Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I understand but I still don't like the scanning... :-)
I don't like it either. But I don't see an alternative yet.
We could just provide the feature if the label is not deeper than
one-level. If the user wants to deeply bury the label insi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Maybe LyX displaces too much super and subscripts, such that \left
> > and \right delimiters are higher than necessary.
> > I really don't care, but does the attac
> * Modified (date)
> * Modified (person9
> * Last printout
> * Editing time ()
Think privacy.
Now try again.
As long as the meta information is entered by user, there is no
privacy problem. However,
1. You can use comments in preamble or even in main texts to achieve this.
2. I usually u
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:35:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Date of creation
> * Last modified by
> * Last modified on the date...
>
> Checking in Open Office 1.1.5 (yes, it's old...), they show the following
> properties for a MS Word document that I opened:
>
> * Created (date)
> *
I just messed with some old LyX files, and for some reason I had four
copies of the files. My problem was figuring out which file was more
recent, but unfortunately I couldn't rely on the modification time from
the file systems.
This got me thinking. Wouldn't it be good to have some of kind of
Hello,
i found a crash in TocBackend::updateItem():
steps to reproduce:
- create a new document
- change the document class to article (AMS)
- change the current layout to theorem, definition, proposition,
- try to write something -> boom
in TocBackend::updateItem() the variable toc_item
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I understand but I still don't like the scanning... :-)
I don't like it either. But I don't see an alternative yet.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I'd rather do:
- if (layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
+ if (cur.innerInsetOfType(InsetBase::CAPTION_CODE) ||
layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
Yes. That's what I meant in my previous comment (obviously InsetCaption
derives
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And then, once he has changed 3457 lines of code in a seemingly
>> random way, he says "now that I have spent all that time on my
>> project, either you accept it as is, or I leave!" :)
Abdelrazak> No, because he/she would ha
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I would say that when choosing a float thing, it should come up
empty, such that you have to explicitly put the caption in there.
After all, I could well have a floating figure or table without
any caption.
Sure but that's independent of inset versus no inset. I agree t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> That depends on how the release manager views it. The big
Abdelrazak> advantage is that *any* contributor can start hacking
Abdelrazak> right away without having to go through the lengthy
Abdel
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> That depends on how the release manager views it. The big
Abdelrazak> advantage is that *any* contributor can start hacking
Abdelrazak> right away without having to go through the lengthy
Abdelrazak> process of recogni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> It's still down. Only one person has any ability to handle this?
| >>
| > We should really switch to a "one person bus thing"-immune system.
| > Any commendations?
Yes. At least make a tiny effort to see if the "bus
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > All of us have probably noticed that aussie (www.lyx.org,
| > wiki.lyx.org etc) is down. Does anyone know if Lars is aware of this?
|
| I guess he would have done something if he knew...
|
|
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:09:03AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I'd rather do:
- if (layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
+ if (cur.innerInsetOfType(InsetBase::CAPTION_CODE) ||
layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
Yes. That's what I meant in my previous comm
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:22:32PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 15:39 +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:18:54PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Enrico> One adva
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 15:39 +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:18:54PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Enrico> One advantage is that you get numbered figures on screen.
> >
> > It would have b
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:06:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:21:05AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >> alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
> >> have similar bindi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I think the exact rules are in the TeX book, or at least some kind
> of approximation... If that's not too difficult, we should try to
> use this (at least the rules for displayed math, inline is too dense for
> editing).
I could no
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:09:03AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >I'd rather do:
> >
> >-if (layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
> >+if (cur.innerInsetOfType(InsetBase::CAPTION_CODE) ||
> >layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
>
> Yes. That's what I meant in my previous comment
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
> Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it?
>
> These are word left/right in cua, I
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:21:05AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
>> have similar bindings here?
Andre> Alt+up and alt+down move me one step up and down in the grid o
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Maybe LyX displaces too much super and subscripts, such that \left
> and \right delimiters are higher than necessary.
> I really don't care, but does the attached patch give a less uglier
> aspect in those cases? BTW, I think that
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:21:05AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to have
> similar bindings here?
Alt+up and alt+down move me one step up and down in the grid of virtual
screens and has done like that since the introduction of X in the
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:18:54PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> One advantage is that you get numbered figures on screen.
