Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-07 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:11:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > I'd like to have more input from boost people, though. > | > | No need for this. I don't advocate the inclusion of the patch and > | I only mentioned it due to a problem r

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > I'd like to have more input from boost people, though. | | No need for this. I don't advocate the inclusion of the patch and | I only mentioned it due to a problem rised on the cygwin mailing. Anyways, when we stop providing an in-tree copy of bo

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:15:04PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > [...] > > I don't want to introduce ugly code only for the benefit of one platform, > > so I don't advocate the patch. But I think that it makes sense to apply > > it as a local patch if you specifically buil

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Georg Baum
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:08:58PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >> Enrico Forestieri wrote: > [...] >> > The correct way is simply allowing both windows and posix style paths >> > on cygwin, but I think that this has something to do with religion, >> > so I don't think they

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:55:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> See above. Bo, you have your patch if you want to apply it to the > >> cygwin package. > > Georg> Under this circumstances I don't have anything against the > Ge

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> I don't want to introduce ugly code only for the benefit of Enrico> one platform, so I don't advocate the patch. But I think that Enrico> it makes sense to apply it as a local patch if you Enrico> specifically build lyx for th

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:08:58PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: [...] > > The correct way is simply allowing both windows and posix style paths > > on cygwin, but I think that this has something to do with religion, > > so I don't think they will ever do the right thing. > >

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> See above. Bo, you have your patch if you want to apply it to the >> cygwin package. Georg> Under this circumstances I don't have anything against the Georg> patch, but the people to ask are Lars for 1.5 and Jean-Marc for Georg> 1.4 I

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Georg Baum
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:41:13AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Did you check the newest boost cvs whether that problem is fixed? > > No, it is even exacerbated, if possible. They introduced a > BOOST_CYGWIN_PATH define which simply means allowing Windows style paths

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-06 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:41:13AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Did you check the newest boost cvs whether that problem is fixed? No, it is even exacerbated, if possible. They introduced a BOOST_CYGWIN_PATH define which simply means allowing Windows style paths but using the posix api functions on

Re: LyX and share paths

2006-10-05 Thread Georg Baum
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Please have a look at this thread: > http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin@cygwin.com/msg73025.html > > I exactly know where the problem lies. It is due to the brain dead > boostfs library. Indeed, I always apply the attached patch to my > cygwin builds and everything work