On 2009-02-27, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Thursday 26 February 2009 16:56:57 schrieb Wilfried:
>> Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> But how about trying to get LyX into TeXLive?
>> There is already a bootable, self-sustained Linux DVD available with LyX
>> integrated:
>> http://www.knoppix.org/
>> Th
Am Thursday 26 February 2009 16:56:57 schrieb Wilfried:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2009-02-07, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > >> On Friday 06 February 2009 09:32:12 A B wrote:
> > >>
> > >> perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be help
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-02-07, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >> On Friday 06 February 2009 09:32:12 A B wrote:
>
> >> perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to demonstrate
> >> its merrit to those who care
>
> > Actually
On 2009-02-07, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>> On Friday 06 February 2009 09:32:12 A B wrote:
>> perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to demonstrate
>> its merrit to those who care
> Actually, a complete installation of LyX, LaTeX
A B wrote:
What is needed is the ability to let LyX users interact with other
people. With good converters that enable LyX users to take a X-file,
open, edit, and send back a X-file, (where X = word or html or rtf or
openoffice or xml or even MP3 (with lillypond?) ) you can work with
LyX in any
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Helge Hafting wrote:
It'd be a simple piece of software, self-contained and easy to install
on someone's pc for cooperative writing.
Is there a reason it has to be installed? Maybe it'd be interesting
with a version that can be run without ha
Am Sunday 08 February 2009 10:35:04 schrieb Wolfgang Keller:
> > > perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to
> > > demonstrate its merrit to those who care
> >
> > Actually, a complete installation of LyX, LaTeX and various software
> > on a CD could be a good idea, assuming it can
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to
demonstrate its merrit to those who care
Actually, a complete installation of LyX, LaTeX and various software
on a CD could be a good idea, assuming it can be run without
installing it. I'm not
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, typh...@aanet.com.au wrote:
I wasn't clear enough... I was actually thinking of Windows users, and
that they'd be able to run LyX from the CD, but still inside Windows
and not by booting into eg Knoppix.
Using a virtual machine might be an idea, but then you have the probl
Guenter Milde writes:
> Document format conversion is lossy "by a natural law".
...the Wise know this.
Anyway, @LyxLyght's "oppositors": I
not-LyX-nor-even-LaTeX (i.e. Word) collaborators are of 3 kind:
A. Those who will never use anything different than Word (or OOo), say >50%
B. Those who
> > perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to
> > demonstrate its merrit to those who care
>
> Actually, a complete installation of LyX, LaTeX and various software
> on a CD could be a good idea, assuming it can be run without
> installing it. I'm not sure it's feasible though.
I'
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> Christian Ridderström wrote:
perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to demonstrate
its
merrit to those who care
>>>
>>> Actually, a complete installation of LyX, LaTeX and various software on
>>> a
>>> CD could be a good i
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to demonstrate its
merrit to those who care
Actually, a complete installation of LyX, LaTeX and various software on a
CD could be a good idea, assuming it can be run with
Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to demonstrate its
>> merrit to those who care
>
> Actually, a complete installation of LyX, LaTeX and various software on a
> CD could be a good idea, assuming it can be run without installing it.
> I'm not su
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Friday 06 February 2009 09:32:12 A B wrote:
perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to demonstrate
its merrit to those who care
Actually, a complete installation of LyX, LaTeX and various software on
a CD could be a good idea,
A few threads back, someone mentioned a "light LyX" version. (A light
version that you wouldn't need the latex. You could edit the text, and and
see the equations)
I couldn't help thinking about adobe's "PDF reader" vs. "PDF convert".
10 years ago, most people used PDF readers, and only acade
On Friday 06 February 2009 09:32:12 A B wrote:
perhaps a live CD with a whatever-Lyx would be helpful to demonstrate its
merrit to those who care
Wolfgang
>
> I'd say: create converters that are shipped with LyX instead!
>
> If I may generalize a little
> The word users are of two kinds: t
Steve Litt wrote:
On Friday 06 February 2009 11:46:21 am Richard Heck wrote:
David Mertens wrote:
It would be great if ... the .lxy document would be bundled with all
images in a .zip file.
