Hi all,
as other users of the currently in Debian 7 stable ('wheezy') included
version LyX 2.0.3-3 might also have a need for a current apa6.layout
file usable with this older version of LyX (to be able to use the
LaTeX APA style in version 6), I thought I'll just send it aroun
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I am sorry that I can't help except perhaps with testing/writing the helps
> (the advantage would be, that I always manage to do the wrong things if
> the advices are not idiot-proof ...)
Testing and entering the results in
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 20:09:38 schrieb Georg Baum:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> >> No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
> >> version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
>
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
>>
>> No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
>> version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
>> which is a script: "usage: %prog [options] [file]". Opt
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >> For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file
> >> in your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the
> >> same), it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx
>
> You can copy the lyx2lyx script (or directory of scripts) from the
> development version (2.1) to the stable one. Then, 2.0 will be able to
> open 2.1 files with auto-conversion.
good to know!
converting larger documents with lyx2lyx takes quite some time!
Wolfgang
On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
filename filename should work.
Mind
On 2013-03-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>> > former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
>> LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. Ho
On 04 Mar 2013, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
> experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
> squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
> /etc/apt/sources.list sq
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 09:29:13 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> yes, I could and did. However, I have quite a lot of lyx files created by
> the 2.1 version and was hoping the lyx2lyx would already contain the
> conversion 2.1 to 2.0, so that I could run a batch. But, if I understand
> correctly
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> > former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
>
> LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
> format is consta
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
format is constantly evolving. Only the very last release of the 2.0.x series
will be ab
> For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
> your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
> it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
> filename filename should work.
>
Mind you, I compiled and installed lyx 2.0.5-1
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 19:56:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>
> wrote:
> > 1-
> >
> > former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> > Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer
2013/3/4, Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>> I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
>>
>> experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
>> squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Now it works after following your advices. Two questions left:
>
> 1-
> former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
> lyx2lyx-Skript konnte
you if you want to create the new directory. Click yes.
Now it works after following your advices. Two questions left:
1-
former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dok
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> 1-
> former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
> lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht konvertieren
This is strange.
root-dir
> >
> > Wolfgang
>
> I was referring to your LyX user dir, usually ~/.lyx. But you said
> that it was .lyx20 so the previous preferences were in the .lyx20
> folder? Just to test, you could run
> ./src/lyx -userdir /tmp/tempuserdir
> LyX will ask you if you wa
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>> > This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
>> > with
>> > wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/hom
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> > This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> > with
> > wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
>
> So configure and make su
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> with
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
So configure and make suceeded?
> [1] 15863
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> with
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
> [1] 15863
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp (1130):
> Ignoring unkn
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp (1130):
Ignoring unknown flag `zipped=native' for format `dia'.
LyXRC.cpp (1130): Ignoring
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Thanks, Jürgen.
> What is the difference between a smaller binary and normal binary in
> respect to funtionality of Lyx? -->
>
> 4) make install
>will install it. You can use "make install-strip" instead
>if you want a smaller binary.
I never u
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 11:36:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is
> > an experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid
> > since squeeze does not off
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
> experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
> squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
> /etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
>
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
/etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
I see the lyx 2.0.3-3 in synaptic, but if I am going
Dima gmail.com> writes:
>
> After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a
> document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph
> with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of "Standard". I
guess
&
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a
document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph
with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of "Standard". I guess
this has something to do with the environment order
, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Eugene wrote:
> Hi
>
> Running Lyx 2.0.3 on WinXP witn Knitr results in the following error
>
> LyX: Cannot convert file
>
> An error occurred while running:
> Rscript --verbose --no-save --no-restore "C:/Program
> Files/Lyx20/bin/../Resources/scrip
Hi
Running Lyx 2.0.3 on WinXP witn Knitr results in the following error
LyX: Cannot convert file
An error occurred while running:
Rscript --verbose --no-save --no-restore "C:/Program
Files/Lyx20/bin/../Resources/scripts/lyxknitr.R" "C:/Documents and
Settings/me/Loca
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/release
>
> Did someone test whether this works with Debian, too?
