> "Albert" == Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Albert> While building 1.3.0 with the Qt frontend on Solaris 2.6 with
Albert> GCC 3.2.2:
[...]
Albert> No build problems on Solaris 7, 8, or 9. From Solaris 7
Albert> How about the patch below?
Albert, it seems to me that your patch has
> "Albert" == Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Albert> While building 1.3.0 with the Qt frontend on Solaris 2.6 with
Albert> GCC 3.2.2:
Albert> ../../boost/boost/integer_traits.hpp:109:2: #error No
Albert> WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX present, please adjust
Albert> integer_traits<> for your
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:47:18AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> How about the patch below?
sure, but it needs to go to the boost guys, and then we'll take
the update.
thanks,
john
Helge Hafting wrote:
> I decided to try preview-latex. I installed the debian
> package preview-latex-style and turned on the option
> in lyx. I typed in a math formula, and as soon as
> I hit space (leaving math) the crash happened.
> Lyx created a ppm file on disk with the formula, but I newer
> You should set LD_LIBRARY_PATH appropriately if you want to override
> the default linking directories.
>
Thanks John.. it might be nice to mention this somewhere in the INSTALL
file...
nirmal
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:25:28AM -0700, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> was using the correct qt library when it started.. turns out it wasn't..
>
> I compiled qt 3.0.7 in /usr/local/qt and configure lyx using the
> --with-qt-dir=/usr/local/qt option but the program uses the libqt.so.3
> in /usr/lib whe
>
> Does your link error tell you what tries to access this symbol?
> Do Debian have a help forum? Is there a powerpc news group?
No, the only error I get is what I reported in the earlier mail.. is
there a way to get more information on the error??
debian-powerpc is a forum that I'm on but usu
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Nirmal Govind wrote:
>> Hi.. based on suggestions from this list, I upgraded to gcc3.2 and
>> recompiled QT 3 and then compiled lyx 1.3.0. I still can't startup
>> Lyx.. gives the following error:
>>
>> src/lyx: relocation error: s
Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. based on suggestions from this list, I upgraded to gcc3.2 and
> recompiled QT 3 and then compiled lyx 1.3.0. I still can't startup
> Lyx.. gives the following error:
>
> src/lyx: relocation error: src/lyx: undefined symbol: _ZN5QChar4nullE
>
> I'm using gcc/g++ 3.2.1
> "m" == m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
m> Hi, trying to build lyx 1.3.0 on openbsd 3.1. Here is output. Will
m> provide any more information required.
m> Advice? I'm still running version 1.16.
m> Thanks for your time, -Marten
m> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src -I../../../../
On 7 Feb 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> You mean there is no qt in rh7.x? What about pspell?
In case you're interested, I seem to have the following on standard RedHat
RH7.1: pspell 0.11.2
qt 2.3.0
RH7.3: pspell 0.12.2
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> I could use some help in getting those stable releases out. The
>> only
John> Help in what way ...
I will probably know more about that in a few days, when
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I could use some help in getting those stable releases out. The only
Help in what way ...
john
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> --with-pspell --with-frontend=qt
>
> You mean there is no qt in rh7.x? What about pspell? Does configure
> just die if pspell is not found?
Actually, you're right. It should be fine. At least we need both xforms
and qt
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:36:17AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: OK, though my .src.rpm will be rh80 specific too...
>> Why is this necessary?
John> --with-pspell --with-frontend=qt
You mean there is no qt in rh7.x? What ab
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:32:06AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> This can maybe wait for 1.3.1. I have a feeling that this will be
>> soon anyway.
John> Since you mention it... I'd love to see more frequent stable
John> re
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:36:17AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> OK, though my .src.rpm will be rh80 specific too...
>
> Why is this necessary?
--with-pspell --with-frontend=qt
> Can't we avoid it?
no idea ...
john
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:30:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: I've uploaded latex-ttf-fonts again into incoming/
>> Where do you suggest it should go? Contrib?
John> It's too obscure to find then... it needs to be pretty
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:32:06AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This can maybe wait for 1.3.1. I have a feeling that this will be soon
> anyway.
