Done, Ticket #7349
/Anders
On 2011-03-08 10.13, "Pavel Sanda" wrote:
>Stephan Witt wrote:
>> But I tried to verify it on Linux - it is there too. No platform
>>dependency!
>> You have to disable the "Open documents in tabs" check box in
>>preferences and
>> follow the recipe Anders gave exactly
Stephan Witt wrote:
> But I tried to verify it on Linux - it is there too. No platform dependency!
> You have to disable the "Open documents in tabs" check box in preferences and
> follow the recipe Anders gave exactly.
>
> Interestingly the existing document is marked as changed after saving the
Am 07.03.2011 um 15:36 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 07.03.2011 um 14:32 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
>
>> On 2011-03-07 14.29, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>>
>>> Am 07.03.2011 um 13:32 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
>>>
On 2011-03-07 12.44, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
> Sorry, I cannot reproduce it.
>
Am 07.03.2011 um 14:32 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
> On 2011-03-07 14.29, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>
>> Am 07.03.2011 um 13:32 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
>>
>>> On 2011-03-07 12.44, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>>>
Sorry, I cannot reproduce it.
(I tried it with the LyX.app started from the .dmg volume
On 2011-03-07 14.29, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>Am 07.03.2011 um 13:32 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
>
>> On 2011-03-07 12.44, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I cannot reproduce it.
>>> (I tried it with the LyX.app started from the .dmg volume).
>>> Perhaps it depends on the document you start with. I
Am 07.03.2011 um 13:32 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
> On 2011-03-07 12.44, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I cannot reproduce it.
>> (I tried it with the LyX.app started from the .dmg volume).
>> Perhaps it depends on the document you start with. Is it somewhat special?
>>
>> Stephan
>
> Seems to
On 2011-03-07 12.44, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>Sorry, I cannot reproduce it.
>(I tried it with the LyX.app started from the .dmg volume).
>Perhaps it depends on the document you start with. Is it somewhat special?
>
>Stephan
Seems to be triggered with every document for me (at least that the pasted
Am 07.03.2011 um 11:33 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
>
>
> On 2011-03-07 11.26, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>
>> Am 07.03.2011 um 11:13 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
>>
>>> One more nasty bug on Mac (latest SnowLeopard):
>>> The alt key modifier seems to be broken. As an example, alt+m m (which
>>> should give y
Am 07.03.2011 um 11:33 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
> On 2011-03-07 11.26, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>
>> Am 07.03.2011 um 11:13 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
>>
>>> One more nasty bug on Mac (latest SnowLeopard):
>>> The alt key modifier seems to be broken. As an example, alt+m m (which
>>> should give you an
Stephan Witt wrote:
> PS. Pavel, obviously I forgot to make this change more clear in the .dmg.
> It would be no real change to the code base if I add a README to the
> distribution media.
> Would it better to add another .dmg with this addition for RC1?
no. but i can add a sentence to announceme
On 2011-03-07 11.26, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>Am 07.03.2011 um 11:13 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
>
>> One more nasty bug on Mac (latest SnowLeopard):
>> The alt key modifier seems to be broken. As an example, alt+m m (which
>> should give you an inline formula) give ¹m, alt+p gives you ¼ etc.
>
>Sorry
Am 07.03.2011 um 11:13 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
> One more nasty bug on Mac (latest SnowLeopard):
> The alt key modifier seems to be broken. As an example, alt+m m (which
> should give you an inline formula) give ¹m, alt+p gives you ¼ etc.
Sorry for the inconvenience... but this is (partly) intende
One more nasty bug on Mac (latest SnowLeopard):
The alt key modifier seems to be broken. As an example, alt+m m (which
should give you an inline formula) give ¹m, alt+p gives you ¼ etc.
/Anders
On 2011-03-07 09.10, "Stephan Witt" wrote:
>Am 07.03.2011 um 01:06 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Pavel Sa
Anders Ekberg wrote:
>
>
> On 2011-03-07 09.54, "Pavel Sanda" wrote:
>
> >Anders Ekberg wrote:
> >> - Open an existing document with a Preamble
> >> - Create a new document
> >> - Choose Document > Settings... and then LaTex Preamble in the new
> >>document
> >
> >now you close the dialog or le
On 2011-03-07 09.54, "Pavel Sanda" wrote:
>Anders Ekberg wrote:
>> - Open an existing document with a Preamble
>> - Create a new document
>> - Choose Document > Settings... and then LaTex Preamble in the new
>>document
>
>now you close the dialog or let it open?
