On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:06:43PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 23.11.2021 um 21:35 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I think I found another instance of this issue. To reproduce, open
> > the attached file and do spellcheck. "abcxyz" is misspelled, but if
> > you click on "
Am Dienstag, dem 23.11.2021 um 21:35 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I think I found another instance of this issue. To reproduce, open
> the attached file and do spellcheck. "abcxyz" is misspelled, but if
> you click on "ignore all" it goes to the next instance of that word.
>
> I think the issu
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 09:40:21AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 16:04 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > I've just tested it and it is working well. I will enjoy using this
> > > feature fo
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 16:04 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I've just tested it and it is working well. I will enjoy using this
> > feature for my personal use. A few comments, although I understand if
> > you don't
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 16:04 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I've just tested it and it is working well. I will enjoy using this
> feature for my personal use. A few comments, although I understand if
> you don't have time these days:
Yes, and I fear this will be true for quite a while.
en Spitzmueller
> > > Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
> > >
> > > Meet per-document spelling dictionaries (fixes #86 [sic!])
> >
> > Great news!
>
> Well done! I look forward to testing this feature.
I've just tested it and it is work
n
>>> exception includes.
>>> What happens if you actually revert 07122f066b43 verbatim?
>>
>> The same. :(
>> Attached is the revert patch I’ve used to test.
>
> To come closer to the original I've moved the location of the spellignore()
> retri
tim?
>
> The same. :(
> Attached is the revert patch I’ve used to test.
To come closer to the original I've moved the location of the spellignore()
retrieval (patch attached). Same exception.
Please consider the fact that I check the spelling of the german Intro.lyx.
The bparams.spe
Am 08.03.2021 um 14:32 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Are you sure you did not errorneously flagged one of bisect steps wrongly?
>>
>> My HEAD is ahead of origin by 4 commits (including the manual reversion -
>> diff attached).
>
> 07
Am Mo., 8. März 2021 um 14:34 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> So "Ignore all" has now different schematics?
>
Yes, "Ignore" and "Ignore All" have changed semantics, as the ignorance
will now persist beyind session.
"Skip" is old "Ignore" (just skip this match without actually ignoring it),
"Skip All
tzmueller
> >> Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
> >>
> >>Meet per-document spelling dictionaries (fixes #86 [sic!])
> >
> > Is this option supposed to pop up at the spellcheck pane?
> > I do not see the corresponding button here???
>
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Are you sure you did not errorneously flagged one of bisect steps wrongly?
>
> My HEAD is ahead of origin by 4 commits (including the manual reversion -
> diff attached).
07122f066b43 and your reversion is not identical - I see se
Am 08.03.2021 um 12:18 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
>> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
>> Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
>>
>>Mee
Am 08.03.2021 um 12:14 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:14:13AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 08.03.2021 um 07:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
To reproduce I
1. Open the Help -> Intro.
>
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
>
> Meet per-document spelling dictionaries (fixes #86 [sic!])
Is this option suppos
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:14:13AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 08.03.2021 um 07:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> >
> > Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> >> To reproduce I
> >>
> >> 1. Open the Help -> Intro.
> >> 2. Boom.
> >
> > Is it related to the darkmode
Am 08.03.2021 um 07:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> To reproduce I
>>
>> 1. Open the Help -> Intro.
>> 2. Boom.
>
> Is it related to the darkmode runtime switch we recently added? You
> backtrace points towards that code regi
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> To reproduce I
>
> 1. Open the Help -> Intro.
> 2. Boom.
Is it related to the darkmode runtime switch we recently added? You
backtrace points towards that code region.
In any case, you can try bisecting.
Jürgen
signature.asc
D
Am 07.03.2021 um 20:08 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
>> Am 07.03.2021 um 19:09 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>>
>> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:58 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>>> From the dictionary.
>>
>> Thanks. Cannot reproduce. Can you try to dig in deeper?
>
> How? The exception comes from „
> Am 07.03.2021 um 19:09 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:58 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> From the dictionary.
>
> Thanks. Cannot reproduce. Can you try to dig in deeper?
How? The exception comes from „outer space“ …
This is the program output:
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:58 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> From the dictionary.
Thanks. Cannot reproduce. Can you try to dig in deeper?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailm
Am 07.03.2021 um 18:50 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:48 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> To reproduce I do:
>>
>> 1. Open the attached document.
