Re: Plan for next announcement

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 07:00:54PM +, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 17.12.2017 um 16:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 07:10:16AM +, Stephan Witt wrote: > >> I’ve noticed Qt-5.9.x doesn’t run on Mac OS X 10.8.x anymore. So, the RC1 > >> binary as available for 10.9+ o

Re: Plan for next announcement

Am 17.12.2017 um 16:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 07:10:16AM +, Stephan Witt wrote: >> I’ve noticed Qt-5.9.x doesn’t run on Mac OS X 10.8.x anymore. So, the RC1 >> binary as available for 10.9+ only (although I couldn’t test this OS - >> I don’t have it ATM). > > Ah

Re: Plan for next announcement

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 07:10:16AM +, Stephan Witt wrote: > I’ve noticed Qt-5.9.x doesn’t run on Mac OS X 10.8.x anymore. So, the RC1 > binary as available for 10.9+ only (although I couldn’t test this OS - > I don’t have it ATM). Ah good to know. We should put this in the release notes and th

Re: Plan for next announcement

the newer Qt. >>> >>> I think 5.9.3 makes sense, especially since it fixed that ticket. I can >>> upload a new Mac binary for RC1 if you send it to me. If you prefer to >>> wait for RC2, that's fine too. Your call. >> >> If you can make a binar

Re: Plan for next announcement

that ticket. I can > > upload a new Mac binary for RC1 if you send it to me. If you prefer to > > wait for RC2, that's fine too. Your call. > > If you can make a binary by tomorrow, send it to me. Otherwise I will > proceed with the RC1 announcement. Thanks, Stephan! (sent binaries in private email). They're now on the FTP. I'll wait for the mirrors to update and then announce tomorrow. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Plan for next announcement

at least one > > ticket is solved by using the newer Qt. > > I think 5.9.3 makes sense, especially since it fixed that ticket. I can > upload a new Mac binary for RC1 if you send it to me. If you prefer to > wait for RC2, that's fine too. Your call. If you can make a binary by tomorrow, send it to me. Otherwise I will proceed with the RC1 announcement. Thanks, Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Plan for next announcement

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 08:05:56AM +, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 12.12.2017 um 02:52 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:58:36AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> El 10.12.2017 a las 21:28, Scott Kostyshak escribió: > >> > >>> One option is just to announce rc1 now. > >> >

Re: Plan for next announcement

El 12.12.2017 a las 09:05, Stephan Witt escribió: Which Qt-Version did you use for this installer? Qt 5.9.3. I am using this build now for a while and wrote some new LyX documents with it. I have not encountered a problem. regards Uwe

Re: Plan for next announcement

Am 12.12.2017 um 02:52 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:58:36AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> El 10.12.2017 a las 21:28, Scott Kostyshak escribió: >> >>> One option is just to announce rc1 now. >> >> I would announce it right now. >> >> Please use build 8 of my RC1 installe

Re: Plan for next announcement

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 08:51:43AM +, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 10/12/2017 à 21:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > Dear all, > > > > Now that the mailing lists are back and seem to be working well, I would > > like to discuss our next announcement. We ha

Re: Plan for next announcement

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:58:36AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > El 10.12.2017 a las 21:28, Scott Kostyshak escribió: > > > One option is just to announce rc1 now. > > I would announce it right now. > > Please use build 8 of my RC1 installer. OK I will. Thanks, Scott

Re: Plan for next announcement

El 10.12.2017 a las 21:28, Scott Kostyshak escribió: One option is just to announce rc1 now. I would announce it right now. Please use build 8 of my RC1 installer. thanks and regards Uwe

Re: Plan for next announcement

Le 10/12/2017 à 21:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Dear all, Now that the mailing lists are back and seem to be working well, I would like to discuss our next announcement. We have not officially announced 2.3.0rc1 (the lists went down just before we were going to). One option is just to

Plan for next announcement

Dear all, Now that the mailing lists are back and seem to be working well, I would like to discuss our next announcement. We have not officially announced 2.3.0rc1 (the lists went down just before we were going to). One option is just to announce rc1 now. Alternatively, we could choose to not

Re: Win Vista announcement for lyx.org

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > post is subjective and thus not fair. We should not propose an OS for the > users! People are free to use what they like. If they prefer PC-BSD, MacOS I kicked any OS related suggestions out. Pavel

Re: Win Vista announcement for lyx.org

Am 09.06.2016 um 20:15 schrieb Richard Heck: That seems like a good and clear message. OK, could you please put it then on lyx.org? Or should I do this If so how is this done? I don't have access. Pavel took care of the news items related to the release. Needs SVN access to change the RSS code

