I'm experiencing consistent failures and core dumps using the keyboard to
access sub-menu items in LyX 1.3.2 using the qt front-end.
For example:
alt-I (Insert)
brings up the first menu, but then
alt-S (Special Character)
fails to bring up the submenu. Nothing happens. In
Is there no one else who can address this?
Is LyX 1.3.2 -- including the qt front-end code -- considered finished,
in the can, a part of the past, with the obvious focus on 1.4.0cvs?
Is qt-3.1.2 not the right version? Or is the qt front-end for LyX still not
suited to serious usage?
On Thu, Jun
I've sent the backtrace to Alfredo. Any body else want it?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:03:03PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is there no one else who can address this?
>
> qt version? lyx compiled by yourself or specific rpm?
> I cannot reproduce it, and it's
Interesting. Running under GDB, the error not only crashes LyX, it causes the
KDE window manager to lock up, and it doesn't seem recoverable.
That means I can't run, cut and paste "bt" easily.
However, the following line appears under gdb at the time of the crash:
Program received signa
In a LyX document, you cannot insert the raw latex command
\setcounter{enumi}{3} (for example)
into any position where it will change the label of the first enumerated point
in a list.
If you insert it before the first point, which is outside the list environment,
it has no effect.
No one has any ideas???
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:50:55AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Interesting. Running under GDB, the error not only crashes LyX, it causes the
> KDE window manager to lock up, and it doesn't seem recoverable.
>
> That means I can't run, cut and paste "bt" easily.
>
>
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:25:26PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> You may need to issue
> ulimit -c unlimited
> to enable core dumps.
>
> Then do
> gdb core.PID lyx
> and then please post the output of 'bt' to the list.
Alfredo:
Thanks for the brief tutorial.
Here is the bt:
(gdb) bt
#0
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:42:57PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> This is entirely within Qt, we have no control over it. Possible causes
> are a compiler bug or some weird library mismatch.
Be that as it may, it is endemic to redhat 9, as updated by redhat's
own update rpms. A rather widely used
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:09:38PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Why aren't we seeing lots of reports then ?
Hop on over to lyx-users. You'll see reports also by:
Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Also, if you didn't notice, here on lyx-devel, it's a
Hmm. I have lots of functioning qt apps under 3.1.2 with submenu navigation by
keyboard shortcuts, but a broken LyX in this regard. Does the LyX qt frontend
do something unusual, triggering this bug?
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:12:49AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Fernando Perez wrote:
>
- Forwarded message from "Micha H. Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Micha H. Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Universität Freiburg
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LyX-Problem
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:07:34 +0200
Hello Larry,
I have the same
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:32:36AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> Not that I am aware of. Have your qt apps all been complied against the same
> qt version than LyX?
Well, as you've found some evidence of this in the qt/kde community and other
apps, apparently not.
Can anyone assemble
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Some context: Ruurd would like us to distribute this port (the binaries for
> now), but this is only possible if we change our license to explicitly allow
> for linking against Qt non-commercial binary-only version.
Unless I'
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:16:31AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> > The problem here is not with the GPL, but with the Troll Tech business model and
> > licensing practices, which puts open source applications under the GPL in this
> > untenable position if developers wish to release Windows version
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:25:58PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> This isn't true: the licensing scheme is clearly documented. We were and
> are well aware of its drawbacks.
I didn't exactly start questioning the QT effort yesterday, as you well know.
No one would doubt your understanding of the d
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 07:47:59PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Sorry, your head is stuck in the ground ...
> It's frankly a waste of my time ...
> You obviously have no conception ...
> You're making statements. You're not actually saying anything...
> You're arguing against a chimera I'm afraid .
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:04:14AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> larry> I was rather shrill about the QT effort, in particular. In
> larry> light of Trolltech's dual support for Unix and Windows, the QT
> larry> frontend has always seemed destined to run ag
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:15:08AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> [...] is bad because people might break the rules?
Any situation that predictibly makes violations of the GPL into standard
practice is, indeed, bad. That's an indictment of Troll Tech's practices, not
LyX or QT development by a
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:37:45AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> So what you are actually proposing is that the current developers or
> whoever distributes LyX (including Kayvan, the Linux distributors etc)
> take some legal risk just for the benefit of a random Windows user that's
> neither abl
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:05:23AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Because LyX without the 'GUII effort' and further cleanups is in a state
> where adding new features is very difficult. Moreover, even if adding a
> new feature turns out to be possible it most likely adds to the current
> mess and
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:33:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I've been using LyX for six years now, and I find
>
> - Layout -> Document
> - Layout -> Paragraph
> - Layout -> Character
>
> very logical now.