>
I wouldn't do that. To the best of my knowledge Ubuntu distros are not
binary compatible with Debian distros. If you want 2.0.3 on D
On 2012-04-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] on behalf of kaplae01
> [ehud.kap...@gmail.com]
>>Could someone please reminds me where to get the latest Lyx (2.0.3) for
&g
From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] on behalf of kaplae01
[ehud.kap...@gmail.com]
>Could someone please reminds me where to get the latest Lyx (2.0.3) for ubuntu?
>Their repositories are shamefully out of date (they offer 2.0.2). I know it
>exists somewhere,
&g
Could someone please reminds me where to get the latest Lyx (2.0.3) for
ubuntu?
Their repositories are shamefully out of date (they offer 2.0.2). I
know it exists somewhere,
but cannot find it. I tried to get it from getdeb but failed.
Thanks,
Ehud Kaplan
From: Stephan Witt gmx.net>
Subject: Re: LyX 2.0.3
Newsgroups: gmane.editors.lyx.general
Date: 2012-03-30 03:25:01 GMT (16 hours and 13 minutes ago)
Am 29.03.2012 um 23:50 schrieb KooShee:
finally I took the risk to install 2.0.3 without uninstalling LyX 1.6.10
and both are working prope
Am 29.03.2012 um 23:50 schrieb KooShee:
> finally I took the risk to install 2.0.3 without uninstalling LyX 1.6.10 and
> both are working properly.
> However, even after having installed Aspell-fr-0.50-3, LyX 2.0.3 claims that
> no dictionnary are installed.
> When you are
finally I took the risk to install 2.0.3 without uninstalling LyX 1.6.10 and
both are working properly.
However, even after having installed Aspell-fr-0.50-3, LyX 2.0.3 claims that
no dictionnary are installed.
When you are looking in the preference, spell checker is freezed on
"Hun
oblige you to
download the bundle to reinstall MikTex
Regards
Paul
-Message d'origine-
From: Richard Heck
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:38 PM
To: KooShee
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyX 2.0.3
On 03/28/2012 06:20 PM, KooShee wrote:
Hi,
Coming from 1.6.10 with M
On 03/29/2012 09:48 AM, Kheniene A. wrote:
Dear Richard,
I used the version lyx.1.6.
OK, then it looks as if there is a conversion failure. You can send me
the file if you wish, and I'll have a look at it. Alternatively, you can
go back to 1.6.10, which can still be downloaded here:
ftp
On 03/29/2012 05:18 AM, Kheniene A. wrote:
Hi
I have just installed the new version of lyx but I cannot open the
thesis with it. The error I am getting that is ‘’ is not readable with
lyx.exe’’. Please can you help me how reopen again my thesis because I
need to show is by the end of this mo
On 03/28/2012 06:20 PM, KooShee wrote:
Hi,
Coming from 1.6.10 with MikTex installed and updated.
Shall I uninstall 1.6.10 ahead of installing 2.0.3 or proceed directly
with LyX-2.0.3-2-Alt-Installer.exe (being noted that 1.6.10 has been
installed with the Alt-Installer) ?
I think the
Hi
I have just installed the new version of lyx but I cannot open the thesis with
it. The error I am getting that is '' is not readable with lyx.exe''. Please
can you help me how reopen again my thesis because I need to show is by the end
of this month.
Regards,
A
Hi,
Coming from 1.6.10 with MikTex installed and updated.
Shall I uninstall 1.6.10 ahead of installing 2.0.3 or proceed directly with
LyX-2.0.3-2-Alt-Installer.exe (being noted that 1.6.10 has been installed
with the Alt-Installer) ?
