$ echo $XDG_SESSION_TYPE
x11
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:02 AM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> #10963: long pressing arrow, page up/down delete or backspace does not
> repeat
> action
> ---+-
> Reporter: JohnKarma | Owner: lasgout
5.9.3
Packaging: posix
LyX binary dir: /usr/bin
LyX files dir: /usr/share/lyx
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:38 PM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> #10963: long pressing arrow, page up/down delete or backspace doe
Bo Peng schrieb:
I have given up 1.4.3 and use 1.5.x/svn for my daily work. Nice work
everyone!
BTW, I see that Status.15x is no longer used. Michael, you need to
count the credits and mail your prizes to our hero.
I will care for the prizes within the next couple of weeks. No need to
remind m
Bo Peng schrieb:
I have given up 1.4.3 and use 1.5.x/svn for my daily work. Nice work
everyone!
BTW, I see that Status.15x is no longer used. Michael, you need to
count the credits and mail your prizes to our hero.
I will care for the prizes within the next couple of weeks. No need to
remind m
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak> Looks like 1.4.4 will be a nice contender for 1.5.0 ;-)
You mean for the race of being released last?
Bah...
:-)
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This patch backports a 1.5 fix that was only partly applied by
>> Enrico: since the selection() status of the cursor was not take in
>> account, Shift+pagedown would lose the selection at
Looks like 1.4.4 will be a nice contender for 1.5.0 ;-)
I have given up 1.4.3 and use 1.5.x/svn for my daily work. Nice work everyone!
BTW, I see that Status.15x is no longer used. Michael, you need to
count the credits and mail your prizes to our hero.
Bo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch backports a 1.5 fix that was only partly applied by Enrico:
since the selection() status of the cursor was not take in account,
Shift+pagedown would lose the selection at times.
It was not Enrico fault as I put in this fix after Enrico backported the
othe
This patch backports a 1.5 fix that was only partly applied by Enrico:
since the selection() status of the cursor was not take in account,
Shift+pagedown would lose the selection at times.
I'll commit now since it is already in 1.5, and I did test it.
JMarc
Index: src/text3.C
==
John Levon wrote:
I mean that if you can't fix the bug you shouldn't label the fix a bad
idea.
But it is a bad idea in my opinion (the fix in general I mean not the
particular code lines), anyway I just want to have the lines there so
that I don't have to download an earlier version to see how t
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 02:43:06PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> BTW.: Why do I need to send a patch for a patch? Do we have new rules?
I mean that if you can't fix the bug you shouldn't label the fix a bad
idea.
I've no real problem with including #if 0 stuff, even if it's pointless
as it will
John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:58:08AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Well I don't think this patch is a good idea and if we insert it that
way I at least want a #warning there and I would like to have the old
code there #if 0 out as the existing code should be the right on and the
n
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:58:08AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well I don't think this patch is a good idea and if we insert it that
> way I at least want a #warning there and I would like to have the old
> code there #if 0 out as the existing code should be the right on and the
> new code is a
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:26:02AM +, John Levon wrote:
This works OK for me. Note it fixes only one mode of failure - several
other cases are still broken. But those are not regressions, this is.
OK ?
Looks ok.
Well I don't think this patch is a good idea and if w
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:26:02AM +, John Levon wrote:
> This works OK for me. Note it fixes only one mode of failure - several
> other cases are still broken. But those are not regressions, this is.
>
> OK ?
Looks ok.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Securit
This works OK for me. Note it fixes only one mode of failure - several
other cases are still broken. But those are not regressions, this is.
OK ?
Index: text3.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/text3.C,v
retrievin
Somewhat better testet. Same patch. Ok to apply?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/l
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:02:07AM +0100, Jan Warnking wrote:
> When the cursor is inside a float, the page up/down keys do not move it
> outside the float.
Yes, this is a known problem ... no fix on the horizon ...
regards
john
--
"If a thing is not diminished by being shared
When the cursor is inside a float, the page up/down keys do not move it
outside the float.
In some situations (wasn't able to reliably reproduce this) the canvas
will be scrolled one page, moving the float off screen as expected, but
the cursor stays inside. Further page up/down's wi
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:08:07PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> >> It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with
> >> 1.2.0 towards 1.1.5.
>
> Juerg
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I do think too that it is one. But you know italian, don't you?
>> This was for this that I suggested you could take a look, for for
>> your hacking skills.
