venom00 wrote:
> Do you think it would be difficult to implement? I'm at my first experience
> with LyX code, but I could give a look.
>
> What do you think?
the code is partly finished and hopefully shipped with 2.0.
pavel
Bernd Sellentin wrote:
Hi,
since lyx 1.6 ERT does some strange and unwanted insertion like
\foreignlanguage{ngerman} and {} when I modify an existing ERT. You can see
this if you open VIEW->Source.
Mostly this ERT-modified code does not compile anymore.
I found 2 workarounds:
- save-close-reop
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:17:04 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
This has benn discussed on the list. This is the minimalitic style.
To collapse an ERT, right-click on it, to uncollapse, click on it.
We cannot ke
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:17:04 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >>> This has benn discussed on the list. This is the minimalitic style.
> >>> To collapse an ERT, right-click on it, to uncollapse, click on it.
> >
> > We cannot ke
>>> This has benn discussed on the list. This is the minimalitic style.
>>> To collapse an ERT, right-click on it, to uncollapse, click on it.
>
> We cannot keep this feature as this is in violation of the simple model
> "right-click == context menu".
ouch. isnt really possible to keep right mous
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
This has benn discussed on the list. This is the minimalitic style.
To collapse an ERT, right-click on it, to uncollapse, click on it.
We cannot keep this feature as this is in violation of the simple model
"right-click == context menu".
yes, ri
Pavel Sanda wrote:
This has benn discussed on the list. This is the minimalitic style.
To collapse an ERT, right-click on it, to uncollapse, click on it.
We cannot keep this feature as this is in violation of the simple model
"right-click == context menu".
yes, right click is now context m
> This has benn discussed on the list. This is the minimalitic style.
> To collapse an ERT, right-click on it, to uncollapse, click on it.
yes, right click is now context menu.
pavel
> ert inset has no label on the left side and there is no clean way
> how to uncollapse it.
This has benn discussed on the list. This is the minimalitic style.
To collapse an ERT, right-click on it, to uncollapse, click on it.
regards Uwe
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:01:21 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Done, see attached.
>
> Very good.
>
> JMarc
It's committed, thanks.
- Martin
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Done, see attached.
Very good.
JMarc
Every day, and in every way, it gets better and better. (With apologies
to Inspector Dreyfus, not to mention Emile Coue.)
rh
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:38:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ah. But doesn't verba
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:38:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ah. But doesn't verbatim imply free spacing? And what about allowEmpty()?
> >
> > I see what's happening with the Verbatim layout and with the
> > FreeSpacing parameter, but wha
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 17:14:50 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> It's a thing that should be decided per case in the review proces...
I agree.
> In theory.
>
> Andre'
--
José Abílio
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:05:22AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> We should put a hard rule that anyone adding more than 10 lines of code
> to a method should do so in a new method. Or is it in the coding rules
> already?
It's a thing that should be decided per case in the review proces...
I
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 11:38:54 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It would make sense to have the same concepts in both kind of layouts.
> I think your verbatim is what is called pass_thru in Layout. I do not
> care about particular names, but uniformity is good (meaning that if
> you prefer you
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah. But doesn't verbatim imply free spacing? And what about allowEmpty()?
>
> I see what's happening with the Verbatim layout and with the
> FreeSpacing parameter, but what is the logic behind it (if any)?
> Should we have a separate FreeSpacing parm fo
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:57:18 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am thinking of just implementing isFreeSpacing() for Inset, and then
> > inheriting and modifying it in Collapsable using layout.verbatim. Are
> > there any prob
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:05:22 +0200
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
I _hope_ the encoding problem was the only one remaining... can you say
'spaghetti'?
It wasn't so bad in the end, was it? ;)
I circumvented the spaghetti rather than addressing it ;-/ "N
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am thinking of just implementing isFreeSpacing() for Inset, and then
> inheriting and modifying it in Collapsable using layout.verbatim. Are
> there any problems with that?
