Re: #13082: Tools | Preferences | Look & Feel | Display graphics | Preview size box doesn't show the number

2024-07-08 Thread David Cardon
Yes. Changing the theme fixes the problem. It seems that the "windows11" theme is the only one with this issue. On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:49 PM LyX Ticket Tracker wrote: > #13082: Tools | Preferences | Look & Feel | Display graphics | Preview > size box >

Re: All layouts icons look like Default

2020-07-24 Thread Daniel
On 2020-07-25 07:06, Daniel wrote: On 2020-07-21 21:05, racoon wrote: On 2020-07-21 21:04, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.07.2020 um 06:31 schrieb Daniel mailto:xraco...@gmx.de>>: In my copy of master all layout icons look like the Default icon. Anyone else seeing this (attached)? Daniel

Re: All layouts icons look like Default

2020-07-24 Thread Daniel
On 2020-07-21 21:05, racoon wrote: On 2020-07-21 21:04, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.07.2020 um 06:31 schrieb Daniel mailto:xraco...@gmx.de>>: In my copy of master all layout icons look like the Default icon. Anyone else seeing this (attached)? Daniel — No, not on my system. Stephan

Re: All layouts icons look like Default

2020-07-21 Thread racoon
On 2020-07-21 21:04, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.07.2020 um 06:31 schrieb Daniel mailto:xraco...@gmx.de>>: In my copy of master all layout icons look like the Default icon. Anyone else seeing this (attached)? Daniel — No, not on my system. Stephan Thanks. Okay, maybe I just got a b

All layouts icons look like Default

2020-07-20 Thread Daniel
In my copy of master all layout icons look like the Default icon. Anyone else seeing this (attached)? Daniel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: [LyX/master] Correct path names were to look for RPM based dictionaries for hunspell on Linux.

2016-06-11 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/11/2016 06:11 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 29.05.2016 um 23:56 schrieb Richard Heck : >> commit 3a2fc1595b316e0847d25b0604ec9188d953af01 >> Author: Stephan Witt >> Date: Tue May 10 18:06:48 2016 +0200 >> >> Correct path names were to look for RPM based

Re: [LyX/master] Correct path names were to look for RPM based dictionaries for hunspell on Linux.

2016-06-11 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 29.05.2016 um 23:56 schrieb Richard Heck : > > commit 3a2fc1595b316e0847d25b0604ec9188d953af01 > Author: Stephan Witt > Date: Tue May 10 18:06:48 2016 +0200 > >Correct path names were to look for RPM based dictionaries for hunspell on > Linux. > > diff --gi

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Correct path names were to look for RPM based dictionaries for hunspell on Linux.

2016-05-22 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 10.05.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Stephan Witt : > > commit 5c1a9063cfe95b5b4b31734d6a38ec69a142d5e6 > Author: Stephan Witt > Date: Tue May 10 18:06:48 2016 +0200 > >Correct path names were to look for RPM based dictionaries for hunspell on > Linux. > > diff --gi

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-08-08 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 23/07/2015 16:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 23/07/2015 16:29, Richard Heck a écrit : I wonder how bad this will be. In practice, people do not actually use that many different words when writing. Probably no more than a few hundred, and a couple thousand, at most. It is not a problem o

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/07/2015 16:29, Richard Heck a écrit : I wonder how bad this will be. In practice, people do not actually use that many different words when writing. Probably no more than a few hundred, and a couple thousand, at most. It is not a problem of words, it is a problem of lines of text. For ex

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/07/2015 16:19, Helge Hafting a écrit : There are many strings - but instead the number of rows in a document is limited. There is one entry per screen line, right? (Assuming all are indeed different.) Even a 1000-page book will have a very limited number of screen lines - compared to the si

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-23 Thread Richard Heck
uint qHash(const & docstring d) { return qHash(toqstr(d)); } Alternatively, we could borrow the qHash code: https://searchcode.com/codesearch/view/47469703/ From a quick look, it actually converts the QString to unicode before operating on it: uint qHash(const QString &key) {

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-23 Thread Helge Hafting
Den 23. juli 2015 10:16, skrev Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Except for #9691. The big remaining problem though is that I rely on a map for caching word widths and this will probably fill up with long editing sessions. In the original rowpainter2 code, there were only words in the cache, and the n