>> 2. Remove the second unrrund.
>> 3. Navigate and type some text. Boom.
>
> What do you mean by "remove"? Remove fr
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:48 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> To reproduce I do:
>
> 1. Open the attached document.
> 2. Remove the second unrrund.
> 3. Navigate and type some text. Boom.
What do you mean by "remove"? Remove from the dictionary or delete the
word in the document?
Jürgen
s
Am 07.03.2021 um 18:24 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:55 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> But I'll implement another lfun along this way.
>
> Done.
>
> Jürgen
Thanks.
Is this crash related? Hard to say…
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thre
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:55 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> But I'll implement another lfun along this way.
Done.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-d
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:56 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Or add it to LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE implementation?
I would rather keep the diverse dictionaries separated.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.o
Am 07.03.2021 um 17:55 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:47 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> Yes, there is LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE already.
>
> I find this rather odd, as you have to know a word is in the dictionary
> in order to remove it.
>
> But I'll implement anoth
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:47 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Yes, there is LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE already.
I find this rather odd, as you have to know a word is in the dictionary
in order to remove it.
But I'll implement another lfun along this way.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This i
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:51 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> > It did not come yet AFAIR.
>
> Yes, it was not announced yet.
So we are not in feature freeze.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http:
Am 07.03.2021 um 17:36 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>>> Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to
>>> it?
>>
>> https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Meeting2021-01-11
>
> This only says "A feature and format freeze
Am 07.03.2021 um 17:24 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 16:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> No I don’t want to enhance it *now*. We are in feature-freeze IMO.
>
> Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to it?
>
> (I agree that we should enter
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> > Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to
> > it?
>
> https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Meeting2021-01-11
This only says "A feature and format freeze is coming soon."
It did not come yet AFAIR.
Jürgen
signatu
Am 07.03.2021 um 17:24 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 16:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> No I don’t want to enhance it *now*. We are in feature-freeze IMO.
>
> Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to it?
https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Meetin
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 16:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> No I don’t want to enhance it *now*. We are in feature-freeze IMO.
Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to it?
(I agree that we should enter feature freeze soon, though).
> > > > >
> > I see. Can you try
Am 07.03.2021 um 14:36 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 14:04 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>>> I can't follow you here. Sure it is.
>>
>> IMO it is a new feature.
>
> Where did I claim it isn't?
>
> If you want to enhance it: be invited.
No I don’t want to enhance
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 14:04 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> > I can't follow you here. Sure it is.
>
> IMO it is a new feature.
Where did I claim it isn't?
If you want to enhance it: be invited.
> > > > Also, as you say it is marked correctly after context menu
> > > > action,
> > > > the
Am 07.03.2021 um 13:54 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:45 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> I see more than one problem.
>>
>> 1. The spell checker on Mac is an OS service and there is support for
>> document scope too. Probably this collides with our implementation
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:45 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> I see more than one problem.
>
> 1. The spell checker on Mac is an OS service and there is support for
> document scope too. Probably this collides with our implementation in
> LyX.
Why is this a problem? The implementation I have
Am 07.03.2021 um 13:36 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:24 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> The first document has „unrrund“ in local dictionary and therefore it
>> shouldn’t
>> marked as mis-spelled. On Mac the spellchecker doesn’t check words -
>> it checks
>> para
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:24 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> The first document has „unrrund“ in local dictionary and therefore it
> shouldn’t
> marked as mis-spelled. On Mac the spellchecker doesn’t check words -
> it checks
> paragraphs and so it misses the entries in local dictionary.
>
>
Am 07.03.2021 um 12:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 11:24 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> On Mac it doesn’t work well.
>>
>> 1. Mark a word as ignored per-document.
>> 2. Save it.
>> 3. Close it.
>> 4. Reopen it.
>> 5. The ignored word is misspelled.
>> 6. Open co
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 11:24 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> On Mac it doesn’t work well.
>
> 1. Mark a word as ignored per-document.
> 2. Save it.
> 3. Close it.
> 4. Reopen it.
> 5. The ignored word is misspelled.
> 6. Open context-menu w/o doing any action and close it.
> 7. Word is not mi
>>> Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
>>>
>>> Meet per-document spelling dictionaries (fixes #86 [sic!])
