On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 03:55:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | This is just a first impression and I certainly haven't used any of those. > | The deciding think for libxml2 is the XSLT processor, it would be just cool > | to have that in LyX. > > I disagree. LyX is not XSLT
But this is a natural way to handle export filters. >, espescially not when it can more easily be handled _outside_ of lyx. I would disagree with that assertion. We have had no end of problems with temporary file handling and the like. It makes real sense to automatically get export filters via XSLT almost for free rather than relying still on our fragile export machinery. > And I find the interface of libxml a lot harder for simple xml parsing > than expat. "A lot" ? Are you serious?? regards john