Great idea, but not trivial. Has this been discussed on the lists
before? If it has, I
On Friday 06 February 2009 11:46:21 am Richard Heck wrote:
> David Mertens wrote:
> >> It would be great if ... the .lxy document would be bundled with all
> >> images in a .zip file.
> >
> > Great idea, but not trivial. Has this been discussed on the lists
> > before? If it has, I couldn't find i
On Friday 06 February 2009 11:37:50 am Richard Heck wrote:
> Yes, of course, that's correct. There's layout2layout, as well. So
> python is definitely required.
What does layout2layout do?
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
David Mertens wrote:
It would be great if ... the .lxy document would be bundled with all images
in a .zip file.
Great idea, but not trivial. Has this been discussed on the lists before?
If it has, I couldn't find it.
A lot, but mostly on devel. There is, in fact, a script that lives
Guenter Milde wrote:
FYI, I think Richard has further improved the bibtex parsing lately.
I know, this is why I can browse my bibtex database easily from within lyx.
Would it be feasable to use this new ability in LyX's text export?
I don't see why not. Basically, we have a data struc
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-02-05, rgheck wrote:
I looked a bit closer and you are correct. Python was installed
I'd guess that a LyXLite probably wouldn't need python. We're never
exporting; we're never compiling. We don't care what programs and
packages are available or not
David Mertens schreef:
It would be great if ... the .lxy document would be bundled with all images
in a .zip file.
Great idea, but not trivial. Has this been discussed on the lists before?
If it has, I couldn't find it.
Yes, see:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/BundleSuggestions
http://w
>
> It would be great if ... the .lxy document would be bundled with all images
> in a .zip file.
>
Great idea, but not trivial. Has this been discussed on the lists before?
If it has, I couldn't find it.
We would probably want a portable LyX format (.plyx) that would be a
tarrball or zip of the
Hi,
It would be great if LightLyx(or whatever name) would be a portable,
one file solultion and the .lxy document would be bundled with all
images in a .zip file.
So you can just give the document (zip-file) and the exe (for windows)
file of PortanbleLightlyx to someone and he/she could review and
On 2009-02-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> This was about citation support. But I see it works without LaTeX too (but
>> with limited funtionality: giving the bibtex-key instead)::
>> ...
>> for details see [milde.ea.ieee-sensors:08]
>> [LaTeX-Befehl: bibtex]
> FYI
AB
I might have missed something here (I'm sorry in that case) but are
you suggesting a LyX-light version for people that does not want to
use anything but word
Paradoxically yes.
I'd say: create converters that are shipped with LyX instead!
If I may generalize a little
The wo
On 2009-02-06, A B wrote:
>>> I might have missed something here (I'm sorry in that case)
Yes, reading the thread from the beginning will help to understand the
complex issue and the various solutions proposed so far...
>>> but are you suggesting a LyX-light version for people that does not
>>>
On 2009-02-05, rgheck wrote:
>> I looked a bit closer and you are correct. Python was installed
> I'd guess that a LyXLite probably wouldn't need python. We're never
> exporting; we're never compiling. We don't care what programs and
> packages are available or not. We're assuming that none ar
>> I might have missed something here (I'm sorry in that case) but are
>> you suggesting a LyX-light version for people that does not want to
>> use anything but word
>
> Paradoxically yes.
I'd say: create converters that are shipped with LyX instead!
If I may generalize a little
The word use
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
> As you understand by now, I only see improvements to LyX without the
> need for having a different application. And improvements are of course
> always worth implementing.
When I'm talking about LyXght I don't think it should a *different* app, of
course. I th
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Reading your other post:
> > It may also be useful on computers too small for latex
> > Lyx-light will be much easier to install because latex and other large
> packages of supporting software is omitted.
