Re: first step of merging the Win installers

2011-06-11 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4de9a690.2020...@web.de... - I used the custom LaTeX installer page from my installer, only because this is already translated to 22 languages. The page design is a matter of taste, so we can also use yours if you prefer it for a certain reason. This page do

Re: first step of merging the Win installers

2011-05-23 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi Uwe, Below are my comments/concerns. I guess in the future it's better to have a little discussion on the devel list first so things don't have to be reverted. "Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dd9dfbf.2080...@web.de... > - you installed LyX's sty-files always to MiKTeX's user folder. B

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Peter Kümmel" wrote in message news:4dd58dae.5040...@gmx.net... > Yes, I see. Only when the entry is also set in the cache the gui shows the > correct value. > The problem was, when a option is implicitly set, like HUNSPELL when > INSTALL is set, > HUNSPELL would be still ON even when INSTALL

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-19 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dd51e0b.3010...@web.de... > It is the same, but doesn't work, neither in trunk nor branch. I have to > set it manually. > Perhaps because it is only set on Win32, but I am on Win64. IIRC it does work but it doesn't show in the CMake UI. Joost

Re: [HELP] Windows 7, 64 bit Bug

2011-05-16 Thread Joost Verburg
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:4dd16a18.1080...@lyx.org... > The reason was that the installer configured LyX using the > preferences of LyX 1.6. In particular this meant that in Tools > ->Preferences->Path, there was the path to > C:\Program Files\LyX16\python which didn't exist

Re: [HELP] Windows 7, 64 bit Bug

2011-05-16 Thread Joost Verburg
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:4dd16a18.1080...@lyx.org... > The reason was that the installer configured LyX using the > preferences of LyX 1.6. In particular this meant that in Tools > ->Preferences->Path, there was the path to > C:\Program Files\LyX16\python which didn't exist

Re: How to compile LyX with MSVC 2010?

2011-05-14 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dcebf92.8010...@web.de... > I'm using Joost#s dependency package for MSVC 2010. > > Any ideas? Did you follow the instructions in INSTALL.Win32? Joost

Re: Directory cleanup

2011-05-13 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" wrote in message news:4dcd44ce.6090...@lyx.org... > I'd have to understand what the actual patch is. I did not find it at > first glance in the zip file. The subdirectories in the zip file contain the patches. There are quite a lot of them. Joost

Re: Directory cleanup

2011-05-12 Thread Joost Verburg
"Abdelrazak Younes" wrote in message news:4dcb8b0d.6090...@lyx.org... > AFAIK Joost maintains such a dll. Joost could you please update the intl > directory with whatever fixes you have? > AFAIK2 the gettext developpers have dropped msvc support a long time ago. Yes there's no MSVC support main

Re: Directory cleanup

2011-05-12 Thread Joost Verburg
> On 05/12/2011 10:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Could we in general depend on gnome dependencies instead of ours? AFAIK those binaries are all based on MinGW. We use MSVC. Joost

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-12 Thread Joost Verburg
"Peter Kümmel" wrote in message news:4dcb63e3.6070...@gmx.net... Joost, how do you compile libintl? With Mingw or does it work with msvc? Couldn't we use the libintl shipped with lyx? libintl is also compiled with MSVC 2010. Joost

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-11 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dcb36a7.4090...@web.de... Why is MSVC 2010 required? What feature do we use that is not in MSVC 2008? However, I can successfully compile LyX with the linked hunspell. Hunspell probably works because it's a C library, although now you need both the 2008 and

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-11 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dcb0acc.20...@web.de... Why is MSVC 2010 required? What feature do we use that is not in MSVC 2008? If possible I don't want to switch to MSVC 2010 because I tested it last year and it was unstable. It also requires much more disk space (which I currently don

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-11 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dcb1094.2020...@web.de... For multi-user installations it's also impossible to download them directly to the program files because of the need for administrator privileges. Sure, a normal user cannot set up things for other users on the PC. That is for a go