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:50:23PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: >> >>> Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the >>> problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:04:16PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Typically -j3 is a better choice than -j2 on dual core machines, as not everything is processor-bound. Sure, maybe the reason. Note that multiple concurrent processes intensively accessing one res

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:04:16PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > Typically -j3 is a better choice than -j2 on dual core machines, as not > > everything is processor-bound. > > Sure, maybe the reason. Note that multiple concurrent processes intensively > accessing one resource (say memory or

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:12:40PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >> > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > writes: >> > >> >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now >> >> renamed to note that it's explicitly

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:12:40PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed > >> to note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > > > Note that compil

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Le 6 juin 08 à 23:12, Alfredo Braunstein a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core machines. faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Yes, it is a bit faster. JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Alfredo Braunstein wrote: José Matos wrote: On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. Good to know... I wonder why. My understanding is that launching 2 compilat

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> faster than -j2 or was it a typo? > > Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. Good to know... I wonder why. A/

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. > A/ -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed >> to note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core > machines. faster than -j2 or wa

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed > to > > note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much fa

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

"Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed to > note that it's explicitly for Mac). Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core machines. JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed to note that it's explicitly for Mac). Thanks for the cleaning-up! I would suggest the follwing changes (see attached): 1) The HostSystemIntel and HostSystemPPC variables should NOT be changed ever as long as we support 10.4

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure reported some errors. I

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 13:53:39 Pavel Sanda wrote: > for example today is so beautiful sunny day that i can even smell beta3 in > the air don't you think? :)) > pavel I do. :-) I will expand this in a new thread. -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 14:17:56 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > 2) sounds good as it also convey the information as a "mini-freeze". > > +1 Fair enough. I will try this for the next release. :-) > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Te

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When >> executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure rep

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Btw there's one more mall quirk: When opening a new document the top line > is partly hidden by the toolbar, i.e. the crolling i wrong. I think I > remember this being mentioned before, but can't find it in bugzilla. > ht

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On 3 jun 2008, at 18.20, Bennett Helm wrote: - In the tutorial there are some button-figures missing I don't see this. Is it just that the graphics aren't displaying for you? Strange, now it works... Before some figures where replaced by black squares, but now it's fine. Anyway no big deal

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When > executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure reported some > errors. > It seems there were some stray invisible characters in th

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3 jun 2008, at 16.15, Bennett Helm wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> Bennett Helm wrote: >>> >>> I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. >>>

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On 3 jun 2008, at 16.15, Bennett Helm wrote: On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Bennett Helm wrote: I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? Yes. I've posted a Mac package here:

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett Helm wrote: > >> Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: >> >> LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..> < >> http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Universal.dmg> >> >> Konrad and Anders, could you both test it -- r

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..> Konrad and Anders, could you both test it -- running the installer as well -- to see if it works for you? Works fine here on Intel Mac OS

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: > If so, that means that you can (and should) build the release > version yourself again, right? > > > Yes, at least to the "can" part. ... And "should" because of the following reason. > That might also solve the crash occurring with George. > > > I hope so. I'm

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett Helm wrote: > >> I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. >> > > Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..>

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? If so, that means that you can (and should) build the release version yourself again, right? That might also solve the crash occurring with George. /Konrad

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Bennett, Anders, >> >> please find at >> >> a universal binary built

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 2) change the configure.ac to the release tag, and works for some >> days in that state before reverting to svn after tagging the >> release. > > 2) sounds good as it also convey the information as a "mini-freeze". +1 JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> Would it be worth to release beta 3 with this problem fixed or should we >>> publically announce beta 2 remarking the known problems? >>> >> >> i would vote for beta 3 if you are able to prepare it very soon. >> otherwise next development bring new bugs we will ne

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Pavel Sanda wrote: José Matos wrote: On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:40:10 Pavel Sanda wrote: José Matos wrote: The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the developers list. ok, and what do you plan now :) ? pavel The only glaring remaining

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:40:10 Pavel Sanda wrote: > > José Matos wrote: > > > The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the > > > developers list. > > > > ok, and what do you plan now :) ? > > pavel > > The only glaring remaining problem was the updat

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: On Tuesday 03 June 2008 13:05:58 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: OK, so what you could have tried is to package some rX revision, let people try it, and tag beta2 from it if there are no brown paper bag issues. OK, the only issue is that the default options change if

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:40:10 Pavel Sanda wrote: > José Matos wrote: > > The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the > > developers list. > > ok, and what do you plan now :) ? > pavel The only glaring remaining problem was the update problem from lyx2lyx. This was fi

