Le 2 juin 09 à 23:47, Richard Heck a écrit :
And the problem is probably that we cannot have "Chapter 1" and
"Chapitre 2" in the same document anymore (but this is my fault,
not your patch's).
here, I think. Still, this is not going to be the normal case, so
there must be a way to handle
And the problem is probably that we cannot have "Chapter 1" and
"Chapitre 2" in the same document anymore (but this is my fault,
not your patch's).
here, I think. Still, this is not going to be the normal case, so
there must be a way to handle it. E.g., check if the paragraph
language is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
One idea would be to do it when we calculate the flat label string,
but we don't have information on the paragraph language at that
point, so that would be less than ideal. But I don't really see what
else we can do.
Does it mean that this flat label stuff needs to
Le 2 juin 09 à 19:11, rgheck a écrit :
I've worked on this a bit, but it is a bit harder than it seemed it
might be. I don't think there's anything we can reliably translate
where you put the FIXME. We do this:
counterLabel(it->second.flatLabelString(appendix()))
but flatLabelString() is ca
ive way of outlining,
an excellent enumeration method for documentation. It would be a nice extra
to be able to have some outlines in the doc follow the preceding protocol,
while others follow other protocols. It wouldn't be an earth shaking feature
like character styles, but it would be a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheck writes:
The point of this patch is that sometimes one wants enumerations that
behave differently, even within a single document. E.g, I've got an
Enumerati environment that gives me enumerations with \roman, \Roman,
\alph, \Alph, and I'd like to see them th
to see them that way. Your solution changes
> everything globally.
>
> Richard
In 7th grade they taught us to outline like this:
I. Top level
A. Second level
1. Third level
a. Forth level
i. Fifth level
I'd
ead the layout counter for enumrations).
Starting from the patch below, it is easy to define the enumeration that
you describe here. It might end up a bit longer than what you describe
here, but at least we do not have to add ad-hoc layout syntax.
This patch can probably go to 1.6.4 actually (up
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheck writes:
The following patch does as advertised. I think it's fairly
straightforward, but any comments?
Yes: your are making things unnecessarily complicated :)
I did not do anything because I had to think about the implications in
terms of upgrade
rgheck writes:
> The following patch does as advertised. I think it's fairly
> straightforward, but any comments?
Yes: your are making things unnecessarily complicated :)
I did not do anything because I had to think about the implications in
terms of upgrade compatibility of layout files (proba
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
+# Incremented to format 16, 2 June 2009 by rgh
+# Add new tags LabelStringI through LabelStringIV for use with
+# enumeration counters.
+
# Do not forget to document format change in Customization
# Manual (section "Declaring a new text
Richard Heck wrote:
> +# Incremented to format 16, 2 June 2009 by rgh
> +# Add new tags LabelStringI through LabelStringIV for use with
> +# enumeration counters.
> +
> # Do not forget to document format change in Customization
> # Manual (section "Dec
--- lib/scripts/layout2layout.py (revision 29903)
+++ lib/scripts/layout2layout.py (working copy)
@@ -49,13 +49,17 @@
# Rename I18NPreamble to BabelPreamble and add LangPreamble
# Incremented to format 15, 28 May 2009 by lasgouttes
-# Add new tag OutputFormat; m
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> The patch seems to work. However, I follow the instructions in
Enrico> bug 2445, and after BAR and ENTER, I select Standard. What now
Enrico> I type seems to be still part of the proof and I have to
Enrico> decrease the enviro
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:34:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2445
>
> This is what I think to be the right fix for this bug. I contains
> martin's fixed for 1.5, but adds another part.
>
> I want that in 1.4.3. Testers please (see the file in
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2445
This is what I think to be the right fix for this bug. I contains
martin's fixed for 1.5, but adds another part.
I want that in 1.4.3. Testers please (see the file indent.lyx from
pol).
JMarc
Index: src/paragraph_funcs.C
===
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> The free-standing functions, but as said I am unsure aboutthis.
Just tell me when you have made up your mind, then. I could not think
of another way to do what I wanted. I mean, it is of course possible,
but kind of ugly.