Interestingly, over my many years of using LyX, I've watched other word
proc
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:49:06PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Fundamental changes sometimes cause problems during periods of
> transition. This does not necessarily imply the change is bad.
Of course not.
But as an infrequent observer over a period of years, it's really striking to
see that
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:45:42PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think you are now fudding all over the place.
What I find most remarkable about this discussion, Lars, is the emails I've
received from sympathetic readers who don't want to have to deal with the
"ramifications" of posting th
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:10:54AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Do you have any examples? Be as specific as you can.
Kayvan, I returned to evaluate whether to jump back into the LyX effort over a
period of weeks and months (as I said in one of my first postings in 2003).
Those focused on GU
ERT can play an important role in creating templates, allowing for insertion of
raw LaTeX at key points throughout a document.
However, for inexperienced users using a template, it may be important that
items of LaTeX be "locked", so they may not be casually erased.
In fact, I would find this v
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:06:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:40:45AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > However, for inexperienced users using a template, it may be important that
> > items of LaTeX be "locked", so they may not be casually erased.
>
> But I don't
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:18:21AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Therefore an alternative proposal: what about introducing an inset --
> we could call it InsetProtected -- that protects everything inside it
> from deletion? A little easier to code on the document level. And the
> thing remains
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> You have so far provided a lot of statements about the development of
> lyx and the lack of new features, about what has been done to the code
> and not, and what we have lost because of the drive for GUII.
I've certainly sa
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:10:54PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Some content from Larry ! :)
Very funny, John.
> Any permutation is a distribution of some kind. This change in
> particular reflects the general move to an object-verb interface instead
> of a verb-object inte
What do you propose be done if someone builds and posts binaries somewhere
else? Which is inevitable.
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:23:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > Well, distributing the sources of the native version without the
> > binaries is really hypocritical, I think. If these sou
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:12:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> And _who_ are you to tell people what they should use their spare time
> on?
>
> Put up or shut up, you are really beginning to annoy me now.
Making fundamental UI changes, for functions that have been around for
what, six
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:19:03AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> ERTs that is part of a paragraph _must_ be deleted if the paragraph as
> a whole is deleted.
>
> ERTs that is a paragraph of its own might need to be locked.
Well, I suppose one could disqualify deletion of a block of text
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And there are two things here:
> - locking the contents of the instet from alteration
> - making the inset be indeletable.
>
> I have sympathy with the first one, I have problems with the second
> one.
>From th
Editing text, if you insert hit a "space" at the end of a word (with other
words already typed after it), then cntrl-right arrow to jump forward one word,
then you are left with 2x blank spaces in the text which persist.
I imagine this is buggy behavior.
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:51:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> - feature requests
As I said, over a period of weeks and months, if I decide to become more
involved, I'll sift through my old archives and attempt to reintroduce some of
the nifty but long-abandoned historical ideas/ambitions
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:22:53AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> With templates we can have a .layout keyword. For documents in general,
> either the change tracking, or the standard Undo/Revert stuff will do
> IMO.
Not sure I get your point about .layout.
The problem I'm thinking about is the
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:15:49AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Whilst this is true, it would only make real sense to keep with a worse menu
> layout if we expect the total number of current users to forever exceed the
> total number of new users plus the total number of users who switch.
Gadzook
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:53:55AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If it canot be said out in the open... is it then worth saying?
> (as long as it concerns lyx?)
Certainly, the LyX community should strive for an open atmosphere inviting of
comment and feedback, where such an ethos can predo
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:48:17PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Then get a source control system, and use it...
That's rich.
Unfortunately, I've put LyX in the hands of some less-than-power users.
> Why does using minipage instead of ERT directly provide *any* extra
> protection ? You've los
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:43:54PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:52:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> You don't need to be a power user to use source control, and depending
> on your circumstances, the user may not even need to see the SCS at all
True, but it wouldn
gt; > > exceed the total number of new users plus the total number of users who
> > > switch.
> > Larry Marso wrote:
> > Gadzooks! The greatest good for the greatest number? Strict
> > utilitarianism!