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-10 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9f19f.3030...@web.de... Btw., can you please send me the hunspell.lib, iconv.lib and intl.lib files? Currently I cannot compile LyX against hunspell for that reason and i can also not use the new versions of intl and iconv you ship with your installer. If p

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-10 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9f4fd.9020...@web.de... So - maybe full offline installation wasn't all that convenient, but it was at least possible - please don't cut off this way. We won't cut that of. But note, to have a fully functional LaTeX installation, you at least once nee

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-10 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9f3f7.90...@web.de... OK, there was indeed a problem with my MiKTeX installation residues in the registry. now the installation runs through as expected, but there are thing we should improve: a. When LyX is installed together with MiKTeX we need to set an

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-10 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9150a.9060...@web.de... Am 10.05.2011 02:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Seems to be a problem of the MiKTeX repositories: LyX's first run of configure.py runs through without installing any LaTeX-package. That's why I couldn't see in this case no feedback from the

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-10 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9150a.9060...@web.de... I tried to resolve the known issues in the new 2.0 version of the Metafile 2 EPS converter. Joost fixed this yesterday. I made some more improvements to metafile2eps today. I'll prepare updated installers. 7. It is not possible

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-09 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc7ddbe.2020...@web.de... 5. The latest version of the metafile2eps printer gives an error message when it is first used: When I compile a LyX file containing a wmf-image, I get the error message that the printer could not be successfully be initialized. For

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-09 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jim Oldfield" wrote in message news:868476.20267...@web29206.mail.ird.yahoo.com... > Personally, am I happy to sacrifice 40MB of disk space if it means that uninstalling other programs doesn't suddenly stop LyX from working. This is the "Windows way" sadly - since there is no package manager,

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

2011-05-09 Thread Joost Verburg
"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc7ddbe.2020...@web.de... the last days I tested your new installer. You have done a good job!: the installer code is much more understandable and contains more comments to be able to understand the code. Thanks. As we once agreed, we should only provide ON

Re: Dictionaries location for LyX on Linux

2011-05-05 Thread Joost Verburg
At the time I stepped in and added this dataDirectory relative to lyx's system and user directories there was only one path for hunspell available: the one in preferences. This one now is the first one visited. The idea to add the other paths was to incorporate some dictionary download into LyX

Re: Trunk is completely frozen for any commits [unfrozen]

2011-05-05 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110505061312.ga15...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... Joost do you have time to fix (in another words should i wait with announce for the new version)? I was just able to reproduce the problem. Compiling new installers now. Joost

Re: Pdf problem

2011-04-13 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110413211218.ga8...@sirio.sssup.it... My wild guess is that that pdfview thingie is using DDE commands for opening pdf files. As Adobe changed the servername in Reader X, it does not work anymore. LyX is not the only software which was broken. Have a l

Re: LyX 2.0 RC2 for Windows

2011-04-06 Thread Joost Verburg
"Diego Queiroz" wrote in message news:BANLkTim6fQ-7u+04_zMnOf5Zb2vh1=e...@mail.gmail.com... Here is the screenshot of C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 10.0\Reader\AcroRd32.exe. You're talking about Adobe Acrobat, right? Not Adobe Reader? If yes please also send the info of Acrobat.exe instead of

Re: LyX 2.0 RC2 for Windows

2011-04-06 Thread Joost Verburg
"Diego Queiroz" wrote in message news:banlktinv39cbo6klvortkyfodtymtka...@mail.gmail.com... I've found this bug when I installed Adobe Acrobat X also (when you click to view PDF, the Adobe Acrobat app starts as well but the file is not oppened), but it is not exactly related with Adobe Acrobat

Re: "Package" not initialized under Win32 with CMake

2011-03-31 Thread Joost Verburg
wrote in message news:65388B121D284A0088A95CB71C14A75F@venomobile... OK, sorry :P I was using Qt compiled with MSVC2008 and using MSVC2008. Are you aware that the package of pre-compiled dependencies requires MSVC2010? Joost

