On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:26:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > No. This is 0 in any case. For further processing it would be > > nice if the button is know, though. > > So you're saying that we think we're passing the button id, but > in fact we're not because ev->xbutton.button is 0 always? Sounds > like a bug to me (so the 1.3 release coordinator should accept a > bug fix ;-)
At least that's what I get when I add lyxerr<< lines there. > Perhaps John knows as he played quite hard with all this. John, ar eyou listening? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