JMar
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> The only think I am unsure about is opening up the dociterator
| Lars> interface (protected -> public.)
>
| Note that LCursor has push() and pop() that are just public wrapp
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> The only think I am unsure about is opening up the dociterator
Lars> interface (protected -> public.)
Note that LCursor has push() and pop() that are just public wrappers
around push_bacl() and pop_back(). It looks a bit silly
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is a fix for
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465
>
| What this does is to basically rewrite the setCounter code to use
| proper ParIterator and fix nesting of enumerate and itemize when they
| are in nested insets. This is demonstra
// Maybe we have to increment the item depth.
- incrementItemDepth(it.plist(), it.pit(), 0);
}
+ // Compute the item depth of the paragraph
+ par.itemdepth = getItemDepth(it);
+
// erase what was there before
par.params().labelString(string());
@@ -414,9 +414,6 @@ void setCounter(Buffer const &a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a LyX document, you cannot insert the raw latex command
>
> \setcounter{enumi}{3} (for example)
>
> into any position where it will change the label of the first enumerated
> point in a list.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07142.html
Regard
In a LyX document, you cannot insert the raw latex command
\setcounter{enumi}{3} (for example)
into any position where it will change the label of the first enumerated point
in a list.
If you insert it before the first point, which is outside the list environment,
it has no effect.
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:50:09AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> At about page eleven (Conducting a Chi-square test), lyx displays the
> enumeration as 0 for each entry. The latex output renders correctly.
>
> Also, ^G to insert a greek character seems to have stopped work
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 05:08:51PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:58:52AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
> > > Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
> > > will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> >
> > Are you s
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:58:52AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> I thought that last time we went through this, it came out that
> it *wasn't* my personal setting, and that it had made it into
> default bindings sometime along the way (I'm certain that it
> wasn't originally bound to tha
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 04:53:35PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:50:09AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > Also, ^G to insert a greek character seems to have stopped working.
> Was this some personal setting of you?
> Default is M-m g, and this seems to work wel
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:50:09AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> Also, ^G to insert a greek character seems to have stopped working.
Was this some personal setting of you?
Default is M-m g, and this seems to work well.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Se
At about page eleven (Conducting a Chi-square test), lyx displays the
enumeration as 0 for each entry. The latex output renders correctly.
Also, ^G to insert a greek character seems to have stopped working.
Did a recent update clobber config files or some such?
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst
> > > * text2.C: fixed enumeration mis-count as reported by
> > > Dr. Richard Hawkins.
> > oh, dear. If this kind of entry is made, My name will be in there
> > more than half the developers :)
> This is called 'motivating' :)
Now wait a mi
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:13:16AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> 2002-08-22Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * text2.C: fixed enumeration mis-count as reported by
> Dr. Richard Hawkins.
oh, dear. If this kind of entry is made, My name will be in there
mor
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:27:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> - for (int i = par->enumdepth + 1; i < 4; i++) {
> + for (int i = par->enumdepth; i < 4; i++) {
As a matter of style: prefer pre-increment over post-increment.
It does not really matter here (except for con
prefered.
>
> --
> Lgb
2002-08-22 Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* text2.C: fixed enumeration mis-count as reported by
Dr. Richard Hawkins.
msg43357/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the
| > > > attached document, the enumeration under "Course Methods and Learning"
| > > > displays the first element as 5, continuing the count from the previous
| > > > enumeration. The postscript o
the
> > > attached document, the enumeration under "Course Methods and Learning"
> > > displays the first element as 5, continuing the count from the previous
> > > enumeration. The postscript output is correct.
Sloppy Martin, sloppy! You should have caught th
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the
> > attached document, the enumeration under "Course Methods and Learni
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the
> attached document, the enumeration under "Course Methods and Learning"
> displays the first element as 5, continuing the count from the pre
As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the
attached document, the enumeration under "Course Methods and Learning"
displays the first element as 5, continuing the count from the previous
enumeration. The postscript output is correct.
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 03:43:23PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
> the fifth question on this document appears as 5. in lyx, but back to 1
> . in latex
Here is a fixed file.