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:4d8cd11d.8000...@lyx.org... Why is this post-2.0 stuff. This is not so difficult ? I think Jurgen's concern is the RC status. As a final suggestion for 2.0: Maybe the UI file could be linked to an icon directory (instead of the preferences which

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201103251812.22547.sp...@lyx.org... The whole thing is not for 2.0. Bad luck. People had two years time to come up with UI proposals. Perhaps it's better to postpone all the UI stuff to a future release. It seems like discussions with a bit of contro

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201103251748.53062.sp...@lyx.org... Now having the same item twice (even if one toolbar can be disabled) is *really* bad UI design. A better idea would be to introduce OptItem for the toolbar to let the master-buffer-* items disappear if the document i

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325143448.ge29...@sirio.sssup.it... I don't agree. As you can see, additional icon sets may simply subsitute some icons. If an icon is missing, the one from the default set will be used. So, there's no maintaining burden as only those icons that don

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325162427.gn29...@sirio.sssup.it... Hmmm... the artifacts are now gone, but the toolbars are still unrensposive. No problems here. Did you try a clean user directory? Perhaps there's still some session info left. Joost

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325161616.gm29...@sirio.sssup.it... Yep, that did the trick. However, it is going to surprise many people. BTW, why the "View" button appears twice? Even if it is in two different toolbars, they are the default ones. Because many users don't need

Re: Error in clean_dvi.py in Lyx 2.0 RC1

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Ola Ringdahl" wrote in message news:4d8c95d6.7080...@cs.umu.se... There seems to be an error in clean_dvi.py in the windows version of Lyx 2.0 RC1. When trying to produce a dvi output (ctrl-D, dvipdfm or ps2pdf) Lyx gives an error (see the atached screenshot). Replacing clean_dvi.py with the o

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325142851.gd29...@sirio.sssup.it... On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:17:19PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote: Why did you revert this? What was broken? See attached screen shot. Moreover, the toolbars where unrensposive and only through the m

Re: Final round for UI changes

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325144230.gj29...@sirio.sssup.it... Because it was broken. Apart from artifacts in the upper left corner, after starting LyX with no document open, the toolbars where not responding when clicked. That's probably because your session file contained

Re: Final round for UI changes

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110324030315.ga29...@sirio.sssup.it... Here is another possible set of icons to be considered. I just noticed the last minute work on the new "liber" icon set. Perhaps we should delete the "oxygen" and "old" sets so only one style of icons has to be

Re: Final round for UI changes

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Edwin Leuven" wrote in message news:AANLkTi=+t2HRjX4oZCoozDFo760_Mo0uVPZ4j5C_x=k...@mail.gmail.com... i guess only the new toolbar layout is left... Yes. I did upload the new toolbar (with optional "classic" toolbars in addition), but Enrico reverted this. I'm not sure why. Joost

Re: r38036 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake

2011-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
"Kornel" wrote in message news:201103250733.23097.kor...@lyx.org... Why everything instead of adding only *.R? lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib lyx2lyx *.py .) +lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib scripts *.R .) Kornel Yes that's also fine. Joost

Re: Conversion Error

2011-03-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Richard Heck" wrote in message news:4d87a8cf.2070...@comcast.net... Can you please repeat for me exactly what the error is and how I can reproduce it? There was a bug along these lines a while ago. I'm not sure why it has resurfaced. 1) Create any module with an inset, e.g.: InsetLayout Cha

Re: Conversion Error

2011-03-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Liviu Andronic" wrote in message news:AANLkTinV1z9NZR2pe_GXk08aB5vF2+gMPG=owm7fx...@mail.gmail.com... Wild guess: is it possible that after a class change the modules previously loaded get unloaded? Have you tried removing and re-inserting all the used modules? It also happens without changin