>>
>> Great news!
>
> Well done! I look forward to testing this feature.
On Mac it doesn’t work well.
1. Mark a word as ignored
Le 06/03/2021 à 21:06, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
On Saturday, March 6, 2021 5:52:53 PM WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Don't tempt me. Or a flutter frontend?
JMarc
I suggest instead a probably less known toolkit: xforms. It is a small code
base but the mailing list is still active, the last
On Saturday, March 6, 2021 5:52:53 PM WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Don't tempt me. Or a flutter frontend?
>
> JMarc
I suggest instead a probably less known toolkit: xforms. It is a small code
base but the mailing list is still active, the last messages are from last
December. :-D
--
José
Le 06/03/2021 à 18:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
You are cheating here. Only #88 is available.
If you want, we can reopen 1 and you can add a gtk 4.0 frontend to fix it?
Don't tempt me. Or a flutter frontend?
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailma
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 05:54:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 06/03/2021 à 16:52, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
> > commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
> > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> > Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
> >
> >
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:26:04PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Looks good.
It's in master at ad65f609.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Le 31/10/2016 à 00:48, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I don't often use continuous spellcheck, but I was surprised when I
toggled it and LyX recentered. I am guessing that when users are
scrolling and then toggle it, they do not expect LyX to recenter around
the cursor. What do others think?
The atta
after toggling
continuous spellcheck.
Scott
From a0f58ac0dd1bd1cc75a4562cbfc8b773938fcd42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Kostyshak
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:38:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Do not recenter screen on spelling-continuously
If a user is scrolling and then toggles spellcheck, LyX
Am 26.03.2015 um 10:24 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker :
> #9477: spelling-ignore and spelling-add with only the option crash once
> continuous spelling is enabled.
> -+---
> Reporter: wilsoc5 | Owner: stwitt
> Type: defect
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 29.05.2013 09:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
>
>> Can I change "Postscript" to "PostScript" in all of the manuals?
>
>
> You can change this in all examples and template files, in all Intro,
> Tutorials, the Customization and the Additional.
Am 29.05.2013 09:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Can I change "Postscript" to "PostScript" in all of the manuals?
You can change this in all examples and template files, in all Intro, Tutorials, the Customization
and the Additional. The other manuals (Math, EmbeddedObjects and UserGuide) are cur
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
>> 11/04/2013 04:51, Scott Kostyshak:
>>
>>> From what I understand, "PostScript" is the correct way to write it.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an opinion on this?
>>
>>
>> Why not
7 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Kostyshak
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:47:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Spelling: "Postscript" -> "PostScript"
---
lib/configure.py |6 +++---
lib/doc/EmbeddedObjects.lyx |2 +-
lib/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx
11/04/2013 04:51, Scott Kostyshak:
From what I understand, "PostScript" is the correct way to write it.
Does anyone have an opinion on this?
Why not. If you go this way, "git grep" tells me that there are other
places needing attention.
JMarc
>From what I understand, "PostScript" is the correct way to write it.
Does anyone have an opinion on this?
Scott
From 57122755eec3497c4bbe2215cc71b87be9ef8071 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Kostyshak
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:47:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Spelling
Le 28 janv. 2011 à 15:36, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> Without patch the painting of the misspelled marker isn't correct anymore if
> you enter or leave a word at the end.
> The old isMisspelled check returned true for the position immediately after
> the word end.
> We fixed that with the previous p
Am 28.01.2011 um 15:17 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 28 janv. 2011 à 14:22, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> I did it. I have to check the "do not mark the word at cursor position"
>>> feature again.
>>
>> It has shown the following patch is needed. Ok?
>
> Why not, but what does it fix (besides
Le 28 janv. 2011 à 14:22, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> I did it. I have to check the "do not mark the word at cursor position"
>> feature again.
>
> It has shown the following patch is needed. Ok?
Why not, but what does it fix (besides the cleanup)?
You should update the documentation of Paragraph
Am 28.01.2011 um 08:05 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 28.01.2011 um 00:06 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> Le 27 janv. 2011 à 21:49, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> Yes, it is.
>>> The innermost loop in method RowPainter::paintChars() stops at printable
>>> spaces.
>>> After returning and drawing the m
Am 28.01.2011 um 00:06 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 27 janv. 2011 à 21:49, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Yes, it is.
