On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:57:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> (This also reminded me how VERY VERY VERY unhappy I am about Math not
> having its own top-level menu entry anymore. It is such a separate and
> special part of both LyX and LaTeX, that this old practice was more than
> justified.
So I tried this idea, if ~S-^would be recognized, but no.
What did help though was adding this to the X config:
Option "XkbVariant""nodeadkeys"
Now ^ for superscript works again... rejoice children of Israel...
Still, no accents by deadkeys, and not by compose either (I enabled the
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 14:22, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Noteworthy is that
>
> - my LyX thinks that I pressed the key combination [S-^], which it does
> not recognise as anything that should trigger math-superscript, or
> anything else for that matter; whereas
> - your LyX thinks you pressed [S-as
On Monday 24 January 2005 09:51, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Yes, agree. But it is packaged in qt with FC3.
The packages from kde-redat.se.net don't have that problem. :-)
Since I saw you use rpmforge you can also use kde-redhat packages. :-)
> - Martin
--
Josà AbÃlio
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 13:26, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 24 January 2005 10:56, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> > Any other difference you can think of? What does lyx -dbg key say
> > for ^ ?
>
> Attached is the output of
> $ qlyx13x -dbg key > dbg.log 2>&1
>
> in which I:
> HTH,
> Angus
I t
On Monday 24 January 2005 10:56, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> (To make sure: you type ^ and a blue superscript box opens?
Yes.
> What keyboard do you have and is ^ supposed to be a deadkey on it?)
A generic 105 key keyboard. Attached is my /etc/X11/xorg.conf file.
> Weird. Has anything changed here
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 12:14, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 24 January 2005 10:01, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Mine do *partially*. They work in KDE apps like this knode
> > > console, but not when I'm using LyX. And again, I emphasise that
> > > I'm using the compose-key approach to write accent
On Monday 24 January 2005 10:01, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Mine do *partially*. They work in KDE apps like this knode
> > console, but not when I'm using LyX. And again, I emphasise that
> > I'm using the compose-key approach to write accents. I have no
> > real idea what dead keys are but have thi
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 10:30, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > No, rather not. Have them too already :-(
> > My version is qt-3.3.3-8.
>
> Mine too.
>
> > So, you seem to have the same stuff as I, but your accents work and mine
> > don't.
>
> Mine do *partially*. They work in KDE
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 10:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use
> Martin> dead keys like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't
> Martin> produce a superscript. Anno
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use
Martin> dead keys like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't
Martin> produce a superscript. Annoying.
Martin> It's a qt-3.3.3- bug known as 141475 by Red Hat's
Ma
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> No, rather not. Have them too already :-(
> My version is qt-3.3.3-8.
Mine too.
> So, you seem to have the same stuff as I, but your accents work and mine
> don't.
Mine do *partially*. They work in KDE apps like this knode console, but not
when I'm using LyX. And again, I
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 00:45, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>> > and does it have immodule?
> >>>
> >>> I have no idea. How do I find out?
> >>> Angus
> >>
> >> For imstance by rpm -ql qt and look for a directory
> >> plugins/inputmethods.
> >
> > /us
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>>> > and does it have immodule?
>>>
>>> I have no idea. How do I find out?
>>> Angus
>>
>> For imstance by rpm -ql qt and look for a directory
>> plugins/inputmethods.
>
> /usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins
> /usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins/inputmethods
> /usr/lib/qt-
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> > and does it have immodule?
>>
>> I have no idea. How do I find out?
>> Angus
>
> For imstance by rpm -ql qt and look for a directory
> plugins/inputmethods.
/usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins
/usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins/inputmethods
/usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins/inputmethods/libqimsw-multi
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:51:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Sunday 23 January 2005 21:38, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Which qt version do you have
>
> qglobal.h tells me:
> #define QT_VERSION_STR "3.3.3"
> /*
>QT_VERSION is (major << 16) + (minor << 8) + patch.
> */
> #define QT_VERS
On Sunday 23 January 2005 21:38, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Which qt version do you have
qglobal.h tells me:
#define QT_VERSION_STR "3.3.3"
/*
QT_VERSION is (major << 16) + (minor << 8) + patch.
*/
#define QT_VERSION 0x030303
> and does it have immodule?
I have no idea. How do I find out?
An
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:34:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >
> > Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use dead keys
> > like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't produce a superscript.
>
> Sure it does. I have FC3 here and I've just fired
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use dead keys
> like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't produce a superscript.
