On 09/02/2017 02:24, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
btw, does anyone know if the big providers take into account that some
spam is only forwarded, not originating?
we have many customers who want to forward their mail from
someth...@myname.com to their gmail/hotmail/etc. mailboxes - which
sometimes leads
On 2017-02-09 03:24:09 (+0100), Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> btw, does anyone know if the big providers take into account that some
> spam is only forwarded, not originating? we have many customers who
> want to forward their mail from someth...@myname.com to their
> gmail/hotmail/etc. mailboxes - wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Brandon,
First, thanks for your objective mail.
Are you speaking for for Microsoft or for another company? I cannot get
that from your mail address.
Am Mi den 8. Feb 2017 um 21:48 schrieb Brandon Long via mailop:
> Generally speaking, we've
If you do a "reply-all" to Brandon's email, you'll see he works for Google.
Have you ever had a security issue with a microsoft.com website? Can you
provide a news article or other source confirming that their servers were
compromised? I could see there possibly being an issue with the advertis
On Thursday 09 February 2017 10:15:17 Philip Paeps wrote:
> Also note that DMARC breaks forwarding like this (or forwarding breaks
> DMARC, depending on your religious affiliation). You can get around SPF
> as long as your envelope matches your relay but for DMARC, the From:
> domain also needs to
Hi all,
Long (loong) time lurker, rare poster here. I work for a fairly well
known ESP and last week our private link shortener was reported as being
classified as malicious by Office365 users. Our system had detected that an
unusual mailing had been sent and locked down the account; they had
In article <1573147.t2hcmj7...@skynet.simkin.ca> you write:
>Forwarding does not break DMARC. A DMARC pass requires that either SPF or DKIM
>pass, not both.
If a domain only authenticates with SPF, not DKIM, and publishes a
DMARC policy, then forwarding will break DMARC. I don't think I've
seen
On 2017-02-06 12:34:50 (+0100), Philip Paeps wrote:
> Does anyone have a current way of getting in touch with whoever runs
> btinternet.com these days? They have a history of (quasi-)randomly
> blocking mailservers but in the past a friendly email to postmaster@
> always got issues resolved.
For
On 2017-02-09 08:54:09 (-0800), Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On Thursday 09 February 2017 10:15:17 Philip Paeps wrote:
> > Also note that DMARC breaks forwarding like this (or forwarding
> > breaks DMARC, depending on your religious affiliation). You can get
> > around SPF as long as your envelope match
> On Feb 9, 2017, at 9:47 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article <1573147.t2hcmj7...@skynet.simkin.ca> you write:
>> Forwarding does not break DMARC. A DMARC pass requires that either SPF or
>> DKIM
>> pass, not both.
>
> If a domain only authenticates with SPF, not DKIM, and publishes a
> DMA
Heh. These days, when I go home for the day, I am so gone home.
I’m looking thru my inbox and having a hard time finding your email, could you
ping me offline and tell me what the URL shortener is and I’ll have a peek.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise
Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
"Your
>I never understand why users won't just collect mail from the 'proper'
>mail server rather than having to forward it all to gmail/hotmail. A
>large portion of our support issues are to do with this forwarding.
Bad reason: setting up POP collection takes two minutes, while adding a
forward only
On 2017-02-09 12:25, John Levine wrote:
I never understand why users won't just collect mail from the 'proper'
mail server rather than having to forward it all to gmail/hotmail. A
large portion of our support issues are to do with this forwarding.
Bad reason: setting up POP collection takes two
On 2017-02-09 01:16, Paul Smith wrote:
I never understand why users won't just collect mail from the 'proper'
mail server rather than having to forward it all to gmail/hotmail. A
large portion of our support issues are to do with this forwarding.
In my experience, it's because Gmail/Hotmail/wha
On 2017-02-09 20:25:25 (-), John Levine wrote:
> >I never understand why users won't just collect mail from the 'proper'
> >mail server rather than having to forward it all to gmail/hotmail. A
> >large portion of our support issues are to do with this forwarding.
>
> Bad reason: setting up
having IMAP IDLE to everywhere... ugh, I guess. What's another million
persistent connections. I'd rather make forwarding more reliable. I've
wanted to add an inbound gateway setting to consumer accounts, similar to
what we have for GSuite customers, which would allow us to be smarter about
forwa
having IMAP IDLE to everywhere... ugh, I guess. What's another million
persistent connections.
As the saying goes, if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a
thumb.
I'd rather make forwarding more reliable. I've wanted to add an inbound
gateway setting to consumer accounts, simil
John Levine schrieb am 09.02.2017 um 05:30:
> If you want your mail delivered, you have to filter out the spam, even
> if it's forwarded.
sure - i didn't say i don't do that.
maybe i should simply set stricter rules for forwards than for local
mailboxes...
__
18 matches
Mail list logo