Re: Conversion Error

2011-03-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:000b01cbe7fa$547ab800$fd702800$@oak-tree.us... Any idea as to what might be causing them? The export errors bug is fairly new. I thought that it might be specific to Mac OS X, but after updating the SVN version on my Linux box this morning, I'm getting them th

Re: Conversion Error

2011-03-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:c27fccf8-7391-4fe2-87f0-ab02ae46c...@oak-tree.us... Undefined Flex inset Also, after going to the document settings I'm no longer able to view the PDF output. These "class switch errors" come back as "export errors", although they are unrelated to LaTeX. Loo

Re: Conversion Error

2011-03-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:c27fccf8-7391-4fe2-87f0-ab02ae46c...@oak-tree.us... Since yesterday, I've run into a new problem as well. I will occasionally get another error which says: Undefined Flex inset The description says: "Flex inset Code is undefined because of class conversion f

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

2011-03-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Abdelrazak Younes" wrote in message news:4d87341c.5050...@lyx.org... I am not sure this is wise... might even be a good reason to step back to MSVC2008... at least until Qt switches to MSVC2010... But you are the one to decide. Windows 2000 is 12 years old and no longer receives security fix

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

2011-03-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Michal" wrote in message news:20110321074737.2ec3@ms-dual... This might also be somehow related to http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg85707.html, though I haven't checked LyX 1.6.9 at all. No, LyX 1.6.9 contains the right file. Windows 2000 is no longer supported by

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

2011-03-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:AANLkTi=91sdj0xspvtseutxq5iddc7hivpmw8ygta...@mail.gmail.com... Iconv.dll depends on msvcr90.dll. An old file somehow ended up in the dependency package. I'll update the installers. Joost

Re: CMake issues

2011-03-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:4d863447.70...@lyx.org... The problem is that cyggomp-1.dll is missing. I guess this should be included in the msvc10-deps package. Thanks. Will fix that. Joost

Re: Final round for UI changes (was: Towards rc2)

2011-03-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Edwin Leuven" wrote in message news:aanlktikf5+pazt7uj+cga+wkt1kj+3hpsc_xfpkkg...@mail.gmail.com... imo, 4 good reasons to go for it now I agree. Updating the icons and toolbar together makes much more sense. If we put it in now, there's enough time left for fine tuning. Joost

Re: LyX 2.0.0 release candidate 1 - (Non official Win32 binaries)

2011-03-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110316165005.go25...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... rc1 installer is announced by Joost in one week, so for this moment things are ok, but it would be good if you can try to reproduce the buidling process and let us know whether the instructions can be followed

Re: Final round for UI changes (was: Towards rc2)

2011-03-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110319155427.gd25...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... ok, so at this moment we know the new default is going to be oxygen. Should I upload the new icons? Joost

Re: Release 2

2011-03-14 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110314000522.gl25...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... Michal wrote: While I still don't know why msvc2008 is no longer recommended, it i think the reason is that Joost (who was recently working on new installer) is simply using and testing with 2010. A

Re: Towards rc1 (status update #3)

2011-03-02 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110302005838.gj30...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... Rob Oakes wrote: but did we ever come to a consensus as to which icons we might want to use? no, i only remember libreoffice style gained most votes... Some people preferred Oxygen style icons and others

Crash on Windows when searching citation

2011-03-01 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi all, On Windows with current trunk I'm getting a crash when clicking the Search button in the Citation dialog. Not sure what's going on. GuiApplication::notify reports a "regular expression error" which is strange because the error occurs in the mouse event handling. Any ideas? msvcr100

Re: Icons

2011-02-23 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110223123315.gs26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... Edwin Leuven wrote: ps. does anyone know where the svg sources for the libreoffice icons can be found? at the bottom there are source files http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/LibreOffice_Initial_Ico

Re: Commit Do not set all CMake files as C header files.

