Am 07.03.2021 um 14:36 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org>: > > Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 14:04 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt: >>> I can't follow you here. Sure it is. >> >> IMO it is a new feature. > > Where did I claim it isn't? > > If you want to enhance it: be invited.
No I don’t want to enhance it *now*. We are in feature-freeze IMO. >>>>> Also, as you say it is marked correctly after context menu >>>>> action, >>>>> there is probably only some call missing here. >>>> >>>> Yes, probably. >>> >>> I have just looked again at AppleSpellChecker and really do not see >>> how >>> this is so special. Maybe you just need to debug a bit >>> Paragraph::spellCheck() (the routine which is in if (speller- >>>> canCheckParagraph())). Well likely just a simple oversight. Check >>>> for >>> the return values of speller->check() gathered here. It should be >>> LEARNED_WORD for the cases in question. >> >> The difference is made by the canCheckParagraph() method of spellers. > > Yes, I know (see my comment above). > >> Paragraph::spellCheck() has different code paths for it. >> >> With paragraph check enabled - see AppleSpellChecker.h - the speller >> sees the whole sentence as a word and marks one or more words as mis- >> spelled at once. > > I see. Can you try (and maybe play with) the attached patch? This is better now. Next problem: I cannot remove the learned word from document dictionary? Should this work? Stephan -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