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/07/2015 08:09, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Donnerstag 23 Juli 2015, 00:43:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 22/07/2015 17:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Yes, this is with recent master. I can easily reproduce it with sec 2.5.1 of the User Guide, for instance (see attached screensh

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag 23 Juli 2015, 00:43:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Le 22/07/2015 17:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : > > Yes, this is with recent master. I can easily reproduce it with sec 2.5.1 > > of the User Guide, for instance (see attached screenshot). > > OK, try again now. Let's see how i

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 22/07/2015 17:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Yes, this is with recent master. I can easily reproduce it with sec 2.5.1 of the User Guide, for instance (see attached screenshot). OK, try again now. Let's see how it fares. JMarc

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 22/07/2015 13:34, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Mittwoch 22 Juli 2015, 11:55:32 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: I fixed this problem. Now I am interested in any row-breaking behavior that does not sound good. It breaks between xref inset and closing bracket, e.g. in "(for details, cf. [XRef

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch 22 Juli 2015, 11:55:32 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > I fixed this problem. Now I am interested in any row-breaking behavior > that does not sound good. It breaks between xref inset and closing bracket, e.g. in "(for details, cf. [XRef Inset])." Jürgen

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 22/07/2015 09:40, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Are you interested in *any* difference in behavior I notice when testing? For example, if a linebreak is at a different (but still sensible) place than it was before? No, because I am not sure that my row breaking after str-metrics was sensibl

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 22/07/2015 05:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I landed in master now. I could be imagining things, but scrolling feels smoother to me. Yes it should. The number of QPainter::drawText calls is reduced a lot (but the strings are

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I landed in master now. I could be imagining things, but scrolling feels smoother to me. Are you interested in *any* difference in behavior I notice when testing? For example, if a linebreak is at a different (but still sensible) pl

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Qt and/or STL wants to have a look JMarc From f76e728dbc026e54ff6bdb9d5cf7568012a148e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:19:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Use QCache to cache string width This buys us a hash table and some LRU eviction of old strings

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-21 Thread Georg Baum
Richard Heck wrote: > On 07/21/2015 09:36 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> wrote: >> >>> Basically, I'd appreciate if some people could test it so that we can >>> see what's right and what's wrong. Since leave on thursday for vacation, >>> the

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-21 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 21.07.2015 um 18:04 schrieb Richard Heck : > On 07/21/2015 09:36 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> wrote: >> >>> Basically, I'd appreciate if some people could test it so that we can see >>> what's right and what's wrong. Since leave on thu

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-21 Thread Richard Heck
On 07/21/2015 09:36 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Basically, I'd appreciate if some people could test it so that we can see what's right and what's wrong. Since leave on thursday for vacation, the choice is between landing it now or lan

Re: About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Basically, I'd appreciate if some people could test it so that we can see > what's right and what's wrong. Since leave on thursday for vacation, the > choice is between landing it now or landing it in late August when I come > back. B

About the rowpainter2 branch (testers, have a look!)

2015-07-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Hello, I have now done most of what I wanted on the rowpainter2 branch. When I decided a few month ago that it would be a good JMarc Week of Code project I thought that 2.2 would be near enough then and that this work would be 2.3 material. Now I guess it makes more sense to land it for 2.2.

Re: Proposal updated, please take a look

2013-04-29 Thread Cyrille Artho
nother email address (shanxueq...@gmail.com <mailto:shanxueq...@gmail.com>) when I registered for GSoC. I would greatly appreciate if any prospective mentors can take a look and give me some suggestions. Best, Xueqing Shan *Xueqing Shan* Vanderbilt Univers

Re: Proposal updated, please take a look

2013-04-29 Thread Vanderbilt
;mailto:shanxueq...@gmail.com>) when I registered for GSoC. I would greatly >> appreciate if any prospective mentors can take a look and give me some >> suggestions. >> >> Best, >> Xueqing Shan >> >> *Xueqing Sha