>
> The only difference I see is an installer that does not a
David Mertens wrote:
I'm a bit puzzled about this, because python is needed to run the
configure.py script that checks for installed programs and the like. Are you
sure the installer didn't install python?
rh
I looked a bit closer and you are correct. Python was installed in my LyX
prog
>
> I'm a bit puzzled about this, because python is needed to run the
> configure.py script that checks for installed programs and the like. Are you
> sure the installer didn't install python?
>
> rh
I looked a bit closer and you are correct. Python was installed in my LyX
program folder, not in
On Feb 5, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think this should hold for FullyLyX too. You should be able to use
LyX without any Latex and/or Image conversion applications. Of
course some export functions don't work and some images can't be
converted, but plain text, etc. sho
David Mertens wrote:
3. After installing most of what I needed, it downloaded the aspell
software and installed it. I thought that Python was required for LyX (it
used to be required), but this apparently is no longer the case, which is
nice.
I'm a bit puzzled about this, because python i
(Forgot to reply to the full list again. My apologies Helge.)
@ Vincent - The installer would be different, and LyX would have to not give
error messages for messed-up layout files. See my notes below.
@all - Regarding MicroLyX (tested on Windows) -
I recalled that LyX could be run without a L
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Helge Hafting wrote:
It'd be a simple piece of software, self-contained and easy to install
on someone's pc for cooperative writing.
Is there a reason it has to be installed? Maybe it'd be interesting with
a version that can be run without having first been installed?
/
Helge Hafting schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think this should hold for FullyLyX too. You should be able to use
LyX without any Latex and/or Image conversion applications. Of course
some export functions don't work and some images can't be converted,
but plain text, etc. should work
Ken wrote:
Helge,
Thanks for your message. Yes, I wrote to the IT folks a few weeks ago
with the suggestion and will try to follow it up in a few weeks time.
While there is no licensing costs they may have to worry about the
installation and support cost/effort. But again, I think that LyX
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think this should hold for FullyLyX too. You should be able to use LyX
without any Latex and/or Image conversion applications. Of course some
export functions don't work and some images can't be converted, but
plain text, etc. should work.
I believe LyX alread
A B wrote:
Not quite true. Most (if not all) of the image formats typically used by
Windows user are natively supported by LyX.
interesting; i would expect postscript to be used as the most common format
for scientific papers...
For the images? Rather EPS or PDF. PDF is supported.
As the conve
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-02-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
Editing yes, output would need LaTeX even for text (AFAIK).
No, unless this has changed recently, LateX is not needed for text
export in the 1.5 and 1.6 series.
This was about citation support. But I see it
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-02-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
In my view, to use LaTeX as exchange format,
LyX development should
a) concentrate on an improved
LyX -> LaTeX -> LyX
cycle (with the aim to get this round-trip lossless) and
b) encourage develop
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-02-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
In my view, to use LaTeX as exchange format,
LyX development should
a) concentrate on an improved
LyX -> LaTeX -> LyX
cycle (with the aim to get this round-trip lossless) and
On 2009-02-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> In my view, to use LaTeX as exchange format,
>> LyX development should
>> a) concentrate on an improved
>> LyX -> LaTeX -> LyX
>>cycle (with the aim to get this round-trip lossless) and
>> b) encourage development/imp
A B schreef:
Not quite true. Most (if not all) of the image formats typically used by
Windows user are natively supported by LyX.
interesting; i would expect postscript to be used as the most common format
for scientific papers...
For the images? Rather EPS or PDF. PDF is suppor
>>> Not quite true. Most (if not all) of the image formats typically used by
>>> Windows user are natively supported by LyX.
>
>> interesting; i would expect postscript to be used as the most common format
>> for scientific papers...
>
> For the images? Rather EPS or PDF. PDF is supported.
>
> As t
Piero Faustini schreef:
Helge Hafting writes:
Or in the case of a serious cooperation setup - use the same config file
as the guy who has the full lyx setup and does the printing.
That's smart.
LyghtLyX (got the word-pun?) should know that with that document, he is working
on a pro
On 2009-02-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Editing yes, output would need LaTeX even for text (AFAIK).
> No, unless this has changed recently, LateX is not needed for text
> export in the 1.5 and 1.6 series.
