Am Mittwoch, dem 06.11.2024 um 08:00 +0100 schrieb Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Jürgen Klingenberg:
> thank you for the great program!
> Many LaTeX fans are under the threat of the sword of Damocles
> in the form of the requirement for accessible documents
> for people with disabilities (e.g. PDF/UA (Universal A
Am Donnerstag, dem 07.11.2024 um 16:41 +0900 schrieb Yokota K.:
> Since \DocumentMetadata{…} needs to come in front of \documentclass
> declaration, LyX layout scheme probably need be updated.
No, we have an UI for it as of LyX 2.4:
Document > Settings > PDF Settings > Document Metadata.
--
Jür
Dear Prof. Klingenberg,
Looking at related LaTeX News
(https://www.latex-project.org/news/2022/03/21/latex-dev-2022-1/ under the
title of \DocumentMetadata), is it sufficient to add \DocumentMetadata{…} at
the head of LaTeX file to create PDF/UA?
LaTeX tagging-project
(https://github.com/late
On 2009-12-10, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default
> > included. So I would wait for at least one year until using this as
> > default.
> >
> > OK. Could the WindowsInstaller recommend to install Latin Modern?
> lmodern is automatically installed
On 2009-12-10, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On 12/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> That would be OK. What do you propose as text for the tooltip?
> Perhaps something in the style of:
> "Select the .. typeface. Note: Default (Computer Modern) fonts may
> appear jagged (?) on some systems; consider selecting
> Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default
> included. So I would wait for at least one year until using this as
> default.
>
> OK. Could the WindowsInstaller recommend to install Latin Modern?
lmodern is automatically installed to MiKTeX or TeXLive when installing LyX. T
On 12/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> That would be OK. What do you propose as text for the tooltip?
>
Perhaps something in the style of:
"Select the .. typeface. Note: Default (Computer Modern) fonts may
appear jagged (?) on some systems; consider selecting Latin Modern or
another available font."
Li
On 2009-12-10, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > "LM are [...] not by default included in all LaTeX distributions, for
> > example not in MiKTeX."
> >
> > 1. This would indeed be a problem, but is this still true today?
> Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default
> included. So I would
On 2009-12-10, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> This is much too complicated for new users. When I'm new to a program I
> want to use it and not be forced to learn how fonts are defined and
> what a bitmap font is and why it might have disadvantages.
Agreed.
> When I don't like the result, I simply use anot
Liviu Andronic schrieb:
Why not at least add a quick note in a tooltip in Settings > Fonts?
That would be OK. What do you propose as text for the tooltip?
regards Uwe
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > This is much too complicated for new users. When I'm new to a program I
> > want to use it and not be forced to learn how fonts are defined and what a
> > bitmap font is and why it might have disadvantages. When I don't like the
> > result, I simply use another font. This
Hello
On 12/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> This is much too complicated for new users. When I'm new to a program I
> want to use it and not be forced to learn how fonts are defined and what a
> bitmap font is and why it might have disadvantages. When I don't like the
> result, I simply use another fo
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> so isn't this rather request on latex devs to use lm as default for their
> classes?
+1. Also note that not all classes use computer modern. We can not override
this default.
Jürgen
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What is a n00b?
Slang for "newbie"
I realize now that my suggestion was misguided. I had no idea the
font was to blame when I first learned LaTeX/LyX. (Even worse, Google
did not yet exist to answer all my questions.) But given that recent
ve
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > "LM are [...] not by default included in all LaTeX distributions, for
> > example not in MiKTeX."
> >
> > 1. This would indeed be a problem, but is this still true today?
>
> Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default included.
> So I would wait for at
While I know that I don't really get a vote, I thought I would offer a
user's opinion.
In short, it's this. I agree with Uwe. I think the dialogs are
unnecessary.
It's no secret that I don't care for the Computer Modern fonts(in less
politic moments, I've been know to call it ghastly); but they
Ben M. schrieb:
Simply accepting LaTeX's default is a terrible solution because it
leaves the n00b wondering why their pdfs look jagged.
What is a n00b?
PDFs don't look "jagged" with the default font. All PDF viewers I know are able to smooth pixel
fonts (Acrobat, Foxit Reader, Okular, GSview
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> LaTeX's default which is the best solution. When the user don't like the
> font, he can test out the other fonts and save the one he find most suitable
> as document default.
Simply accepting LaTeX's default is a terrible solution because it
leav
> "LM are [...] not by default included in all LaTeX distributions, for
> example not in MiKTeX."
>
> 1. This would indeed be a problem, but is this still true today?
Yes. First since MiKTeX 2.8 (about 2 months old) it is by default included. So I would wait for at
least one year until using th
Suggestion:
Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard template?
This is a re-post from a thread at lyx-users.
On 2009-11-13, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> LM is out for some time by now and could be considered the
> "Hartmut" == Hartmut Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hartmut> Hi Jean-Marc,
>> No the LyX wiki seems to have moved. The new location is
>> http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/FAQ/PDF
>>
Hartmut> thank you, but LyX 1.3.3 does not seem to work with
Hartmut> \usepackage{hyperref} and my kind of
Hi Jean-Marc,
>
> No the LyX wiki seems to have moved. The new location is
> http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/FAQ/PDF
>
thank you, but LyX 1.3.3 does not seem to work with
\usepackage{hyperref}
and my kind of referrencing with Ref+Text which LyX does allow anyway.
--
Regards
Hartmut
Hungerhilfe:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:22:25PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > A note for lyx-devel list: Wouldn't it be better to make LyX automatically
> > add "\usepackage{ae,aecompl}" to the latex file if the font encoding is T1 ?
> > Just think of the endless question
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> A note for lyx-devel list: Wouldn't it be better to make LyX automatically
> add "\usepackage{ae,aecompl}" to the latex file if the font encoding is T1 ?
> Just think of the endless questions on this subject we will get if LyX 1.1.6
> do not do that (assumi
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:53:33PM -0600, Michael O'Brien wrote:
> A little experimentation has shown that the incompatability lies within
> the default LyX preamble. The lines
> \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
> \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
>
> create all the problems. If I export my do
25 matches
Mail list logo
