* Andrew Sullivan wrote, On 02/09/09 14:10: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote: >> The Delivered-To: header is not the same as the list-id header - I'm >> more interested in how the message reached me (via the list or not), >> Delivered-To: signifies something else, and my mail server does not >> support it. >> >> http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919.html > > In another message, I referred to that, and I think I'd incorrectly > believed there's a List-Id header on this list. You're right that > there isn't. > > But you can cheat. The list _does_ provide RFC2369 headers, and > they're just as good for this purpose. Evidently that's what I'm > doing, since this all sorts nicely for me.
yeah; sadly Citadel mail server has support for list-id, but not the rest. Sam