Juergen> And for what
On 18-Apr-2002 John Levon wrote:
>> Cells touch by the cursor get a red box (which is ok) but retain it even
>> after the cursor left. Nothing serious, but 'unexpected'.
>
> Argh argh regression regression :)
#:O)
> Why does this bug haunt us so ...
Maybe because we the implementation is not
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:55:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Cells touch by the cursor get a red box (which is ok) but retain it even
> after the cursor left. Nothing serious, but 'unexpected'.
Argh argh regression regression :)
Why does this bug haunt us so ...
regards
john
--
"Be advis
On 18-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> One item is:
>
> - new doc
> - click on table toolbar entry to create 'standard table'
> - move cursor around in the cell
>
> Cells touch by the cursor get a red box (which is ok) but retain it even
> after the cursor left. Nothing serious, but 'une
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:49:30PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > After all I was answering to one of Lars' mails...
>
> You are complaining about missbehaviour but cannot give real points as long
> as you do this for mathed I don't care, but when you bring tabulars in the
> discussion I at leas
On 18-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:13:10PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> I cannot do anything with "feelings" (didn't I tell this already today) and
>> I learned to not care for them if people cannot give me facts for them!
>
> You should practise "not caring" a bi
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:13:10PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I cannot do anything with "feelings" (didn't I tell this already today) and
> I learned to not care for them if people cannot give me facts for them!
You should practise "not caring" a bit.
After all I was answering to one of Lars'
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I do think too that it is one. But you know italian, don't you? This
> was for this that I suggested you could take a look, for for your
> hacking skills.
And for what should I look exactly? Anyway it seems really bad for me to
edit lyxfiles by hand
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> And I cannot read it without errors with 1.1.6 so it seems to
Juergen> me that this is a manually edited file!
I do think too that it is one. But you know italian, don't you? This
was for this that I suggested you could take a
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:44:01AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with 1.2.0
> towards 1.1.5.
We have - UPGRADING
regards
john
--
"Be advised. Your bedroom may quietly detach from the house while you sleep."
- Sarah Bee
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 09:29:59AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> If you think my recent changes only added more bugs to lyx then I miss the
> bug reports on LyXBugs. I've only seen decrease the bugs. Now as Allan told
Yes but the risk is replacing a mis-drawing with a crash, and we don't
find ou
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Hmm well strange enough someone change it_Tutorial already. I
> Juergen> did a update recently and now the top of it_Tutorial tells
> Juergen> us:
>
> I said it_Customization.lyx.
Oops ;), well then it is surely no 1.1.5 file as 1.1.5 had
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen> I would say now just convert them, going over a 1.1.5 format
Juergen> to be sure! If you don't have 1.1.5 anymore I can do it if
Juergen> you want.
>> Yes, please do!
Juerg
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> I would say now just convert them, going over a 1.1.5 format
> Juergen> to be sure! If you don't have 1.1.5 anymore I can do it if
> Juergen> you want.
>
> Yes, please do!
Hmm well strange enough someone change it_Tutorial already. I did a
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| He changed all \\end_float to \\end_inset without changing the check for
>| this in other compatibility reads (say tabulars!).
>
> So was it a cosmetic bug, or a real one?
Hmm, well, I let you decide if you change the fileformat and then give it
to
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 18-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> While investigating for the sk_??? read I saw that most probably the problem
>> lies in the mathed parser I will tell Andre when I see where, but for now I
>> saw just this (no bug just a bit strange handling)
>
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> So this is a very old file, but 1.1.6 can read it. Should I just
>> convert it, or does somebody want to investigate why it does not
>> work?
Juergen> I would say now just convert
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So this is a very old file, but 1.1.6 can read it. Should I just
> convert it, or does somebody want to investigate why it does not work?
I would say now just convert them, going over a 1.1.5 format to be sure!
If you don't have 1.1.5 anymore I can d
On 18-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> While investigating for the sk_??? read I saw that most probably the problem
> lies in the mathed parser I will tell Andre when I see where, but for now I
> saw just this (no bug just a bit strange handling)
Well it wasn't Andres, but Lars's fault #:O)
He
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 09:44:46AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I almost agree with this... but I want at least a prerelease where we
> have a larger group of people testing, and also a period of time where
> no patches are going in. I do not want to release 1.2.0 one day and
> 1.2.1 the ot
On 18-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
While investigating for the sk_??? read I saw that most probably the problem
lies in the mathed parser I will tell Andre when I see where, but for now I
saw just this (no bug just a bit strange handling)
In Parser::parse_into1() you check a lot of paterns on
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> No, just convert it. I do not want any more compability hack now
| Lars> to accomodate 1.1.5. (unless someone else bothers to look and
| Lars> discovers that it is really ea
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> No, just convert it. I do not want any more compability hack now
Lars> to accomodate 1.1.5. (unless someone else bothers to look and
Lars> discovers that it is really easy to fix.