The problem is that CVS lyx allows "infinite nesting":
Start an enumerate paragraph, create two items, and press M-p
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 05:35:48PM +0200, Saalfeld, Christoph wrote:
> I tried to insert a "comment" in an "enumeration" environment. Because a
> comment will not be visible in the final document, the enumeration should
> continue with the next number.
>
>
Hi,
I tried to insert a "comment" in an "enumeration" environment. Because a
comment will not be visible in the final document, the enumeration should
continue with the next number.
For example:
1. Some stuff
Comment: "Something only for me..."
2.
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Allan Rae wrote:
| >
| > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Staffan Ringbom wrote:
| >
| > > Thank you very much, I got the point!
| > >
| > > \renewcommand\labelenumi{\alph{enumi}.}
| > > \renewcommand\labelenumii{\roman{enumii}.}
| > > \renewcommand\labelenum
gt; >
> > Allan. (ARRae)
> Sounds like a job for Super Preferences to me.
No. Super-Document and Super-Paragraph perhaps but not Super-Preferences.
These changes are the enumerate equivalent of the bullet selection and
belong at document-global and paragraph scope. While you might
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Staffan Ringbom wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much, I got the point!
> >
> > \renewcommand\labelenumi{\alph{enumi}.}
> > \renewcommand\labelenumii{\roman{enumii}.}
> > \renewcommand\labelenumiii{\roman{enumiii}.},
> >
> > made the Job.
> >
> > Did not fin
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Staffan Ringbom wrote:
> Thank you very much, I got the point!
>
> \renewcommand\labelenumi{\alph{enumi}.}
> \renewcommand\labelenumii{\roman{enumii}.}
> \renewcommand\labelenumiii{\roman{enumiii}.},
>
> made the Job.
>
> Did not find this in the User Gidd, although this
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:42:21PM +0300, Lior Silberman wrote:
> The two methods for empty enumeration points are radically different.
> Putting a nonbreaking space gives (in the dvi)
> 1.
> (a)
> (b)
>
> while using an empty {} gives:
> (a)
> (b)
>
>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So it seems to me that Return (break-paragraph) can go back in depth
> _if_ it changes the layout too.
>
> Comments?
I suppose you mean environment instead of layout there.
I remember being surprised when I first used verse. There are many more
lines than stanzas,
>>>>> "Lior" == Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lior> Thanks for the help! First, I wanted to report a bug. When you
Lior> are start the next point in an enumeration, I would expect the
Lior> enumeration depth should remain as in the previo
Thanks for the help!
First, I wanted to report a bug. When you are start the next point in an
enumeration, I would expect the enumeration depth should remain as in the
previous point (If I have 1a it's almost certain to be followed by 1b and
not 2).
I tried debugging the code, and foun
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 11:04:35AM -0600, Bruce M Beach wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Amir Karger wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 10:41:54PM -0600, Bruce M Beach wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello All
> > >
> > > To do something like
> > >
> > > 1. Statement 1
> > >substatem
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 10:41:54PM -0600, Bruce M Beach wrote:
> >
> > Hello All
> >
> > To do something like
> >
> > 1. Statement 1
> > substatement 1
> > substatement 1
> > 2. Statement 2
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> This only works if you put the "verses" one level deeper in the nested list
> structure. It is the toolbar button that looks like a printed sheet with a
> left and a right arrow.
>
In this case it worked well enought.
> In
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 10:41:54PM -0600, Bruce M Beach wrote:
>
> Hello All
>
> To do something like
>
> 1. Statement 1
>substatement 1
>substatement 1
> 2. Statement 2
>substatement 2
>substatement 2
> do I h
>
> To do something like
>
> 1. Statement 1
>substatement 1
>substatement 1
> 2. Statement 2
>substatement 2
>substatement 2
> do I have to resort to latex or is there some
> convienent way to do it in lyx
>
Hello All
To do something like
1. Statement 1
substatement 1
substatement 1
2. Statement 2
substatement 2
substatement 2
do I have to resort to latex or is there some
convienent way to do it in ly
55 matches
Mail list logo