Thanks and Regards
Paul
Op 26-3-2012 12:26, Kunal Saha schreef:
Hi ,
I just installed Lyx 2.0.3 on Windows 7 x64 (the installation file
included MiKtex, Jabref et al). When I try to run the appplication, I get
a window for Proxy Authentication. I fill in the username and password,
then nothing happens .. I see that
Hi ,
I just installed Lyx 2.0.3 on Windows 7 x64 (the installation file
included MiKtex, Jabref et al). When I try to run the appplication, I get
a window for Proxy Authentication. I fill in the username and password,
then nothing happens .. I see that the apps running are latex.exe,
lyx.exe
Am 19.03.2012 um 10:52 schrieb Daisuke Koya:
> Hello LyX Users,
>
> I am using LyX 2.0.3 on Mac OS 10.7.3.
>
> Prior to updating LyX to 2.0.3, SizeUp and Divvy used to work. These programs
> allow usage of keyboard shortcuts to resize windows. I was wondering whether
> th
The problem with Divvy is a known one (we had discussions about this
problem in this list).
I switched to Moom because of this incompatibility with Lyx.
2012/3/19 Daisuke Koya
> Hello LyX Users,
>
> I am using LyX 2.0.3 on Mac OS 10.7.3.
>
> Prior to updating LyX to 2.0.3, S
Hello LyX Users,
I am using LyX 2.0.3 on Mac OS 10.7.3.
Prior to updating LyX to 2.0.3, SizeUp and Divvy used to work. These programs
allow usage of keyboard shortcuts to resize windows. I was wondering whether
the programs could work once again with LyX.
Thank you very much,
Daisuke Koya
On 04.03.2012 04:11, Richard Heck wrote:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.3
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.3. This is the third
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
[...]
Hi,
Just FYI, the slow/jaggy scrolling regression from
On 03/04/2012 05:19 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Grateful for all the work on improving LyX, not to speak of creating it in the
first place and keeping it going over the years.
That said, the "View other formats" button still greys out and becomes unusable
after the first use. Was hoping that would be
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 05:19:34 -0500
Eric Weir wrote:
>
> Grateful for all the work on improving LyX, not to speak of creating
> it in the first place and keeping it going over the years.
Ditto! Every book I sell that was written in the 21st Century I wrote
in LyX. My courseware Instructor Notes a
aybe
next.
Eric Weir
On Mar 3, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.3
> ===
>
> We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.3. This is the third
> maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
>
> L
Public release of LyX version 2.0.3
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.3. This is the third
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
LyX 2.0.3 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable version
even more reliable and stable. We have
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> Although there is no official announcement release of lyx-2.0.3,
> lyx in my Ubuntu 11.10 has been updated to lyx-2.0.3 today (from
> getdeb repository).
>
You may also try out the new LyX PPA. [1]
Liviu
[1] https://launch
Hi all,
Although there is no official announcement release of lyx-2.0.3,
lyx in my Ubuntu 11.10 has been updated to lyx-2.0.3 today (from
getdeb repository).
regards,
waluyo
So.. how can we prepare a collaborative document in LyX in windows system.
Please.. Do you have any suggestion, the system that we have to use.
What is the software svn client and the server, that perfectly match
with LyX.
As Stephan said, LyX can't handle yet Subversion 1.7. Your only option
On 28 February 2012 14:51, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 28.02.2012 um 07:33 schrieb Waluyo Adi Siswanto:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just install LyX 2.0.3(downloaded from sourceforge mentioned by Uwe)
>> in Windows 7(64bit) and want to try control version.
>> When I open lyx
Am 28.02.2012 um 07:33 schrieb Waluyo Adi Siswanto:
> Hi,
>
> I just install LyX 2.0.3(downloaded from sourceforge mentioned by Uwe)
> in Windows 7(64bit) and want to try control version.
> When I open lyx document (*.lyx) in control version folder (using
> TortoiseSVN). Th
Hi,
I just install LyX 2.0.3(downloaded from sourceforge mentioned by Uwe)
in Windows 7(64bit) and want to try control version.
When I open lyx document (*.lyx) in control version folder (using
TortoiseSVN). The file that I open does not show that it is under
control version.
File>Version cont
61 matches
Mail list logo