Since you mention it... I'd love to see more frequent stable releases.
john
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:30:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> I've uploaded latex-ttf-fonts again into incoming/
>
> Where do you suggest it should go? Contrib?
It's too obscure to find then... it needs to be pretty prominent so
RH8.0 users know they need it.
> Why, let's keep
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I'm currently
Lars> building Qt RPMs for RH8.0 with pspell support. Will | upload
Lars> when done then make an xforms RPM too.
Lars> I explictly did not do this, since we talked about sp
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:28:01AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | I'm currently building Qt RPMs for RH8.0 with pspell support. Will
> | upload when done then make an xforms RPM too.
>
> I explictly did not do this, since we talked about splitting lyx into
> more than one RPM.
It's a bit
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I'm currently building Qt RPMs for RH8.0 with pspell support.
John> Will upload when done then make an xforms RPM too.
John> I've uploaded latex-ttf-fonts again into incoming/
Where do you suggest it should go? Contrib?
John> regardin
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I'm currently building Qt RPMs for RH8.0 with pspell support. Will
| upload when done then make an xforms RPM too.
I explictly did not do this, since we talked about splitting lyx into
more than one RPM.
--
Lgb
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:29:26PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
|
| > When I type "10" into the to-field, the "5" gets reset to "1"
| > in the from-field.
|
| Lars, can I apply the below please ? It is very low risk, and fixes a
| really really braindead b
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:29:26PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> When I type "10" into the to-field, the "5" gets reset to "1"
> in the from-field.
Lars, can I apply the below please ? It is very low risk, and fixes a
really really braindead behaviour.
john
Index: frontends/qt2/QLPrintDialog.C
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:29:26PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
>> > I tried to print from page 5 to page 10. When I type "10" into the
>> > to-field, the "5" gets reset to "1" in the from-field.
>>
>> Do I smell a 'clever' feature?
>
> Clever a
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Do I smell a 'clever' feature?
>
> Clever and wrong :-(
As most of them *sigh*
> It is _impossible_ to enter a invalid interval
> such as pages from 23 to 13. Seems clever until:
> 1) It says from 10 to 20, and I want to change t
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:29:26PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > I tried to print from page 5 to page 10. When I type "10" into the
> > to-field, the "5" gets reset to "1" in the from-field.
>
> Do I smell a 'clever' feature?
Clever and wrong :-(
It is _impossible_ t
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:29:26PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> I tried to print from page 5 to page 10. When I type "10" into the
> to-field, the "5" gets reset to "1" in the from-field.
Do I smell a 'clever' feature?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
w
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | especially bug 8 !
>
> The target milestone also says when bugs to look into before release,
> if it is decided that this problem is minor etc. The target milestone
> can be removed.
OK fine. Then I would say that bug 8 is
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:55:09AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
|
| > How about bugs #770, #795 ?
| >
|
| Why must they be fixed before 1.3.0 ? Juergen is going to apply a fix
| for 770. Why must 795 be fixed ?
|
| I dont understand why we've added a
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:55:09AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> How about bugs #770, #795 ?
>
Why must they be fixed before 1.3.0 ? Juergen is going to apply a fix
for 770. Why must 795 be fixed ?
I dont understand why we've added a load of bugs as important now, just
as we're getting close
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:55:09AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
How about bugs #770, #795 ?
They have no target milestone.
#795 has a target milestone now :-)
135 bugzilla bug reports in total including unconfirmed and trivial
bugs! Not to bad.
I will check my
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:55:09AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> How about bugs #770, #795 ?
They have no target milestone.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
How about bugs #770, #795 ?
Michael
--
===
Michael Schmitt Telefon: +49 651 97551-40
Institut für TelematikTelefax: +49 651 97551-12
Bahnhofstrasse 30-32 WWW: http://ww
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:55:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| > |
| > | So should I move this function to frontends/qt/qt_helpers.C
| > | (this file doesn't exist now) ?
| >
| > Yes, why not. Or any other file that fits the bill.
|
| Here is the
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:55:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> |
> | So should I move this function to frontends/qt/qt_helpers.C
> | (this file doesn't exist now) ?
>
> Yes, why not. Or any other file that fits the bill.
Here is the latest version of the patch.
