Am Mittwoch, dem 06.11.2024 um 08:00 +0100 schrieb Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Jürgen Klingenberg:
> thank you for the great program!
> Many LaTeX fans are under the threat of the sword of Damocles
> in the form of the requirement for accessible documents
> for people with disabilities (e.g. PDF/UA (Universal A
Am Donnerstag, dem 07.11.2024 um 16:41 +0900 schrieb Yokota K.:
> Since \DocumentMetadata{…} needs to come in front of \documentclass
> declaration, LyX layout scheme probably need be updated.
No, we have an UI for it as of LyX 2.4:
Document > Settings > PDF Settings > Document Metadata.
--
Jür
Dear Prof. Klingenberg,
Looking at related LaTeX News
(https://www.latex-project.org/news/2022/03/21/latex-dev-2022-1/ under the
title of \DocumentMetadata), is it sufficient to add \DocumentMetadata{…} at
the head of LaTeX file to create PDF/UA?
LaTeX tagging-project
(https://github.com/late
Dear developer freaks,
thank you for the great program!
Many LaTeX fans are under the threat of the sword of Damocles
in the form of the requirement for accessible documents
for people with disabilities (e.g. PDF/UA (Universal Accessibility)).
Are there any plans to do something about this with
Level and then pick a bullet icon, the icon for the bullet does
> not change within the Itemize environment inside lyx. It does however work
> correctly in the pdf. To reiterate, while lyx shows the wrong bullet icon
> after it has been changed (as described above), the pdf is correctly
&
n, the icon for the
bullet does not change within the Itemize environment inside lyx. It
does however work correctly in the pdf. To reiterate, while lyx shows
the wrong bullet icon after it has been changed (as described above),
the pdf is correctly generated. lyx and pdf test files attached.
icon for the bullet does not change
within the Itemize environment inside lyx. It does however work correctly in the
pdf. To reiterate, while lyx shows the wrong bullet icon after it has been
changed (as described above), the pdf is correctly generated. lyx and pdf test
files attached.
As indicat
Itemize environment inside lyx. It does however work
correctly in the pdf. To reiterate, while lyx shows the wrong bullet icon
after it has been changed (as described above), the pdf is correctly
generated. lyx and pdf test files attached.
I'm on lyx-2.2.1, opensuse 42.1 (Qt 4 fronte
On 2009-12-10, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default
> > included. So I would wait for at least one year until using this as
> > default.
> >
> > OK. Could the WindowsInstaller recommend to install Latin Modern?
> lmodern is automatically installed
On 2009-12-10, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On 12/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> That would be OK. What do you propose as text for the tooltip?
> Perhaps something in the style of:
> "Select the .. typeface. Note: Default (Computer Modern) fonts may
> appear jagged (?) on some systems; consider selecting
> Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default
> included. So I would wait for at least one year until using this as
> default.
>
> OK. Could the WindowsInstaller recommend to install Latin Modern?
lmodern is automatically installed to MiKTeX or TeXLive when installing LyX. T
On 12/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> That would be OK. What do you propose as text for the tooltip?
>
Perhaps something in the style of:
"Select the .. typeface. Note: Default (Computer Modern) fonts may
appear jagged (?) on some systems; consider selecting Latin Modern or
another available font."
Li
On 2009-12-10, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > "LM are [...] not by default included in all LaTeX distributions, for
> > example not in MiKTeX."
> >
> > 1. This would indeed be a problem, but is this still true today?
> Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default
> included. So I would
On 2009-12-10, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> This is much too complicated for new users. When I'm new to a program I
> want to use it and not be forced to learn how fonts are defined and
> what a bitmap font is and why it might have disadvantages.
Agreed.
> When I don't like the result, I simply use anot
Liviu Andronic schrieb:
Why not at least add a quick note in a tooltip in Settings > Fonts?
That would be OK. What do you propose as text for the tooltip?
regards Uwe
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > This is much too complicated for new users. When I'm new to a program I
> > want to use it and not be forced to learn how fonts are defined and what a
> > bitmap font is and why it might have disadvantages. When I don't like the
> > result, I simply use another font. This
Hello
On 12/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> This is much too complicated for new users. When I'm new to a program I
> want to use it and not be forced to learn how fonts are defined and what a
> bitmap font is and why it might have disadvantages. When I don't like the
> result, I simply use another fo
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> so isn't this rather request on latex devs to use lm as default for their
> classes?
+1. Also note that not all classes use computer modern. We can not override
this default.
Jürgen
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What is a n00b?
Slang for "newbie"
I realize now that my suggestion was misguided. I had no idea the
font was to blame when I first learned LaTeX/LyX. (Even worse, Google
did not yet exist to answer all my questions.) But given that recent
ve
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > "LM are [...] not by default included in all LaTeX distributions, for
> > example not in MiKTeX."
> >
> > 1. This would indeed be a problem, but is this still true today?
>
> Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default included.
> So I would wait for at
While I know that I don't really get a vote, I thought I would offer a
user's opinion.
In short, it's this. I agree with Uwe. I think the dialogs are
unnecessary.
It's no secret that I don't care for the Computer Modern fonts(in less
politic moments, I've been know to call it ghastly); but they
Ben M. schrieb:
Simply accepting LaTeX's default is a terrible solution because it
leaves the n00b wondering why their pdfs look jagged.
What is a n00b?
PDFs don't look "jagged" with the default font. All PDF viewers I know are able to smooth pixel
fonts (Acrobat, Foxit Reader, Okular, GSview
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> LaTeX's default which is the best solution. When the user don't like the
> font, he can test out the other fonts and save the one he find most suitable
> as document default.
Simply accepting LaTeX's default is a terrible solution because it
leav
> "LM are [...] not by default included in all LaTeX distributions, for
> example not in MiKTeX."
>
> 1. This would indeed be a problem, but is this still true today?
Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default included. So I would wait for at
least one year until using th
Suggestion:
Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard template?
This is a re-post from a thread at lyx-users.
On 2009-11-13, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> LM is out for some time by now and could be considered the
> "Hartmut" == Hartmut Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hartmut> Hi Jean-Marc,
>> No the LyX wiki seems to have moved. The new location is
>> http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/FAQ/PDF
>>
Hartmut> thank you, but LyX 1.3.3 does not seem to work with
Hartmut> \usepackage{hyperref} and my kind of
Hi Jean-Marc,
>
> No the LyX wiki seems to have moved. The new location is
> http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/FAQ/PDF
>
thank you, but LyX 1.3.3 does not seem to work with
\usepackage{hyperref}
and my kind of referrencing with Ref+Text which LyX does allow anyway.
--
Regards
Hartmut
Hungerhilfe:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:22:25PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > A note for lyx-devel list: Wouldn't it be better to make LyX automatically
> > add "\usepackage{ae,aecompl}" to the latex file if the font encoding is T1 ?
> > Just think of the endless question
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> A note for lyx-devel list: Wouldn't it be better to make LyX automatically
> add "\usepackage{ae,aecompl}" to the latex file if the font encoding is T1 ?
> Just think of the endless questions on this subject we will get if LyX 1.1.6
> do not do that (assumi
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:53:33PM -0600, Michael O'Brien wrote:
> A little experimentation has shown that the incompatability lies within
> the default LyX preamble. The lines
> \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
> \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
>
> create all the problems. If I export my do
Dear LyX crew,
I have just finished creating a web page with instructions to show
people how to create pdf files with Aladdin ghostscript ( instructions
accessible from http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12 ). If you look at
this page, you will see how much I love LyX. :)
I have found that LyX
31 matches
Mail list logo
