD turned 4.3-beta, does that
mean -current is now 4.3-beta? If so, is there anything spec
Darrin Chandler wrote:
One good reason for last match wins is that the rules proceed from most
general to most specific. ...
I'm fairly comfortable with PF, but that way of looking at it really helps.
Regards,
-Lars
SO now do you want FireEngine? Or rather SMPng networking? Or
would you like ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh?
Now that you've brought it up, I would really like a
ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh TCP stack. Just make sure it
doesn't require 1.2Jigawatts of power and have interesting si
Is this the library you're looking for http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/ ?
I found it via Google and it wasn't exactly very hard.
-Nix Fan.
Dubai Balanced Score Training Center
Up Coming Program Mar 2008
-
[http://www.bsdubai.org/programs_details.php?type=course&cat=510]
Strategies Of Modem Public Relations Dubai - City
Seasons Hotel - Mar 02To 06 / 2008
-
[http://www.bsdubai.org/programs_details.php?type=co
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:52 AM, knitti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SO now do you want FireEngine? Or rather SMPng networking? Or
> would you like ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh?
Now that you've brought it up, I would really like a
ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh TCP stack. Just make
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:54PM +0100, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> I wonder why pf works from top to bottom in filtering with last matching
> rule wins but in adress translation from top to bottom with first
> matching rule wins.
I've wondered about the difference between NAT and filter rules myse
Hi,
> Writing into /dev, /tmp and /var would definitely NOT "destroy the CF
> card".
Might be. I used none-industrial-grade CF cards, so the chance is of course
higher.
> running for about half a year now, with all filesystems being regular
Thats fine. The machines that got replaced by the Ali
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