This was about citation support. But I see it works without LaTe
On 2009-02-05, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> Piero Faustini wrote:
want. No converters, no LaTeX.
>>> no converters -> no pictures
>> Not quite true. Most (if not all) of the image formats typically used by
>> Windows user are natively supported by
Helge Hafting writes:
>
> Or in the case of a serious cooperation setup - use the same config file
> as the guy who has the full lyx setup and does the printing.
That's smart.
LyghtLyX (got the word-pun?) should know that with that document, he is working
on a project, for which he relies on
On Thursday 05 February 2009 05:51:38 am Guenter Milde wrote:
> Why not Ly-X (for lyx without TeX)? but this is a minor point.
That doesn't roll smoothly off the tongue and sounds a little too much
like "liar."
SteveT
I like the idea of LyX-Lite too. Perhaps one way to deal with the images
problem is for LyX to export a LyX-Lite version with images in jpg/png format to
a sub-directory along with the lyxlite.lyx file. Would this make sharing the
images within a document easier and more light-weight?
-Ken
Guenter Milde wrote:
In my view, to use LaTeX as exchange format,
LyX development should
a) concentrate on an improved
LyX -> LaTeX -> LyX
cycle (with the aim to get this round-trip lossless) and
b) encourage development/improvement of LaTeX converters (to/from
OOffice, HTML, r
Guenter Milde wrote:
Editing yes, output would need LaTeX even for text (AFAIK).
No, unless this has changed recently, LateX is not needed for text
export in the 1.5 and 1.6 series.
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Piero Faustini wrote:
>>> want. No converters, no LaTeX.
>> no converters -> no pictures
>
> Not quite true. Most (if not all) of the image formats typically used by
> Windows user are natively supported by LyX.
interesting; i would expect postscr
Helge,
Thanks for your message. Yes, I wrote to the IT folks a few weeks ago with
the suggestion and will try to follow it up in a few weeks time. While
there is no licensing costs they may have to worry about the installation
and support cost/effort. But again, I think that LyX is far and away
On 2009-02-05, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> the options of editing via PDFs and conversion from and to rtf, should
> be explored further as they really would solve the problem.
The problem here is, that PDF and rtf do not provide semantic markup so
most of the document structure and other vital inform
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Helge Hafting wrote:
Isn't this going to be a big problem? LyX objects rather strongly
when it thinks you don't have the corresponding LaTeX class installed.
Of course, this behaviour could be changed.
Isn't this decision made based on what the configure script autodete
Ken wrote:
harder to export them to SWP even though they are both LaTeX editors. At the
university, SWP is available as a standard install on machines but not LyX.
Have you tried getting the university to offer LyX as part of the
standard install as well? Being free means they don't need a b
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Guenter Milde wrote:
idiot-proof as well) LyX version, (I have the name: LyteX or LyghtX!)
Why not Ly-X (for lyx without TeX)? but this is a minor point.
Maybe it's _too_ close to LyX? Thus easily mistaken.
lyxlight? minilyx? microlyx?
Als
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Guenter Milde wrote:
idiot-proof as well) LyX version, (I have the name: LyteX or LyghtX!)
Why not Ly-X (for lyx without TeX)? but this is a minor point.
Maybe it's _too_ close to LyX? Thus easily mistaken.
Also, it may be that some settings are blocked if the supportin
On 2009-02-04, David Mertens wrote:
>> 3. (optional, and not so inmediate) A light-weight full-view (and
>> idiot-proof as well) LyX version, (I have the name: LyteX or LyghtX!)
Why not Ly-X (for lyx without TeX)? but this is a minor point.
>> is able to edit text (and structure) of conventiona
On 2009-02-04, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Piero Faustini wrote:
>> want. No converters, no LaTeX.
> no converters -> no pictures
Well, pictures in formats supported directly by QT will still be visible
(which are a lot).
Günter
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Piero Faustini wrote:
want. No converters, no LaTeX.
no converters -> no pictures
Not quite true. Most (if not all) of the image formats typically used by
Windows user are natively supported by LyX.