2011-02-23 Thread Joost Verburg
"Peter Kümmel" wrote in message news:4d655881.9090...@gmx.net... Fixed: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37776/lyx-devel/trunk Thanks! The text files are still C++ headers now but I guess MSVC ignores those. Joost

Re: Commit Do not set all CMake files as C header files.

2011-02-23 Thread Joost Verburg
"Peter Kümmel" wrote in message news:4d641864.1090...@gmx.net... Here it breaks the merged build. Any idea what's the cause of this issue? It must be related to a certain file type not being set correctly. After the change, all real header files should still be automatically set as headers.

Re: Icons

2011-02-22 Thread Joost Verburg
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:a5accdd7-6e23-47c6-9b16-d42583e6b...@oak-tree.us... I spent a little bit of time trying to order the toolbar, based on the conversation from the other day. Here is a first pass attempt which shows the standard toolbar and a revised extras toolbar. Good work!

Re: Icons

2011-02-22 Thread Joost Verburg
Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110222172309.ga28...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... you didnt get me right. i opposed to definitive killing of old icons for people who get used to them and want to continue using them. in the begining i was silent and prepared to 'fix' it locally for me, but s

Re: Icons

2011-02-22 Thread Joost Verburg
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:AANLkTino30Rzx3ZPti9G=h6uuvxrvmzv3wnaumaus...@mail.gmail.com... Personally I was more happy with Edwin's set than the oxygen set, but that is just based on taste. Is anyone planning to design a complete icon set for the standard toolbars based on

Re: Icons

2011-02-22 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110222152505.gm26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... as expected with the ui attempts majority of devs is hard to get. as i count 2 dev against oxygen, third one rather created his own set ;) Still I think it's good to hear the opinion of some more people outs

Re: Commit Do not set all CMake files as C header files.

2011-02-22 Thread Joost Verburg
"Peter Kümmel" wrote in message news:4d636252.8070...@gmx.net... is definitely wrong. Please revert. This macro is only to add files to the IDE and these files should not influence the build process, therefore the header only flag. Because of this setting they were defined as C++ headers, so t

Re: Icons

2011-02-22 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201102220915.55759.sp...@lyx.org... My proposal, instead of pressing all on one "minimal" toolbar is to further split these toolbars. Then, people can customize the UI to their needs simply by hiding toolbars they do not need. If the view document i

Re: Icons

2011-02-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Edwin Leuven" wrote in message news:AANLkTi=dh3gj3zqvkwz6gaxeg6qpag-s1ppjddr7z...@mail.gmail.com... On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 15:36, Joost Verburg wrote: Here's the new icon set I worked on with Jürgen! It's based on the Oxygen style. attached some idea how it would

Re: Icons

2011-02-21 Thread Joost Verburg
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:0a5aac7a-2fd2-4e25-9834-39e61557c...@oak-tree.us... If we're going to give LyX a fresh coat of paint, why don't we deal with some of the other UI concerns as well. For example, in addition to improving the visual consistency of the icons, why not simplify the

Re: Icons

2011-02-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110220155614.GE1772@GIOVE... OK. But as we already have a consistent set of icons, why throwing out of the window something that already required a huge amount of work? There could simply be a new option "use the new, shiny, wonderful oxygen icons"?

Re: Icons

2011-02-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110220151223.ge26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... we would just create new dir "oxygen", or perhaps someone will prepare "tango" and "win". we would always try to load image from this directory and then have fallback to the old set if image not found. (i hav

Re: Icons

2011-02-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110220143302.GB1772@GIOVE... But your argument only holds for a *specific* size, as all other sizes are obtained by scaling that specific size. So, what is the rationale of having 16x16 instead of 18x18 if both are going to be scaled down from the 22x2

Re: Icons

2011-02-20 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201102191746.11671.sp...@lyx.org... I think we should finally stick with the standard sizes (16x16, 22x22, 32x32, 48x48). That is: increase smallIconSize from 14 to 16 and bigIconSize from 26 to 32. Increasing the bigIconSize to 32 does not make se

