On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:36:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Confirming bugs needs web access. I currently have a choice between
> | either net access and no time at all, or no net, but a couple of
> | minutes to spare. I.e. I can handle offline mail and news, but no http.
> >
> | When
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 01:41:04PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > May I suggest a slightly different approach?
> >
> > Let's have some MetaInset that's a proper LyX inset, i.e. deriving
> > from InsetBase, but which mainly acts as a data storage capable to
> > store attrib
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:45:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> what I want (future stuff) is to have a nice xml file format, that is
> expressive enought to produce docbook, latex, ascii etc. from. With no
> direct support inside the LyX binary for this to happen.
Ah, XSLT, right?!
john
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> And I also admit that I don't want LyX as a DocBook editor, just as I
>> don't want LyX as a LaTeX editor.
>
| But do have anything against LyX being able to produce DocBooks?
| (It's the specificness that you don't l
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And I also admit that I don't want LyX as a DocBook editor, just as I
> don't want LyX as a LaTeX editor.
But do have anything against LyX being able to produce DocBooks?
(It's the specificness that you don't like, right?)
/Christian
--
Christi
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I like Andreas Vox's recently stuff for example (I still
>> think LyX can one day be an excellent DocBook editor)
>
|
| So you didn't see the bugs which crept in?
| (No, I'm not talking about spurious spaces! ;-
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I like Andreas Vox's recently stuff for example (I still
> think LyX can one day be an excellent DocBook editor)
So you didn't see the bugs which crept in?
(No, I'm not talking about spurious spaces! ;-) )
For anyone to test how far LyX is from an excell
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> | Lars> But is not just about resolving, but also abo
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 09:56:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> >
> >> But we need more, and as I said in another mail: Just about everyone
> >> (except from the submitter himself) can confirm a bug.
> >> You don't nee
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 09:52:46PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> That's not entirely true.
I didn't said that it was true, but that is the perception of the moment.
> Firstly, 1.4.0 core structure is much simpler than 1.3.x, so even for
> someone starting core work from scratch it's not the
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 09:37:37AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> > Andre> Especially in times of freeze when every minute that's spend on
> > Andre> LyX goes into bugfixing.
> >
> > Sure. I have to say that I
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> | Lars> But is not just about resolving, but also about confirming that
> | Lars> it is a real bug.
> >
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> But we need more, and as I said in another mail: Just about everyone
>> (except from the submitter himself) can confirm a bug.
>> You don't need any particular skills (most often), ju
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> But we need more, and as I said in another mail: Just about everyone
> (except from the submitter himself) can confirm a bug.
> You don't need any particular skills (most often), just the time to
> check if the reported problem
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> May I suggest a slightly different approach?
>
> Let's have some MetaInset that's a proper LyX inset, i.e. deriving
> from InsetBase, but which mainly acts as a data storage capable to
> store attribute and CDATA contents. The parser (expat or whatever)
> only generates a t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> But is not just about resolving, but also about confirming that
| Lars> it is a real bug.
>
| I did some of that, too ;) I even fixed one.
How good of you.
But we need more
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> But is not just about resolving, but also about confirming that
Lars> it is a real bug.
I did some of that, too ;) I even fixed one.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Help get bugzilla into a better state and it will (at least for
| Lars> me) be a bit easier to work on bugs.
>
| Lars> If everytime I want to work on a bug have to waddle thr
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Help get bugzilla into a better state and it will (at least for
Lars> me) be a bit easier to work on bugs.
Lars> If everytime I want to work on a bug have to waddle through a
Lars> lot of unconfirmed and outdated bugs I soon lo
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Andre> Especially in times of freeze when every minute that's spend on
> Andre> LyX goes into bugfixing.
>
> Sure. I have to say that I am a bit puzzled by all this excitation
> about xml when I see in what state HEAD is.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Andre> On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 03:20:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
| Andre> wrote:
>>> | A small step to Lars a large leap to LyX? ;-)
>>>
>>> Parse Ok! vs. Parse Failed!
>>>
>>> do
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 03:20:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre> wrote:
>> | A small step to Lars a large leap to LyX? ;-)
>>
>> Parse Ok! vs. Parse Failed!
>>
>> does not help us much.
Andre> Especially in times of freeze wh
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 07:42:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> >> >> I disagree. LyX is not XSLT
>> >> >
>> >> | But this is a natural way to handle export filters.
>> >>
>> >> if you want a huge monolithic think, then yes.
>> >
>> | *Huh*?
>> >
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 07:42:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> >> >> I disagree. LyX is not XSLT
> >> >
> >> | But this is a natural way to handle export filters.
> >>
> >> if you want a huge monolithic think, then yes.
> >
> | *Huh*?
> >
> | http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/tutorial/libxslttutori
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 07:18:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> >> I disagree. LyX is not XSLT
>> >
>> | But this is a natural way to handle export filters.
>>
>> if you want a huge monolithic think, then yes.
>
| *Huh*?
>
| http://xmlsoft.org/XS
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 07:18:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> >> I disagree. LyX is not XSLT
> >
> | But this is a natural way to handle export filters.
>
> if you want a huge monolithic think, then yes.
*Huh*?
http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/tutorial/libxslttutorial.html
I'm sorry, but that
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 03:55:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> | This is just a first impression and I certainly haven't used any of those.
>> | The deciding think for libxml2 is the XSLT processor, it would be just cool
>> | to have that in LyX.
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 03:55:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | This is just a first impression and I certainly haven't used any of those.
> | The deciding think for libxml2 is the XSLT processor, it would be just cool
> | to have that in LyX.
>
> I disagree. LyX is not XSLT
But this is
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| |
| | On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
| |
| | > Is the plan to feed the dtd to the parser, so that it parses only lyx docs
| | > and not some other well formed but otherwise arbitr
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > Is the plan to feed the dtd to the parser, so that it parses only lyx docs
| > and not some other well formed but otherwise arbitrary file?
| >
| > I was thinking about the best way t
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 03:20:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | A small step to Lars a large leap to LyX? ;-)
>
> Parse Ok! vs. Parse Failed!
>
> does not help us much.
Especially in times of freeze when every minute that's spend on LyX goes
into bugfixing.
Andre'
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 10:08:57AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > This is my test expath code so far.
> > This gives me everything in the file... now I just need to make use of
> > it.
> >
> > Signal driven.
>
> Looks good. Also looks like lots still to do.
>
> Seri
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Is the plan to feed the dtd to the parser, so that it parses only lyx docs
> and not some other well formed but otherwise arbitrary file?
>
> I was thinking about the best way to proceed on the way home last night. Do
> we really ne
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I have begun on a road that I am not sure that I should continue.
>> It is nice in a way... but I have feeling that it is complicated...
>> OTOH the handlers are quite easy to write, since you only follow the
>> DTD when doi
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have begun on a road that I am not sure that I should continue.
> It is nice in a way... but I have feeling that it is complicated...
> OTOH the handlers are quite easy to write, since you only follow the
> DTD when doing so.
>
> I am now so far that I can with littl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> This is my test expath code so far.
>>> This gives me everything in the file... now I just need to make use of
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Signal driven.
>>
| | Looks good. Also lo
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> This is my test expath code so far.
>> This gives me everything in the file... now I just need to make use of
>> it.
>>
>> Signal driven.
>
| Looks good. Also looks like lots still to do.
>
| Seriously, if you would like so
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is my test expath code so far.
> This gives me everything in the file... now I just need to make use of
> it.
>
> Signal driven.
Looks good. Also looks like lots still to do.
Seriously, if you would like some help with this, why not create a branch
of the cvs tr
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>> Given that expat already has the machinery we need, so that all you need do
>> is register handler functions with the parser, I'd start off with that.
>> Most of the strai
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Given that expat already has the machinery we need, so that all you need do
> is register handler functions with the parser, I'd start off with that.
> Most of the strain will be in writing these handler functions anyway.
> (Presum
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I am sure it would be a lot easier for me to use expat instead...
>
> Ok I got xml.cpp to compile.
>
> I have not made it do anything yet...
> (except parse UserGuide.lyx.xml successfully.)
Is the plan to feed the dtd to the parser, so that it parses only lyx docs
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Ok I got xml.cpp to compile.
>>
>> I have not made it do anything yet...
>> (except parse UserGuide.lyx.xml successfully.)
>
| A small step to Lars a large leap t
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Ok I got xml.cpp to compile.
>
> I have not made it do anything yet...
> (except parse UserGuide.lyx.xml successfully.)
A small step to Lars a large leap to LyX? ;-)
> --
> Lgb
--
José Abílio Matos
LyX and doc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> | Sure. See attached.
>>>
>>> Ok... then add some attributes, mixed-contentent.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hellothere.
>>>
>>>
>>> Would be great seeing an example using the actua
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Sure. See attached.
>>
>> Ok... then add some attributes, mixed-contentent.
>>
>>
>> Hellothere.
>>
>>
>> Would be great seeing an example using the actual xml grammar from
>> xml.zip? Or is generic parsing frowned up
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Incidentally, I see that Dan Nuffer's stuff unzips to a directory xml that
> contains Makefile.am. How do I generate a Makefile from that?
Add Makefile.am to AC_CONFIG_FILES in configure.ac and then call automake
from toplevel.
Georg
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> Any pointers?
>>
> | Sure. See attached.
>
> Ok... then add some attributes, mixed-contentent.
Incidentally, I see that Dan Nuffer's stuff unzips to a directory xml that
contains Makefile.am. How do I generate a Makefile from that?
$ automake
automake: `configure.a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Sure. See attached.
>
> Ok... then add some attributes, mixed-contentent.
>
>
> Hellothere.
>
>
> Would be great seeing an example using the actual xml grammar from
> xml.zip? Or is generic parsing frowned upon with spirit?
I haven't looked at that stuff, just f
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Either a lib or xml parser for spirit.
>>>
>> | There are examples of same in the repository at spirit.sf.net. If you
>> | want any help, j
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> Either a lib or xml parser for spirit.
>>
> | There are examples of same in the repository at spirit.sf.net. If you
> | want any help, just holler. The spirit-users list is jolly helpful.
>
50 matches
Mail list logo