Sure it does. I have FC3 here and I've just fired up LyX 1.3.x and created
a formula a+b^2. Perfect. Trying LyX 1.4.x... yup,
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> So, please help hunt for these problems, not just report them.
Sure. But the first step is actually identifying a bug. In this case, three
of us spent quite some time tracking down the cause before John squashed
it.
--
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Levon wrote:
|
| > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:59:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
| >
| >> In fact, it's totally fubar-ed. Add three paragraphs containing just 'a',
| >> save, close and reopen. The table appears as it does on the screenshot.
| >>
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:59:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> In fact, it's totally fubar-ed. Add three paragraphs containing just 'a',
>> save, close and reopen. The table appears as it does on the screenshot.
>> The truncated table is preceded immediately by the 'a', y
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:59:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> In fact, it's totally fubar-ed. Add three paragraphs containing just 'a',
> save, close and reopen. The table appears as it does on the screenshot. The
> truncated table is preceded immediately by the 'a', yet I can navigate the
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Try and open the attached file with current lyx, either frontend.
> Screenshot also attached, both immediate and after a carriage return after
> the table.
In fact, it's totally fubar-ed. Add three paragraphs containing just 'a',
save, close and reopen. The table appears a
On Friday 16 August 2002 4:18 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:02:17AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > around this maze right now
> >
> > I thought this code was now really easy to follow :-(
>
> it probably is ! I only spent ten minutes... I just can't work out where
> we are
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:02:17AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > around this maze right now
>
> I thought this code was now really easy to follow :-(
it probably is ! I only spent ten minutes... I just can't work out where
we are trying to display some non-existent file
john
--
"Someone t
On Friday 16 August 2002 1:26 am, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:06:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > That's true. It usually involves some horrid BadDrawable, as if the
> > > execvp failure is still trying to draw a non-existent pixmap or
> > > something
> >
> > can I get you
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:06:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > That's true. It usually involves some horrid BadDrawable, as if the
> > execvp failure is still trying to draw a non-existent pixmap or
> > something
>
> can I get you to investigate since I'm sort of busy and you have been
> ex
On Friday 09 August 2002 1:30 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > either way, LyX shouldn't crash...
>
> That's true. It usually involves some horrid BadDrawable, as if the
> execvp failure is still trying to draw a non-existent pixmap or
> so
On Friday 09 August 2002 1:30 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Friday 09 August 2002 12:14 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> 2. Alternatively, it could be a non-member function
> >>
> >> void Counters::copy(Counters const & from, Counters & to)
> |
> |
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> either way, LyX shouldn't crash...
That's true. It usually involves some horrid BadDrawable, as if the
execvp failure is still trying to draw a non-existent pixmap or
something
john
--
"It is unbecoming for young men to utter ma
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 09 August 2002 12:14 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> 2. Alternatively, it could be a non-member function
>>
>> void Counters::copy(Counters const & from, Counters & to)
>
| That's
| void copy(Counters const & from, Counters & to)
How is this the
On Friday 09 August 2002 1:18 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:27:52AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > It loads here now, after making some scripts executable.
> > (Yes, I am using the non-installed version from the src-directory.
>
> anyone remember how we get them +x in the repo
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:27:52AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> It loads here now, after making some scripts executable.
> (Yes, I am using the non-installed version from the src-directory.
anyone remember how we get them +x in the repository ? Do we have to
re-add them or is there a cvs thingy
On Friday 09 August 2002 12:14 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> 2. Alternatively, it could be a non-member function
>
> void Counters::copy(Counters const & from, Counters & to)
That's
void copy(Counters const & from, Counters & to)
On Friday 09 August 2002 11:59 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 09 August 2002 12:23 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > and can therefore be simplified to
> > >
> > > void Counters::copy(Counters & from, Counters & to)
> > > {
> >
On Friday 09 August 2002 12:23 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > and can therefore be simplified to
> >
> > void Counters::copy(Counters & from, Counters & to)
> > {
> > CounterList::iterator it = counterList.begin();
> > CounterL
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> and can therefore be simplified to
>
> void Counters::copy(Counters & from, Counters & to)
> {
> CounterList::iterator it = counterList.begin();
> CounterList::iterator end = counterList.end();
> for (; it != end;
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Amazing what happens if you dig deeper
>
| aleem@pneumon:src-> grep "counters()" *.C */*.C | grep copy
| text2.C:par->counters().copy(par->previous()->counters(),
| par->counters(), "");
| aleem@pneumon:src-> grep "counters()" *.C */*.C
Amazing what happens if you dig deeper
aleem@pneumon:src-> grep "counters()" *.C */*.C | grep copy
text2.C:par->counters().copy(par->previous()->counters(),
par->counters(), "");
aleem@pneumon:src-> grep "counters()" *.C */*.C | grep reset
text2.C:par->cou
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:37:10AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
...
