Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I understand but I still don't like the scanning... :-)
I don't like it either. But I don't see an alternative yet.
We could just provide the feature if the label is not deeper than
one-level. If the user wants to deeply bury the label inside nested
insets, then he will miss the feature.
In other word:
if (parent().lyxCode() == InsetBase::CAPTION_CODE)
name = from_ascii(static_cast<InsetCaption const &>(parent()).type());
if (parent().lyxCode() == InsetBase::OPTARG_CODE
&& parent().parent().lyxCode() == InsetBase::CAPTION_CODE)
name = from_ascii(
static_cast<InsetCaption const &>(parent().parent()).type());
The tree-like approach brings very clean and understandable code IMO.
Abdel.
PS: I have a patch mostly ready for that.
