On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:36:10PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Richard Heck wrote:
> >>> Attached are some screen shots of the new dialog, which I've updated on
> >>> the basis of the now restored old version. Comments welcome.
> >> Looks
Richard Heck wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Attached are some screen shots of the new dialog, which I've updated on
the basis of the now restored old version. Comments welcome.
Looks good and better than what we have currently.
I miss some explanations for the "Set width
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:16:44PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I've restored the horizontal layout now.
it is still not ok
Really? It's perfect on my screen... really weir
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:16:44PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I've restored the horizontal layout now.
> >>>
> >>> it is still not ok
> >>
> >> Really? It's perfect on my screen...
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Attached are some screen shots of the new dialog, which I've updated on
>> the basis of the now restored old version. Comments welcome.
> Looks good and better than what we have currently.
>
> I miss some explanations for the "Set width" and "Set h
Richard Heck wrote:
Attached are some screen shots of the new dialog, which I've updated on
the basis of the now restored old version. Comments welcome.
Looks good and better than what we have currently.
I miss some explanations for the "Set width" and "Set height"
options... I don't know wh
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I've restored the horizontal layout now.
it is still not ok
Really? It's perfect on my screen... really weird!
try to resize the dialog
Ah... yes, you're right! But the problem is more general...
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I've restored the horizontal layout now.
it is still not ok
Really? It's perfect on my screen... really weird!
try to resize the dialog
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I've restored the horizontal layout now.
it is still not ok
Really? It's perfect on my screen... really weird!
will commit a fix...
Fine.
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I've restored the horizontal layout now.
it is still not ok
will commit a fix...
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> the bug introduced by 17625 and 17626 by reverting these
> changesets because 1) they introduced a bug and 2) they don't do what
> advertised, rather the contrary. I checked this both on Windows (with
> Qt4.1.4 and Qt4.2.2) and Solaris (with Qt4.2.2). See the attached
imag
Richard Heck wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Please, can you wait with this patch? Before you commit it I would like
to see resolved the bug introduced by 17625 and 17626 by reverting these
changesets because 1) they introduced a bug and 2) they don't do what
advertised, rather the contrary. I c
> the bug introduced by 17625 and 17626 by reverting these
> changesets because 1) they introduced a bug and 2) they don't do what
> advertised, rather the contrary. I checked this both on Windows (with
> Qt4.1.4 and Qt4.2.2) and Solaris (with Qt4.2.2). See the attached images.
That's weird, what
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Please, can you wait with this patch? Before you commit it I would like
to see resolved the bug introduced by 17625 and 17626 by reverting these
changesets because 1) they introduced a bug and 2) they don't do what
advertised, rather the contrary. I checked this both on W
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:55:29PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Attached is what is hopefully the penultimate version of this patch.
> Please note that the diff was run from src/frontends/qt4/.
>
> The changes at the beginning of QGraphicsDialog.C are less extensive
> than they appear. I had to
Attached is what is hopefully the penultimate version of this patch.
Please note that the diff was run from src/frontends/qt4/.
The changes at the beginning of QGraphicsDialog.C are less extensive
than they appear. I had to re-arrange this so I could make sense of it.
The only real changes are ad
> are u sure it doesn't work with:
>
> QGraphicsDialog::on_Width_textChanged(const QString &)
Thanks, now I get it. Patch comes tomorrow.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
This is simple and logic. I wrote it down here in Pseudocode as I still
fail to implement this easy code in GraphicsDialog.C (I fail to manage
that QGraphicsDialog::on_Width_textChanged() is really called when the
text is changed - I' too stupid!).
are u sure it doesn't work
Here's my solution in Pseudocode:
void QGraphicsDialog::on_aspectration_toggled()
begin
// set the same unit for width and height
if Index(widthUnit) != Index(heightUnit) then
Index(heightUnit) = Index(widthUnit);
// only the smaller value is used by LaTeX when aspectratio is on
// therefor
Richard Heck schrieb:
Attached is a patch that PARTIALLY addresses this issue.
Hi Richard, I'm currently working on a different solution but needs a day for this as I'm new to Qt.
I'll send you something as soon it's ready (I hope tomorrow).
regards Uwe
Attached is a patch that PARTIALLY addresses this issue. I say
"partially" because the work is not complete. In particular, I HAVE NOT
CHECKED to make sure that the dialog actually works: That is, that if
you say "Scale 50%" you get the right LaTeX output. The changes made to
QGraphics::apply() ar
Discussion of bug 3215
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3215
revealed some problems with the current UI in the graphics dialog.
Attached is a screenshot of an idea for a new organization. The "Set
width" and "Set height" checkboxes are enabled only when "Scale graphic"
is not; when they
22 matches
Mail list logo
