Thank you,
I found that this strange behaviour is due to the viruses (malwares).
Now after struggling to remove them, I can reinstall lyx, It can run as
usual.
I have to be extra careful with this box running windows.
regards,
waluyo
On 10 December 2013 15:05, Hugo Hinterberger wrote:
> On Mon
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:14:02 +0100, Waluyo Adi Siswanto
wrote:
What is this problem and how I can install lyx again.
Hi waluyo,
As far as I know LyX does not need to be installed, it should work fine
when being copied from an existing installation.
After copying you just need to check t
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> I have a problem when installing LyX 2.06. (Windows 7)
> It always stops when compiling python script. (see attachment)
> I have tried to uninstall all including miktex, the install using the bundle
> installer, it also stops at the sam
> Maybe the source in SVN still contains basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe, but when I build the installers
> I always include the latest version.
But the problem is real and probably Vincent is right:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg150268.html
Can you please have a look?
(I btw
Joost Verburg schreef:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
>
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads "basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe"
from "http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/";.
Aha, this explains a lot
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
>
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads "basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe"
from "http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/";.
Aha, this explains a lot. This is a one year old
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What do you mean. When you set the option to install LyX for all users,
a global file association for .lyx is set. When a user logs in, why
should he change this? But anyway, when he wants to do this, he can do
this via the folder options of the Windows file explorer as for all
> Your installer does not always take user specific settings into account (file
associations etc.).
What do you mean. When you set the option to install LyX for all users, a global file association
for .lyx is set. When a user logs in, why should he change this? But anyway, when he wants to do
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
That's what I meant, not all programs work when you don't install them
with admin priviledges. The Ghostscript developers will also not change
this.
I btw. could convince them today to provide Windows binaries for the
version 8.62 they released 2 months ago as this fixes some b
> A bundled subset of Python is installed, you don't need to have Python
installed.
>
>>What about Ghostscript?
>
> Ghostscript currently requires administrator privileges to install.
That's what I meant, not all programs work when you don't install them with admin priviledges. The
Ghostscr
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I tested out yesterday to install LyX as user-only using your latest
installer. The installation works, but the system I get is not complete
and not very useful - regarding image preview. I ve a full Python
installation, but what if I don't have, does it work to install Python
>>We have these restrictions here too and the admins absolutely don't like
that users install
>> things. Even when it is possible with user permissions, some things will
automatically be undone
>> when relogin. I discussed this with our admins a few times and they
convinced me not to offer
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What is btw. pplatex for?
The DVI post-processing for change tracking.
Joost
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But haven't you done so the time Christian tried to bring us working
together? I had this time rewritten major parts of my code as suggested
by Christian. The plan was that these parts will be taken and other
parts of your installer to create a new one which code we both
under
>>Please, only install additional software if it is not already installed.
>
> I think the most important reason why Uwe wants to bundle this software is
because the already
> installed version may be outdated.
This is one reason (especially for ImageMagick), the other one the download size
> Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper Windows ports of Aspell,
the > Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv, pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have
> included all these things in your installer. That's of course fine with me,
but it's not reall
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Joost Verburg wrote:
I think you misunderstood me.
I think the word 'misunderstanding' probably plays a huge part in the
"dramas" we see on mailing lists... Perhaps it played a central part in
the recent drama about embedding although I can't say as I didn't follow
it.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper
Windows ports of Aspell, the Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv,
pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have included all
these things in your installer. That's of course fine with me
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper
> Windows ports of Aspell, the Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv,
> pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have included all
> these things in
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe, this is just my 2 cents, if you still don't want to merge your
effort with Joost's just say "no", no need for another drama after the
embedding stuff :-)
I'm also not interested in long discussion without results. I just want
to say that I don't have strong opini
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I mean I have contacted
the authors of MiKTeX, ImageMagick, Ghostscript, JabRef to get versions
I could use for the installer. I even wrote for JabRef a new installer,
I developed together with the MiKTeX developer some interfaces that were
needed, ... So I'm not the one dupli
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
My installer had this time some Windows specific settings, so that LyX
under Windows looked a bit different than the Linux version, that not
all developers liked, but these changes were requested by users.
