On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:17:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> Abdelrazak> - the format used by default by thunderbird: I can view > >>> Abdelrazak> them inlined, even though they are attachments really. The > >>> Abdelrazak> problem is that web mailers transform that to inline > >>> Abdelrazak> proper. > >>> > >>> This is inlined mime attachments. It seems that Thunderbird can only > >>> produce this sort. > >> > >> According to the following URI, you can make Thunderbird produce proper > >> attachments: > >> > >> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Send_plain_text_attachments_as_real_attachments > > > >OK I've modified the settings accordingly and am sending the last patch > >fo this thread attached. Let's see how I am going to see it through > >news.gmane.org and if Bo can apply it properly. > > It's shown inline in gmane's web interface: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/89212 > > In my news reader (pine), it's shown as a separate attachment which I have > to press 'v' to view (which is fine by me). So I think it's sent in a > different way now, although gmane's web interface is still being > difficult (just like it was for me).
Why don't you just look at what is actually in the mail? Mail is just plain text, attachment or not. One does not need a 'Mail client' to read it, much less so when it comes to forensics. Andre'