I'd rather separate the notion of verbatim and the notion of free
spacing, li
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:05:22 +0200
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> >>> I _hope_ the encoding problem was the only one remaining... can you say
> >>> 'spaghetti'?
> >> It wasn't so bad in the end, was it? ;)
> >
> > I circumvented the spaghetti rather than addressing it ;-/ "No
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:51:00AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
But anyhow, IMO both r21153 and r21121 should be reverted. I think it's
best that we leave ERT out of this, at least for now. I don't really see
what we gain by making it use the "verbatim" layout --- the cod
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:51:00AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:33:32 +0200
> >Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This thread is about a separate problem, which is due to Martin's change
> >>in r21121. I have described above what the p
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:33:32 +0200
Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread is about a separate problem, which is due to Martin's change
in r21121. I have described above what the problem is, and provided a
sample file with both the incorrect output, and corre
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:33:32 +0200
Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >> (This all relates to the situation after undoing the changes to
> >> Text.cpp from r21117)
> >>
> >> At the risk of being proved wrong again (but that's how we lear
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:19:48AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> (changing the title, since it now sounds like this is really a separate
> issue from Neal's original issue...)
>
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> >The attached seems to fix it and has the merit of me sort of
> >understanding w
(changing the title, since it now sounds like this is really a separate
issue from Neal's original issue...)
Martin Vermeer wrote:
The attached seems to fix it and has the merit of me sort of
understanding why it works.
- Martin
Thanks, Martin! This does indeed fix the issue I was complai
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Yes, but the thread was hijacked by a different problem in trunk. The
> 1.5.x is different but still present AFAIU.
OK. Thanks for the clarification.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Not needed... the fix replaces something that Abdel removed ;-)
I'm confused. I thought this "ERT in titel bug" is something that appeared in
1.5.x?
Yes, but the thread was hijacked by a different problem in trunk. The
1.5.x is different but
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Not needed... the fix replaces something that Abdel removed ;-)
I'm confused. I thought this "ERT in titel bug" is something that appeared in
1.5.x?
Jürgen
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 04:00:34PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > The attached seems to fix it and has the merit of me sort of
> > understanding why it works.
>
> Do you also have a fix for branch?
Not needed... the fix replaces something that Abdel removed ;-)
- Ma
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> The attached seems to fix it and has the merit of me sort of
> understanding why it works.
Do you also have a fix for branch?
Jürgen
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:58:08PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:10:36PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
After a clean compile of trunk (r20239), I'm seeing strange stuff:
*) type a few words, sw
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:58:08PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:10:36PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> > Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > >Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > After a clean compile of trunk (r20239), I'm seeing strange stuff:
> >
> > *) type a few words, s
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:10:36PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
> After a clean compile of trunk (r20239), I'm seeing strange stuff:
>
> *) type a few words, switch to \emph (ctrl-e) and continue typing, and
> then start an ERT inset (ctrl-
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
So, does anyone know how it was solved? If we understand why it's now
working, I guess the FIXMEs from r1 can be removed. Also, if Abdel
says this is not working now in branch, the fix should be ported to
branch, because the problem I'm descri
Dov Feldstern wrote:
So, does anyone know how it was solved? If we understand why it's now
working, I guess the FIXMEs from r1 can be removed. Also, if Abdel
says this is not working now in branch, the fix should be ported to
branch, because the problem I'm describing is definitely a regre
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't get this effect at all. Tried with article (AMS) and title
layout. The title is in small caps, and no
Neal Becker wrote:
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't get this effect at all. Tried with article (AMS) and title
layout. The title
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't get this effect at all. Tried with article (AMS) and title
layout. The title is in small caps, and no matter what I do, the ERT
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I don't get this effect at all. Tried with article (AMS) and title
> layout. The
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't get this effect at all. Tried with article (AMS) and title
layout. The title is in small caps, and no matter what I do, the ERT
inset content is in lo
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't get this effect at all. Tried with article (AMS) and title
layout. The title is in small caps, and no matter what I do, the ERT
inset content is in lower case, standard size, t
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> >I don't get this effect at all. Tried with article (AMS) and title
> >layout. The title is in small caps, and no matter what I do, the ERT
> >inset content is in lower case, standard size, typewriter L
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't get this effect at all. Tried with article (AMS) and title
layout. The title is in small caps, and no matter what I do, the ERT
inset content is in lower case, standard size, typewriter LaTeX red
text, just as it is supposed to be.