Abdel.
Hi,
Here's an ide for those wishing to promote LyX within their particular
field or organisation:
Create one or more simple example documents that use reasonable
formatting and layout for your area.
I think that if the starting threshold to actually being productive is
lowere
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
wrote:
> Piero Faustini schreef:
>>
>> Pavel Sanda writes:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> when you download lyx installer (not the bundled version), you are
>>> enforced
>>> to install miktex too? to remove export/view menu items is a piece of
>>> cake.
>>> t
Piero Faustini wrote:
> want. No converters, no LaTeX.
no converters -> no pictures
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
> Although I was enthusiastic when I first saw this proposal, but I do not
> think it is something that solves the problem.
>
> 1. LyX is pretty lightweight, as you don't have to install any of the
> additional stuff,
> 2. You still have to convince your coauthor
Piero Faustini schreef:
Pavel Sanda writes:
when you download lyx installer (not the bundled version), you are enforced
to install miktex too? to remove export/view menu items is a piece of cake.
to deny editing of certain elements would be harder.
should this part of the discussion
Pavel Sanda writes:
>
> when you download lyx installer (not the bundled version), you are enforced
> to install miktex too? to remove export/view menu items is a piece of cake.
> to deny editing of certain elements would be harder.
should this part of the discussion be moved to the Lyx.Devel l
David Mertens wrote:
> >
> > 3. (optional, and not so inmediate) A light-weight full-view (and
> > idiot-proof as well) LyX version, (I have the name: LyteX or LyghtX!) which
> > is able to edit text (and structure) of conventional LyX docs, without the
> > possibility of editing ERT or items expl
Erez Yerushalmi writes:
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/phds/3rd_year/yerushalmi/c
omputing/lyx
Nice page, only that "a few other languages" seems quite unfair... above all
for french, german, spanish, italian etc. etc. users!!!
> Yeah, a LyX viewer/editor without document processing back-end (and
> the associated 800Mb download) would be great.
> I posted this "wanted feature" (let's call it this way!) in
> http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Collaboration and I'm very persuaded
> it could be great but I have NO idea of how muc
David Mertens writes:
> Yeah, a LyX viewer/editor without document processing back-end (and the
> associated 800Mb download) would be great.
I posted this "wanted feature" (let's call it this way!) in
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Collaboration
and I'm very persuaded it could be great but I have
>
> 3. (optional, and not so inmediate) A light-weight full-view (and
> idiot-proof as well) LyX version, (I have the name: LyteX or LyghtX!) which
> is able to edit text (and structure) of conventional LyX docs, without the
> possibility of editing ERT or items explicitly banned by the original
>
Hi Erez,
Nice promotional page! I had planned to write a page on LyX on my very
slow-living blog after the release of the version 1.6, but I have not
time yet. My students normally use the tips I give there Maybe during
the next holidays I will try to put it in place. The promotion is
important. W
Hi all,
I agree with much of what has been said.
Another thing which *diffuses* LyX into the academia is just pure*advertising
* - I'm using Murat's words.
For example, I am advertising LyX to all my students and colleagues.
Maybe a good thing is for all those that like LyX, to do something simi
I definitely support Ken's proposition. SWP really makes a huge mess
with the latex file (even if the file is compilable by a standar Latex
engine - I use the same TexLive 2005 with SWP and LyX). The
possibility of easily switching to LyX can have some importance
consequences on a larger diffusion
It was a few months ago that I went through the hassle of import/exporting
between LyX and SWP. Yes, SWP can export to "portable" latex, but it was
not all that portable. However with a few tweaks it was possible to get a
decent import into LyX. (I think there is a wiki page on it with regards to
I have worked with a co-author that insists on using Scientific
Word. My
experience is that not only is SW/SWP very expensive, I also find
it a far
inferior product to LyX. It is not easy to import documents from
SWP and even
harder to export them to SWP even though they are both LaTeX
ed
I have not followed the entire thread on this issue but I did a search through
the discussion and could not find anyone mentioning the issues with Scientific
Word/Workplace.