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 13:05:58 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > OK, so what you could have tried is to package some rX revision, > let people try it, and tag beta2 from it if there are no brown paper > bag issues. OK, the only issue is that the default options change if we are using a beta or

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

past we have never announced beta versions in the users list. This > sort of announcement tries to be a compromise. OK, so what you could have tried is to package some rX revision, let people try it, and tag beta2 from it if there are no brown paper bag issues. JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: > The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the > developers list. ok, and what do you plan now :) ? pavel

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 01:10:49 Pavel Sanda wrote: > no, this means that it is ok to build beta2 wininstaller and announce it on > _devel_ list even before the green light. Yes. > with annoucements for users should arch builders wait for green light from > Jose (which is the message in the annou

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 11:40:10 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes, as far as possible (in particular for bugs that affect all > architectures). Architecture dependent fixes are acceptable. > > JMarc Yes and yes. :-) -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

sort of announcement tries to be a compromise. Since we are in the beta stage I think that such system would be an overkill. I don't think that we should go over a second nested level of releases, it is not worth it. Last year, regarding the release of 1.4.5.1 I have nested one further leve

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But in any case: I assume the arch builds should be based on José's > official tar-balls, without any additional patches applied (or > otherwise be termed 1.6.0svnx), correct? Yes, as far as possible (in particular for bugs that affect all archite

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). Windows binaries are available at http://www.lyx.org/~joost/ Joost

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Same result her on PPC 10.4. Could the UserGuide-problems be due to: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3938 Anders On 2 jun 2008, at 23.02, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: José Matos wrote: as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:45:47PM +0200, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > This is due to the fact that in the user guide the symbol '·' is used rather than the macro \cdot, and there was a bug in the recent support for unicode symbols in math. Now '·' gets translated to \cdot

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi all, > as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that > appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). > > As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that there > are no > embarrassin

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:33:53AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:16:48AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> >>> rgheck wrote: >>> Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: >>

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett, Anders, > > please find at > > a universal binary built on Mac OS X 10.4.11 from lyx-1.6.0beta2.tar.gz, > and using the attached script. > >

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:45:47PM +0200, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > Should the UserGuide compile in beta2? > > I just built on Mac and get a Latex error: > > ! Undefined control sequence. > > l.4078 ...ecause $sin$ does normally mean $s\cdoti > > \

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Note that an announcement in the devel list for binary packages for beta > 2 is reasonable since > > anyone reading your message will have seen this message before. > > I don't understand what you mean by this. Should I also CC the devel-list &

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:16:48AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: rgheck wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appear

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:16:48AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > rgheck wrote: >> Andre Poenitz wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: >>> Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> I find the "reorganization" behaviour after creating an empty >> doc/loading an existing one etc mildly confusing. The document >> gets redrawn twice, the first time partially hidden by the tool >> bar, the second time correctly, but with ~ 0.5 s delay. >> > > Right,

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

rgheck wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guaran

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the > problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta > 2). > > As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that > there are no

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). Bennett, Anders, please find at a universal binary built on Mac OS X 10.4.1

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: So let us please test this release and when there is some confidence in the release tar ball let us announce this also in the users list. Should the UserGuide compile in beta2? I just built on Mac and get a Latex error: ! Undefined control sequence. l.4078 ...ecause $sin$ d

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

> Uwe please do not announce a win package in the users list before we > have a green light from all the involved platforms. OK, I'll wait until you give the green light. Beta 2 compiles well on Windows btw. > Note that an announcement in the devel list for binary packages

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that there are no embarrassing bugs. I mean in this case a failure to compil

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:00 PM, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, >as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems > that > appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). > >As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that > appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). In the future, I think you should tag a betaXrc1 before tagging betaX, as stupid as it may seem (or just pac

Beta 2 (private announcement)

release tar ball let us announce this also in the users list. Uwe please do not announce a win package in the users list before we have a green light from all the involved platforms. Note that an announcement in the devel list for binary packages for beta 2 is reasonable since anyone

Re: [PATCH] Announcement patch for bug 3971, can not display Chinese characters under some circustances.

> Jose, OK? just an idea - i registered also another problems from CJK user similar to http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3673 . (see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168799#c20 ). what about to write some paragraph about using CJK into our help for known problems and additional packa

Re: [PATCH] Announcement patch for bug 3971, can not display Chinese characters under some circustances.

On 7/24/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2007 15:50:50 Bo Peng wrote: > Jose, OK? OK. Done. Thanks. Bo

Re: [PATCH] Announcement patch for bug 3971, can not display Chinese characters under some circustances.

