Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Has anybody an idea when we'll have 1.3.0?
>
| I ask because yesterday I had a long shot at "inset unification" (i.e.
| reconciliation of math insets and the rest of the world) but failed.
>
| So the question is whether I should leave it as it is (which is probably
| best if we plan 1.3.0 really soon) or try to get there using small steps.
I think that we should aim to have a 1.3.0 pretty soon, the main
obstacle and some thing that we IMHO must have is a workable Qt
version.
Also some work to make Jean-Marc's 1.3.0cvs compile and run.
(I am guessing on problems with static initialization)
Are we up to a feature freeze Aug. 1.? and a full freeze Aug. 15. ?
--
Lgb