Re: Proposal updated, please take a look

2013-04-29 Thread Cyrille Artho
nxueq...@gmail.com <mailto:shanxueq...@gmail.com>) when I registered for GSoC. I would greatly appreciate if any prospective mentors can take a look and give me some suggestions. Best, Xueqing Shan *Xueqing Shan* Vanderbilt University, '16 -- Regard

Proposal updated, please take a look

2013-04-29 Thread Ashley Shan
f any prospective mentors can take a look and give me some suggestions. Best, Xueqing Shan *Xueqing Shan* Vanderbilt University, '16

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-17 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Looks good. Thanks for adding this. I will add stuff eventually, but > I'm not sure when. I'm also not sure what the relationship should be > between this doc and the README files in '/development/autotests'. > Perhaps the README files should be for technical information,

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> It's not possible to just use the same application that was used in >> previous years? > > It is a process, not a static result. OK. >>> Not at the moment. Unless somebody complains I'll simply create this >>> docum

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-16 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > It's not possible to just use the same application that was used in > previous years? It is a process, not a static result. >> Not at the moment. Unless somebody complains I'll simply create this >> document when I'll find some time again, and if you'd like a specific >>

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Georg Baum >> wrote: >>> >>> This has been requested several times, but I did not find the time to >>> write one up to now. I do not want to dump it into a hidden place where >>> nobod

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-11 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Georg Baum > wrote: >> >> This has been requested several times, but I did not find the time to >> write one up to now. I do not want to dump it into a hidden place where >> nobody will find it. Recently I had the idea of a development manu

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> Should we see if he's interested this year? > > Are you prepared to take the mentoring role? Prepared in terms of time and eagerness? Yes. Prepared in terms of ability? This depends on the specific project. For most pr

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Should we see if he's interested this year? Are you prepared to take the mentoring role? Pavel

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
t; >> No, I think the main problem was that we were not able to gain enough >> momentum >> to proceed with the formalities and clear goals, so no application happened. >> If you would like to apply it's perhaps time to start organizining things... > > OK I will loo

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
momentum > to proceed with the formalities and clear goals, so no application happened. > If you would like to apply it's perhaps time to start organizining things... OK I will look into the requirements and decide soon. I probably won't do it because although I would like to spend a

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I think there was one student interested last year but the problem was > that LyX wasn't accepted. Is that right? No, I think the main problem was that we were not able to gain enough momentum to proceed with the formalities and clear goals, so no application happened. If

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> I wonder if this would improve chances of being accepted for Google >> Summer of Code. >> >> If there's any task that you can delegate to me, I'd be happy to help. > > You mean you would like to apply for GSoC? I meant

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I wonder if this would improve chances of being accepted for Google > Summer of Code. > > If there's any task that you can delegate to me, I'd be happy to help. You mean you would like to apply for GSoC? Pavel

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> BTW, is there somewhere a description of how these test work? A readme >> file would be nice. > > This has been requested several times, but I did not find the time to write > one up to now. I do not want to dump

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-06 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 06/02/2013 13:43, Kornel Benko a écrit : >> tex2lyx tests: >> 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' >> 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim' > > I am not sure (yet) whether this is a good thing. Th

Re: Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2013 um 14:51:32, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 06/02/2013 13:43, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > tex2lyx tests: > > 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' > > 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim' > > I am n

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim'

2013-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 06/02/2013 13:43, Kornel Benko a écrit : tex2lyx tests: 1.) Remove empty layout 'Plain' 2.) Adapt to changed look of layout 'Verbatim' I am not sure (yet) whether this is a good thing. The fact is that my new code avoids extra empty paragraphs at the en

Linear history even with git? (was: [svn2git] Second preliminary test repo - please have a look)

2011-10-19 Thread Pavel Sanda
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bj?nnes) writes: > This second bundle is _really_ close to what I think could be used as a > starting point for a git lyx repo. One thing missing is pruning of empty > commits, and fixing up the author names that were noted as lacking last

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-14 Thread Georg Baum
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > I'm annoyed by the capitals only in the email address of Georg.Baum (but > well that's nitpicking). And I am annoyed if that address is written without capitals, since I use that spelling since ages. If you want everything in lowercase please use the .lyx.org add