>
> It would have been very easy to do even in 1.4; the only reason why I
> did not do it i
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> It's still down. Only one person has any ability to handle this?
| >>
| > We should really switch to a "one person bus thing"-immune system.
| > Any commendations?
Yes. At least make a tiny effort to see if the "bus thing" actually
happened
On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Not on Mac (mac.bind): they move the cursor to the
Bennett> beginning/end of the line.
And that is a standard mac binding?
Yes.
Bennett
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Not on Mac (mac.bind): they move the cursor to the
Bennett> beginning/end of the line.
And that is a standard mac binding?
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> One advantage is that you get numbered figures on screen.
It would have been very easy to do even in 1.4; the only reason why I
did not do it is because (1) not enough time (2) procrastination about
the syntax to choose in th
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:12:50AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> Maybe LyX displaces too much super and subscripts, such that
> Enrico> \left and \right delimiters are higher than necessary. I
> Enrico> really don't
On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:58 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chemnitz.de> writes:
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it?
These are word left/right i
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > All of us have probably noticed that aussie (www.lyx.org,
| > wiki.lyx.org etc) is down. Does anyone know if Lars is aware of this?
|
| I guess he would have done something if he knew...
|
| By the way, is there any bac
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Peter Kümmel wrote:
| > Timothy Reaves wrote:
| >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| >>> I guess nobody is able to rescue it except Lars...
| >>>
| >>> Hope he will not be off for months ;-)
| >>>
| >>> Abdel.
| >>>
| >>>
| >> It's still down. Only one per
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> OK, let's list the regressions then:
>
> 1) the automatic label: this should be solved soon easily (and cleanly
> see other thread)
> 2) configurability in the layout file: I am not a layout or latex expert
> (ignorant is a better qualifier for me ;-)), so what exactly is
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Having said that, the labels could of course also be set a bit less
> > hackish: The inset could return a proper prefix. But this is entails more
> > changes up to the insetbase level.
>
> Which would be a good solution.
But we still need the hacks, as long as we canno
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > I'd rather do:
> >
> > - if (layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
> > + if (cur.innerInsetOfType(InsetBase::CAPTION_CODE) ||
> > layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
>
> Yes. That's what I meant in my previous comment (obviously InsetCaption
> derives from
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I'd rather do:
-if (layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
+if (cur.innerInsetOfType(InsetBase::CAPTION_CODE) ||
layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
Yes. That's what I meant in my previous comment (obviously InsetCaption
derives from InsetText, not LyXT
Georg Baum wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
One advantage is that you get numbered figures on screen.
This is actually one part of the code that could also be used for layout
type captions. It was not implemented before, but it could be adapted
easily to layouts.
It would be nice if somebody
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> One advantage is that you get numbered figures on screen.
This is actually one part of the code that could also be used for layout
type captions. It was not implemented before, but it could be adapted
easily to layouts.
It would be nice if somebody could make a list of
Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Personally I like the inset approach. We just need some more cleanup and
design. I am confident that the benefit will show up in the future so I
am not in favour of reverting it.
In principle I like the inset too, but it looks like it is not as power
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 19:57 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
The attached patch seems the most easiest way to implement this.
Comments?
Georg
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Georg> Here comes the next mechanical one: Get rid of one of the 100
Georg> arguments of Paragraph::Pimpl::simpleTeXSpecialChars.
>> Very good. W
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> Maybe LyX displaces too much super and subscripts, such that
Enrico> \left and \right delimiters are higher than necessary. I
Enrico> really don't care, but does the attached patch give a less
Enrico> uglier aspect in those ca
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> The attached patch seems the most easiest way to implement
Jürgen> this. Comments?
I'd rather do:
- if (layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
+ if (cur.innerInsetOfType(InsetBase::CAPT
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Personally I like the inset approach. We just need some more cleanup and
> design. I am confident that the benefit will show up in the future so I
> am not in favour of reverting it.
In principle I like the inset too, but it looks like it is not as powerful
as the layou
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Georg> Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 19:57 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> >> The attached patch seems the most easiest way to implement this.
> >> Comments?
>
> Georg> T
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
have similar bindings here?
