Please unsubscribe me from your mailing list.
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
MacOS 15.1.1 is not allowing lyx 2.4.2.1 to open, even with the standard
workaround of pressing control and clicking on open. What to do?
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Maybe it is polyglossia. Look at the Tex file or do not use the preamble,
but the beginning of the document.
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 09:20 -0400, Kevin Cole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since most lists that I'm on seem to consist of messages that begin as a
> question, followed by replies attempting to answer the question or gather
> more information, a subject line consisting of nothing but the
Hi,
Since most lists that I'm on seem to consist of messages that begin as a
question, followed by replies attempting to answer the question or gather
more information, a subject line consisting of nothing but the word
"question" is pretty useless.
So, a gentle nudge to some: Try
Alright then, I will post to lyx-devel and with more info.
Basically Pacstall is package manager for Debian based systems and for more
info see pacstall.dev.
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Hello, there is an ongoing pull request for your package at:
https://github.com/pacstall/pacstall-programs/pull/971. Just a couple of
questions, would you like to maintain it, and also it would be great to
have this installation method in wiki (users can install via: pacstall -I
lyx-deb once the PR
The enclosed MWE shows a simple document with a series of key words with which I would like to fill a subject index. However, if I choose Makeindex as the index processor, the subject index is NOT displayed in the resulting PDF document. PLEASE, can someone tell me why? And how do I manage to
have the lowercase letter a, b or f after the page number in the subject index, depending on which of the three sections (A, B, F) they are placed in.
MWE1 uses the index processor texindy. The associated PDF file shows that a German DUDEN order according to DIN5007-1 can be created in the
Am Sonntag, dem 02.05.2021 um 18:46 +0200 schrieb Andreas Plihal:
> for a KOMA book I have created both a list of figures and a subject
> index. However, I would like to add an introductory text to the
> subject index, immediately after the heading.
> Where and how should I place this
El dom, 2 may 2021 a las 18:46, Andreas Plihal () escribió:
> Hi,
>
> for a KOMA book I have created both a list of figures and a subject index.
> However,
> I would like to add an introductory text to the subject index, immediately
> after the heading.
> Where and ho
Hi,
for a KOMA book I have created both a list of figures and a subject index. However, I would like to add an introductory text to the subject index, immediately after the heading.
Where and how should I place this introductory text in the LYX file?
Best regards
Andreas
--
lyx-users
Pls subscibr me lyx development.
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Dear sir, how to recover my damaged . lyx filekindly suggest me some
ideayour faithfully
Dolan
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
On 2017-04-01, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --]
> I would like to rename my 'name index' and 'subject index' to the German
> 'Namensverzeichnis' and 'Stichwortverzeichnis' with
> \renewcommand{\indexname
I would like to rename my 'name index' and 'subject index' to the German
'Namensverzeichnis' and 'Stichwortverzeichnis' with
\renewcommand{\indexname}{Sachverzeichnis}
in the preamble, but this does not give the desired output in the pdf
file. What
f the English version gives me an error (see ###1###)
> and view complete log gives me (see ###2###)
>
> If I comment out the subject index at the end of my document it works
> alright.
> The name index works alright.
>
> Has anybody run into such an error and could give me a
###)
and view complete log gives me (see ###2###)
If I comment out the subject index at the end of my document it works
alright.
The name index works alright.
Has anybody run into such an error and could give me a hint what is going
wrong?
I am using koma script book style and A5 size, if this is
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg83713.html
>
> Ok, AFAIU this refers to the XeLaTeX engine and not to LyX.
> Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language
> guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the
> resources to imple
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language
> guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the
> resources to implement and test it - it may happen. Another option
> would be to have a spell checker backend including this featur
Am 27.01.2011 um 14:05 schrieb Walter:
>>> Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran
>>> a spell check for the first time.
>>>
>>> The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras, however
>>> the following struck me as possible to improve.
>>>
>
Am 27.01.2011 um 15:16 schrieb Walter:
>> This sounds ugly. Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs? Is
>> there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction
>> layer
>> available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect
>> known diction
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Walter wrote:
>> This sounds ugly. Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs? Is
>> there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction
>> layer
>> available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect
>> known
> This sounds ugly. Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs? Is
> there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer
> available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect
> known dictionaries and spell checkers on a cross-platform bas
Hello
This is a long document indeed and, unfortunately, I couldn't find the
will to go through it all. But I should have a couple of interesting
references regarding multilingual documents.
