On Tuesday 15 October 2002 4:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Here's a reasonable > | ChangeLog entry. > > Not if we stick to the "what" and not the "why" in the > Changelog. > > | Angus > | > | 2002-10-15 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > | * XWorkArea.C (work_area_handler): it transpires that > | ev->xbutton.button == 0 when the mouse is dragged, > | so it cannot be used to initialise x_button_state and > | hence FuncRequest. > | This patch uses the 'key' that is passed into the function > | by xforms to extract this info and so resolve the problem.
Lo! A miracle! He has spoken and there are now 11 Commandments. Although questioning Him is sometimes considered heresy, can I ask why there is a problem with such an entry? Are ChangeLogs not for /our/ benefit? I would contend that "why" does not hurt when the "what" is not intuitive. Especially since you venture in here but rarely and I would like some reminder of "why". Angus
