Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-07 Thread rgheck
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Pavel Sanda ha scritto: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: However, it comes pretty late in the 1.6 cycle. I think we should really think about stopping to put in new features (if only little ones such as outliner extensions) before even daring to think about releasing 1.6.0

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-07 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Pavel Sanda ha scritto: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: However, it comes pretty late in the 1.6 cycle. I think we should really think about stopping to put in new features (if only little ones such as outliner extensions) before even daring to think about releasing 1.6.0. It's not my decision,

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Stefan Schimanski wrote: > Hi! > > Is the patch available anywhere? > > I have some refactoring work todo in formulas of my thesis and the regexps > in math search would be great for that. http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998 pavel

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-07 Thread Stefan Schimanski
Hi! Is the patch available anywhere? I have some refactoring work todo in formulas of my thesis and the regexps in math search would be great for that. Stefan Am 04.10.2008 um 00:02 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta: Hi all, my old version of patched LyX still runs on my current Ubuntu 8.04, s

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-04 Thread rgheck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I agree. This is too late for 1.6.0 but we can make it work for 1.6.1 or 2 without problem as there is no format change involved. So, Tommaso, if you adapt your patch to current trunk I'll work toward inclusion in 1.6.x. Yes. As usual,

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I agree. This is too late for 1.6.0 but we can make it work for 1.6.1 or > 2 without problem as there is no format change involved. So, Tommaso, if > you adapt your patch to current trunk I'll work toward inclusion in 1.6.x. Yes. As usual, 1.6.1 (and maybe 1.6.2, dependi

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-04 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 04/10/2008 18:05, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 05:54:40PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/10/2008 08:36, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: Hope this way people may see more easily if this would be an interesting feature to have in LyX.

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 05:54:40PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On 04/10/2008 08:36, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Hope this way people may see more easily if this would be an interesting feature to have in LyX. >>> i think that people already th

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-04 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 04/10/2008 08:36, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: Hope this way people may see more easily if this would be an interesting feature to have in LyX. i think that people already think it would be cool feature. the problem is that we need the patch which is assimilated t

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > if we have working patch for 1.6 we can at least put it in 1.7 trunk or may > be backport it later to 1.6.x. Sure. It's a real pity this didn't make it in earlier. But we have to draw a line evetually, IMHO. Jürgen

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > However, it comes pretty late in the 1.6 cycle. I think we should really > think > about stopping to put in new features (if only little ones such as outliner > extensions) before even daring to think about releasing 1.6.0. > > It's not my decision, but I'd rather se

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Hope this way people may see more easily if this would be an interesting > > feature > > to have in LyX. > > i think that people already think it would be cool feature. the problem is > that we need the patch which is assimilated to 1.6 source tree. have you > been working up

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-03 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Hope this way people may see more easily if this would be an interesting feature to have in LyX. This would be fantastic !!! /Konrad

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-03 Thread Pavel Sanda
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Hope this way people may see more easily if this would be an interesting > feature > to have in LyX. i think that people already think it would be cool feature. the problem is that we need the patch which is assimilated to 1.6 source tree. have you been working upon thi

Re: SearchAdv patch

2008-10-03 Thread Stefan Schimanski
Looks fantastic. Stefan Am 04.10.2008 um 00:02 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta: Hi all, my old version of patched LyX still runs on my current Ubuntu 8.04, so I just packed a couple of videos in order to show basic usage of the feature http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=JxjMVvn7d3M and usage of reg

SearchAdv patch

2008-10-03 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Hi all, my old version of patched LyX still runs on my current Ubuntu 8.04, so I just packed a couple of videos in order to show basic usage of the feature http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=JxjMVvn7d3M and usage of regular expressions http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqwwhu4VkGw Hope this way peop

Re: SearchAdv Patch ?

2008-02-12 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Pavel Sanda wrote: if you are working on this, please consider the following bug: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3095 Hi, I can't remember if the latest rework of that patch, that was including regexp facilities, was working when searching for environments as well. If not, in princi

Re: SearchAdv Patch ?

2008-02-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
hi, > Has anyone taken into serious consideration my patch on the advanced > search facility ? I was just needing it a few days ago, while changing my > latest article according to some reviewers comments, but unfortunately > I'm using the official release for such purposes. if you are working on

Re: SearchAdv Patch ?

2008-02-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Hi all, I've been busy for a while, so I couldn't follow the latest team discussions. Has anyone taken into serious consideration my patch on the advanced search facility ? I was just needing it a few days ago, while changing my latest article according to some reviewe

SearchAdv Patch ?

2008-02-02 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Hi all, I've been busy for a while, so I couldn't follow the latest team discussions. Has anyone taken into serious consideration my patch on the advanced search facility ? I was just needing it a few days ago, while changing my latest article according to some reviewers comments, but unfortuna