Now I'm just waiting for s
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| > +string makeFontName(string const & family, string const & foundry)
| > +{
| > + if (foundry.empty())
| > + return family;
| > +#if QT_VERSION >= 300
| > + r
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> +string makeFontName(string const & family, string const & foundry)
> +{
> + if (foundry.empty())
> + return family;
> +#if QT_VERSION >= 300
> + return family + '[' + foundry + ']';
> +#else
> +
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 05:28:03PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>>
>> Here is the patch that implements the above for the QT frontend.
>> Please check that it works correctly with QT2.
>
| I had a small error in the patch above and it probably hadn't functione
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 05:28:03PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> Here is the patch that implements the above for the QT frontend.
> Please check that it works correctly with QT2.
I had a small error in the patch above and it probably hadn't functioned
correctly with QT2. Here is an updated version
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:08:20PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Here is what should be done:
> 1. In lyxrc.C, we should be able to read old preferences file
> (or perhaps we should write a preferences file converter ?).
>
> 2. In the frontend font loader, the code should combine the family &
> found
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:06:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> | Dekel> Do you mean that in lyxrc we should store two variable for each
>> | Dekel> font: family & foundary (e.g.
>> | Dekel> roman_font_family/roman_font_foundry) ? Also, should we us
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:06:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Dekel> Do you mean that in lyxrc we should store two variable for each
> | Dekel> font: family & foundary (e.g.
> | Dekel> roman_font_family/roman_font_foundry) ? Also, should we use in
> | Dekel> the preferences file: \screen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Dekel> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:53:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes
| Dekel> wrote:
>>> I belive the fault is at the xforms side actually, in that we are
>>> way to low-level in the lyxrc
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:53:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> I belive the fault is at the xforms side actually, in that we are way
>> to low-level in the lyxrc file, i.e. "-*-times". We should to the same
>> with the xforms frontend that has been
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:51:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: Should this be solved with qt-only menu layout ?
>> It could be an optitem and the lfun should be disabled if there is
>> nothing hooked to the signal.
John> H
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:53:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes
Dekel> wrote:
>> I belive the fault is at the xforms side actually, in that we are
>> way to low-level in the lyxrc file, i.e. "-*-times". We should to
>> the same with the
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 11:08 am, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> 4. What should be done in the XForms dialog ?
> The alternatives are:
> - For each font, replace the text input widget by a combox like the QT
> preferences dialog.
That'd be nice...
Angus
> - Create two text input widgets for each font.
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:53:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I belive the fault is at the xforms side actually, in that we are way
> to low-level in the lyxrc file, i.e. "-*-times". We should to the same
> with the xforms frontend that has been done in qt, have a style
> "Times" and a fou
On Sunday 24 November 2002 17:53, John Levon wrote:
> If there are any bugs you think are needed for 1.3.0 please tell me
>
> bug 666
> lyx2lyx cannot load elasticity.lyx
>
> Can a lyx2lyx person comment on this please ?
I am looking into this. As well as the other lyx2lyx related bugs.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:51:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Should this be solved with qt-only menu layout ?
>
> It could be an optitem and the lfun should be disabled if there is
> nothing hooked to the signal.
Hmm, maybe. I was thinking of #define FRONTEND_NAME in co
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> bug 719 Preamble menu item does nothing
John> Should this be solved with qt-only menu layout ?
It could be an optitem and the lfun should be disabled if there is
nothing hooked to the signal.
Another bug: LYX_CHECK_DECL does not wo
John Levon wrote:
> bug 710
> qdocument not complete
>
> Still needs comment on what needs doing
AFAIK the only missing thing is that setting bullets does not automatically
use the packages which are needed (e.g. pifont).