Re: [svn2git] Second preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-13 Thread Richard Heck
On 10/12/2011 09:29 PM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > > | I have created a repo with basically the contents I think we should juse > | going forward. This repo is not directly accessible, but distributed as > | a git bundle. > > This second bundle is

[svn2git] Second preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | I have created a repo with basically the contents I think we should juse | going forward. This repo is not directly accessible, but distributed as | a git bundle. This second bundle is _really_ close to what I think could be used as a starting poi

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: | Op 12-10-2011 19:45, Lars Gullik Bjønnes schreef: >> gitglossary - grafts: Grafts enables two otherwise different lines >> of development to be joined together by recording fake ancestry >> information for commits. This way you can make git pretend the set >> of p

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 12-10-2011 19:45, Lars Gullik Bjønnes schreef: gitglossary - grafts: Grafts enables two otherwise different lines of development to be joined together by recording fake ancestry information for commits. This way you can make git pretend the set of parents a commit has is different from what

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: >> | This worked seemingly perfekt (except for the strangish history) for >> | 1.5.3. >> >> grafts does not get resolved by a clone. Seems that git-filter-branch is >> required for that. > | I don't really understand the problem. In the git repo it's pretty | easy t

[svn2git] verify the 1.4 series tags (was: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look)

2011-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | (I'll go through the other series as well and try to be really thorough) This is the 1.4 tags: 1.4.0pre1 1.4.0pre2 1.4.0pre3 1.4.0pre4 1.4.0pre5 1.4.0pre6 - fixed by grafting 1.4.0 - fixed by grafting 1.4.1 1.4.2 1.4.3 1.4.4 1.4.5 1.4.5.1

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
| This worked seemingly perfekt (except for the strangish history) for | 1.5.3. grafts does not get resolved by a clone. Seems that git-filter-branch is required for that. I don't really understand the problem. In the git repo it's pretty easy to split commits and rewrite the history right ?

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > > | [...] | | Thinking... no I think I can test out grafts without major surgery. It | | is making the grafts permanent that is a flag-day. Then it is more | | ok-ish. Will test. > | This worked see

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: [...] | Thinking... no I think I can test out grafts without major surgery. It | is making the grafts permanent that is a flag-day. Then it is more | ok-ish. Will test. This worked seemingly perfekt (except for the strangish history) for 1.5.3. --

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: >> I am inclined to ignore this difference and place the tag in the best >> spot, instead of where it would be "correct". The diff above will then >> added in the next commit after the 1.6.8 tag. > | The difference is really minor, so it would not be a problem. > |

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
1.6.8 - because the 1.6.8 branch (read: svn tag) seems to be made from a wc with local changes. This is the diff from where I really want to place the tag: diff --git a/ANNOUNCE b/ANNOUNCE index f5276aa..d8c87f7 100644 --- a/ANNOUNCE +++ b/ANNOUNCE @@ -70,9 +70,6 @@ want to apply one of the fo

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: >> Now you can look around in this repo and see what the result is like. > | I like it. > >> I know of one small mistake, I misspelled Josès surname. > | I'm annoyed by the capitals only in the email address of Georg.Baum | (but well

Re: [svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Now you can look around in this repo and see what the result is like. I like it. I know of one small mistake, I misspelled Josès surname. I'm annoyed by the capitals only in the email address of Georg.Baum (but well that's nitpicking). Also a couple of tags are missing, they

[svn2git] Preliminary test repo - please have a look

2011-10-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I have created a repo with basically the contents I think we should juse going forward. This repo is not directly accessible, but distributed as a git bundle. How to get it: download http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23498902/lyx-git-test.bundle (223 MB) then: git clone Now you can look around

Re: Bo, look here please (was Re: Time for 1.6 alpha?)

2008-03-13 Thread Bo Peng
> The include inset label have the tag "(embedded)". This is because we > check the "embed" parameter for emptiness. But this parameter content is > very bizarre IMHO, sometimes a file name, sometimes "true" or "false". > This needs fixing... I see. This is fixed for InsetInclude. I will have

Re: Bo, look here please (was Re: Time for 1.6 alpha?)