But then how would you bind Outline-Up and Down?
Edwin> Ctrl+up and Ctrl+down ?
The
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> The attached patch avoids hiding the libdir in "Help->About
Enrico> LyX". I am going to shove it in as I think it is
Enrico> uncontroversial.
I did not think of that... Thanks.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> Here comes the next mechanical one: Get rid of one of the 100
> Georg> arguments of Paragraph::Pimpl::simpleTeXSpecialChars.
>
> Very good. What does the patch look like now?
It follows
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 19:57 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> The attached patch seems the most easiest way to implement this.
>> Comments?
Georg> This patch finally convinced me that the move to insets was
Georg> wrong. I am sorry
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> The attached patch seems the most easiest way to implement
Jürgen> this. Comments?
I'd rather do:
- if (layout->labeltype == LABEL_SENSITIVE) {
+ if (cur.innerInsetOfType(InsetBase::CAPTION_CODE) || layout->labe
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it?
These are word left/right in cua, I think.
No these are Ctrl+left/right in cua. Alt+left/ri
> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
>>> have similar bindings here?
>> But then how would you bind Outline-Up and Down?
Edwin> Ctrl+up and Ctrl+down ?
These are already bo
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it?
These are word left/right in cua, I think.
JMarc
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Indeed... The correct solution would be to modify the cua
Abdelrazak> and all other bindings to not use any Alt-XXX shortcut
Abdelrazak> because these should be reserved to GUI accessible element
Abdelrazak> (menu _and
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Also, Bennett, are there instances where we use normal dialogs and
>> sheets would be more appropriate?
Bennett> Sheets are appropriate for document-specific modal win
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> I think if we implement this as a drawer -- which is quite
Bennett> nice -- we should not also allow a docked widget or floating
Bennett> window. (That's not the Mac way: simplify to avoid
Bennett> confusion.)
100% agreed. Abdel
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
have similar bindings here?
But then how would you bind Outline-Up and Down?
Ctrl+up and Ctrl+down ?
Wouldn't it be better to affect those to pars up and down instead and
alt+arr
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Here comes the next mechanical one: Get rid of one of the 100
Georg> arguments of Paragraph::Pimpl::simpleTeXSpecialChars.
Very good. What does the patch look like now?
JMarc
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Michael Gerz wrote:
>> Actually, I intended to switch to two complementing packages:
>> changes.sty and changebar.sty. The translation problem of
>> changes.sty is not really a problem, because we wouldn't use the
>> corresponding feat
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Montag, 12. März 2007 20:36 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 07:29:11PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
I committed some pure renaming. Here is the rest of the patch. How
should
we proceed?
I wouldn't mind seeing it in trunk.
Unfortunately I am not 100% sure of
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> John Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> It seems that part of the issue could be that Ubuntu has a local that
>> uses unicode. Not sure what that means in detail, but perhaps it's a
>> difference from Solaris?
>>
>
> I thought that the key sequence ^* was s
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
The attached patch seems the most easiest way to implement this.
Comments?
Jürgen
Index: src/text.C
===
--- src/text.C (Revision
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
This patch finally convinced me that the move to insets was wrong. I am
sorry that I caused others to work on this, but at that time I was not
aware that we would need so many hacks.
Personally, I don't mind if we revert to the caption layout. I don'
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:53:02PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Jan Peters wrote:
>
> > Dear Bennet,
> >
> > I had a discussion with Uwe on the fonts for
> > parantheses, see
> >
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3330
> >
> > He told me that the parentheses/v
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Argh... reverting all caption inset patches will be bloody. We have to
> be VERY careful!
I would not revert these patches, but rather remove the caption inset and
fix all compile errors, readding the old code on a case by case basis.
I know that this is some work, and that
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to have
similar bindings here?
But then how would you bind Outline-Up and Down?
Ctrl+up and Ctrl+down ?
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:11:25PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to fin
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Actually, I intended to switch to two complementing packages:
> changes.sty and changebar.sty. The translation problem of changes.sty is
> not really a problem, because we wouldn't use the corresponding feature
> within LyX. Nevertheless, I contacted the author (no answer yet
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:11:25PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to find shorter names for "
72 matches
Mail list logo