Re: Icons

2011-02-18 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201102181239.57022.sp...@lyx.org... Yes. I hacked some together myself. See attachment. They are certainly not masterpieces, I mainly took some elements from existing icons, if possible, to have something halfway matching. Thanks. Do you also have t

Re: Icons

2011-02-18 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201102181054.36078.sp...@lyx.org... The icons I use are not the latest, I have done this some years back. Note that some (the update PDF/master) are badly self-designed icons, since I did not find anythink appropriate back then. We should use somethin

Re: Icons

2011-02-18 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201102180850.11166.sp...@lyx.org... +1 for Oxygen. It's a very well-designed, large and clean icon set. As a bonus, Lyx would integrate even better into KDE. Where do I find the latest Oxygen set which contains the icons you're using here? Joost

Re: Find & replace in 2.0

2011-02-18 Thread Joost Verburg
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201102180855.11402.sp...@lyx.org... -1. I think this simple and fast search method is still of much use besides the big, blown advanced dialog. Currently the dialogs are exactly the same except for the possibility to type non-plain text in the advan

Re: Find & replace in 2.0

2011-02-17 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110217231834.gr26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... i must miss something very basic. what two windows are you talking about? :) i see one panel with two workareas and one tab for special settings. You're right, I was confused myself now by the UI. These tex

Re: Icons

2011-02-17 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110217230252.ga16...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... btw aren't those 22 pixels what you get if you just switch to "big" icons via context menu? pavel No, those are much bigger. 32 pixels I believe. Joost

Re: Find & replace in 2.0

2011-02-17 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110217225227.gp26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... Vincent had plan to move it to firefox-style onliner, but it didn't happened. unless you show me where is the third, i think these two are fine. advanced speed is still not enough. The advanced mode has two

Re: Icons

2011-02-17 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110217224752.go26...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... 2.0 is good excuse, but it should happen before RC. i would like to make freeze more strict once we enter it. OK. Let's update the main icons now and leave further updates for 2.1. just side notes: - there

Re: Icons

2011-02-17 Thread Joost Verburg
"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:88f13752-72ca-4a77-83f1-13040e951...@oak-tree.us... As a way of starting, you might take a look at some of the icons in the Oxygen set or in the faenza set. We might also look at finding an artist to create a custom set for LyX? Maybe for 2.1? The Ubuntu artw

Find & replace in 2.0

2011-02-17 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi, I was just checking out some new 2.0 features and noticed we got three find & replace dialogs now: * Find & replace - Quick * Find & replace - Advanced - Basic * Find & replace - Advanced - Advanced This really seems like too much. Could we get rid of the old "Quick" dialog and rename "Adv

Icons

2011-02-17 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi all, The current LyX toolbar icons are blurred because the default icon size is set to 20x20 pixels, although most of our icons actually are 22x22 (this is a standard size). Also some icons looks quite outdated and have jagged edges. Is it OK if I increase the default size with 2 pixels a

Re: r37243 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

2011-01-18 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/18/2011 3:11 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Do you think this can be handled easily by CMake ? Does it already generate lyxrc.dist for the installer ? The Windows installer generates lyxrc.dist because it needs to contain absolute paths which depend on the installation directory. With

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/17/2011 9:10 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: LyXDir is the location of the "LyX library". With 1.6.x, Help>About LyX displays it as "Libary directory". This discussion was about the program directory, not the library directory. Joost

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/17/2011 1:57 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I do not think there is any problem to expect. Are calls to QtCore allowed these days? I noticed a function called applicationDirPath. Joost

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/17/2011 11:27 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: The conclusion is it will not work with batch files. So one should avoid them consequently. I suppose with python scripts we have no problems on windows... Converters that use Python scripts are defined as "python script.py", just like for a batch fil