What should I do to see the bug?
Neal Becker wrote:
In my title I tried to insert:
Revision ERT{\input{build_id}}
On the screen, it says: \INPUT{BUILD_ID}
because I'm using ams art, and title is caps.
I chose 'view source', it says:
\title{SCMA Design Document\\
Revision \input{build_id}}
\maketitle
OK, fine. Just a scree
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:11:42PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> >Neal Becker wrote:
> >>In my title I tried to insert:
> >>
> >>Revision ERT{\input{build_id}}
> >>
> >>On the screen, it says: \INPUT{BUILD_ID}
> >>
> >>because I'm using ams art, and title is caps.
> >>
>
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
In my title I tried to insert:
Revision ERT{\input{build_id}}
On the screen, it says: \INPUT{BUILD_ID}
because I'm using ams art, and title is caps.
I chose 'view source', it says:
\title{SCMA Design Document\\
Revision \input{build_id}}
\maketit
Neal Becker wrote:
> In my title I tried to insert:
>
> Revision ERT{\input{build_id}}
>
> On the screen, it says: \INPUT{BUILD_ID}
>
> because I'm using ams art, and title is caps.
>
> I chose 'view source', it says:
> \title{SCMA Design Document\\
> Revision \input{build_id}}
>
> \maketitle
>
> O
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Because of minipage trouble, I tried to create
> one using ERT instead.
>
> The minipage is supposed to go around a heading with big text.
> The first oddity I noticed was that the red text itself were
> set in a very big font. Is
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:38:19PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> > Because of minipage trouble, I tried to create
> > one using ERT instead.
>
> I know the reason for the minipage problem, a patch will follow soon.
>
> > The minipage is supposed to go around a heading with
On 21.04.05, Helge Hafting wrote:
> ... Seems to me there is little point in setting the ERT text in a
> special font, especially considering that the current approach only
> goes halfway. The ERT text got bigger, but it was still red and still
> in its special font.
However, this font change
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:18:39PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >> "Georg" == Georg Baum
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> writes:
> >
> > Georg> This is not intentional and may be related to Martins recent
> > Georg> font changes. To Martin: The ERT inset is
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Are we sure? I guess that people who use inlined ERT in paragraphs
>> would disagree with you. Think using the \LaTeX macro in a text (of
>> course, this one is not needed, but you see what I mean).
Georg> As long as the ERT inset never
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> This is not intentional and may be related to Martins recent
> Georg> font changes. To Martin: The ERT inset is not allowed to have a
> Georg> nondefault font, i.e. it must not inherit th
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The minipage is supposed to go around a heading with big text. The
>> first oddity I noticed was that the red text itself were set in a
>> very big font. Is that really intentional? It is kind of hard if
>> one needs lots of code in the ER
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Because of minipage trouble, I tried to create
> one using ERT instead.
I know the reason for the minipage problem, a patch will follow soon.
> The minipage is supposed to go around a heading with big text.
> The first oddity I noticed was that the red text itself were
> s
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 05:24:17AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Typing Return in an ERT inset would appear as a simple line break, but in
> fact would produce in latex output a double line break (i.e., a paragraph
> break).
ok, if this makes sense, please file a bugzilla bug
john
-
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:03:49AM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Something better than the Error boxes? Hardly...
>
> Well I consider myself pretty average and I didn't know what the error
> box was trying to tell me.
*grin*
I can believe that. It's directly taken from LaTeX's output, and tha
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 03:45, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:24:18AM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > If this is really a problem, putting ERTs wherever you feel like, then
> > is it documented for the user?
>
> You can put ERT anywhere you like. However, LaTeX does not like all
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:24:18AM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> If this is really a problem, putting ERTs wherever you feel like, then
> is it documented for the user?