On Tuesday 24 July 2007 15:50:50 Bo Peng wrote: > Jose, OK? OK. -- José Abílio

[PATCH] Announcement patch for bug 3971, can not display Chinese characters under some circustances.

Jose, OK? Index: ANNOUNCE === --- ANNOUNCE(revision 19182) +++ ANNOUNCE(working copy) @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ the user interface. Note that setting the encoding for these languages in LyX 1.5 by using ERT or the document preamble

Re: Announcement of a hidden feature?

What is the status for zip files and symlinks? Any solution possible there? Further development of this local feature was discouraged, because the whole layout feature is likely to be overhauled, along with our XML format change. In my opinion, the lyx XML format would better mimic ooffice ODF

Re: Announcement of a hidden feature?

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:58:45AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote: > > Does this works for all systems/latex combinations? > > I can not test all, but it works under windows and linux (tetex and > miktex). The only problem I am aware of is that when child documents > resides in a different directory fr

Re: Announcement of a hidden feature?

On 7/23/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 23 July 2007 18:37:41 Bo Peng wrote: > How about: OK. Done. Bo

Re: Announcement of a hidden feature?

On Monday 23 July 2007 18:37:41 Bo Peng wrote: > How about: OK. -- José Abílio

Re: Announcement of a hidden feature?

Then either this goes in the announce or everything stays out of the announce. :-) I feel that this is an important feature because installing .cls and .layout files are non-trivial to most lyx users, and it is convenient to send someone a .zip file with everything in it. How about: Index: ANN

Re: Announcement of a hidden feature?

On Monday 23 July 2007 13:58:45 Bo Peng wrote: > I can not test all, but it works under windows and linux (tetex and > miktex). The only problem I am aware of is that when child documents > resides in a different directory from the main document, the cls and > layout files have to be copied to all

Re: Announcement of a hidden feature?

Does this works for all systems/latex combinations? I can not test all, but it works under windows and linux (tetex and miktex). The only problem I am aware of is that when child documents resides in a different directory from the main document, the cls and layout files have to be copied to al

Re: Announcement of a hidden feature?

he .lyx file. > > This is the result of my now-stopped 'local .layout and .cls files' > efforts. It can be very useful in cases like "download this > sample_thesis.zip, unpack and change appropriate parts". Should we > advertise it in the announcement, or even user&#x

Announcement of a hidden feature?

ayout and .cls files' efforts. It can be very useful in cases like "download this sample_thesis.zip, unpack and change appropriate parts". Should we advertise it in the announcement, or even user's guide? Index: ANNOUNCE ===

Fwd: [scons-dev] Announcement: creating rpm packages

FYI: scons is making progress in packaging ... Bo -- Forwarded message -- From: Philipp Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 28, 2006 7:20 AM Subject: [scons-dev] Announcement: creating rpm packages To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, the packaging infrastructure is now a

Re: Announcement: 8 and 1/2 LyX meeting just finished.

"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 03 September 2004 18:56, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Wrong focus? > | Come on Lars, that was really, really a joke, we (me and Martin) both | agree that the best thing to do is to have the release of 1.4 as soon as | possible. > | Does

Re: Announcement: 8 and 1/2 LyX meeting just finished.

On Friday 03 September 2004 18:56, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I still have the cut on my fore-arm. (mostly gone by now, but I > managed to crasy my motorcycle in the mean time creating new cuts and > bruises...) I hope that all is ok now. > >> | We have devised also a secret plan to bloat

Re: Announcement: 8 and 1/2 LyX meeting just finished.

"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> lunch? > | Sure, it was a typo. The launch time was in the last meeting with those | fast and furious sleigh races. ;-) I still have the cut on my fore-arm. (mostly gone by now, but I managed to crasy my motorcycle in the mean time creating new cuts

Re: Announcement: 8 and 1/2 LyX meeting just finished.

On Thursday 02 September 2004 18:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Hello all, > | we take this opportunity to announce that the 8 + 1/2 meeting was held > | in Porto at launch time today. > > lunch? Sure, it was a typo. The launch time was in the las

Re: Announcement: 8 and 1/2 LyX meeting just finished.

Jose' Matos wrote: > http://www.trekearth.com/images/photos/4368/img_1338_filtered.jpg > http://www.trekearth.com/images/photos/2818/luzes_da_cidade.jpg > http://www.trekearth.com/images/photos/9047/dsc01287.jpg > http://www.trekearth.com/gallery/Europe/Portugal/North/Porto/photo79349.htm Cripl

  1   2   >