On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:54:03PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> The type of attachment is separate from how the reader
christian> shows the attachment. If I've understood
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
So you do not see this attachment as attachment?
I can view the attachment of this email.
Wow... progress... :-)
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On 05.07.2007, at 20:51, Bo Peng wrote:
--00090009040901040802
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="persistent_selection5.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="persistent_selection5.patch"
This is displayed inline, with no possibility to s
--00090009040901040802
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="persistent_selection5.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="persistent_selection5.patch"
This is displayed inline, with no possibility to save the attachment
(Mail.app).
So the onl
Hi,
On 05.07.2007, at 20:31, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:17:59PM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Abdelrazak> - the format used by default by thunderbird: I can
view
Abdelrazak> them inlined, even t
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:17:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Abdelrazak> - the format used by default by thunderbird: I can view
> >>> Abdelrazak> them inlined, even though they are attachments really. The
>
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:54:03PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> christian> The type of attachment is separate from how the reader
> christian> shows the attachment. If I've understood it correctly, the
> christian>
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> It's hard to believe we still have these problems given how long e-mail
>> has been around...
>
> That's because we still apply patches manually. 'git' has some method
> apparently to apply patches from mbox... that's what I call efficient! I
> personally hate this ema
So you do not see this attachment as attachment?
I can view the attachment of this email.
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
> If that's the case and Bo can see it, we're good (enough).
Just let you know that there is no such setting in gmail to view your
attachment as attachment.
So you do not see this attachment as attachment?
Index: CutAndPaste.cpp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
OK I've modified the settings accordingly and am sending the last
patch fo this thread attached. Let's see how I am going to see it
through news.gmane.org and if Bo can apply it properly.
It's shown inline in gmane's web in
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Abdelrazak> - the format used by default by thunderbird: I can view
> Abdelrazak> them inlined, even though they are attachments really. The
> Abdelrazak> problem is that web mailers transform that to inline
> Abdelrazak
> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> The type of attachment is separate from how the reader
christian> shows the attachment. If I've understood it correctly, the
christian> gmane web interface will take text attachments (non-MIME)
christian> and show th
> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> According to the following URI, you can make Thunderbird
christian> produce proper attachments:
christian>
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Send_plain_text_attachments_as_real_attachments
Thanks for the tip.
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Abdelrazak> - the format used by default by thunderbird: I can view
Abdelrazak> them inlined, even though they are attachments really. The
Abdelrazak> problem is that web mailers transform that to inline
Abdelrazak> proper.
This is inlined mime attachments. It seems that
Abdelrazak> - the format used by default by thunderbird: I can view
Abdelrazak> them inlined, even though they are attachments really. The
Abdelrazak> problem is that web mailers transform that to inline
Abdelrazak> proper.
This is inlined mime attachments. It seems that Thunderbird can only
prod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, it'll be interesting to see if Bo can extract what I attached
and if Abdel is able to view it.
In thunderbirds, I am viewing it inline with a double line marking the
threshold between the main body and the attachment. But I also see it as
an _attachment_ at
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
christian> Maybe you should attach it in MIME format?
What does this mean? Inline vs attached? Aren't both of these things
MIME?
Abundant confusion What I meant was that it is shown inline, i.e.
there's no discernable difference between t
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "christian" == christian ridderstrom
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
christian> Maybe you should attach it in MIME format?
>>
>> What does this mean? Inline vs attached? Are
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> Maybe you should attach it in MIME format?
What does this mean? Inline vs attached? Aren't both of these things
MIME?
AFAIU:
1) Inline means "in the body text", i.e. no attachment.
2) At
> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> Maybe you should attach it in MIME format?
What does this mean? Inline vs attached? Aren't both of these things
MIME?
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
> Following our middle-mouse pasting discussions, I think I've
implemented
> the optimal solution that will work under Mac and Windows too
> (internally to LyX). My solution is to save the selectionBuffer
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I always attach my patch I never put then inline, I am sorry but I
think the problem is on your side. gmail is wrong if it thinks that it is
inline.
Maybe you should attach it in MIME format? When looking at your post via
gmane's web interf
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
> Following our middle-mouse pasting discussions, I think I've implemented
> the optimal solution that will work under Mac and Windows too
> (internally to LyX). My solution is to save the selectionBuffer just
> before it is pasted
Bo Peng wrote:
Following our middle-mouse pasting discussions, I think I've implemented
the optimal solution that will work under Mac and Windows too
(internally to LyX). My solution is to save the selectionBuffer just
before it is pasted in the same LFUN_MOUSE_PRESS. The big change is that
we ch
Following our middle-mouse pasting discussions, I think I've implemented
the optimal solution that will work under Mac and Windows too
(internally to LyX). My solution is to save the selectionBuffer just
before it is pasted in the same LFUN_MOUSE_PRESS. The big change is that
we check if the curre
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following our middle-mouse pasting discussions, I think I've
>> implemented the optimal solution that will work under Mac and
>> Windows too (internally to LyX). My solution is to
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hi,
Following our middle-mouse pasting discussions, I think I've implemented
the optimal solution that will work under Mac and Windows too
(internally to LyX). My solution is to save the selectionBuffer just
before it is pasted in the same LFUN_MOUSE_PRESS. The big ch
Hi,
Following our middle-mouse pasting discussions, I think I've implemented
the optimal solution that will work under Mac and Windows too
(internally to LyX). My solution is to save the selectionBuffer just
before it is pasted in the same LFUN_MOUSE_PRESS. The big change is that
we check if
29 matches
Mail list logo