> > > Andre ? Martin ?
> >
> > Seems correct to me. The first dozen lines or so in LyXText::setCounter
> > are: if a par has no previous(), it resets its counter array, otherwise it
> > copies the one of its predecessor. Should c
On Friday 09 August 2002 11:30 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Friday 09 August 2002 10:37 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Incidentally, why not:
> >>
> >> void Counters::reset(string const & match)
> >> {
> >>CounterList::iterator it = counterLi
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 09 August 2002 10:37 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Incidentally, why not:
>>
>> void Counters::reset(string const & match)
>> {
>> CounterList::iterator it = counterList.begin();
>> CounterList::iterator end = counterList.end();
>>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:37:10AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> (I believe that they're executed in order).
They have to.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Friday 09 August 2002 10:37 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Incidentally, why not:
>
> void Counters::reset(string const & match)
> {
> CounterList::iterator it = counterList.begin();
> CounterList::iterator end = counterList.end();
> if (match.empty()) {
> for (; it
On Friday 09 August 2002 10:39 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 07:15:23PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Kornel Benko sent me this file because we thought that the crash was
> > > caused by the previewing. Howev
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 07:15:23PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Kornel Benko sent me this file because we thought that the crash was caused
> > by the previewing. However, I can't load it at all with current, with or
> > with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thursday 08 August 2002 15:06, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Kornel Benko sent me this file because we thought that the crash was
> > caused by the previewing. However, I can't load it at all with cu
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 07:15:23PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> ==9208== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==9208==at 0x40480B95: ostream::operator<<(int) (in
>/usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so)
> ==9208==by 0x8163A63: {anonymous}::initSymbols(void) (math_f
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:24:15PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 09:42:11PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > Start a new document, create a right aligned paragraph, and then insert
> > a collapsible inset (footnote/note/ert etc.), and LyX will go into an
> > infinite rendering
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 09:42:11PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Start a new document, create a right aligned paragraph, and then insert
> a collapsible inset (footnote/note/ert etc.), and LyX will go into an
> infinite rendering loop...
this seems fixed. is it ?
john
--
"Not to laugh, not to la
On 13-Aug-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 12:31:04PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> > BTW, please fix the bug I reported here (collapsible inset in right aligned
>> > paragraphs) as soon as possible.
>>
>> I cannot fix it as I don't use RTL!
>
> It is not a RTL problem!
> Just
On 13-Aug-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 12:31:04PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> > BTW, please fix the bug I reported here (collapsible inset in right aligned
>> > paragraphs) as soon as possible.
>>
>> I cannot fix it as I don't use RTL!
>
> It is not a RTL problem!
> Just
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 12:31:04PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > BTW, please fix the bug I reported here (collapsible inset in right aligned
> > paragraphs) as soon as possible.
>
> I cannot fix it as I don't use RTL!
It is not a RTL problem!
Just created a right aligned paragraph (in a LTR do
On 13-Aug-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> It was 0 in 1.1.6, so I was curious why you changed it.
I don't know but I already told you you can change it to 0 if this does
work for both cases otherwise we have to find another solution.
> BTW, please fix the bug I reported here (collapsible inset in rig
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 09:24:29AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 11-Aug-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> >> PS: The first line in LyXText::fill() is
> >> if (paper_width < 0)
> >> return 20;
> >>
>
> Negative paperwidth means that the paper width is infinite (no rowb
On 11-Aug-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
>> PS: The first line in LyXText::fill() is
>> if (paper_width < 0)
>> return 20;
>>
>> Why 20 is returned and not 0 ??
> Let me guess:
> Unless another test is done, a value of 0 would imply that you could
> create 0 sized rows on ne
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:58:28PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 04:50:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > In my opinion the current behavior is not fine.
> > Please revert to the old one.
>
> which old one ? it did this in 116 at least ...
argh,sorry, no it didn't of cour
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 04:50:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> In my opinion the current behavior is not fine.
> Please revert to the old one.
which old one ? it did this in 116 at least ...
john
--
"I'd rather be rudely informed than politely left in the dark."
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:08:45PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> at least openoffice doesn't change the preceding word. But this is not necessarily
> a thing to copy ...
>
> so perhaps the current behaviour is fine; it just surprised me ...
In my opinion the current behavior is not fine.