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg48002.html
>
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:53:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I belive the fault is at the xforms side actually, in that we are way
> to low-level in the lyxrc file, i.e. "-*-times". We should to the same
> with the xforms frontend that has been done in qt, have a style
> "Times" and a fo
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| bug 735
| qt doesn't start with sensible fonts
|
| Dekel has a patch, but I dunno if it works fine with Qt 2
I belive the fault is at the xforms side actually, in that we are way
to low-level in the lyxrc file, i.e. "-*-times". We should to the same
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 07:08:15PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> ?? I use qt3
OK, thanks. Please report this bug to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give them the xev output and tell them that key() is returning
Qt::Key_unknown
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same perso
John Levon schrieb:
bug 737
qt can't handle some keys like Ä
As discussed. Perhaps we could force such users to use Qt 3
?? I use qt3
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:53:34PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > I don't think this is easy to fix. We would have to redo the
> > whole page-up/down scroll routine to not scroll on lyx-rows but
> > on real screen heigth.
>
> Well, do we ? Surelly all we need is the cursor placement routine to
> ope
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:33:03AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> - "Search" as well as "replace all" sometimes miss some places (in
> particular in tabulars
> and insets) (see also #576).
if it's "also" can you provide simple testcases (I know you're good at
that).
> - When a search str
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:06:11AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >infinite loop trying to search
> >http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615
> >page down for large tables broken
> >http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618
> >
> > - need guru help
>
> I don't think this is easy to fix. W
John Levon wrote:
If there are bugs that should be on this list but aren't, tell me.
infinite loop trying to search
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615
page down for large tables broken
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618
- need guru help
I don't think this is easy to fix. We
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:11:06PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Bug #668 is very serious.
yes thanks
john
--
""All the people we like are We, and everyone else is They."
- Kipling
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:35:35AM +, John Levon wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/2b0y
>
> Please inform me about other bugs not listed here that must be fixed
> before 1.3.0 !
Bug #668 is very serious.
Another example for this bug (or perhaps a different bug) is given in
the attached file:
When
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:55:40AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> and perhaps the other stuff on qt/TODO
yes, I should fill up bugzilla
john
--
""All the people we like are We, and everyone else is They."
- Kipling
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:35:02AM +, Philippe Elie wrote:
> #11 0x40380d99 in QPrintDialog::~QPrintDialog ()
>from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
argh ! how silly :)
Now I need a different name ...
thanks Phil
john
--
""All the people we like are We, and everyone else is They."
Am Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2002 02:35 schrieb John Levon:
> Please inform me about other bugs not listed here that must be fixed
> before 1.3.0 !
>
> Qt
QDocument:
(from TODO)
- finalize bullets
- buffer should update after apply
- set default unit if metric
Philippe Elie wrote:
John Levon wrote:
#10 0x4038c62a in QDialog::~QDialog () from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#11 0x40380d99 in QPrintDialog::~QPrintDialog ()
from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
^
you have a name conflict between your
QPrintDialog and th
John Levon wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2b0y
Please inform me about other bugs not listed here that must be fixed
before 1.3.0 !
Qt
--
544 Print dialog gets deleted twice -> crash
not called twice, rather your ~QPrintDialog is never called
- doesn't affect xforms. I need help here badly
#9
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> I can | Lars> start lyx now, but when
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> How strict is the distinction development/release branch
> David> anyway? With Linux, it is usual that something is, i.e., "1.3
> David> material". That does not mean that it
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:18:24PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Hm. Maybe we should really support \choose _and_ \binom then.
> Andre> Currently both are changed into \choose since \binom is AMS.
>
> But when I have 'use AMS', it should be \binom, no?
Probably.
Andre'
--
Those
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:17:39PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Can you add this wise comment to the bug?
Done.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Hm. Maybe we should really support \choose _and_ \binom then.
Andre> Currently both are changed into \choose since \binom is AMS.
But when I have 'use AMS', it should be \binom, no?
JMarc
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:46:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
Jean-Marc> There are a few things I'd like to address first.
>> Also Andre', could you look at bug 472 (math-greek and
>> math-greek-toggle?)
Andre> Act
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:01:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Seeing your message, I was not sure you considered the patch as safe.
> But if you say so, I will apply it, provided you send a changelog
> entry :)
Well, it work for. We can wait a few days, though...
> Actually I had notic
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:46:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jean-Marc> There are a few things I'd like to address first.
>
> Also Andre', could you look at bug 472 (math-greek and
> math-greek-toggle?)