>
> If it weren't for the utilitarian value of
Kuba responded to three of my postings on this thread. Please Lars, can I
write a brief response without you trying to reignite a week-old flame war?
As to your request for specifics, I haven't decided whether it's worth the
effort to dredge up and advocate past ambitious proposals, a subset of
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 02:53:19AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Blue underlining means different language (and you can turn it off if
> you like)
I see what is happening.
British and American language specified documents are shared among our offices.
Cutting and pasting between them is triggering
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:53:14AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> | As to your request for specifics, I haven't decided whether it's worth the
> | effort to dredge up and advocate past ambitious proposals, a subset of which
> | have been outlined on this list ove
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:15:26PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> ...Preferences->Lang Opts>Language>Mark foreign <>
Thanks. Couldn't find that one. With this available, the function
certainly makes sense.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:39:48AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> >, it is desired that LyX should automatically change the language of
> > the copied text to American, and then the user should fix the spelling.
>
> And what if it's *not* intended to be a single-language document ? You
> just broke
Would it be possible to create a user preference item that would cause
spellchecker to always review the entire document, instead of from the current
cursor position to the end of the document?
I can't remember a single time I've ever wanted to use spellchecker, the way
that it currently works. E
How going from the current cursor position to the end, asking whether to
"continue from beginning?", then continuing until back to where you started.
That's the typical behavior of word processors, I believe.
Is that where LyX is headed?
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 06:19:13PM +0100, John Levon wro
Thanks! Macros can change the game considerably, I see.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to create a user preference item that would cause
> > spellchecker to always review the entire
Is it insets in general? I have some ERT insets inside minipage insets, and
they're darned slow at the moment. Quite speedy last week.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:54:54PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Andre, what is the source of the table slowness at the moment ?
>
> Just trying to catch up
>
Hello LyX developers. Long time no see.
I haven't kept close tabs on the External Inset discussions. But I was
wondering whether it might be used to support external *text* files.
Sometimes I'm struggling incessantly over a paragraph (or two or three) of
simple text -- no formatting -- and pref
Thank you very much for your comprehensive answer Angus. Recent
development seems promising.
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:54:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > More broadly, is LyX capable of calling the appropriate editing
> > program (according to MIME conventions) by clicking on the inset
>
Is anonymous cvs available again? From where?
Best Regards.
cceed 1.1.5fix in all respects? Has there been
any loss of momentum? Is it possible that this is becoming another
development path that has bitten off more than it can chew? Just my 2
cents.
Best Regards,
Larry Marso
Some of us recall wistfully the adaption of a 1.0 vintage LyX from
xforms to QT in "a week" (or some other ridiculously short period of
time, was the claim) by one of the original core developers and, if I
recall correctly, one other gentleman.
I can't help but wonder whether GUI "independence" i
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 06:56:53PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> > I can't help but wonder whether GUI "independence" is a worthwhile
> > goal, verses the selection of an alternative toolkit, warts and all.
>
> I suggest you go back, and read approximately 3-4000 messages on this topic.
> I'm not
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:49:16PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> Well, the developers seem to be holding the opinion that GUI
> independence is a good idea, and since we hold the steering wheel, we
> have the last say. I don't mean it in the dictatorial way ...
At least you have offered some amus
> - Forwarded message from Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Now imagine having LyX on Windows. All these people would be happy and
> there is quite a few of them. Add to that group potential users from non
> scientific community, say writers, who want to have a nice interface fo
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 09:31:05AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> Why does it matter to you to use KDE and not Xforms? What is so
> pressing, so important that the GUI will be done in some other toolkit
> now and not in XForms?
If you are attributing a preference to KDE to me, you're mistaken.
I
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 03:44:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I suppose I should make it clear that IMHO Larry has some very good
> points. I just don't see the point in another debate that will change
> nothing.
>
> And I don't agree with him on everything; in particula
My concern is more that many of the ridiculous quests relate to support
for an out-of-date toolkit or, lord help us, GUII.
Aren't these distractions interrelated?
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 07:59:57PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > -
y
wrong".
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:37:19AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> > The struggling of the "insets" and tabular efforts
> > disturbs me, particularly if it's related to the choice of toolkits or
> > the GUII movement.