>> The innermost loop in method RowPainter::paintChars() stops at printable
>> spaces.
>> After returning and drawing the misspelled marker the space is not painted
>> but skipp
Le 27 janv. 2011 à 21:49, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> Yes, it is.
> The innermost loop in method RowPainter::paintChars() stops at printable
> spaces.
> After returning and drawing the misspelled marker the space is not painted
> but skipped.
>
> The normal spell checker stops at word boundaries an
Am 27.01.2011 um 17:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 27/01/2011 17:12, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Am 27.01.2011 um 16:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>>
>>> In a document with spell-as-you-type enabled, type "LyX@". The spell marker
>>> will contain the "@" character, whereas normal spell c
Am 27.01.2011 um 17:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 27/01/2011 17:12, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Am 27.01.2011 um 16:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>>
>>> In a document with spell-as-you-type enabled, type "LyX@". The spell marker
>>> will contain the "@" character, whereas normal spell c
Le 27/01/2011 17:12, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Am 27.01.2011 um 16:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
In a document with spell-as-you-type enabled, type "LyX@". The spell marker will contain the
"@" character, whereas normal spell check will select "LyX" only.
I looked a bit at the code but I do n
Am 27.01.2011 um 16:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> In a document with spell-as-you-type enabled, type "LyX@". The spell marker
> will contain the "@" character, whereas normal spell check will select "LyX"
> only.
>
> I looked a bit at the code but I do not know where to search.
It's my fa
In a document with spell-as-you-type enabled, type "LyX@". The spell
marker will contain the "@" character, whereas normal spell check will
select "LyX" only.
I looked a bit at the code but I do not know where to search.
JMarc
stefano franchi wrote:
> I have not noticed it in the latest release i tried (alpha5), but I did not
> conduct extensive tests, especially with long documents. I will do so and
> report back
Good. Feel free to close the ticket if you are not able to reproduce (it can
always be reopened if the iss
I have not noticed it in the latest release i tried (alpha5), but I did not
conduct extensive tests, especially with long documents. I will do so and
report back
S.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:36 AM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> #6628: Crash on scrolling when continuous spelling enab
Le 12 mars 10 à 14:48, BH a écrit :
Is there an easy way to get enchant to recognize the Mac native
spellchecker?
unfortunately, the code is there but i do notknow how to build it.
jmarc
Is there an easy way to get enchant to recognize the Mac native spellchecker?
BH
On 02/26/10, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>Stefano Franchi wrote:
>> Perhaps the (continuous) spellchecker dislikes funny diacritics?
>
>maybe lyx, being latex pop-cultural derivate, has some philosophical
>difficulties with slavoj's ideas ;p
>
>> Anyways, hope it helps,
>
>for sure, can you please put this
Stefano Franchi wrote:
> Perhaps the (continuous) spellchecker dislikes funny diacritics?
maybe lyx, being latex pop-cultural derivate, has some philosophical
difficulties with slavoj's ideas ;p
> Anyways, hope it helps,
for sure, can you please put this into bugzila with the file which crashes?
ones don't).
Even a document containing just that single word produces a crash if
continuous spelling is turned on. That is, Lyx 2.0 cannot open the one-word
file without crashing. Nothing happens if I turn continuous spelling off
before opening the
Stefano Franchi wrote:
> On 02/24/10, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >Stefano Franchi wrote:
> >> Thanks, John. Here is a backtrace:
> >are you sure you have debugging symbols enabled when you did ./configure?
> >i would expect line numbers to appear in the listing.
> >pavel
>
> Hmm, I must have recompiled
On 02/24/10, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>Stefano Franchi wrote:
>> Thanks, John. Here is a backtrace:
>are you sure you have debugging symbols enabled when you did ./configure?
>i would expect line numbers to appear in the listing.
>pavel
Hmm, I must have recompiled in release mode at some point. Is the
Stefano Franchi wrote:
> Thanks, John. Here is a backtrace:
are you sure you have debugging symbols enabled when you did ./configure?
i would expect line numbers to appear in the listing.
pavel
On 02/24/10, "John McCabe-Dansted" wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Stefano Franchi
>
> wrote:
>> backtrace if someone is willing to teach me how to convince gdb to start
>> lyx with -sysdir and -userdir parameters.