Actually I want to get rid of these. The one-shot variant is possible to
get by ke
> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> How strict is the distinction development/release branch
David> anyway? With Linux, it is usual that something is, i.e., "1.3
David> material". That does not mean that it will be complete and
David> functional with 1.3.0, but that
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:17:23PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Andre> wrote: Actually I don't even see that as a must. Would be nice,
> Andre> though.
> >> What would be th
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Can't you release 1.2.1 "soon"?
>> There are a few things I'd like to address first.
>>
>> 453: search/replace doesn't work properly with inline equatio
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:41:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> The preview stuff perhaps?
>
> I thought it was always clear that GUI-I was _the_ 1.3.0 feature.
Ok.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, eith
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Can't you release 1.2.1 "soon"?
>
> There are a few things I'd like to address first.
>
> 453: search/replace doesn't work properly with inline equations
>
> 443:Add Dekel's floatingfigure patch
>
> 425: link
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>>> You mean I won't have time to release 1.2.1? Why not...
Andre> Can't you releas
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:17:23PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Actually I don't even see that as a must. Would be nice,
Andre> though.
>> What would be the new features in 1.3.0 if nother frontend is not
>> operation
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> You mean I won't have time to release 1.2.1? Why not...
Andre> Can't you release 1.2.1 "soon"?
There are a few things I'd like to address first.
453
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:17:23PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Actually I don't even see that as a must. Would be nice,
> Andre> though.
>
> What would be the new features in 1.3.0 if nother frontend is not
> operational?
Good question.
The preview stuff perhaps?
Andre'
--
Th
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:08:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Also, the problem of handling old files has to be settled. Currently,
> | lyx cannot read files produced by reLyX, which is of course not
> | acceptable.
>
> Yes... but imho the fault is as much with reLyX as it is with LyX
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You mean I won't have time to release 1.2.1? Why not...
Can't you release 1.2.1 "soon"?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Wednesday 03 July 2002 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> That is not the problem. reLyX is a part of LyX. If we cannot fix
>> it, we'll have to make sure that compatibility file reading is
>> reinstated. Actually
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> That is not the problem. reLyX is a part of LyX. If we cannot fix it,
> we'll have to make sure that compatibility file reading is reinstated.
> Actually, I would like to see the python fileters that Jose has been
> promising to writ
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | Also, the problem of handling old files has to be settled.
Lars> Currently, | lyx cannot read files produced by reLyX, which is
Lars> of course not | acceptable.
Lars> Yes... but imho the fault is as much with reLyX as it is
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:52:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre> wrote:
>> | So the question is whether I should leave it as it is (which is
>> probably | best if we plan 1.3.0 really soon) or try to get there
>> using small st
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:52:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | So the question is whether I should leave it as it is (which is probably
> | best if we plan 1.3.0 really soon) or try to get there using small steps.
>
> I think that we should aim to have a 1.3.0 pretty soon, the main
> ob
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> I think that we should aim to have a 1.3.0 pretty soon, the main
| Lars> obstacle and some thing that we IMHO must have is a workable Qt
| Lars> version.
>
| How far is that
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I think that we should aim to have a 1.3.0 pretty soon, the main
Lars> obstacle and some thing that we IMHO must have is a workable Qt
Lars> version.
How far is that?
Lars> Also some work to make Jean-Marc's 1.3.0cvs compile
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Has anybody an idea when we'll have 1.3.0?
>
| I ask because yesterday I had a long shot at "inset unification" (i.e.
| reconciliation of math insets and the rest of the world) but failed.
>
| So the question is whether I should leave it as it is (which
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:41:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > aka "auto correction" for mathed. Type '-' '>' to get '\rightarrow'...
>
> Excellent ... now we can support the TeXMacs math bindings properly, no ?
Sure. That was the point of the exercise...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give u
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:57:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> aka "auto correction" for mathed. Type '-' '>' to get '\rightarrow'...
Excellent ... now we can support the TeXMacs math bindings properly, no ?
john
--
"SirCam: Hi! How are you? Eliza: Why are you interested in whether or not I
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:30:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Just to satsify my curiosity, how would I type "->" if I didn't want to
> convert?
That would be the next feature request ;-)
There are a few sequences that make no sense in most cases. I believe "->"
is one of them... Apart from
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
