Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > I'd like to have more input from boost people, though. | | No need for this. I don't advocate the inclusion of the patch and | I only mentioned it due to a problem rised on the cygwin mailing.
Anyways, when we stop providing an in-tree copy of boost this will be
a problem. And patching around the problem might only make it harder
to solve later.
For 1.4.x I have no opinion.
--
Lgb
