On Monday 12 August 2002 2:07 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (open, collapsed, and inline) ? > > > In my opinion, the open state has no advantage over the inline state. > > > So in my opinion, we can just have inline & collapsed states. > > > Then, the ERT dialog can be removed (pressing the 2nd mouse button in > > > an inline inset will collapse the inset, and pressing the 1st on 2nd > > > mouse button on a collapse inset will make it inline). > > > > Inline has the "advantage" of being less intrusive and shortens things a > > bit. > > This doesn't contradict what I've written above.
Surely you mean to retain Open and Collapsed, not Inline and Collapsed? I occasionally have an ERT inset containing several lines of LaTeX. I'm sure Herbert has too... Angus