Leave it open
>
>> - Switch to
Anders Ekberg wrote:
> - Open an existing document with a Preamble
> - Create a new document
> - Choose Document > Settings... and then LaTex Preamble in the new document
now you close the dialog or let it open?
> - Switch to the existing document and choose Document > Settings... and
> then LaTe
Thanks, it seems to work fine.
But I ran into a nasty bug:
- Open an existing document with a Preamble
- Create a new document
- Choose Document > Settings... and then LaTex Preamble in the new document
- Switch to the existing document and choose Document > Settings... and
then LaTex Preamble in
Am 07.03.2011 um 01:06 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> only doc or translations can go in.
>>
>> trunk is completely frozen now.
>
> trunk is opened for bug fixing again.
> tarballs are on usual place, i'll announce rc1 at monday night.
>
> give it a try.
It
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > only doc or translations can go in.
>
> trunk is completely frozen now.
trunk is opened for bug fixing again.
tarballs are on usual place, i'll announce rc1 at monday night.
give it a try.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> only doc or translations can go in.
trunk is completely frozen now.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> freeze for RC1 should be at friday night.
trunk is frozen from now on. only doc or translations can go in.
i'll do tarballs at sunday and announce at monday.
pavel
-- news happening while writting this message ;)
exception has aparently forgotten header change in Tommaso F&R
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message
news:20110302005838.gj30...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz...
Rob Oakes wrote:
but did we ever come to a consensus as to which icons we might want to
use?
no, i only remember libreoffice style gained most votes...
Some people preferred Oxygen style icons and others
Julien Rioux wrote:
> LyX. While we're at it, I also think the image in the LyX background looked
> more professional in 1.6 and could use some help from the artist community
> as well.
you are one hour late :)
pavel
Rob Oakes wrote:
> but did we ever come to a consensus as to which icons we might want to use?
no, i only remember libreoffice style gained most votes...
> there are enough improvements that it might be better to wait.
no opinion about this. just sent warning that trying overhauls of ui
somewher
On 01/03/2011 7:39 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
While I would love to see an interface overhaul as part of the 2.0
improvements, there are enough improvements that it might be better to wait.
I'd like to see a change too, and 2.0 seems a justified target for that.
I think the toolbar changes suggeste
> - libreoffice icon guys there seems to be agreement on the need of new
> defaults.
> its time to for finishing the thread if you want this in 2.0.
> i'll be against such commits in rc2/3 phase.
I wasn't sure where the UI discussion left off. It seems that restructuring
some of the menus and
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > thus i plan release candidate 1 around 7. march.
>
> few more notes: i would like to make soft freeze one week before,
> in order to avoid needless regressions.
> (RC is most probaly going to reach more linux repos and users
> and it should mean what is
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> thus i plan release candidate 1 around 7. march.
few more notes: i would like to make soft freeze one week before,
in order to avoid needless regressions.
(RC is most probaly going to reach more linux repos and users
and it should mean what is says - candidate for release.)
a
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> the ratio of new bugs reported by users is small and remaining number
> of bugs is fixable (or retargetable).
>
> thus i plan release candidate 1 around 7. march.
Good plan!
> from the bugs which have no assignee:
Also note that we have some critical bugs assigned to 1.6.10
On 02/13/2011 06:33 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
#6871 - Crash when closing file before pictures are converted
tough bug, even for our magicians ;)
I think this one is:
Missing screen update can cause assertion after lyxserver communication
#7163 - Crash when closing file before pictures ar
hi,
the ratio of new bugs reported by users is small and remaining number
of bugs is fixable (or retargetable).
thus i plan release candidate 1 around 7. march.
from the bugs which have no assignee:
#6871 - Crash when closing file before pictures are converted
tough bug, even for our magi
31 matches
Mail list logo
