On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:51:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Here is an example of how one can provide a means of inserting simple (or not so > | simple) ERT commands into your document more easily. > > > | There is a whole set of commands which one regularly needs but are not provided > | (yet) as insets etc. Currently you have to insert them directly -- if you remember > | them. > > I must admit that I am not in favour. > IMHO support like this will easily become a cushion and a reason to > not implement the real thing. Also by adding support like this, we > must (or at least should) handle the transcription when (if) we get > support for the real thing. In addition it is very latex specific. >
If/when we get the "real thing", we still have to provide some conversion mechanisms or compatibility with old documents, so I don't really see what the problem is with supporting such constructs in a more user-friendly way. It can only be a net plus for our users. -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89) http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | "crown of her husband" | Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
msg33114/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
