On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I don't think so, as it is a very particular switch. Here is the
> pertinent comment in src/lyxfunc.C:
>
> void actOnUpdatedPrefs(LyXRC const & lyxrc_orig, LyXRC const & lyxrc_new)
> {
> // Why the switch you might ask. I
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
>> I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to hav
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have the time
to have a look at everything that goes in
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have t
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES:
> > if (lexrc.next()) {
> >
> > Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
> > (cygwin), I have applied to both 1.4 and 1.5.
>
> Bo, please DO NOT apply ANYTHING to the 1.4 branch without Jean-Marc's
agreement.
I think I have to be blamed for this, not Bo.
Do not feel bad, Enrico. At least I do n
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES:
> if (lexrc.next()) {
> tex_allows_spaces = lexrc.getBool();
> @@ -1342,6
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:09:51AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> and branch?
>
> >>> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
>
> > Since thi
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
and branch?
>>> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
> Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
> (cygwin), I have
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:50:29AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> > > > and branch?
> > >
> > > It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
>
> S
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:32:06PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> And does your patch to configure.py solve the crash of the "open file"
> button?
No, sorry. It is an unrelated problem, only showing up because I used
a cmd.exe to launch your LyX/Qt4. I did so because from a rxvt terminal
I go
On 4/29/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> > and branch?
>
> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
(cygwin),
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
If you just copied the exe inside a 1.4.1 directory, I think there is a
mismatch between configure.sh and configure.py. Please try the full package.
Nope, it was the full
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
> >> runtimes dll:
> >> http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15
> Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> and branch?
It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
That is a good detective work! I will apply if JMarc does not object.
I have to trust Enrico on this though, since I can not test the
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
runtimes dll:
http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip
Abdel,
I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug report
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
> runtimes dll:
> http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip
Abdel,
I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug report for you.
After launching
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:15:53PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Having that definition in mind, then none of your exes is a "true native"
> windows app. Sorry! ;-)
I have never claimed they are :-)
> However, I tested both on Win98, and both work pretty much as expected:
>
> 1/ LyX "native" (Qt
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri ...> writes:
>
> > I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go
through
> > the command prompt; however, it is may not a native applic
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go
> through
> the command prompt; however, it is may not a native application. To be
> a "native" application it h
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Cygwin runs on top of Windows. It works because it is developed by
> competent people **who** know how to deal with various Windows flavors.
>
Agree...
> The path handling is not a mess in my copy of LyX, perhaps it is
> in the official sources
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Luis Rivera a écrit :
> Where did you get this file?
From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
(younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
changed the extension so it can pass the filt
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Luis Rivera a écrit :
>
> > Where did you get this file?
>
> From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
> (younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
> changed the extension so it can pass the filters.
>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> AFAIK, LyX still works on Win95/Cygwin (on an Intel486!). Slow as anything
> can
> be, but works. On Win98 it greatly improves, thanks to the hardware. The
> real
> mess seems to be the path handling. On Cygwin everything is nor
Luis Rivera a écrit :
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
>> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows
described in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>>
>
> I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the
library zlib1.dll be
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
> in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>
I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the library
zlib1.dll besides the files distribute
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
> in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>
Sure enough! Give me half an hour.
>
> So, if I understand you correctly, all the special code in this boost
>
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Given that Win95 is dead as a dodo, it may well be that you don't need the
>> NewAPIs.h. The only way to check, however, is to compile (on a WinXP machine,
>> presumably) and then see if it'll run on Win98. That's what the stub magic in
>> NewAPIs.h
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell
me what I should do
You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for
other reasons. That may well mean that all you need i
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell
> me what I should do
You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for
other reasons. That may well mean that all you need is the ERROR_ACCESS_DENI
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
| >>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
| >>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't
track the
| >>> chan
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
#includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track the
change down.
Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track
>> the
>> change down.
> Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree. Bo, Enrico,
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
| > Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
| > Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
| > Angus> to B
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
Angus> to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into
Angus> t
Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
Angus> to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into
Angus> the version of Boost.Filesy
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on
Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki.
I think that Abdel meant to say, "We had information that
lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ..."
Yep, sorry.
T
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on
> Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki.
I think that Abdel meant to say, "We had information that
lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ..."
The improvement comes, of course, from
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the
1.4.x series,
I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98.
Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that
Cygw
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the
> 1.4.x series,
> I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98.
>
Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that
Cygwin (Qt|xforms)
Hello,
I've been busy, and I'd just like to add two announcements; what follows should
mean what I say.
1/ WinLyX 1.4.1 doesn't seem to work on Win98 (didn't even try on Win95). Aborts
with a "Page Fault" error; doesn't go to the ugly blue screen, but it's certain
that something's wrong very deep
42 matches
Mail list logo