Please rev
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:29:04PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I don't know what we want to do, actually. Stealing ideas from others
> is always good.
Do I take it it is fairly easy to separate the mechanisms ?
Index entry should always work on last word.
Font changes etc. should be t
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:33:33AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Did it work with 1.1.6? I cam to the conclusion at the time that
> font-emph did not really work like that.
hmm, you're right. I must have been luck enough to have always pressed space
first (really I had never noticed such
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 06:42:18PM -0600, Fernando Pérez wrote:
> I found an ugly coredump with 1.1.6f1: if I have a simple lyx file with an
> included eps figure (in a float, it so happens), and try to export to latex
> with
> lyx --export latex file.lyx
>
> all goes well. However, if I us
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| John> The only reason you get mails from me personally as well as to
| John> the list is indeed my laziness. My fault of course ! But I
| John> stupidly use pine, and am wedded to it now
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 03:22:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> The only reason you get mails from me personally as well as to
> John> the list is indeed my laziness. My fault of course ! But I
> John> stupidly use pine, and
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 09:30:53AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
[snip things that actually matter]
> P.S.: I wonder what mail-programs people use and why it is so hard to
> remove personal addresses if you know the one is subscribed to the
> list anyway. Mate isn't it possible to set
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> The only reason you get mails from me personally as well as to
John> the list is indeed my laziness. My fault of course ! But I
John> stupidly use pine, and am wedded to it now. I don't know why it
John> doesn't have a proper reply-to c
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> P.S.: I wonder what mail-programs people use and why it is so hard to
> remove personal addresses if you know the one is subscribed to the
> list anyway. Mate isn't it possible to set the Reply-To address
> automatically to the list? I
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 09:30:53AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> P.S.: I wonder what mail-programs people use and why it is so hard to
> remove personal addresses if you know the one is subscribed to the
> list anyway. Mate isn't it possible to set the Reply-To address
> autom
On 20-Oct-2000 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I read a handful lists with such a policy and I do not like it more than
> our current policy. Sometimes I simply want to reply to the sender only,
> and this is easier if ReplyTo points to this single person...
This may happen, but let's say that (at le
> P.S.: I wonder what mail-programs people use
Elm 2.4ME+ PL60 (25), of May, 1999
> and why it is so hard to remove personal addresses
In my case it's simply laziness.
> Mate isn't it possible to set the Reply-To address
> automatically to the list?
I read a handful lists
On 19-Oct-2000 Andre Poenitz wrote:
[snip VERY good explanation]
>
> PS: Since we are at it: Default-constructing std::strings is pretty cheap, too.
Ok this convinced me, from now on I will do as you "preached" #:O)
Jürgen
P.S.: I wonder what mail-programs people use and why it is so har
> I think that Jürgen is asking the question, "is it more expensive to assign
> PODs (your notation I think) or to construct them?" Well, if he isn't, I am!
Default-constructing a POD costs nada, they is no assignment at all.
There might be three ints on the stack in this case, but they
are "con
> Well and I don't get what we gain with this? We NEED that variable all
> over (so no case we wouldn't need it), so why allocating it X times if
> just 1 time is enough!
It is simply cleaner and for some people (including me) simpler to read.
Once the variable is gone, it's gone. No side effects
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On 19-Oct-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> | >| And I really don't like how variables are declared at the top and used
> | >| inside separate bloc
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | On 19-Oct-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | >| And I really don't like how variables are decl
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 19-Oct-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| >
| >| And I really don't like how variables are declared at the top and used
| >| inside separate blocks (ref. int cell)
| >
| > This would suit me a lot
On 19-Oct-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
>| And I really don't like how variables are declared at the top and used
>| inside separate blocks (ref. int cell)
>
> This would suit me a lot better:
Well and I don't get what we gain with this? W
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| And I really don't like how variables are declared at the top and used
| inside separate blocks (ref. int cell)
This would suit me a lot better:
Index: tabular.C
===
RCS file: /usr
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 18-Oct-2000 John Levon wrote:
| >
| > Try loading up TableExamples.lyx, and do ascii export,
| > or try and cut the first table - it will not be happy.
| >
|
| I fixed this again, but the one who changed some types in LyXTabular::Ascii
| should ha
On 18-Oct-2000 John Levon wrote:
>
> Try loading up TableExamples.lyx, and do ascii export,
> or try and cut the first table - it will not be happy.
>
I fixed this again, but the one who changed some types in LyXTabular::Ascii
should have red ears to not try out the changes he did! This was on
81 matches
Mail list logo