You can put ERT anywhere you like. However, LaTeX does not like all kinds of
stuff in every place.
> Could we add an intelligen
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 02:31, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:24:18AM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > > Of course it doesn't work.
> > > You put the \pagestyle{empty} command inside two groups:
> > > 1. \begin{center} .. \end{center}, and
> > > 2. \textbf{...}
> > >
> > > You should
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:24:18AM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Of course it doesn't work.
> > You put the \pagestyle{empty} command inside two groups:
> > 1. \begin{center} .. \end{center}, and
> > 2. \textbf{...}
> >
> > You should put the ERT inset in a paragraph of its own, not in bold,
>
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 23:39, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:19:55PM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > > Darren> This is really freaking me out, man. Have a go for yourselves.
> > > Darren> Can you insert TeX as the first thing in a document, in the
> > > Darren> standard environment
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:19:55PM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Darren> This is really freaking me out, man. Have a go for yourselves.
> > Darren> Can you insert TeX as the first thing in a document, in the
> > Darren> standard environment (bold if it matters). Try what I tried:
> > Darren> \pa
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:01:58PM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dunno. The only thing I can point to and say is wrong is that LyX is
> able to lock it up =) But as for LaTeX, is it possible that I need some
> more packages? Is \frontmatter a part of LaTeX or an add-on?
It is part of certain clas
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 17:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Darren> Dear list, OK now I'm getting worried!
>
> Darren> That ERT at the top of my document, \pagestyle{empty}, wasn't
> Darren> being noticed by view->dvi so I added the
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 05:19, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Dear list,
> >
> > OK now I'm getting worried!
> >
> > That ERT at the top of my document, \pagestyle{empty}, wasn't being
> > noticed by view->dvi
>
> so I added the carriage return inside the ERT as
> > before
> "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> Dear list, OK now I'm getting worried!
Darren> That ERT at the top of my document, \pagestyle{empty}, wasn't
Darren> being noticed by view->dvi so I added the carriage return
Darren> inside the ERT as before when it was working.
Darren Freeman wrote:
> I just inserted my first ERT..
Congratulations ;-)
> Can't kill that extra blank line.
Yes, this is a known bug (it's on bugzilla).
A workaround is to delete the second line with the del key while you are at
the end of the first line. Works only if the second line is not
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:36:42PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > +-++
> > some text |LABEL|text| more text
> > +-++
> > same way current collapsible inset is drawn
> > +-+
> > |LABEL|
> > ++
> > |text... |
> > |text... |
> > +-
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:43:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> But this does not save any code than, so it's just a UI thing?
>
> You know, some people are interested in other things than saving
> code...
Really?
There must be funny people out there...
Andre'
--
Those who des
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> But this does not save any code than, so it's just a UI thing?
You know, some people are interested in other things than saving
code...
JMarc
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:29:32PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> We can make the other collapsible inset behave in the same way (see below).
> A perhaps better behavior of collapsible inset is as follows:
> An open collapsible inset is drawn inline as follows:
> +-++
> some text |L
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:16:34PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 12 August 2002 2:29 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > No, I meant Inline and Collapsed.
> >
> > > I occasionally have an ERT inset containing several lines of LaTeX. I'm
> > > sure Herbert has too...
> >
> > You can have more than
On Monday 12 August 2002 2:29 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> No, I meant Inline and Collapsed.
>
> > I occasionally have an ERT inset containing several lines of LaTeX. I'm
> > sure Herbert has too...
>
> You can have more than one line of text in an inline ERT inset.
> In that case, it behaves exactly a
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:07:40PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> This doesn't contradict what I've written above.
Ah. Ok.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 12 August 2002 2:07 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > > Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (
On Monday 12 August 2002 2:07 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (open, collapsed, and inline) ?
> > > In my opinion, the open state has
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (open, collapsed, and inline) ?
> > In my opinion, the open state has no advantage over the inline state.
> > So in my opinion, we
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (open, collapsed, and inline) ?
> In my opinion, the open state has no advantage over the inline state.