>
> Sorry Larry
Jeez. This kind of language is not what I expected from this list. I
guess I was wrong to expect civil discussion. Frankly, this is not
the list it used to be.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 04:28:50PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Get over it ...
> Secondly, you can't force people to wo
While I am thankful for your effort, I would hope you don't want
my appreciation in the form of silence when I have questions.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:07:43AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> P.S.: And I did realize the ERT inset for you Larry, didn't I #:O)
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 05:28:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> In all your "questions" and statements so far you make _a lot_ of
> false assumptions, resulting in coming of as offensive towards the
> people doing the actual work.
I believe my questions have been fairly stated as questions
You took my statement completely out of context.
I made this statement only after careful discussion over several e-mails
of the fact that it is *NOT* clear -- at least to me -- whether xforms
is, in fact weighing down LyX in this way. And after reference to a few
claims by others that it may be
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 06:40:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Hmm this was also one thing that bugged me... We, The LyX Team, have
> so far had/done _no_ efforts to provide the Windows port. All testing
> and support has been done outside of core team.
> The Windows port is just a bonu
Look pretty good, but why is everything double spaced?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:25:51AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> The emporers new clothes are awaiting your perusal and (hopefully)
> your approval at:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/
>
> XHTML1-Strict and CSS2 are the order of the day.
>
> T
Are ascii format archives (plzzeee not html)
of the lyx mailing lists available anywhere?
Best regards
--
lsm
I can't seem to get Math in display mode with labels of "#", for
use with package{reqno}, to work since LyX-1.2.
In fact, I can't seem to enter labels at all for Math in display mode.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "larry" == larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> larry> I can't seem to get Math in display mode with labels of "#",
> larry> for use with package{reqno}, to work since LyX-1.2.
>
> larry> In
I have a large number of documents in which "#" is the label for
every formula contained therein. I believe that I've used this
label because it is a documented standard label for the package
"reqno" if you want to insert no content, just obtain an automatic
numeric designation for the formula in
A change in math mode has rendered unusable a large number of my
documents from the 1.0.4 days.
The difficulty lies with the uses of {cases} in math mode.
I'm attaching a mocked up sample that works great in 1.0.4 and is
horribly broken in 1.1.5.
Thank you.
-lsm
#This file was created by Tu
Thank you very much. This is a complete solution.
It's a pleasure participating in such an informed, responsive
community of users and developers.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 08:47:22PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> The problem here is that you use the \cases command incorrectly. You should
> hav
When my computer is even slightly overtasked, and particularly when
I'm making changes to the middle of existing lines, LyX seems to
*lose* any character that the computer is not capable of writing
immediately after I type it because of system constraints.
I'm using 1.1.5cvs.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:32:35AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You mean 1.1.6cvs, right?
Maybe. I've just been running "cvs update" in my 1.1.5cvs directory.
larry@second lyx-1_1_5>ls
ABOUT-NLS Makefile acconfig.h configure*lyx.1
ANNOUNCE
No, it's more broad that that. I can be typing whole words of
different characters and just get two or three of them.
I've never seen this before in any version of lyx. And I'm a,
shall we say, passionate user.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 03:50:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 08:28:02PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> The LyX Development Team is pleased to announce LyX 1.0.1 and refute the claim
> that there is no open source word processor! Here (www.lyx.org) is a full
//<- "no first rate open source word processor"
> featured
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 08:56:07AM -0600, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> Particularly, the first page head is longer than the later heads. I
> need to set the \textheight to the unused portion of the page, as latex
> seems to be calculating it before the headers are made.
Here's some code
Yes, a remarkable achievement. Just did the most usable conversion ever
of a large, highly formatted document.
However, one of my documents died during conversion with:
gawk: lyx2mml.gawk:464: (FILENAME=Briefing2.lyx FNR=450) fatal: function
`markerorxref_out' not defined
> > From: [EMAIL PRO
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 11:10:52PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> I don't recall anyone telling us about this review.
> Dated Feb 15. by Jeremy "Unknwn" Katz on LyX-1.0
>
> http://linuxpower.org/display_item.phtml?id=103
>
> Fairly short review, recommends reading tutorial and the author feels LyX
On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 10:38:27AM +0100, Frank de Lange wrote:
> tabbed notebook for all Layout properties
> (Character, Paragraph, Document, Paper & Quotes), in contrast to KLyX's (and
> Lyx's) separate dialogs for all these items. but maybe the general consensus
> is to keep Lyx's interface co
On Sun, Apr 04, 1999 at 10:56:26AM -0700, Christopher Shamis wrote:
> The title page of the Article Class (with "heading" style enabled) keeps
> putting a "1" at the bottom, I don't think I need a page number on my
> title page. :-) So how do I get rid of it?