2008-03-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Bo Peng wrote: >> This one is caused by the Embedded stuff by Bo: > > Will fix it soon. Fixed. Thanks. There is also the bug that any included file is marked as (embedded) in the InsetInclude label, independently of the embedded status. I do not see this here. - New doc - insert

Re: Bo, look here please (was Re: Time for 1.6 alpha?)

2008-03-12 Thread Bo Peng
> > 1. Loading open files from last session does not work. Fixed. Bo

Re: Bo, look here please (was Re: Time for 1.6 alpha?)

2008-03-12 Thread Bo Peng
> >> This one is caused by the Embedded stuff by Bo: > > > > Will fix it soon. Fixed. > There is also the bug that any included file is marked as (embedded) in > the InsetInclude label, independently of the embedded status. I do not see this here. Bo

Re: Bo, look here please (was Re: Time for 1.6 alpha?)

2008-03-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Bo Peng wrote: > 2. Every time I open a file, save it, and open it again, it opens as > changed, so that if I immediately close it it asks if I want to save. This one is caused by the Embedded stuff by Bo: Will fix it soon. Thanks. There is also the bug that any included file is marked a

Re: Bo, look here please (was Re: Time for 1.6 alpha?)

2008-03-12 Thread Bo Peng
> > 2. Every time I open a file, save it, and open it again, it opens as > > changed, so that if I immediately close it it asks if I want to save. > > This one is caused by the Embedded stuff by Bo: Will fix it soon. Bo

Bo, look here please (was Re: Time for 1.6 alpha?)

2008-03-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Bennett Helm wrote: On Mar 12, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Bo Peng wrote: "A first alpha version of LyX 1.6.0 will be released later this week for those who like the bleeding edge experience." 24/02/08 Is there any big must-have feature which we should wait for? As far as I know, embedding wa

Re: Math fonts look fuzzy in lyx_1.4.0cvs

2005-10-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Anand Rangarajan wrote: > For a while now (about a year), I've noticed that math fonts look > fuzzy in lyx_1.4.0cvs. In contrast, they look fine for lyx_1.3.x on the > same machine. I've attached a screenshot. Yes, I get this too on both a FC3 i686 machine and on an Alpha runn

Re: LyX - look and feel

2005-10-01 Thread Angus Leeming
Maria G. wrote: Hi - I've set up a theme for Linux, so that application windows look green instead of grey. LyX, however, despite being an excellent document processor, especially for maths, still looks grey. It would be really nice if LyX could conform to the L&F of the environme

LyX - look and feel

2005-09-30 Thread Maria G.
Hi - I've set up a theme for Linux, so that application windows look green instead of grey. LyX, however, despite being an excellent document processor, especially for maths, still looks grey. It would be really nice if LyX could conform to the L&F of the environment it is ins

Re: [patch] Look for tex2lyx instead of reLyX

2004-10-15 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 25. September 2004 12:56 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > > Is this all that is needed to use tex2lyx as default latex->lyx > translator? Or are there some importer stuff that must be done as > well? No, this is all, but two remarks: - if relyx is called with the -f flag, tex2lyx shoul

[patch] Look for tex2lyx instead of reLyX

2004-09-25 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Is this all that is needed to use tex2lyx as default latex->lyx translator? Or are there some importer stuff that must be done as well? ? tex2lyx-1.diff Index: configure.m4 === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/configure

Re: Look...

2003-02-07 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Am Freitag, 7. Februar 2003 18:11 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller: > http://apps.kde.com/fr/2/info/vid/8784?br=true Sorry, misread. I actually thought Matthias himself did the announcement ;-) (but thanks Moritz anyway) Jürgen.

Look...

2003-02-07 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
http://apps.kde.com/fr/2/info/vid/8784?br=true Jürgen

[PATCH] changes: look up current change

2003-02-07 Thread John Levon
A support function for getting the current type of change at the cursor, needed for deciding what to do on user input Index: src/BufferView.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/BufferView.C,v retrieving revision 1.11

Re: [PATCH]: Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 5:49 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Did you put the same comment bout the ev->xbutton.button in > the .C file? If not, why? That would be the correct place for > it, and easy to find as well... If?, then why in the > ChangeLog... just redundant information. You're p

Re: [PATCH]: Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 5:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:05:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I would contend that "why" does not hurt when the "what" is > > not intuitive. Especially since you venture in here but > > rarely and I would like some reminder of "why".

