Changing labels

2001-03-09 Thread Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá
Hi guys, How can I change label figure for graphics, because sometimes we've graphics instead of figures. Thanks, Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá -- clarkagjcris

changes standard wording?

2001-03-09 Thread Hisyam
Hi Folks! Sorry for asking simple questions! I'm writing an artical using (i) class: article (AMS), (ii) Language: bahasa. I change these under Document Layout. The problem are when I select Abstract, I get RINGKASAN. What I really what is ABSTRAK. Second, when I select Biblography, I get P

i.e.\ serached

2001-03-09 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hello, in LaTeX I often wrote i.e.\ something to avoid a big space after the dot. Is there a lyx equivalent or do I have to switch in latex mode? Thanks. Rainer.

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
Allan (Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) had mentioned the solution: The new tabular code can't handle CR (\r)! Although I have tried to remove them within Win32 (maybe I had made anything wrong;-)) using vim, another test in Linux makes all things as expected! Conclusion: Removing those CR

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:50:26AM -0500, Al Freed wrote: > In the section heading of this short file is an equation that calls a > couple of macros defined > in the LaTeX preamble. > > Any help in resolving this is greatly appreciated. Put \protect before \overset in the definition of \Jaumann,

Intermediate poll results

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
There have been 27 responses so far (not bad, given that the poll has been running just a few hours...) Currently I count two proprietary compilers, that I can't classify (yet), one 2.7.*, two 2.8.*, four egcs*, the remaining 2.95 and above or precompiled binaries from various sources. >From the

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Arthaber Holger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | just for additional information: the document I am working | > has about 25 | > | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a | > postscript | > | file. | > | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. | > | > What's the sum wit

Re: Poll --- Compiler usage

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Moreover, it would be nice if we could get a general picture of how people > get their LyX: Whether they use pre-compiled packages or compile themselves > and if so, what compilers are used. i always use the latest suse with the forelast linux-version (now 2.2.18) and i

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Claus Hentschel wrote: > > I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx > 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems > regardless where they have been written! all worked well with 1.2.0cvs and linux 2.2.18 with suse. exactly the same a

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
> | just for additional information: the document I am working > has about 25 > | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a > postscript > | file. > | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. > > What's the sum with all the graphics? document: 174kB ps/latex: 254kB ps-sca

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I feel 45 s is clearly inacceptable so _I_ would not mind to replace the | lyxsum with a "good ol' C implementation" which should be reasonably fast | in all cases. It would not do much harm to our "new style C++ code" since | it is restricted to a sing

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more | > knowledgeable in STL than I am. | | The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an | item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a | p

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Arthaber Holger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | just for additional information: the document I am working has about 25 | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a postscript | file. | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. What's the sum with all the graphics? Lgb

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:34:42AM +0100, Claus Hentschel wrote: > I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx > 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems > regardless where they have been written! Your table2.lyx file shows up perfect

Re: Including files into a masterdocument

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 03:43:15PM +0100, Marco Bosch wrote: > Hello, > > I'm writing my thesis using different lyx-files for different chapters. > In lyx 1.1.5 it works OK. However, in lyx 1.1.6fix1 I get the message > > ERROR: Cannot handle include file `~/file.lyx' which has textclass > `book

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
> > Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more > > knowledgeable in STL than I am. > > The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while > handling an > item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a > problem... It does not look like I have

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more > knowledgeable in STL than I am. The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a problem... This is basically a tradeoff between speed a

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Al Freed wrote: > In the section heading of this short file is an equation that calls a > couple of macros defined > in the LaTeX preamble. maybe that you need the formula in the section-title and standard-style is not possible. for this reason look at attached file. Herbert -- [EMAIL PROTECT

table within endnotes

2001-03-09 Thread Ronald Florence
Bad form to answer my own query, but after enough fiddling I discovered that the secret to getting complex ERT commands like a table to work inside an \addtoendnotes{} for endnotes.sty is a liberal use of \protect. My little table required 3: \mainmatter \addtoendnotes{ \protect\begin{t

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Al Freed wrote: > > Lars Gullik Bjønnes requested that I ask the LaTeX gurus in this users > group if they could > solve this bug (see attached bug-adf.lyx file) which produces the > following error message: > >TeX capacity exceeded > >input stack_size = 300 in 99% it's not an error wh

LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Al Freed
Hi, Lars Gullik Bjønnes requested that I ask the LaTeX gurus in this users group  if they could solve this bug  (see attached bug-adf.lyx file) which produces the following error message: >    TeX capacity exceeded >    input stack_size = 300 I edited texmf.cnf increasing it several time all the

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The problem is a bad version of the sstream library on your machine (or on | the machine where the binary was compiled). | If you compiled LyX yourself, you might try installing a pre-compiled | binary, or try to recompile using the --with-included-string

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:49:00AM +0100, Arthaber Holger wrote: > Hi folks! > > Since I added some scanned pictures to my LyX-document the > compilation takes very long. (I am not sure but I think that this > effect started appearing after this) > > For example if I use the 'Show/DVI' from LyX

table within endnotes

2001-03-09 Thread Ronald Florence
I need to insert a table at the beginning of the endnotes of a book. What I want to end up with is something like Abbreviations AAE Archives des Affaires Étrangeres, Quai d'Orsay, Paris APT Turquie: Affaires Diverses FO Foreign Office Archives, PRO, L

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | >> > Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, | >> > or does this happen just once? | >> | >> If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Claus Hentschel wrote: > > Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' > > like the old file reader did. > > > > Allan. (ARRae) > > > You mean it's due to the different newline behaviour in DOS/WIN32 and > UNUX/Linux, right? > > I do have changed t

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, >> > or does this happen just once? >> >> If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to >> the document i can reduce the time to 13 seconds until x

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Pierre.Chretien
>>From: "Claus Hentschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "Allan Rae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Cc: "\(LyX-Users\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? >>Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:21:05 +0100 >> >>> Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' >>

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
> Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' > like the old file reader did. > > Allan. (ARRae) You mean it's due to the different newline behaviour in DOS/WIN32 and UNUX/Linux, right? I do have changed the file (using vi on Win32) from fileformat=dos to fileformat

Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1

2001-03-09 Thread John Levon
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: > - You need valid Linux kernel headers (!) which are included within > the xforms test within configure. Having no proper includes in > /usr/src/linux will result in a complaint about a non-working xforms > lib. > > HTH > Frank Just to clarify, th

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Allan Rae
Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file reader did. Allan. (ARRae)

What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems regardless where they have been written! Now I have many problems with tables in 1) newly created files, i.e. with 1.1.6fix1 2) some old file

Poll --- Compiler usage

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Dear all, as you probably know LyX can currently be compiled with g++ 2.8.1 and later as well as with a few proprietary compilers. g++ 2.8.1 does not support some features that some developers would like to use. Currently there is a discussion on lyx-devel on whether it is sensible to drop supp

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
just a quick summary of the times measured: One LaTeX-Run + XDVI-startup Three LaTeX-Runs + XDVI-startup LxY13s45s Shell script <2s<5s Holger

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
> > Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, > > or does this happen just once? > > If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to the > document i can reduce the time to 13 seconds until xdvi pops up. This probably mean that 32 seconds have been used f