You can certainly place raw lat
How about a GUI interface menu item, under Layout->Document, permitting you
to specify a file containing a preamble you want to import?
That's more desirable than having to manually write out the preamble, or
the import statement, in Layout->LaTeX Preamble.
In fact, if you specify the one, perha
Keep up the fantastic work, Garst. You're doing some of the most important
development work for LyX, don't ever think otherwise.
On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 03:17:01PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Today a professional screen-writer friend stopped by and looked at LyX
> with both broadway and holl
Maybe also "typewriter" screen font by default.
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 09:26:57PM -0400, John Weiss wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 06:14:51PM +0200, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> >
> > I think the preamble should be an inset, like Allan suggested. But
> > if it is empty, it's not visible! I
We receive inquiries here regularly from persons interested in porting LyX
to another toolkit. We tell them that toolkit independence is a goal of
the development effort, but that no one is working on a, e.g., Gtk port
right now.
For full disclosure, I suppose it bears mentioning that the first
In pre2, I notice that navigation by ToC is limited by Section Number
Depth, rather than ToC Depth. Is this intentional?
If you have Section Number Depth of 1, but ToC of 2, cl
LyX (and of course LaTeX) just hyphenated:
>models
into:
>model-
>s
--
-lsm
I am often hacking away at preamble or included files, then want to prompt
LyX to run LyX for an update.
It seems that, sometime in recent versions, more "intelligence" was
introduced to LyX's detection of whether changes have been made to the
text. Now, instead of just hitting the space bar har
I'm using LyX-1.0.3pre2.
Again, LyX recently eeems "too intelligent" to easily convince it to
re-run LaTeX. I have a huge preamble, which I modify using vi and
simply include. I have other included files. Making changes to these,
I used to be able to hit a spacebar on the LyX window (followed
I don't recall.
For a complex table is it possible to feed LyX the *whole* LaTeX
\begin{tablular} parameter file, with customized Array Package entries
for multiple columns?
It is much too difficult to keep things straight, maintain perspective
and make changes if I have to input each column's
Regarding borders.
When you designate certain cells of the first row of a table as
Multicolumn, then try and delete the left vertical lines (and right?) of
any particular box, LyX displays that the entire column's left vertical
line has been removed. However, LyX generates the right LaTeX code,
Delete row works properly. Delete row five, and you can hit Delete Row
again and delete row six.
Not so with Delete Column. After you delete column 8, hit Delete Column
again and you delete column 1.
--
-lsm
I need some basic information. Because I'm experiencing serious
instability with LyX1.0.3, and I want to report meaningful debug
information to the list.
LyX is sigfaulting often during some reasonably sophisticated work with
tables. It's a proprietary document, so I can't simply post the conte
If the user opens an emergency saved document after the "truncated"
warning, but opens it anyway (to search for recoverable work), the
autosave feature should be disabled.
As it stands now, if you have a brief autosave period, the truncated file
writes over the autosaved file. If you open the a
I'm having difficulty installing the latest lyx on a RH 5.2 box.
All looks fine during the compile and installation. But, upon running, I
get:
larry@second>lyx
LyXTextClassList::Read: unable to find textclass file `~/'.
Exiting.
LyXSetStyle: an error occured d
In a LyX file, there is some ERT which I have centered using LyX's
paragraph layout controls.
At one point, I decided to put "%" at the beginning of the ERT, so that it
would not be processed and save time in drafts.
Well, it seems that the centered paragraph layout of this "%"ed bit of
ERT blee
I have two minipages alongside each other that I'd like positioned:
|--hfill--| minipage 1 - minpage 2 |--hfill--|
They're alongside each other fine, but not centered, whatever LyX command I
use. Layout paragraph center doesn't work, hfills don't work.
Alas, you must fall back to ERT: \begin{c
I am modifying external included .tex files extensively using 1.03.
It's very frustrating, because the "intelligent" decision about whether to
*really* run LaTeX when I tell it to "update Postscript" is still failing
to examine properly whether I've changed my included files. This has been
a con
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