>
> gdb lyx
> run -sysdir my_sys_dir -userdir my_user_dir
>
>Should do
Stefano Franchi wrote:
> Following the recent exchanges on the lyx-user list, I gave the most recent
> version of the SVN code a try (revision 33559) . Unsuccessfully, it turns
> out.
> Lyx crashes while scrolling a very simple document, with the following output
> to console:
Stefano, are you
continuous spelling. I can provide a
backtrace if someone is willing to teach me how to convince gdb to start lyx
with -sysdir and -userdir parameters.
I cannot reproduce the crash with Lyx help documents--only with some of my
own. But I cannot figure out what triggers it.
C
Am Freitag 05 Februar 2010 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Changing de-alt into de_alt makes it work though.
>
> But is wrong. "de-alt" is intentional.
>
> Jürgen
>
Sorry ...
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Changing de-alt into de_alt makes it work though.
But is wrong. "de-alt" is intentional.
Jürgen
s like it were not corectly extracting.
Error: Unable to handle line:
german german "German (old spelling)" false iso8859-15
de-alt ""
Changing de-alt into de_alt makes it work though.
> Vincent
>
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Kornel Benko schreef:
Hi,
this string is (in branch and trunk) used ( in Preferences->Language
Settings->Language->User interface language: ),
but is not part of po-files, thus will not be translated in the GUI.
Kornel
Then you have to do a remerge.
Vincent
Hi,
this string is (in branch and trunk) used ( in Preferences->Language
Settings->Language->User interface language: ),
but is not part of po-files, thus will not be translated in the GUI.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Would be nice if someone could commit them to trunk and branch for 1.6.6
> when it's open again next week.
Thanks. I'll do that if no one beats me to it.
Jürgen
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Would be nice if someone could commit them to trunk and branch for 1.6.6
> when it's open again next week.
in trunk.
pavel
Hi,
while packaging the 1.6.5 release lintian, one the Debian
helpers to check your package, noted some small spelling errors in the
binary. I tried to track them down without fixing them in other places
like comments aswell.
Would be nice if someone could commit them to trunk and branch for
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
> On 5 jun 2009, at 02.59, BH wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it is some regression. Spellchecker is blanked in my Tools-menu
>>> too
>>> with a compilation from yesterday.
>>
>> This sounds like
On 5 jun 2009, at 02.59, BH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
I think it is some regression. Spellchecker is blanked in my Tools-
menu too
with a compilation from yesterday.
This sounds like a different problem: I can launch the spellchecker;
it's just that the spe
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
> I think it is some regression. Spellchecker is blanked in my Tools-menu too
> with a compilation from yesterday.
This sounds like a different problem: I can launch the spellchecker;
it's just that the spellchecker can't find the dictionaries.
I think it is some regression. Spellchecker is blanked in my Tools-
menu too with a compilation from yesterday.
/Anders
On 4 jun 2009, at 16.29, BH wrote:
Spelling in trunk is not finding my installed dictionaries: I get the
"No word lists can be found for the language 'en_US'
Spelling in trunk is not finding my installed dictionaries: I get the
"No word lists can be found for the language 'en_US'" warning. Yet
spelling works fine in branch, with identical settings in spellchecker
preferences. Am I doing something wrong?
BH
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Ain't I nice?
> To be franck, I already knew it.
What is the world coming to? A Frank being nice to an Angle? Lordy!
--
Angus
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> Angus, do you think I could leave that to you?
>
| Angus> Ain't I nice?
>
| To be franck, I already knew it.
>
| Angus> Looks like a remerge of po
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Angus, do you think I could leave that to you?
Angus> Ain't I nice?
To be franck, I already knew it.
Angus> Looks like a remerge of po files is in order.
Lars, is that OK?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus, do you think I could leave that to you?
Ain't I nice?
Looks like a remerge of po files is in order.
--
Angus
spellchecker_14x.diff.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Maybe we should try and rewrite the offending sentences?
Angus, do you think I could leave that to you?
JMarc
John Levon wrote:
>>> Bit wordy. "Spellchecker command" ?
>> I'd like to get the idea of "executable" in there somehow. The
>> offending widget is permanently disabled in the Windows port
>> because we force these users to use the [ap]spell library.
> Harumph. The Windows port shouldn't even hav
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