This has been discussed previously on the list, in the context of XeTeX
support in LyX 2.0 SVN:
ht
> I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had
> to write this.
Relativity...
>> Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran
>> a spell check for the first time.
>>
>> The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras,
Am 26.01.2011 um 15:00 schrieb Walter:
I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had to
write this.
> Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran
> a spell check for the first time.
>
> The interface is good and no doubt an improvement
(Note: Mostly this email dates from pre-Christmas December - took me awhile
to post!)
(This is a bit more verbose than it should be, as I am presently stuck in
an historic colonial hill station of Tunisia, by the Algerian border, and
being winter the weather is bitter and I am therefore loc
Le 14/02/2010 22:49, Giovanni Bacci a écrit :
domenica 14 febbraio 2010, 22:26, Jean-Marie Pacquet:
Default subject (i.e. beforeopening and untitled) is left justified.
Only the title (if selected) is centered. This can be seen on figure
6.1: Schematic of letter paper's pseudo le
domenica 14 febbraio 2010, 22:26, Jean-Marie Pacquet:
> Default subject (i.e. beforeopening and untitled) is left justified.
> Only the title (if selected) is centered. This can be seen on figure
> 6.1: Schematic of letter paper's pseudo lengths.
> So I don't really u
Giovanni Bacci a écrit :
[...]
Anyway, I'd like to know if it's possible to change subject alignment
in a letter koma-script v.2 class. As an option i can only choose
{before,after}opening and titled/untitled. Both of them came with
a center aligned text. But what i'd like to o
Hi list. I've a problem non strictly about lyx, but i hope to get an
answer, maybe useful for other lyxer too.
Anyway, I'd like to know if it's possible to change subject alignment
in a letter koma-script v.2 class. As an option i can only choose
{before,after}opening and titled
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Manveru wrote:
> 2009/9/17 Andre Poenitz
>
> > That's not really surprising for a page that needs creating an account.
> > I am even surprised that 36 people voted...
>
> I am surprised you said that. I've tested and voting was possible without
> logging in. I've
2009/9/17 Andre Poenitz
> [...]
>
> That's not really surprising for a page that needs creating an account.
> I am even surprised that 36 people voted...
>
> Andre'
>
I am surprised you said that. I've tested and voting was possible without
logging in. I've just enter the survey from a PC that h
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:09:58PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
> > I created a survey about explicit subject tagging:
> > http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/
> >
> > Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message.
> >
> > --
> &
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 17:52 +0200, Julio Rojas wrote:
> Not a lot of people interested on the subject???
I went ahead and took the survey ("no opinion").
I wanted to point out that filtering the list is easy without such a
catch. I have evolution check the recipients for "lyx-
Not a lot of people interested on the subject???
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Manveru wrote:
> 2009/9/7 Manveru
>
>> Hi LyXers,
>>
>> I created a survey about explicit
2009/9/7 Manveru
> Hi LyXers,
>
> I created a survey about explicit subject tagging:
> http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/
>
> Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message.
>
> --
> Manveru
> jabber: manv...@manveru
.
the lyx-users digest is sent as a mime digest and with Thunderbird the user can simply double click
on the message of interest (each message is listed as a mime attachment in the digest) which opens
the message as a pretty much normal message and then hit reply.
For some reason I had to take
It would be interesting for the Lyx website to collect this info.
I assume the posting contains a typo, and should read:
They can record OS statistics, **unless** they are hidden by the user.
(When top posting starts, let top posting continue (8-).
jon
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 21:06 +0200, Murat Y
Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally "snipped"...
for full context see the thread...
It would appear that on Sep 2, Delta moins did innocently start this thread:
> there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people
> "this comes from the Lyx u
On 09/11/2009 03:06 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe.
They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user.
You could get a decent sense of the Windows and Mac populations from
download statistics, but not so much with
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote:
But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!
I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined
that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on:
Linux
Windo
Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe.
They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user.
2009/9/11 Andrew Sullivan :
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>> assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on:
>
> Given t
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on:
Given that it is free software and therefore nearly impossible to know
what the user community size is, knowing the relative sizes of
segments of the population seems to be a
Steve Litt wrote:
On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote:
But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!
I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that
assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on:
Linux
Windows
Mac
BSD
Other
Just
On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!
I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that
assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on:
Linux
Windows
Mac
BSD
Other
Just to start the ball ro
jas wrote:
>>>
>>> Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other
>>> lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading
>>> "lyx
>>> users"? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line t
x.org" messages to a separate
folder.
