Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 17-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| I have to admit I'm a bit worried about all this patching going on ...
>>>
>>| We've already had two or three new bugs come from your recent changes. I
>>| thought we wanted 1.2 to be released ??
>>
>> I can only say that the number of prereleases has been increased with
>> at least 3... that means about three more weeks... and for every
>> non-trivial patch the number will increase...
>>
>> Do you really want 1.2.0 before summer?
>
| If you ask me we could just release it today! 1.2.0 is much more stable then
| 1.1.6 and has more features. So we could start 1.3.0 and Jean-Marc can trow
| away 1.1.6 and hack 1.2.0 for bugfixes ;)
I almost agree with this... but I want at least a prerelease where we
have a larger group of people testing, and also a period of time where
no patches are going in. I do not want to release 1.2.0 one day and
1.2.1 the other just because of some small stupid trivial bug.
| If you think my recent changes only added more bugs to lyx then I miss the
| bug reports on LyXBugs. I've only seen decrease the bugs.
I do think that the recent changes are needed, and I am grateful that
you do it. But it is changes and changes need some testing.
| If you think I'm annoyed I'm not. I have this patch in my tree and also already
| fixed the bug which doesn't permit the mouse selection of the whole UserGuide.
| I will commit them now or save them for later.
do it now, would be nice to have in.
| Ahh and before I forget if you think we shouldn't fix the bugs in LyXBugs
| before 1.2.0 is released then please tag them as 1.3.0 or as later so that
| when I look at the list I know what you want to be fixed and what not.
I have on the bugs that I do not think needs fixing reduced the
priority to P3,P4,P5 (but several of the P2 bugs should also wait for
1.3)
--
Lgb