I have worked with a co-author that insists on using Scientific Word. My
experience is that not only is SW/SWP very expen
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2009 10:52:49 am Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > Have you ever supplied your colleagues with a layout file
containing all
> > the environments and character styles they'll need for their
document? I
> > think even the most non-technic
Peter Baumgartner writes:
>
> It seems to me that there are several co-operations scenarios which may
> require different solutions:
Good work, Peter: my ideas on the subject are clearer now.
Inmediate actions we can take in respect to these scenarios are of two
different kinds:
1. Effort in
It seems to me that there are several co-operations scenarios which may
require different solutions:
1. Leading author/editor:
A) Writing a book alone:
In this case the co-operation is with the publisher. In my experience - this
was before LyX-time, using FrameMaker this boils down to a very
I have had good experience using reStructuredText as a cooperative
format. It is a fairly powerful "plain text" markup. It has the
advantage of a formal specification and good converters to oo, LaTeX
and xhtml.
Because of the formal specs, it has become more powerful than most wiki
languages as ne
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
However, images might be a problem, I guess...
I think it would be a great addition. My use case is my latest book.
It was co-authored in a wiki (50+ persons), converted to html, imported
to oo, exported as Latex imported to lyx. Added a lot of te
On Thursday 29 January 2009, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Add a html/wiki <--> LyX converter and we are all done! Heck, with the
> > current LyX format it feels like replacing \section with ==
>
> Well, in principle, yes.
One further complication I haven't seen mentioned here is that HTML is
> There are several problems here:
>
> * Which of the many wiki variants do you want to support?
Even if there are many wikis, there are many common features.
However, the best aproach may be to include these into a
layout file.
e.g.:
Style Chapter
wikicommand "=="
END
Style Section
oblems here:
* Which of the many wiki variants do you want to support?
* What about the many many features that have no counterpart in the
wiki syntax?
Actually, if even the LyX->LaTeX->LyX round-trip is not failsave (yet),
so I would not expect any other format conversion to be able to o
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, A B wrote:
I seem to remember that a LyX / wiki connection was discussed some time
ago and it just struck me that that is also an nice way of
collaborating.
Hi,
Yes, I'm the guy usually bringing this up :-)
The ability to save LyX documents as a wiki page and load a wik
Hi.
I seem to remember that a LyX / wiki connection was discussed some
time ago and it just struck me that that is also an nice way of
collaborating.
The ability to save LyX documents as a wiki page and load a wiki page into Lyx.
In non-lyx environment there might be a wiki page for information
s
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> do you intend to put these into the tree?
Eventually perhaps. But not now, since both packages are very new, and the
modules are not very much tested (I just hacked them together rather quickly).
But I thought about setting up a "module" site next to the existing "layouts"
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Ehud Kaplan wrote:
> > Thanks, Jurgen. Your comments were helpful.
> > As for the inserted comments (item #4), sometimes one needs to insert
> > comments for one's colleagues while editing a text.
> > I tried to insert a Lyx note or a comment, and although they showed u
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Les Denham wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2009, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> >> I am using Ubuntu Hardy, texlive 2007-13
>> >
>> > AFAIK, you need at least TeXLive-2008 for SyncTeX.
>>
>> Thank explains - now I only need some pointers, on how I can install
>> it on Ubun
On Tuesday 27 January 2009, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> >> I am using Ubuntu Hardy, texlive 2007-13
> >
> > AFAIK, you need at least TeXLive-2008 for SyncTeX.
>
> Thank explains - now I only need some pointers, on how I can install
> it on Ubuntu
Rainer,
There seem to be some problems integrating it w
You have been providing the OTHER (previously unmentioned) reason why I
like Lyx-- the timely and expert advice and open discussion on this
list-server.
Thanks.
Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D.
Jules and Doris Stein /Research to Preven
John Kane wrote:
You? I use OOo all the time and 'within' OOo they work very well,
people seem to be writing books with it all the time. See for
example the Getting Started Guide at
http://documentation.openoffice.org/.
Importing a document from Word seems to often import all kinds of
junk st
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