But I don't want to bury the messages to a separate folder. I merely
want to be able to tell a a glance from the Subject field that LyX is
the subject.
There is also the difference between knowing that a message was sent TO
lyx-users and whether
But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!
Julio Rojas wrote:
Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other
lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading "lyx
users"? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags lik
don't want to bury the messages to a separate folder. I merely
want to be able to tell a a glance from the Subject field that LyX is
the subject.
Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Helge Hafting wrote:
Murray Eisenberg wrote:
I agree with the O.P. on this. This is
>>
> Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other
> lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading "lyx
> users"? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX].
It's also easy. Besides of
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>
>> I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
>> fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has,
>> say, "[LyX]" prepe
Murray Eisenberg wrote:
I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server
has, say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
But we don't want that, so please don't wreck it on the se
, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
There is many voices in favour of such feature. But not a lot of
people vote against. If may I suggest, maybe someone can create a
poll/survey for LyX users list subscribers.
I think the many voices that don't like it are tired of having
Hi LyXers,
I created a survey about explicit subject tagging:
http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/
Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message.
--
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
gg: 1624001
http://www.manveru.pl
Hi LyXers,
I created a survey about explicit subject tagging:
http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/
Feel welcome to fill the answers.
--
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
gg: 1624001
http://www.manveru.pl
has,
>>> say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
>>
>> There is many voices in favour of such feature. But not a lot of
>> people vote against. If may I suggest, maybe someone can create a
>> poll/survey for LyX users list subscribers.
>
> I think the
Le 03/09/2009 19:46, Andre Poenitz a écrit :
I have 42 characters for the subject, given that most messages are
marked with (at least one) 'Re: ', a '[LyX] ' prefix eats 15% of
the available space, for useless 'information'.
Especially since we need [LyX Devel], [LyX Users], etc.
JMarc
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:13:14PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg :
> > I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
> > fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has,
> > say, "[LyX]" prepe
Hello,
Sorry if the subject was already and recurrently treated in the list. As I
said, I'm new so I didn't know.
In fact, I filter by the "To" field and it works perfectly with Yahoo webmail
so my problem is solved. Once again I should have think a bit before sending my
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm
very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject
that tell people "this comes from the Lyx users list".
If you look at the
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Sam Liddicott wrote:
* Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57:
I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject
line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur).
What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX:
developerlist
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote:
2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg :
I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has,
say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
There is many voices in favo
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Delta moins wrote:
Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and
I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail
subject that tell people "this comes from the Lyx users list". It's very
messing beca
Sam Liddicott wrote:
* Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57:
I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject
line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur).
What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX:
developerlist or whatever)? Will
* Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57:
> I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject
> line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur).
>
> What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX:
> developerlist or whatever)? Will
Delta moins wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing :
there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people "this comes from the Lyx
users list". It's very messing because you cannot filter
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:44:00AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> I agree with you and have been saying so for years. But even the Mailman
> software suggest replies go to the individual instead of the list. So much
> for> collaboration.
Mailman might be relying on the faint hope that mail user agen
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 04:53:28 A B wrote:
> I thought it was an unwritte rule: reply to the list, not the list AND
> an explicit email adress (unless they ask to) Or have I got this
> completly wrong?
You're somewhat wrong. On many mailing lists, the custom is to reply to the
list and a
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 04:33:07 Sam Liddicott wrote:
> * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
> > Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
> > If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
>
> You're not the only o
2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg :
> I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
> fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has,
> say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
There is many voices in favour of such feature. But
I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server
has, say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
Many other mailing lists do this. There should be no need for the
subscribers to have
* Andrew Sullivan wrote, On 02/09/09 14:10:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
>> The Delivered-To: header is not the same as the list-id header - I'm
>> more interested in how the message reached me (via the list or not),
>> Delivered-To: signifies something else, and
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> The Delivered-To: header is not the same as the list-id header - I'm
> more interested in how the message reached me (via the list or not),
> Delivered-To: signifies something else, and my mail server does not
> support it.
>
> http:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:11:26AM +, Delta moins wrote:
> that tell people "this comes from the Lyx users list". It's very
> messing because you cannot filter the mails efficiently.
Yes, you can. This is what List-*: headers are for. This very topic
came up not a month ago on this list.
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:40:44 -0400, Sam Liddicott
wrote:
Your message has:
From: "Manveru"
which is not helpful.