> So in my opinion, we can just have inline & collapsed states.
> Then, the ERT dialog can be
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:24:09PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> Doing a clean recompile. Let's see what happens.
That did the trick. Phew indeed.
Martin
msg33403/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:16:21PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 22-Feb-2002 Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > Crashes on float.
>
> Well I don't!
>
> > Looking at line #7, I have a vague suspicion this is connected to your patch,
> > since a few days ago it didn't do this. I have modified co
On 22-Feb-2002 Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Crashes on float.
Well I don't!
> Looking at line #7, I have a vague suspicion this is connected to your patch,
> since a few days ago it didn't do this. I have modified code in parts of my local
>tree,
> but nothing that _ought_ to relate to this.
>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 02:03:57PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 20-Feb-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Juergen> getDrawFont() ?
...
Crashes on float.
Here is the stack:
#0 0x401ebd41 in __kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x401eb9b6 in raise (sig=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> How would you inspect character stuff with the Character
Juergen> layout??? And for the paragraph Layout I REALLY think that
Juergen> you don't have to inspect anything regarding the paragraph
Juergen> Layout of an ERT Inset as
On 20-Feb-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> And IMO the Layout->Character Menu should also be disabled.
> Juergen> Here it is the other way round the changes I make will not be
> Juergen> applied and I get an error message that it isn't possible,
> Juergen> but I can open the Layout wh
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 20-Feb-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> the paragraphs should be "forced" left aligned, IMO. And also we
>> should disable the whole Paragraph-Layout for paragraphs inside an
Juergen> I've just seen that the Layout->Paragraph
On 20-Feb-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> the paragraphs should be "forced" left aligned, IMO. And also we
> should disable the whole Paragraph-Layout for paragraphs inside an
I've just seen that the Layout->Paragraph is disabled if I'm inside an
ERT, but if I have the layout already open I'm able
On 20-Feb-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> getDrawFont() ?
>
> I can live with that. The most important is that the name is not
> getFontSettings.
Well then I'll change it to that. What we then still need is that
the paragraphs should be "forced" left aligned, IMO. And also we
shou
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 20-Feb-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I did not have time to actually try it out, but as I said in bug
>> 143, you should really rename getFontSettings to something else
>> because it does not have the same semantics a
On 20-Feb-2002 John Levon wrote:
> also there is another patch of yours on bugzilla that you need to
> apply I suppose
Did you see my recent commit ;)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It
On 20-Feb-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I did not have time to actually try it out, but as I said in bug 143,
> you should really rename getFontSettings to something else because it
> does not have the same semantics as the other getFontSettings. What
> about adaptFont or filterFont?
getDr
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:51:33AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Anyway all of you should already have had a look at the patch and tried it
> out. So if I don't get any serious complaints I will commit my tree soon!
see jmarc's comments on bugzilla !
also there is another patch of yours on bugz
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> For all of you who didn't look at it in short it does leave
Juergen> the Paragraph (Character) Params unchanged when copiing them
Juergen> inside an ERT and ONLY the display is changed. This is done
Juergen> by calling a functi
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:03:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> This menu sub-tree is really just a memory jogger for these
> Martin> things. It makes life a little easier for the people that need
> Martin> them, r
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> This menu sub-tree is really just a memory jogger for these
Martin> things. It makes life a little easier for the people that need
Martin> them, requiring only a little LaTeX experience. One more
Martin> handle on the inside of
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:51:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Here is an example of how one can provide a means of inserting simple (or not so
> | simple) ERT commands into your document more easily.
> >
> | There is a whole set of command
On 24-Oct-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> I'm a bit astonished that you talk about these facts ... because
> there are some tables with some formats
> on the other hand, I don't change the fileformat.
I don't follow you here? If you mean the new tabular format then that
format was discussed for
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 24-Oct-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> > again: the only reason for my ERT were the
> > problems with the actual one. with all my proposals you
> > do the same: "discussing what should really be ..."
> > a bit annoying
>
> Sure but as you said they are "proposals" and I
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
