Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I have begun on a road that I am not sure that I should continue.
>> It is nice in a way... but I have feeling that it is complicated...
>> OTOH the handlers are quite easy to write, since you only follow the
>> DTD when doing so.
>>
>> I am now so far that I can with little effort parse a document - header
>> only.
>>
>> Have a look at these, and comment please:
>
| Ok, had a look. This is not as I envisaged it. I pictured something like:
>
| class Element {
| boost::signal<> start;
| boost::signal<> body;
| boost::signal<> end;
| };
>
| and that each Element instance (header, param, preamble, options in this
| case) would connect separate functions to these signals. Not this huge
| switch statement.
So you run umph-teen signal handlers on each element?
Or to you think like storing them in a map?
The problem is sub-elements.
<body><paragraph><font></font></paragraph></body>
You have to show me an example of what you are thinking.
| I certainly haven't thought it through, but it seems to me that avoiding
| the switch is a major goal, no?
Yes, but if the signals need to be set dynamically then you just
loose...
--
Lgb
