Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 20:09:38 schrieb Georg Baum:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> >> No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
> >> version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
>
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 18:31:50 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 11:29:30 schrieb ehud.kap...@gmail.com:
> > I suspect that the Palatino that appears in the font list is NOT the
> > same as Palatino Linotype, especially in terms of spacing-- it takes
> > less space than G
Hi!
I have a listing in my document and I put a caption inside it. In Lyx, the
caption shows "Listagem 1:" correctly, as my document is in brazilian
portuguese, but in PDF, the label shows "Listing 1:". All other captions
(for figures and tables) are showing correctly, in portuguese, both in Lyx
a
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" írta:
[long snip]
>There used to be support files for Linotype Palatino (which is a commercial
>font which you have to purchase from Linotype) by Walter Schmidt
>[1].
I can hardly believe that NIH requires exactly Palatino Linotype if it is a
commercial font and has to be
The information I was able to find on the subject was murky, and
left it unclear (at least for me) whether the two fonts are the
same.
However, I did compile my document with Palatino, and it was nearly
as economical (in terms of space) as Times New Roman.
I read so
On 05/03/2013 1:29 PM, celano wrote:
*book.layout* includes *stdclass.inc* which includes *stdciteformats.inc*
*
*I use lyx 2.0.3 under linux-debian-wheezy (testing)
I'm using the book style.
*
*Exporting from lyx to opendocument, I observe that the CiteFormat from
stdciteformats.inc is not resp
Hi John!
I deeply search into my problem and find out that by adding the line
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3} in the preamble solves the problem of no section in
TOC. But I have no good results in adding some pictures in front page, I have
solved this by making the front in another document and forg
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
>>
>> No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
>> version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
>> which is a script: "usage: %prog [options] [file]". Opt
*book.layout* includes *stdclass.inc* which includes *stdciteformats.inc*
*
*I use lyx 2.0.3 under linux-debian-wheezy (testing)
I'm using the book style.
*
*Exporting from lyx to opendocument, I observe that the CiteFormat from
stdciteformats.inc is not respected in the bibliography, and the st
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >> For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file
> >> in your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the
> >> same), it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 11:29:30 schrieb ehud.kap...@gmail.com:
> I suspect that the Palatino that appears in the font list is NOT the
> same as Palatino Linotype, especially in terms of spacing-- it takes
> less space than Georgia, which uses less space than Helvetica or Arial.
> When I try to
>
> You can copy the lyx2lyx script (or directory of scripts) from the
> development version (2.1) to the stable one. Then, 2.0 will be able to
> open 2.1 files with auto-conversion.
good to know!
converting larger documents with lyx2lyx takes quite some time!
Wolfgang
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:20 AM, ehud.kap...@gmail.com wrote:
> Since NIH now wants us to use Palatino Linotype (among several other, uglier
> fonts), I tried to find it in the Lyx font list, but could only find
> Palatino, which is apparently different from Palatino Linotype. Where can I
> find P
I suspect that the Palatino that appears in the font list is NOT the
same as Palatino Linotype, especially in terms of spacing-- it takes
less space than Georgia, which uses less space than Helvetica or Arial.
When I try to use the URW Palladino that appears in the list, I get the
error message:
On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
filename filename should work.
Mind
On 2013-03-05, ehud.kap...@gmail.com wrote:
> Since NIH now wants us to use Palatino Linotype (among several other,
> uglier fonts), I tried to find it in the Lyx font list, but could only
> find Palatino, which is apparently different from Palatino Linotype.
> Where can I find Palatino Linoty
Please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatino first.
URW Palladio that you see in Lyx is a clone of Palatino (Linotype).
On 03/05/2013 10:20 AM, ehud.kap...@gmail.com wrote:
Since NIH now wants us to use Palatino Linotype (among several other,
uglier fonts), I tried to find it in the Lyx fo
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 09:51:26 schrieb _B25:
> I have a problem with numbered examples from the Linguistics package.
> Whenever I insert one, I cannot preview my doc anymore. It works fine
> again, when I delete the example. But previewing a file w/ just one
> numbered example will result in th
Hi there,
I have a problem with numbered examples from the Linguistics package. Whenever I
insert one, I cannot preview my doc anymore. It works fine again, when I delete
the example. But previewing a file w/ just one numbered example will result in
the pdf viewer running incessantly with no outpu
On 2013-03-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>> > former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
>> LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. Ho
On 04 Mar 2013, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
> experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
> squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
> /etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
> I
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 09:29:13 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> yes, I could and did. However, I have quite a lot of lyx files created by
> the 2.1 version and was hoping the lyx2lyx would already contain the
> conversion 2.1 to 2.0, so that I could run a batch. But, if I understand
> correctly
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> > former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
>
> LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
> format is consta
23 matches
Mail list logo