Note that this particular case was 0.12!
JMar
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with
>> 1.2.0 towards 1.1.5.
Juergen> Well but we should! A lot of people did not change because of
Juergen> the problems
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with 1.2.0
> towards 1.1.5.
Well but we should! A lot of people did not change because of the problems
with tabulars in 1.1.6. I think we have to support at least 1.1.5 file format!
Jug
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So this is a very old file, but 1.1.6 can read it. Should I just
> convert it, or does somebody want to investigate why it does not work?
> Why doesn't lyx warn that this file format revision is not well
> supported anymore?
I was quite sure you did
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Jean-Marc> * sk_UserGuide.lyx
>
| Jean-Marc> This one is trickier:
>
| Jean-Marc> lapinot: ~/src/lyx/devbuild/src/lyx sk_UserGuide.lyx
| Jean-Marc> Solitary \end_inset. Miss
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> * sk_UserGuide.lyx
Jean-Marc> This one is trickier:
Jean-Marc> lapinot: ~/src/lyx/devbuild/src/lyx sk_UserGuide.lyx
Jean-Marc> Solitary \end_inset. Missing \begin_inset?. Last inset read
Jean-Marc> was: Formula LyX
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Some compability reading failing. Is the file correct in the first
> place? Does the file reading stop at this point or does it continue?
Well the first question coming to my mind is could the files be read with
1.1.6? If yes and we save them again in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 2808 fax\SpecialChar
| 2809 default o su -p
| 2810 \family default
| \bar default
| ayout\SpecialChar
| typewriter
| \emph on
| block
| \emph default
both of these just look illegal in the first place.
| I suspect this comes from so
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'll try to get a new prelease out today. (it is a but time consuming
> since I want to check that a lot of make targets work as expected.
> Especially clean and distclean. Also building where srcdir != builddir
> and srcdir == builddir must be checked
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> BTW.: As much as I've heard Jean-Marc couldn't convert 2 of
Juergen> our documents, so this should be a priority to fix first.
Juergen> What documents where that?
The relevant documents are
* it_Customization.lyx
lapinot: ~
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| If you ask me we could just release it today! 1.2.0 is much more stable then
>>| 1.1.6 and has more features. So we could start 1.3.0 and Jean-Marc can trow
>>| away 1.1.6 and hack 1.2.0 for bugfixes ;)
>>
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| If you ask me we could just release it today! 1.2.0 is much more stable then
>| 1.1.6 and has more features. So we could start 1.3.0 and Jean-Marc can trow
>| away 1.1.6 and hack 1.2.0 for bugfixes ;)
>
> I almost agree with this... but I want at lea
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 17-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| I have to admit I'm a bit worried about all this patching going on ...
>>>
>>| We've already had two or three new bugs come from your recent changes. I
>>| thought we wanted 1.2 to be released ??
>>
>> I
On 17-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I have to admit I'm a bit worried about all this patching going on ...
>>
>| We've already had two or three new bugs come from your recent changes. I
>| thought we wanted 1.2 to be released ??
>
> I can only say that the number of prereleases has bee
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 04:27:25PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >
> >> It is really small and does IMO the right thing. It only changes the row if
> >
> | I have to admit I'm a bit worried about all th
On 11-Mar-2002 John Levon wrote:
> Open the test case. Press Page Down (goes to start of inset - OK, but
> not ideal). Press PAge Down - *nothing happens*. That is not right.
>
> This is why I said we need to have some code to place a cursor on screen
> artibtrarily that actually opens insets e
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > I strongly disagree. Page Down doesn't move down a page sometimes: how
> > can that /not/ be a bug ?
> >
> > OK, it perhaps is hard to fix, and won't happen for 1.2.0 - that's fine.
> > We are going to have open bugs for 1.2.0, n
On 11-Mar-2002 bugzilla-daemon wrote:
> I strongly disagree. Page Down doesn't move down a page sometimes: how
> can that /not/ be a bug ?
>
> OK, it perhaps is hard to fix, and won't happen for 1.2.0 - that's fine.
> We are going to have open bugs for 1.2.0, no question. But it doesn't
> make
60 matches
Mail list logo