Re: [PATCH]: Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:05:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > I would contend that "why" does not hurt when the "what" is not > intuitive. Especially since you venture in here but rarely and I > would like some reminder of "why". Don't ask. Just commit. Andre' -- Those who desire to give

Re: [PATCH]: Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 4:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Here's a reasonable > | ChangeLog entry. > > Not if we stick to the "what" and not the "why" in the > Changelog. > > | Angus > | > | 2002-10-15 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > |

Re: [PATCH]: Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:29:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > This works very well. > > I'lll let you commit it when you're ready. Here's a reasonable > ChangeLog entry. I am ready, but I have a tree full of small changes which start going in the "can't separate them anymore" direction...

Re: [PATCH]: Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 4:10 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 03:57:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Perhaps you'd test it out and check that it provides you > > with what you require. > > This works very well. I'lll let you commit it when you're ready. Here's a reasonabl

Re: [PATCH]: Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 03:57:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Perhaps you'd test it out and check that it provides you with > what you require. This works very well. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T

[PATCH]: Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 1:46 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 October 2002 12:52 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I've read through the xforms source a little. > > Were I not /still/ compiling libqt, I'd try this out for > >

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 1:46 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 October 2002 12:52 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I've read through the xforms source a little. > > Were I not /still/ compiling libqt, I'd try this out for > >

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 02:07:29PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > Last Sunday I managed to compile the xforms frontend on my best machine > > at home within a mere 2 hours and 10 minutes. Without debug info of > > course... > > I think that you should try distcc http://distcc.samb

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 13:53, Andre Poenitz wrote: > But it was quick ;-) > > Last Sunday I managed to compile the xforms frontend on my best machine > at home within a mere 2 hours and 10 minutes. Without debug info of > course... I think that you should try distcc http://distcc.samba.org/

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 1:53 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:50:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Just finished. Ouch! > > But it was quick ;-) > > Last Sunday I managed to compile the xforms frontend on my > best machine at home within a mere 2 hours and 10 minutes. >

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:50:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Just finished. Ouch! But it was quick ;-) Last Sunday I managed to compile the xforms frontend on my best machine at home within a mere 2 hours and 10 minutes. Without debug info of course... Andre' -- Those who desire to give u

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 1:46 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 October 2002 12:52 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I've read through the xforms source a little. > > Were I not /still/ compiling libqt, I'd try this out for > >

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Tuesday 15 October 2002 12:52 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > I've read through the xforms source a little. > Were I not /still/ compiling libqt, I'd try this out for you. Could you please try once youve finished compiling qt? Andre

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 12:52 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:41:46PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > can you extract the info from ev->xbutton.state? > > > > man XButtonEvent: > > The state member is set to indicate the logical state of > > the pointer buttons and modifi

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:41:46PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > can you extract the info from ev->xbutton.state? > > man XButtonEvent: > The state member is set to indicate the logical state of the pointer >buttons and modifier keys just prior to the event, which is the bitwise >

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 12:31 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:26:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > No. This is 0 in any case. For further processing it would > > > be nice if the button is know, though. > > > > So you're saying that we think we're passing the button i

Re: No mouse button geiven in drag events (John: Look here)

2002-10-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:26:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > No. This is 0 in any case. For further processing it would be > > nice if the button is know, though. > > So you're saying that we think we're passing the button id, but > in fact we're not because ev->xbutton.button is 0 always?

Hello,look,my beautiful girl friend

2002-09-23 Thread antispam
<>

Re: Action diff - look and diss

2002-08-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
t;unlock" it when I paste some > text elsewhere in the owner with the mouse button ? How do you make sure > asynchrnous geometry changes are propogated backwards properly ? You've never had a look at mathed, have you? There are no 'dummy cell positions'. Pasting is "moving

Re: Action diff - look and diss

2002-08-01 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:08:29PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It looks nice to me and I do not have many clever comments. A question > though: we will be adding lots of objects with virtual methods (or > lots of virtual methods to exisiting insets). What is the price we > will have to p

  1   2   >