The information I was able to find on the subject was murky, and
left it unclear (at least for me) whether the two fonts are the
same. However, I did compile my document with Palatino, and it was nearly as economical (in terms of space) as Times New Roman. I read somewhere that Palatino Linotype took up MORE space than Times New Roman, which is why I suspect that P. Linotype is not the same as Palatino, even though the letter shapes might be similar. NIH probably chose P. Linotype precisely because it allows you to put fewer words on the page than, say, Times New Roman, to protect the sanity of the poor reviewers. Ehud On 03/05/2013 12:15 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
--
Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D. Jules and Doris Stein Research to Prevent Blindness Professor Director, The laboratory of Visual & Computational Neuroscience Director, Center for Excellence in Computational & Systems Neuroscience Friedman Brain Institute Departments of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Structural & Chemical Biology, The Ichan school of medicine at Mount Sinai One Gustave Levy Place, NY, NY, 10029 |
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx PhilipPirrip
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx Guenter Milde
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx ehud.kap...@gmail.com
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx Jürgen Spitzmüller
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx Csikos Bela
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx Wolfgang Engelmann
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx Bruce Pourciau
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx EK
- Re: Palatino linotype in Lyx Niklas Huldén