I've been using Opera mail for a long time, which automatically sorts out
mailing list mail. But I note the following headers:
Mailing-List: contact lyx-users-h...@lists.ly
t; >>> If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
> >>
> >> You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header.
> >
> > It has, I am using this one:
> > Delivered-To: mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
&
Delta moins wrote:
Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
There are more who wants this, but also quite a few who don't want it.
The mail can be sorted by other headers than "Subject".
* Kornel Benko wrote, On 02/09/09 10:33:
> Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott:
>> * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
>>> Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
>>> If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it
Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott:
> * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
> > Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
> > If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
>
>
> You're not the only one.
>>
>> So I just sort based on to or cc and swear and cuss from time to time
>> about the Lyx mailing list not supporting list-id header; and generally
>> fail to notice messages also sent directly to me as it's a thread I'm
>> involved in.
>>
>> Sa
the Lyx mailing list not supporting list-id header; and generally
> fail to notice messages also sent directly to me as it's a thread I'm
> involved in.
>
> Sam
>
The subject can be messed up when some programs keep adding Re: or
to the subject and the id
header has to be ad
* Manveru wrote, On 02/09/09 09:18:
> 2009/9/2 Delta moins :
>> Hello everybody,
>> I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised
>> about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people
>> "this comes f
* Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
> Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
> If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header.
Sam
Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
Yves
De : Manveru
À : Delta moins
Cc : lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Envoyé le : Mercredi, 2 Septembre 2009, 10h18mn 35s
Objet
2009/9/2 Delta moins :
> Hello everybody,
> I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about
> one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people "this
> comes from the Lyx users list". It's very messing b
Hello everybody,
I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about
one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people "this
comes from the Lyx users list". It's very messing because you cannot filter the
mails efficient
Murray Eisenberg wrote:
I don't want to direct these messages about lyx to some special folder
(I can do that later if I wish). I just want to be able to tell at a
glance from the Subject showing in Thunderbird that the message is for
the lyx-users group.
I read the group (in Thunde
Nikos Alexandris writes:
> For R it's [R], grass-gis [GRASS], qgis [QGIS] etc. I tend to agree that
> it's not a bad idea to have [LyX] in the Subject. What speaks against
> it?
Probably that developers around here tend to dislike these tags. Many
mail readers are stupi
Murray E:
> I don't want to direct these messages about lyx to some special folder
> (I can do that later if I wish). I just want to be able to tell at a
> glance from the Subject showing in Thunderbird that the message is for
> the lyx-users group.
>
> As somebody el
I don't want to direct these messages about lyx to some special folder
(I can do that later if I wish). I just want to be able to tell at a
glance from the Subject showing in Thunderbird that the message is for
the lyx-users group.
As somebody else wrote, all the other mailing lists to
I'm on a Windows PC using Thunderbird as e-mail client. My outgoing
mail ISP is Comcast.
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
Would it be possible to include (automatically) something like
[lyx-users]
in the Subject of messages sent from this mailing list?
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:59:59AM +1000, Typhoon wrote:
> he probably doesn't use procmail. However, Thunderbird, like almost all
> pop mail clients allows you to define filter rules that will direct
> lyx-user emails to a special folder.
Also, the list seems to use the List-* headers (although n
On Wed, 27 May 2009 15:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to include (automatically) something like
> > [lyx-users] in the Subject of messages sent from this mailing list?
> >
> > It'
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
Would it be possible to include (automatically) something like [lyx-users]
in the Subject of messages sent from this mailing list?
It's often difficult to tell from the subject along that this is about lyx.
Murray,
Do you use procmail as
Would it be possible to include (automatically) something like
[lyx-users] in the Subject of messages sent from this mailing list?
It's often difficult to tell from the subject along that this is about lyx.
--
Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu
Mathematics & S
Andre Poenitz wrote:
However:
why not?
Because filtering works already well on the sender/receiver lines,
and some people (including me) did not want to waste 6 characters
worth of horizontal real estate on the subject lines to state
what is clear from context.
I agree, no need to put
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
why not?
Because filtering works already well on the sender/receiver lines, and
some people (including me) did not want to waste 6 characters worth of
horizontal real estate on the subject lines to state what is clear from
context.
I agree with
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 04:55:05PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi mailing list admin,
>
> Just a minor request. As many other mailing lists, I think it would
> be handy if your listserver would insert [lyx] into the subject
> field. It would help me a lot in order to fi
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