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/17/2011 11:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The reason why I never did it after me promises is that I stopped at the question "what is LyXDir exactly?" I failed to find an answer that is useful to windows, OSX and linux. I poor excuse, I know :) I'd say the location of the executable mi

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/17/2011 11:11 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: This is the portable LyX target? This one I propose to tackle after the standard installation works well. I was trying to avoid using environment variables for the standard installation as well. Environment variables can be user specific or shared by

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/17/2011 11:07 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: I don't get it. LyX has no windows command prompt :-) E.g. to typeset something LyX executes latex... If it's an executable it works obviously. But does it work too, if I make a latex.bat and place in path in front of the regular tex path? Nope, but "c

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/17/2011 8:38 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: You are the devils advocate? :-) Seriously, it would help for external .bat/.cmd utilities on windows. But in general it's a good move to refrain from using system(). I don't see a problem with batch files. Batch files are interpreted by the Windows c

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/17/2011 8:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Sorry, this was not verbose enough. Here I propose to use LyXDir in lyxrc.dist of windows. E.g. \path_prefix = $LyXDir/bin;$LyXDir/ImageMagick;$LyXDir/python Note the $LyXDir notation. The same holds true for \thesaurusdir_path etc... Then set LyXDir e

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-16 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/16/2011 10:16 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Now I think effectively it's a bug. In the past the external utilities where started with system() calls. Then the shell interpreted the environment variables. This was replaced by QProcess::start. I'm almost sure since then the environment variables h

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-16 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/16/2011 8:41 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: LyX uses QProcess to create child processes. I cannot tell for sure if the PATH environment with %LyXDir% included works. I could not find it when reading the Qt docs here: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/latest/qprocess.html Can you give it a try please? I don'

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-16 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/16/2011 5:11 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: In addition a call to expandPath should be added for path_prefix. ... I wonder why that is of any use. If I change my path_prefix in the preferences I don't expect it gets replaced immediately. Instead of this I expect it to be replaced at runtime. Y

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-16 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/16/2011 4:12 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: so it depends whether the guys are satisfied with this. pavel Stephan's patch looks fine to me. In addition a call to expandPath should be added for path_prefix. Joost

Re: Make lyx more easy to be configed as portable program

2011-01-15 Thread Joost Verburg
On 1/14/2011 11:23 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: unless somebody is going to make detail review, this is too late for 2.0. it can bring regressions since the code touches common routine... Some time ago I mentioned this exact same issue on the devel list. It would make the development of a Windows in

Re: Towards beta3 and beyond

2010-12-22 Thread Joost Verburg
On 12/22/2010 7:31 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Could you at least take care that there are installers available for further LyX releases until I'm back. I can try to build my installer from abroad, but I cannot promise this. I don't expect to have time to write a new installer for 2.0 in Jan-Feb. Als

Re: Towards beta3 and beyond

2010-12-21 Thread Joost Verburg
On 12/21/2010 4:39 PM, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: That's why I think more people should be involved so that Uwe, myself and maybe some others will at least be reasonable familiar with the code. If you give me all the necessary info maybe I can help and familiarize with NSIS. I'm pretty expe

Re: Towards beta3 and beyond

2010-12-20 Thread Joost Verburg
On 12/20/2010 7:40 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: although all the advantages above look like very good step forward i'm afraid there is nobody around who is going to write new NSIS code (i suppose Uwe is not going to leave his code for some unfinished stuff he is not familiar with.) That's why I think

Re: Towards beta3 and beyond

2010-12-20 Thread Joost Verburg
On 12/20/2010 6:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: - windows installers. Joost, are there some advances in the announced 'joint' installer, so we no more proceed with the doublet official/alternative? or do we continue with the current 1.6 model? any way we should start to offer *some* officia

Re: no spellcheck after win installer 1.6.8

2010-11-21 Thread Joost Verburg
Yes, I'm working on a fixed version. Joost On 11/21/2010 4:19 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote: see subject: can anyone confirm? thanks, ed.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >