Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> | Lars> But is not just about resolving, but also about confirming that
>> | Lars> it is a real bug.
>> >
>> | I did some of that, too ;) I even fixed one.
>>
>> How good of you.
>>
>> But we need more, and as I said in another mail: Just about everyone
>> (except from the submitter himself) can confirm a bug.
>> You don't need any particular skills (most often), just the time to
>> check if the reported problem actually exists.
>
| Confirming bugs needs web access. I currently have a choice between
| either net access and no time at all, or no net, but a couple of
| minutes to spare. I.e. I can handle offline mail and news, but no http.
>
| When I think about it: Would it be possiblle to create a local mirror of
| the bugzilla database and work with this pretty much the same way CVS
| works? [I can sync CVS from time to time...]
Only a one way mirror.
Perhaps just a dump of the database?
--
Lgb