This was the reason why your installer was not accepted as the official
> if this is true how did it happen, that your installer is an alternative one?
Angus started a Windows installer, I joined him and sent a lot of patches. Angus later retired and I
took over and created my installer. About a year later Joost appeared on the devel-list, and
announced his install
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features
(other than NSIS code
>> optimization and things like that).
> Uwe, I think you should reconsider your position about this story.
Unless you find it fun to
> develop your own personal solution (in which case I
> The problem is that most of the installer features are from me and later
> bit by bit also used in Joost's installer,
if this is true how did it happen, that your installer is an alternative one?
> And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why someone
> who joined the Ly
>> I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other than
NSIS code
>> optimization and things like that).
> Uwe, I think you should reconsider your position about this story. Unless you
find it fun to
> develop your own personal solution (in which case I fully respect you
On Friday 18 April 2008 09:30:07 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Uwe, this is just my 2 cents, if you still don't want to merge your
> effort with Joost's just say "no", no need for another drama after the
> embedding stuff :-)
I always thought that Fridays are perfect for dramas. :-)
> Abdel.
--
Joost Verburg wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is that you always did your own thing with the installer.
I have never had a chance to contribute or discuss with you before you
do a change.
I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other
than NSIS code optimization
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is that you always did your own thing with the installer. I
have never had a chance to contribute or discuss with you before you do
a change.
I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other
than NSIS code optimization and things like that).
Joost Verburg schrieb:
I've recently rewritten large parts of the official installer in trunk.
Everything should now be much easier to understand (no more stack usage
for functions, more comments and meaningful variable names) and has also
been updated to use the latest NSIS technologies (Mod
Joost Verburg schrieb:
I'm not using the Aspell 0.60.x releases because of their broken
Windows support. Currently in use is a Windows port of a recent Aspell
CVS version. I'll prepare a new pre-compiled Qt4 when there is
agreement about the installers.
0.60.5 was released after you grabbed you
I'm not using the Aspell 0.60.x releases because of their broken Windows
support. Currently in use is a Windows port of a recent Aspell CVS
version. I'll prepare a new pre-compiled Qt4 when there is agreement
about the installers.
Joost
Joost Verburg schrieb:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
lyx is nearing it's first beta for the 1.5 release and we could use
some help with the installer. we were hoping you could free some time
for this.
BTW: Do you have any plans to update lyx-windows-deps-msvc-qt4.zip?
There are new versions of both qt
Bo Peng wrote:
If everyone including Uwe thinks this is a good idea we can have a
single official installer very soon.
I am not sure about others...
i think we all agree that only one official installer is needed, and
personally i think joost's one is the obvious choice here.
furthermore,
Bo Peng wrote:
If everyone including Uwe thinks this is a good idea we can have a
single official installer very soon.
I am not sure about others...
AFAIK Uwe explicitly said that he was waiting for Joost to reappear in
order to work with him. Now that you are here and motivated again Joost,
I prefer to use provide an official and
unmodified LyX version and believe that changes should be discussed on
the list and implemented on all platforms.
These are the current consensus regarding windows installer and is
exactly the reason your installer is the official one.
Although it would
Edwin Leuven wrote:
lyx is nearing it's first beta for the 1.5 release and we could use some
help with the installer. we were hoping you could free some time for this.
It took me a lot of time to write an installer that complies with all
the requirements of the LyX users and developers, based
Michael Gerz wrote:
Angus,
if you intend to build another LyX 1.3.7 installer, could you please
update the qtwin library at the same time? Christian has committed a
patch today that looks interesting. Among others, it may address the
flickering problems seen on Windows.
If you visit http://w
Am Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2006 23:08 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Michael Gerz wrote:
>
> > Angus,
> >
> > if you intend to build another LyX 1.3.7 installer, could you please
> > update the qtwin library at the same time? Christian has committed a
>
> Eh... I think you got
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Angus,
>
> if you intend to build another LyX 1.3.7 installer, could you please
> update the qtwin library at the same time? Christian has committed a
Eh... I think you got the wrong name there, unless there's another
Christian on this list.
/Christ
40 matches
Mail list logo
